Neuropsychiatric Disorders as Erratic Attention Regulation – Lessons from Electrophysiology
Attention related electrophysiological waves, such as P300, often deviate from norm in various populations of neuropsychiatric patients. For example, the amplitude is often smaller and the latency is often longer in major depressive disorder, in bipolar disorder and in schizophrenia. On the other ha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatric quarterly 2019-12, Vol.90 (4), p.793-801 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 801 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 793 |
container_title | Psychiatric quarterly |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Shahaf, Goded |
description | Attention related electrophysiological waves, such as P300, often deviate from norm in various populations of neuropsychiatric patients. For example, the amplitude is often smaller and the latency is often longer in major depressive disorder, in bipolar disorder and in schizophrenia. On the other hand, in other neuropsychiatric populations, it is often possible to note the opposite phenomena of larger P300 amplitude and shorter latency in comparison with norm, but only for a specific subset of stimuli. This is often reported in various anxiety disorders, substance abuse and various chronic pain syndromes. These findings in the various clinical populations, on their commonalities and differences, are presented in this work. The prevalence of these two types of deviations in the electrophysiological markers of attention, shared by multiple neuropsychiatric populations, raise interesting questions regarding the role of attention deviation and regulation in neuropsychiatry. We present these questions and outline a possible hypothesis in this regard. Furthermore, such potential sensitivity of the attention-related markers to clinical dynamics suggests they could be candidates for monitoring and, potentially, early-sensing of clinical dynamics. Therefore, we discuss the potential usability of such markers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11126-019-09664-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2272482407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2272482407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43549a7e47b563503dc7e6d7a96deb2c750512337348d81a2e72ccb1cf5b7dd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EoqVwARYoEmvD-Cdxs6yg_EgVSAiWyHIcp02VxsVOpGbHHbghJ8E0BXasZjTz5j3Nh9ApgQsCIC49IYQmGEiKIU0Sjjd7aEhiwXAiIN1HQwDGMBUUBujI-yUAIQmjh2jACCcgKB-i1wfTOrv2nV6UqnGljq5Lb11unI-Uj6bOqSYMJ01j6qa0dfRk5m2ltu3n-0c0M97b2keFs6toWhndBLdF50tb2Xl3jA4KVXlzsqsj9HIzfb66w7PH2_uryQxrJuIGcxbzVAnDRRYnLAaWa2GSXKg0yU1GtYghJpQxwfg4HxNFjaBaZ0QXcSbyHNgInfe-a2ffWuMbubStq0OkpOF_PqYcRFDRXqWd9d6ZQq5duVKukwTkN1HZE5WBqNwSlZtwdLazbrOVyX9PfhAGAesFPqzquXF_2f_YfgFq7oOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2272482407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neuropsychiatric Disorders as Erratic Attention Regulation – Lessons from Electrophysiology</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Shahaf, Goded</creator><creatorcontrib>Shahaf, Goded</creatorcontrib><description>Attention related electrophysiological waves, such as P300, often deviate from norm in various populations of neuropsychiatric patients. For example, the amplitude is often smaller and the latency is often longer in major depressive disorder, in bipolar disorder and in schizophrenia. On the other hand, in other neuropsychiatric populations, it is often possible to note the opposite phenomena of larger P300 amplitude and shorter latency in comparison with norm, but only for a specific subset of stimuli. This is often reported in various anxiety disorders, substance abuse and various chronic pain syndromes. These findings in the various clinical populations, on their commonalities and differences, are presented in this work. The prevalence of these two types of deviations in the electrophysiological markers of attention, shared by multiple neuropsychiatric populations, raise interesting questions regarding the role of attention deviation and regulation in neuropsychiatry. We present these questions and outline a possible hypothesis in this regard. Furthermore, such potential sensitivity of the attention-related markers to clinical dynamics suggests they could be candidates for monitoring and, potentially, early-sensing of clinical dynamics. Therefore, we discuss the potential usability of such markers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2720</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6709</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11126-019-09664-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31410724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Anxiety disorders ; Attention ; Bipolar disorder ; Candidates ; Chronic pain ; Depressive personality disorders ; Deviation ; Drug abuse ; Drug use ; Electrophysiology ; Event-related potentials ; Fear & phobias ; Latency ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mental depression ; Mental disorders ; Obsessive compulsive disorder ; Pain ; Pathology ; Post traumatic stress disorder ; Psychiatry ; Public Health ; Review Article ; Schizophrenia ; Sociology ; Substance abuse</subject><ispartof>Psychiatric quarterly, 2019-12, Vol.90 (4), p.793-801</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Psychiatric Quarterly is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43549a7e47b563503dc7e6d7a96deb2c750512337348d81a2e72ccb1cf5b7dd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43549a7e47b563503dc7e6d7a96deb2c750512337348d81a2e72ccb1cf5b7dd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11126-019-09664-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11126-019-09664-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27901,27902,30976,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shahaf, Goded</creatorcontrib><title>Neuropsychiatric Disorders as Erratic Attention Regulation – Lessons from Electrophysiology</title><title>Psychiatric quarterly</title><addtitle>Psychiatr Q</addtitle><addtitle>Psychiatr Q</addtitle><description>Attention related electrophysiological waves, such as P300, often deviate from norm in various populations of neuropsychiatric patients. For example, the amplitude is often smaller and the latency is often longer in major depressive disorder, in bipolar disorder and in schizophrenia. On the other hand, in other neuropsychiatric populations, it is often possible to note the opposite phenomena of larger P300 amplitude and shorter latency in comparison with norm, but only for a specific subset of stimuli. This is often reported in various anxiety disorders, substance abuse and various chronic pain syndromes. These findings in the various clinical populations, on their commonalities and differences, are presented in this work. The prevalence of these two types of deviations in the electrophysiological markers of attention, shared by multiple neuropsychiatric populations, raise interesting questions regarding the role of attention deviation and regulation in neuropsychiatry. We present these questions and outline a possible hypothesis in this regard. Furthermore, such potential sensitivity of the attention-related markers to clinical dynamics suggests they could be candidates for monitoring and, potentially, early-sensing of clinical dynamics. Therefore, we discuss the potential usability of such markers.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Bipolar disorder</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Depressive personality disorders</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Fear & phobias</subject><subject>Latency</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Obsessive compulsive disorder</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Post traumatic stress disorder</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><issn>0033-2720</issn><issn>1573-6709</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EoqVwARYoEmvD-Cdxs6yg_EgVSAiWyHIcp02VxsVOpGbHHbghJ8E0BXasZjTz5j3Nh9ApgQsCIC49IYQmGEiKIU0Sjjd7aEhiwXAiIN1HQwDGMBUUBujI-yUAIQmjh2jACCcgKB-i1wfTOrv2nV6UqnGljq5Lb11unI-Uj6bOqSYMJ01j6qa0dfRk5m2ltu3n-0c0M97b2keFs6toWhndBLdF50tb2Xl3jA4KVXlzsqsj9HIzfb66w7PH2_uryQxrJuIGcxbzVAnDRRYnLAaWa2GSXKg0yU1GtYghJpQxwfg4HxNFjaBaZ0QXcSbyHNgInfe-a2ffWuMbubStq0OkpOF_PqYcRFDRXqWd9d6ZQq5duVKukwTkN1HZE5WBqNwSlZtwdLazbrOVyX9PfhAGAesFPqzquXF_2f_YfgFq7oOg</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Shahaf, Goded</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Neuropsychiatric Disorders as Erratic Attention Regulation – Lessons from Electrophysiology</title><author>Shahaf, Goded</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43549a7e47b563503dc7e6d7a96deb2c750512337348d81a2e72ccb1cf5b7dd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Bipolar disorder</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Depressive personality disorders</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Fear & phobias</topic><topic>Latency</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Obsessive compulsive disorder</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Post traumatic stress disorder</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shahaf, Goded</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Psychiatric quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shahaf, Goded</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neuropsychiatric Disorders as Erratic Attention Regulation – Lessons from Electrophysiology</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatric quarterly</jtitle><stitle>Psychiatr Q</stitle><addtitle>Psychiatr Q</addtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>793</spage><epage>801</epage><pages>793-801</pages><issn>0033-2720</issn><eissn>1573-6709</eissn><abstract>Attention related electrophysiological waves, such as P300, often deviate from norm in various populations of neuropsychiatric patients. For example, the amplitude is often smaller and the latency is often longer in major depressive disorder, in bipolar disorder and in schizophrenia. On the other hand, in other neuropsychiatric populations, it is often possible to note the opposite phenomena of larger P300 amplitude and shorter latency in comparison with norm, but only for a specific subset of stimuli. This is often reported in various anxiety disorders, substance abuse and various chronic pain syndromes. These findings in the various clinical populations, on their commonalities and differences, are presented in this work. The prevalence of these two types of deviations in the electrophysiological markers of attention, shared by multiple neuropsychiatric populations, raise interesting questions regarding the role of attention deviation and regulation in neuropsychiatry. We present these questions and outline a possible hypothesis in this regard. Furthermore, such potential sensitivity of the attention-related markers to clinical dynamics suggests they could be candidates for monitoring and, potentially, early-sensing of clinical dynamics. Therefore, we discuss the potential usability of such markers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31410724</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11126-019-09664-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2720 |
ispartof | Psychiatric quarterly, 2019-12, Vol.90 (4), p.793-801 |
issn | 0033-2720 1573-6709 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2272482407 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Anxiety Anxiety disorders Attention Bipolar disorder Candidates Chronic pain Depressive personality disorders Deviation Drug abuse Drug use Electrophysiology Event-related potentials Fear & phobias Latency Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mental depression Mental disorders Obsessive compulsive disorder Pain Pathology Post traumatic stress disorder Psychiatry Public Health Review Article Schizophrenia Sociology Substance abuse |
title | Neuropsychiatric Disorders as Erratic Attention Regulation – Lessons from Electrophysiology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A01%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neuropsychiatric%20Disorders%20as%20Erratic%20Attention%20Regulation%20%E2%80%93%20Lessons%20from%20Electrophysiology&rft.jtitle=Psychiatric%20quarterly&rft.au=Shahaf,%20Goded&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=793&rft.epage=801&rft.pages=793-801&rft.issn=0033-2720&rft.eissn=1573-6709&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11126-019-09664-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2272482407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2272482407&rft_id=info:pmid/31410724&rfr_iscdi=true |