How sexual and natural selection shape sexual size dimorphism: Evidence from multiple evolutionary scales

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is pervasive across taxa and reflects differences in the effects of sexual and natural selection on body size between the sexes. However, disentangling the complex eco‐evolutionary interactions between these two mechanisms remains a major challenge for biologists. Here,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Functional ecology 2019-08, Vol.33 (8), p.1446-1458
Hauptverfasser: Littleford-Colquhoun, Bethan L., Clemente, Christofer, Thompson, Graham, Cristescu, Romane H., Peterson, Nicola, Strickland, Kasha, Stuart-Fox, Devi, Frere, Celine H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1458
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1446
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 33
creator Littleford-Colquhoun, Bethan L.
Clemente, Christofer
Thompson, Graham
Cristescu, Romane H.
Peterson, Nicola
Strickland, Kasha
Stuart-Fox, Devi
Frere, Celine H.
description Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is pervasive across taxa and reflects differences in the effects of sexual and natural selection on body size between the sexes. However, disentangling the complex eco‐evolutionary interactions between these two mechanisms remains a major challenge for biologists. Here, we combine macro‐evolutionary (between‐species), local evolutionary (between‐population) and fine‐scale evolutionary (within‐population) patterns of SSD to explore how sexual and natural selection interact and shape the evolution of SSD in Australian agamid lizards. Australian agamid lizards show substantial variation in SSD, ecological traits and species density making them an ideal study system to address this question. At the between‐species level, population density, ecological generalism and mean species size significantly predict SSD variation; however, only ecological generalism was found to significantly explain variation in larger‐than‐average male‐biased SSD. At the population level, density positively correlated with SSD in native habitats, but not city park habitats. Last, agonistic behaviour acted as the primary driver of SSD at the within‐population level. Our results indicate how sexual and natural selection can interact at different evolutionary scales, and show the importance of considering both selective mechanisms when investigating patterns of SSD. A plain language summary is available for this article. Plain Language Summary
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.13337
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2269410774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48583016</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48583016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-4a583e3c7d1904b8bfba1a765299d1bdb2f0b23446d2fb96b2538fdc426a71e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUwMyFFYk7rbycDA6pailSJBWbLjh01VRoHO1Epfz0OoV255U6n97vTewDcIzhDseaIcJZiStgMEULEBZicN5dgAjHP04xycg1uQthBCHOG8QQ8rd0hCfarV3WiGpM0qut9nIOtbdFVrknCVrX2JAnVt01MtXe-3VZhfwuuSlUHe_fXp-BjtXxfrNPN28vr4nmTFkRkIqWKZcSSQhiUQ6ozXWqFlOAM57lB2mhcQo0JpdzgUudcY0ay0hQUcyWQZWQKHse7rXefvQ2d3LneN_GlxNEYRVAIGlXzUVV4F4K3pWx9tVf-KBGUQ0ZySEQOicjfjCLBRuJQ1fb4n1yulosT9zByu9A5f-ZoFn1CxMkPU6lxRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2269410774</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How sexual and natural selection shape sexual size dimorphism: Evidence from multiple evolutionary scales</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Littleford-Colquhoun, Bethan L. ; Clemente, Christofer ; Thompson, Graham ; Cristescu, Romane H. ; Peterson, Nicola ; Strickland, Kasha ; Stuart-Fox, Devi ; Frere, Celine H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Littleford-Colquhoun, Bethan L. ; Clemente, Christofer ; Thompson, Graham ; Cristescu, Romane H. ; Peterson, Nicola ; Strickland, Kasha ; Stuart-Fox, Devi ; Frere, Celine H.</creatorcontrib><description>Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is pervasive across taxa and reflects differences in the effects of sexual and natural selection on body size between the sexes. However, disentangling the complex eco‐evolutionary interactions between these two mechanisms remains a major challenge for biologists. Here, we combine macro‐evolutionary (between‐species), local evolutionary (between‐population) and fine‐scale evolutionary (within‐population) patterns of SSD to explore how sexual and natural selection interact and shape the evolution of SSD in Australian agamid lizards. Australian agamid lizards show substantial variation in SSD, ecological traits and species density making them an ideal study system to address this question. At the between‐species level, population density, ecological generalism and mean species size significantly predict SSD variation; however, only ecological generalism was found to significantly explain variation in larger‐than‐average male‐biased SSD. At the population level, density positively correlated with SSD in native habitats, but not city park habitats. Last, agonistic behaviour acted as the primary driver of SSD at the within‐population level. Our results indicate how sexual and natural selection can interact at different evolutionary scales, and show the importance of considering both selective mechanisms when investigating patterns of SSD. A plain language summary is available for this article. Plain Language Summary</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley</publisher><subject>agamid lizards ; Biological evolution ; Body size ; city landscapes ; eastern water dragon ; Ecological monitoring ; eco‐evolutionary interactions ; Evolution ; EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY ; Lizards ; Natural selection ; Population ; Population density ; Sexual dimorphism ; sexual selection ; sexual size dimorphism ; Species ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2019-08, Vol.33 (8), p.1446-1458</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-4a583e3c7d1904b8bfba1a765299d1bdb2f0b23446d2fb96b2538fdc426a71e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-4a583e3c7d1904b8bfba1a765299d1bdb2f0b23446d2fb96b2538fdc426a71e53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2594-0061 ; 0000-0002-2490-0607 ; 0000-0001-7071-5245</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2435.13337$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2435.13337$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Littleford-Colquhoun, Bethan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente, Christofer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristescu, Romane H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Kasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart-Fox, Devi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frere, Celine H.</creatorcontrib><title>How sexual and natural selection shape sexual size dimorphism: Evidence from multiple evolutionary scales</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is pervasive across taxa and reflects differences in the effects of sexual and natural selection on body size between the sexes. However, disentangling the complex eco‐evolutionary interactions between these two mechanisms remains a major challenge for biologists. Here, we combine macro‐evolutionary (between‐species), local evolutionary (between‐population) and fine‐scale evolutionary (within‐population) patterns of SSD to explore how sexual and natural selection interact and shape the evolution of SSD in Australian agamid lizards. Australian agamid lizards show substantial variation in SSD, ecological traits and species density making them an ideal study system to address this question. At the between‐species level, population density, ecological generalism and mean species size significantly predict SSD variation; however, only ecological generalism was found to significantly explain variation in larger‐than‐average male‐biased SSD. At the population level, density positively correlated with SSD in native habitats, but not city park habitats. Last, agonistic behaviour acted as the primary driver of SSD at the within‐population level. Our results indicate how sexual and natural selection can interact at different evolutionary scales, and show the importance of considering both selective mechanisms when investigating patterns of SSD. A plain language summary is available for this article. Plain Language Summary</description><subject>agamid lizards</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>city landscapes</subject><subject>eastern water dragon</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>eco‐evolutionary interactions</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY</subject><subject>Lizards</subject><subject>Natural selection</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Sexual dimorphism</subject><subject>sexual selection</subject><subject>sexual size dimorphism</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUwMyFFYk7rbycDA6pailSJBWbLjh01VRoHO1Epfz0OoV255U6n97vTewDcIzhDseaIcJZiStgMEULEBZicN5dgAjHP04xycg1uQthBCHOG8QQ8rd0hCfarV3WiGpM0qut9nIOtbdFVrknCVrX2JAnVt01MtXe-3VZhfwuuSlUHe_fXp-BjtXxfrNPN28vr4nmTFkRkIqWKZcSSQhiUQ6ozXWqFlOAM57lB2mhcQo0JpdzgUudcY0ay0hQUcyWQZWQKHse7rXefvQ2d3LneN_GlxNEYRVAIGlXzUVV4F4K3pWx9tVf-KBGUQ0ZySEQOicjfjCLBRuJQ1fb4n1yulosT9zByu9A5f-ZoFn1CxMkPU6lxRg</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Littleford-Colquhoun, Bethan L.</creator><creator>Clemente, Christofer</creator><creator>Thompson, Graham</creator><creator>Cristescu, Romane H.</creator><creator>Peterson, Nicola</creator><creator>Strickland, Kasha</creator><creator>Stuart-Fox, Devi</creator><creator>Frere, Celine H.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2594-0061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2490-0607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7071-5245</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>How sexual and natural selection shape sexual size dimorphism</title><author>Littleford-Colquhoun, Bethan L. ; Clemente, Christofer ; Thompson, Graham ; Cristescu, Romane H. ; Peterson, Nicola ; Strickland, Kasha ; Stuart-Fox, Devi ; Frere, Celine H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-4a583e3c7d1904b8bfba1a765299d1bdb2f0b23446d2fb96b2538fdc426a71e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>agamid lizards</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>city landscapes</topic><topic>eastern water dragon</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>eco‐evolutionary interactions</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY</topic><topic>Lizards</topic><topic>Natural selection</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Sexual dimorphism</topic><topic>sexual selection</topic><topic>sexual size dimorphism</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Littleford-Colquhoun, Bethan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente, Christofer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristescu, Romane H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Kasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart-Fox, Devi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frere, Celine H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Littleford-Colquhoun, Bethan L.</au><au>Clemente, Christofer</au><au>Thompson, Graham</au><au>Cristescu, Romane H.</au><au>Peterson, Nicola</au><au>Strickland, Kasha</au><au>Stuart-Fox, Devi</au><au>Frere, Celine H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How sexual and natural selection shape sexual size dimorphism: Evidence from multiple evolutionary scales</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1446</spage><epage>1458</epage><pages>1446-1458</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is pervasive across taxa and reflects differences in the effects of sexual and natural selection on body size between the sexes. However, disentangling the complex eco‐evolutionary interactions between these two mechanisms remains a major challenge for biologists. Here, we combine macro‐evolutionary (between‐species), local evolutionary (between‐population) and fine‐scale evolutionary (within‐population) patterns of SSD to explore how sexual and natural selection interact and shape the evolution of SSD in Australian agamid lizards. Australian agamid lizards show substantial variation in SSD, ecological traits and species density making them an ideal study system to address this question. At the between‐species level, population density, ecological generalism and mean species size significantly predict SSD variation; however, only ecological generalism was found to significantly explain variation in larger‐than‐average male‐biased SSD. At the population level, density positively correlated with SSD in native habitats, but not city park habitats. Last, agonistic behaviour acted as the primary driver of SSD at the within‐population level. Our results indicate how sexual and natural selection can interact at different evolutionary scales, and show the importance of considering both selective mechanisms when investigating patterns of SSD. A plain language summary is available for this article. Plain Language Summary</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.13337</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2594-0061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2490-0607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7071-5245</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2019-08, Vol.33 (8), p.1446-1458
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2269410774
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects agamid lizards
Biological evolution
Body size
city landscapes
eastern water dragon
Ecological monitoring
eco‐evolutionary interactions
Evolution
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY
Lizards
Natural selection
Population
Population density
Sexual dimorphism
sexual selection
sexual size dimorphism
Species
Variation
title How sexual and natural selection shape sexual size dimorphism: Evidence from multiple evolutionary scales
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A34%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20sexual%20and%20natural%20selection%20shape%20sexual%20size%20dimorphism:%20Evidence%20from%20multiple%20evolutionary%20scales&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Littleford-Colquhoun,%20Bethan%20L.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1446&rft.epage=1458&rft.pages=1446-1458&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.13337&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48583016%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2269410774&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48583016&rfr_iscdi=true