Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Reaction to Unacceptable Behavior Inventory: A Questionnaire to Measure Progress in Implementation of Non-violent Resistance
Background Monitoring the implementation of new interventions, as in this study Non-violent Resistance (NVR) for the use in residential youth care settings, is mandatory in order to evaluate, adjust and refine the implementation process where necessary. Objective As there is no instrument for such m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child & youth care forum 2020-02, Vol.49 (1), p.43-57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 57 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Child & youth care forum |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Visser, K. M. van Gink, K. Thissen, F. Visser, T. A. Rimehaug, T. Jansen, L. C. M. Popma, A. |
description | Background
Monitoring the implementation of new interventions, as in this study Non-violent Resistance (NVR) for the use in residential youth care settings, is mandatory in order to evaluate, adjust and refine the implementation process where necessary.
Objective
As there is no instrument for such monitoring of NVR available, the authors developed a new questionnaire, named
Reaction to Unacceptable Behavior Inventory
, (in short: RUBI).
Method
This questionnaire was completed by staff of four different residential settings in the Netherlands, at different stages of the NVR implementation process. The staff members reported on the practice of their colleagues.
Results
The results are promising, as they show good reliability, inter-item correlations and other psychometric features for the included items. Furthermore, the results show that the RUBI seems to discriminate between trained and untrained teams, defending its use in future implementation processes and implementation research.
Conclusions
The RUBI is the first attempt to create an instrument which can be used for monitoring change during implementation of NVR, and for evaluating the degree of difference or compatibility between NVR and existing practice before implementation. Longitudinal research is needed to strengthen the documentation of validity and reliability of the RUBI in different settings, countries, and cultures. This should also be extended to the final and follow-up stages of implementation. In the future, redundant and insensitive items should be removed and standards for interpreting scale scores should be developed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10566-019-09517-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2270824114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1240439</ericid><sourcerecordid>2270824114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e95bbf2ae9c3cb71c4eacc16a799a2542fe770a4563dd509359a9ea5bfb9d39d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Ud1KHDEUHsSCVvsCBSHQ69T8TDab3lndtlusWqnX4Uz2jEZmkzGZXfCV-pRmHNE7IZBzON_PSb6q-szZV86YPs6cqdmMMm4oM4prqnaqfa60pFJys1tqpiTlc8P2qo853zPGjBZqv_p_hlvsYr_GMBAIK3KVsPNrHyA9ksUWug0MPgYSWzLcIblGcM_9EMlNAOewH6DpkHzHO9j6mMgybItUTI_fyAn5u8E8wgP4hCPnD0LelPIqxduEORMfyHLddzj6vzpdxECLWDfudI3Z5wGCw8PqQwtdxk8v90F182Px7_QXPb_8uTw9OadOztVA0aimaQWgcdI1mru67Oz4DLQxIFQtWtSaQa1mcrVSzEhlwCCopm3MSpZzUH2ZdPsUH8YH2Pu4SaFYWiE0m4ua87qgxIRyKeacsLV98uvya5YzO2Zip0xsycQ-Z2JVIR1NJEzevRIWv7moWS1Nmctpnsss3GJ6s35H9Qnu7Z0-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2270824114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Reaction to Unacceptable Behavior Inventory: A Questionnaire to Measure Progress in Implementation of Non-violent Resistance</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Visser, K. M. ; van Gink, K. ; Thissen, F. ; Visser, T. A. ; Rimehaug, T. ; Jansen, L. C. M. ; Popma, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Visser, K. M. ; van Gink, K. ; Thissen, F. ; Visser, T. A. ; Rimehaug, T. ; Jansen, L. C. M. ; Popma, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Monitoring the implementation of new interventions, as in this study Non-violent Resistance (NVR) for the use in residential youth care settings, is mandatory in order to evaluate, adjust and refine the implementation process where necessary.
Objective
As there is no instrument for such monitoring of NVR available, the authors developed a new questionnaire, named
Reaction to Unacceptable Behavior Inventory
, (in short: RUBI).
Method
This questionnaire was completed by staff of four different residential settings in the Netherlands, at different stages of the NVR implementation process. The staff members reported on the practice of their colleagues.
Results
The results are promising, as they show good reliability, inter-item correlations and other psychometric features for the included items. Furthermore, the results show that the RUBI seems to discriminate between trained and untrained teams, defending its use in future implementation processes and implementation research.
Conclusions
The RUBI is the first attempt to create an instrument which can be used for monitoring change during implementation of NVR, and for evaluating the degree of difference or compatibility between NVR and existing practice before implementation. Longitudinal research is needed to strengthen the documentation of validity and reliability of the RUBI in different settings, countries, and cultures. This should also be extended to the final and follow-up stages of implementation. In the future, redundant and insensitive items should be removed and standards for interpreting scale scores should be developed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10566-019-09517-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aggressiveness ; Behavior ; Behavior disorders ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Correlation ; Employees ; Foreign Countries ; Implementation ; Intervention ; Measures ; Nonviolence ; Original Paper ; Program Evaluation ; Program Implementation ; Psychology ; Psychometrics ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Residential Care ; Resistance ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Responses ; Teams ; Test Construction ; Test Reliability ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Child & youth care forum, 2020-02, Vol.49 (1), p.43-57</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Child & Youth Care Forum is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e95bbf2ae9c3cb71c4eacc16a799a2542fe770a4563dd509359a9ea5bfb9d39d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e95bbf2ae9c3cb71c4eacc16a799a2542fe770a4563dd509359a9ea5bfb9d39d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2859-9986</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10566-019-09517-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10566-019-09517-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27321,27901,27902,30976,33751,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1240439$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Visser, K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gink, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thissen, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, T. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimehaug, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, L. C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popma, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Reaction to Unacceptable Behavior Inventory: A Questionnaire to Measure Progress in Implementation of Non-violent Resistance</title><title>Child & youth care forum</title><addtitle>Child Youth Care Forum</addtitle><description>Background
Monitoring the implementation of new interventions, as in this study Non-violent Resistance (NVR) for the use in residential youth care settings, is mandatory in order to evaluate, adjust and refine the implementation process where necessary.
Objective
As there is no instrument for such monitoring of NVR available, the authors developed a new questionnaire, named
Reaction to Unacceptable Behavior Inventory
, (in short: RUBI).
Method
This questionnaire was completed by staff of four different residential settings in the Netherlands, at different stages of the NVR implementation process. The staff members reported on the practice of their colleagues.
Results
The results are promising, as they show good reliability, inter-item correlations and other psychometric features for the included items. Furthermore, the results show that the RUBI seems to discriminate between trained and untrained teams, defending its use in future implementation processes and implementation research.
Conclusions
The RUBI is the first attempt to create an instrument which can be used for monitoring change during implementation of NVR, and for evaluating the degree of difference or compatibility between NVR and existing practice before implementation. Longitudinal research is needed to strengthen the documentation of validity and reliability of the RUBI in different settings, countries, and cultures. This should also be extended to the final and follow-up stages of implementation. In the future, redundant and insensitive items should be removed and standards for interpreting scale scores should be developed.</description><subject>Aggressiveness</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior disorders</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Nonviolence</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Residential Care</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1053-1890</issn><issn>1573-3319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Ud1KHDEUHsSCVvsCBSHQ69T8TDab3lndtlusWqnX4Uz2jEZmkzGZXfCV-pRmHNE7IZBzON_PSb6q-szZV86YPs6cqdmMMm4oM4prqnaqfa60pFJys1tqpiTlc8P2qo853zPGjBZqv_p_hlvsYr_GMBAIK3KVsPNrHyA9ksUWug0MPgYSWzLcIblGcM_9EMlNAOewH6DpkHzHO9j6mMgybItUTI_fyAn5u8E8wgP4hCPnD0LelPIqxduEORMfyHLddzj6vzpdxECLWDfudI3Z5wGCw8PqQwtdxk8v90F182Px7_QXPb_8uTw9OadOztVA0aimaQWgcdI1mru67Oz4DLQxIFQtWtSaQa1mcrVSzEhlwCCopm3MSpZzUH2ZdPsUH8YH2Pu4SaFYWiE0m4ua87qgxIRyKeacsLV98uvya5YzO2Zip0xsycQ-Z2JVIR1NJEzevRIWv7moWS1Nmctpnsss3GJ6s35H9Qnu7Z0-</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Visser, K. M.</creator><creator>van Gink, K.</creator><creator>Thissen, F.</creator><creator>Visser, T. A.</creator><creator>Rimehaug, T.</creator><creator>Jansen, L. C. M.</creator><creator>Popma, A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-9986</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Reaction to Unacceptable Behavior Inventory: A Questionnaire to Measure Progress in Implementation of Non-violent Resistance</title><author>Visser, K. M. ; van Gink, K. ; Thissen, F. ; Visser, T. A. ; Rimehaug, T. ; Jansen, L. C. M. ; Popma, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e95bbf2ae9c3cb71c4eacc16a799a2542fe770a4563dd509359a9ea5bfb9d39d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aggressiveness</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior disorders</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Nonviolence</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Residential Care</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Visser, K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gink, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thissen, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, T. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimehaug, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, L. C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popma, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Child & youth care forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Visser, K. M.</au><au>van Gink, K.</au><au>Thissen, F.</au><au>Visser, T. A.</au><au>Rimehaug, T.</au><au>Jansen, L. C. M.</au><au>Popma, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1240439</ericid><atitle>Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Reaction to Unacceptable Behavior Inventory: A Questionnaire to Measure Progress in Implementation of Non-violent Resistance</atitle><jtitle>Child & youth care forum</jtitle><stitle>Child Youth Care Forum</stitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>43-57</pages><issn>1053-1890</issn><eissn>1573-3319</eissn><abstract>Background
Monitoring the implementation of new interventions, as in this study Non-violent Resistance (NVR) for the use in residential youth care settings, is mandatory in order to evaluate, adjust and refine the implementation process where necessary.
Objective
As there is no instrument for such monitoring of NVR available, the authors developed a new questionnaire, named
Reaction to Unacceptable Behavior Inventory
, (in short: RUBI).
Method
This questionnaire was completed by staff of four different residential settings in the Netherlands, at different stages of the NVR implementation process. The staff members reported on the practice of their colleagues.
Results
The results are promising, as they show good reliability, inter-item correlations and other psychometric features for the included items. Furthermore, the results show that the RUBI seems to discriminate between trained and untrained teams, defending its use in future implementation processes and implementation research.
Conclusions
The RUBI is the first attempt to create an instrument which can be used for monitoring change during implementation of NVR, and for evaluating the degree of difference or compatibility between NVR and existing practice before implementation. Longitudinal research is needed to strengthen the documentation of validity and reliability of the RUBI in different settings, countries, and cultures. This should also be extended to the final and follow-up stages of implementation. In the future, redundant and insensitive items should be removed and standards for interpreting scale scores should be developed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10566-019-09517-5</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-9986</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1890 |
ispartof | Child & youth care forum, 2020-02, Vol.49 (1), p.43-57 |
issn | 1053-1890 1573-3319 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2270824114 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Aggressiveness Behavior Behavior disorders Behavioral Science and Psychology Child and School Psychology Correlation Employees Foreign Countries Implementation Intervention Measures Nonviolence Original Paper Program Evaluation Program Implementation Psychology Psychometrics Questionnaires Reliability Residential Care Resistance Resistance (Psychology) Responses Teams Test Construction Test Reliability Youth |
title | Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Reaction to Unacceptable Behavior Inventory: A Questionnaire to Measure Progress in Implementation of Non-violent Resistance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T10%3A10%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Preliminary%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20Reaction%20to%20Unacceptable%20Behavior%20Inventory:%20A%20Questionnaire%20to%20Measure%20Progress%20in%20Implementation%20of%20Non-violent%20Resistance&rft.jtitle=Child%20&%20youth%20care%20forum&rft.au=Visser,%20K.%20M.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=43-57&rft.issn=1053-1890&rft.eissn=1573-3319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10566-019-09517-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2270824114%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2270824114&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1240439&rfr_iscdi=true |