State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy
In recent years state and local governmental interest groups have become active in filing amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court. During the same period, the Court has demonstrated a renewed interest in federalism issues. A review of the state and local government interest group particip...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public administration quarterly 2001-01, Vol.24 (4), p.522 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 522 |
container_title | Public administration quarterly |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Laverty, Edward B Palmer, Kenneth T |
description | In recent years state and local governmental interest groups have become active in filing amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court. During the same period, the Court has demonstrated a renewed interest in federalism issues. A review of the state and local government interest group participation in 37 cases between 1995 and 1998 shows that those organizations were more unified in cases raising issues of intergovernmental policy and program implementation than in the major federalism disputes. This article suggests that the increase use of the courts to settle technical intergovernmental issues portends new roles for state and local officials. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_226976506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>103443279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2269765063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjcsOgjAURBujifj4hxv3JNBWELdEo2vck4oXhEBb22Li39tEE7euZjFnzkxIQBlNQ84Zm5IgShkPs5hnc7KwtouimHK-C4gsnHAIQt6gV5XooVFPNHJA6aCVDg1aB41Ro7ZwxVoZBHdHKEZtcEDI1WjcHs6D7ttKuFZJCx76TH8q79XKE68VmdWit7j-5pJsjodLfgq1UY_Rf5WdN0pflZQmWZpso4T9Bb0BZmFMMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>226976506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Laverty, Edward B ; Palmer, Kenneth T</creator><creatorcontrib>Laverty, Edward B ; Palmer, Kenneth T</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years state and local governmental interest groups have become active in filing amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court. During the same period, the Court has demonstrated a renewed interest in federalism issues. A review of the state and local government interest group participation in 37 cases between 1995 and 1998 shows that those organizations were more unified in cases raising issues of intergovernmental policy and program implementation than in the major federalism disputes. This article suggests that the increase use of the courts to settle technical intergovernmental issues portends new roles for state and local officials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-4433</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PAQUE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Randallstown: Southern Public Administration Education Foundation</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US ; Amicus curiae ; Associations ; Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act 1993-US ; Civil rights ; Criminal procedure ; Federalism ; Impact analysis ; Interest groups ; Intergovernmental relations ; Jurisdiction ; Litigation ; Local government ; Participation ; Politics ; Prison libraries ; State court decisions ; Studies ; Supreme Court decisions</subject><ispartof>Public administration quarterly, 2001-01, Vol.24 (4), p.522</ispartof><rights>Copyright Southern Public Administration Education Foundation Winter 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12836,27857</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laverty, Edward B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Kenneth T</creatorcontrib><title>State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy</title><title>Public administration quarterly</title><description>In recent years state and local governmental interest groups have become active in filing amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court. During the same period, the Court has demonstrated a renewed interest in federalism issues. A review of the state and local government interest group participation in 37 cases between 1995 and 1998 shows that those organizations were more unified in cases raising issues of intergovernmental policy and program implementation than in the major federalism disputes. This article suggests that the increase use of the courts to settle technical intergovernmental issues portends new roles for state and local officials.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</subject><subject>Amicus curiae</subject><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act 1993-US</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Criminal procedure</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Intergovernmental relations</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prison libraries</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><issn>0734-9149</issn><issn>2327-4433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjcsOgjAURBujifj4hxv3JNBWELdEo2vck4oXhEBb22Li39tEE7euZjFnzkxIQBlNQ84Zm5IgShkPs5hnc7KwtouimHK-C4gsnHAIQt6gV5XooVFPNHJA6aCVDg1aB41Ro7ZwxVoZBHdHKEZtcEDI1WjcHs6D7ttKuFZJCx76TH8q79XKE68VmdWit7j-5pJsjodLfgq1UY_Rf5WdN0pflZQmWZpso4T9Bb0BZmFMMA</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Laverty, Edward B</creator><creator>Palmer, Kenneth T</creator><general>Southern Public Administration Education Foundation</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy</title><author>Laverty, Edward B ; Palmer, Kenneth T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2269765063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</topic><topic>Amicus curiae</topic><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act 1993-US</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Criminal procedure</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Intergovernmental relations</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prison libraries</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laverty, Edward B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Kenneth T</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Public administration quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laverty, Edward B</au><au>Palmer, Kenneth T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy</atitle><jtitle>Public administration quarterly</jtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>522</spage><pages>522-</pages><issn>0734-9149</issn><eissn>2327-4433</eissn><coden>PAQUE5</coden><abstract>In recent years state and local governmental interest groups have become active in filing amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court. During the same period, the Court has demonstrated a renewed interest in federalism issues. A review of the state and local government interest group participation in 37 cases between 1995 and 1998 shows that those organizations were more unified in cases raising issues of intergovernmental policy and program implementation than in the major federalism disputes. This article suggests that the increase use of the courts to settle technical intergovernmental issues portends new roles for state and local officials.</abstract><cop>Randallstown</cop><pub>Southern Public Administration Education Foundation</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0734-9149 |
ispartof | Public administration quarterly, 2001-01, Vol.24 (4), p.522 |
issn | 0734-9149 2327-4433 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_226976506 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Advocacy Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US Amicus curiae Associations Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act 1993-US Civil rights Criminal procedure Federalism Impact analysis Interest groups Intergovernmental relations Jurisdiction Litigation Local government Participation Politics Prison libraries State court decisions Studies Supreme Court decisions |
title | State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A34%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20and%20local%20government%20interest%20groups%20before%20the%20Supreme%20Court:%20Implications%20for%20intergovernmental%20policy&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20quarterly&rft.au=Laverty,%20Edward%20B&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=522&rft.pages=522-&rft.issn=0734-9149&rft.eissn=2327-4433&rft.coden=PAQUE5&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E103443279%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=226976506&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |