State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy

In recent years state and local governmental interest groups have become active in filing amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court. During the same period, the Court has demonstrated a renewed interest in federalism issues. A review of the state and local government interest group particip...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public administration quarterly 2001-01, Vol.24 (4), p.522
Hauptverfasser: Laverty, Edward B, Palmer, Kenneth T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 522
container_title Public administration quarterly
container_volume 24
creator Laverty, Edward B
Palmer, Kenneth T
description In recent years state and local governmental interest groups have become active in filing amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court. During the same period, the Court has demonstrated a renewed interest in federalism issues. A review of the state and local government interest group participation in 37 cases between 1995 and 1998 shows that those organizations were more unified in cases raising issues of intergovernmental policy and program implementation than in the major federalism disputes. This article suggests that the increase use of the courts to settle technical intergovernmental issues portends new roles for state and local officials.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_226976506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>103443279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2269765063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjcsOgjAURBujifj4hxv3JNBWELdEo2vck4oXhEBb22Li39tEE7euZjFnzkxIQBlNQ84Zm5IgShkPs5hnc7KwtouimHK-C4gsnHAIQt6gV5XooVFPNHJA6aCVDg1aB41Ro7ZwxVoZBHdHKEZtcEDI1WjcHs6D7ttKuFZJCx76TH8q79XKE68VmdWit7j-5pJsjodLfgq1UY_Rf5WdN0pflZQmWZpso4T9Bb0BZmFMMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>226976506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Laverty, Edward B ; Palmer, Kenneth T</creator><creatorcontrib>Laverty, Edward B ; Palmer, Kenneth T</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years state and local governmental interest groups have become active in filing amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court. During the same period, the Court has demonstrated a renewed interest in federalism issues. A review of the state and local government interest group participation in 37 cases between 1995 and 1998 shows that those organizations were more unified in cases raising issues of intergovernmental policy and program implementation than in the major federalism disputes. This article suggests that the increase use of the courts to settle technical intergovernmental issues portends new roles for state and local officials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-4433</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PAQUE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Randallstown: Southern Public Administration Education Foundation</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US ; Amicus curiae ; Associations ; Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act 1993-US ; Civil rights ; Criminal procedure ; Federalism ; Impact analysis ; Interest groups ; Intergovernmental relations ; Jurisdiction ; Litigation ; Local government ; Participation ; Politics ; Prison libraries ; State court decisions ; Studies ; Supreme Court decisions</subject><ispartof>Public administration quarterly, 2001-01, Vol.24 (4), p.522</ispartof><rights>Copyright Southern Public Administration Education Foundation Winter 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12836,27857</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laverty, Edward B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Kenneth T</creatorcontrib><title>State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy</title><title>Public administration quarterly</title><description>In recent years state and local governmental interest groups have become active in filing amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court. During the same period, the Court has demonstrated a renewed interest in federalism issues. A review of the state and local government interest group participation in 37 cases between 1995 and 1998 shows that those organizations were more unified in cases raising issues of intergovernmental policy and program implementation than in the major federalism disputes. This article suggests that the increase use of the courts to settle technical intergovernmental issues portends new roles for state and local officials.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</subject><subject>Amicus curiae</subject><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act 1993-US</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Criminal procedure</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Intergovernmental relations</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prison libraries</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><issn>0734-9149</issn><issn>2327-4433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjcsOgjAURBujifj4hxv3JNBWELdEo2vck4oXhEBb22Li39tEE7euZjFnzkxIQBlNQ84Zm5IgShkPs5hnc7KwtouimHK-C4gsnHAIQt6gV5XooVFPNHJA6aCVDg1aB41Ro7ZwxVoZBHdHKEZtcEDI1WjcHs6D7ttKuFZJCx76TH8q79XKE68VmdWit7j-5pJsjodLfgq1UY_Rf5WdN0pflZQmWZpso4T9Bb0BZmFMMA</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Laverty, Edward B</creator><creator>Palmer, Kenneth T</creator><general>Southern Public Administration Education Foundation</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy</title><author>Laverty, Edward B ; Palmer, Kenneth T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2269765063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</topic><topic>Amicus curiae</topic><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act 1993-US</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Criminal procedure</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Intergovernmental relations</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prison libraries</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laverty, Edward B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Kenneth T</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Public administration quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laverty, Edward B</au><au>Palmer, Kenneth T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy</atitle><jtitle>Public administration quarterly</jtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>522</spage><pages>522-</pages><issn>0734-9149</issn><eissn>2327-4433</eissn><coden>PAQUE5</coden><abstract>In recent years state and local governmental interest groups have become active in filing amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court. During the same period, the Court has demonstrated a renewed interest in federalism issues. A review of the state and local government interest group participation in 37 cases between 1995 and 1998 shows that those organizations were more unified in cases raising issues of intergovernmental policy and program implementation than in the major federalism disputes. This article suggests that the increase use of the courts to settle technical intergovernmental issues portends new roles for state and local officials.</abstract><cop>Randallstown</cop><pub>Southern Public Administration Education Foundation</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0734-9149
ispartof Public administration quarterly, 2001-01, Vol.24 (4), p.522
issn 0734-9149
2327-4433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_226976506
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Advocacy
Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US
Amicus curiae
Associations
Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act 1993-US
Civil rights
Criminal procedure
Federalism
Impact analysis
Interest groups
Intergovernmental relations
Jurisdiction
Litigation
Local government
Participation
Politics
Prison libraries
State court decisions
Studies
Supreme Court decisions
title State and local government interest groups before the Supreme Court: Implications for intergovernmental policy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A34%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20and%20local%20government%20interest%20groups%20before%20the%20Supreme%20Court:%20Implications%20for%20intergovernmental%20policy&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20quarterly&rft.au=Laverty,%20Edward%20B&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=522&rft.pages=522-&rft.issn=0734-9149&rft.eissn=2327-4433&rft.coden=PAQUE5&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E103443279%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=226976506&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true