Comparative evaluation of the polynomial and spline fitting methods for the B0 correction of CEST MRI data acquired from human brains

To compare the magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) values calculated with polynomial and spline fitting methods for B0 correction of the full Z‐spectrum images, full Z‐spectrum data was obtained from 12 elderly healthy subjects by using a 3D segmented EPI sequence, as well as from 17 ot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of imaging systems and technology 2019-09, Vol.29 (3), p.272-282
Hauptverfasser: Yoo, Chang Hyun, Oh, Janghoon, Park, Soonchan, Ryu, Chang‐Woo, Kwon, Young Kyun, Jahng, Geon‐Ho
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 282
container_issue 3
container_start_page 272
container_title International journal of imaging systems and technology
container_volume 29
creator Yoo, Chang Hyun
Oh, Janghoon
Park, Soonchan
Ryu, Chang‐Woo
Kwon, Young Kyun
Jahng, Geon‐Ho
description To compare the magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) values calculated with polynomial and spline fitting methods for B0 correction of the full Z‐spectrum images, full Z‐spectrum data was obtained from 12 elderly healthy subjects by using a 3D segmented EPI sequence, as well as from 17 other subjects by using a 3D GRASE sequence with two different 3 T MRI systems. The full Z‐spectra were analyzed to map MTRasym with three different fitting methods, namely the 10th and 14th polynomial and spline methods, for B0 correction. The MTRasym values for each offset frequency were compared among the three fitting methods. For the 3D segmented EPI sequence, the MTRasym values significantly differed among the three fitting methods at 0.86, 2.14, 3.00, and 3.43 ppm offset frequencies. For the 3D GRASE sequence, the MTRasym values obtained by 14th polynomial and spline fitting methods significantly differed at arbitrary offset frequencies. The MTRasym values are sensitive to the fitting methods of B0 correction and to the type of acquisition sequence for the full Z‐spectrum. Therefore, an appropriate fitting method should be used to analyze the full Z‐spectrum obtained from the brain.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ima.22313
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2269357171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2269357171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-ff1be2ba27718761899f33226438cd5009307b8581fc77a8423c6e8e60331f723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUw8AaWmBjS-qeJk7FEBSpRIUGZLcexqaskTu2kqA_Ae-M2MLLcH-m75-geAG4xmmCEyNTUYkIIxfQMjDDK0uhYzsEIpVkWZbOYXYIr77cIYRyjeAS-c1u3wonO7BVUe1H1YbQNtBp2GwVbWx0aWxtRQdGU0LeVaRTUputM8wlr1W1s6aG27kQ_ICitc0r-SeSL9zVcvS1hKToBhdz1xqkSamdruOlr0cDCCdP4a3ChReXVzW8fg4_HxTp_jl5en5b5_CWSJGM00hoXihSCMIZTluDwk6aUkGRGU1nGCGUUsSKNU6wlYyKdESoTlaoEUYo1I3QM7gbd1tldr3zHt7Z3TbDkQSWjMcMMB-p-oKSz3juleetCru7AMeLHlHnY-CnlwE4H9stU6vA_yJer-XDxA023faQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2269357171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of the polynomial and spline fitting methods for the B0 correction of CEST MRI data acquired from human brains</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Yoo, Chang Hyun ; Oh, Janghoon ; Park, Soonchan ; Ryu, Chang‐Woo ; Kwon, Young Kyun ; Jahng, Geon‐Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Chang Hyun ; Oh, Janghoon ; Park, Soonchan ; Ryu, Chang‐Woo ; Kwon, Young Kyun ; Jahng, Geon‐Ho</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) values calculated with polynomial and spline fitting methods for B0 correction of the full Z‐spectrum images, full Z‐spectrum data was obtained from 12 elderly healthy subjects by using a 3D segmented EPI sequence, as well as from 17 other subjects by using a 3D GRASE sequence with two different 3 T MRI systems. The full Z‐spectra were analyzed to map MTRasym with three different fitting methods, namely the 10th and 14th polynomial and spline methods, for B0 correction. The MTRasym values for each offset frequency were compared among the three fitting methods. For the 3D segmented EPI sequence, the MTRasym values significantly differed among the three fitting methods at 0.86, 2.14, 3.00, and 3.43 ppm offset frequencies. For the 3D GRASE sequence, the MTRasym values obtained by 14th polynomial and spline fitting methods significantly differed at arbitrary offset frequencies. The MTRasym values are sensitive to the fitting methods of B0 correction and to the type of acquisition sequence for the full Z‐spectrum. Therefore, an appropriate fitting method should be used to analyze the full Z‐spectrum obtained from the brain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-9457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-1098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ima.22313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Brain ; Data acquisition ; full Z‐spectrum ; MTR asymmetry ; polynomial fitting ; Polynomials ; sequence type ; spline fitting</subject><ispartof>International journal of imaging systems and technology, 2019-09, Vol.29 (3), p.272-282</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-ff1be2ba27718761899f33226438cd5009307b8581fc77a8423c6e8e60331f723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-ff1be2ba27718761899f33226438cd5009307b8581fc77a8423c6e8e60331f723</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8881-1884</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fima.22313$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fima.22313$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Chang Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Janghoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Soonchan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Chang‐Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Young Kyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahng, Geon‐Ho</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of the polynomial and spline fitting methods for the B0 correction of CEST MRI data acquired from human brains</title><title>International journal of imaging systems and technology</title><description>To compare the magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) values calculated with polynomial and spline fitting methods for B0 correction of the full Z‐spectrum images, full Z‐spectrum data was obtained from 12 elderly healthy subjects by using a 3D segmented EPI sequence, as well as from 17 other subjects by using a 3D GRASE sequence with two different 3 T MRI systems. The full Z‐spectra were analyzed to map MTRasym with three different fitting methods, namely the 10th and 14th polynomial and spline methods, for B0 correction. The MTRasym values for each offset frequency were compared among the three fitting methods. For the 3D segmented EPI sequence, the MTRasym values significantly differed among the three fitting methods at 0.86, 2.14, 3.00, and 3.43 ppm offset frequencies. For the 3D GRASE sequence, the MTRasym values obtained by 14th polynomial and spline fitting methods significantly differed at arbitrary offset frequencies. The MTRasym values are sensitive to the fitting methods of B0 correction and to the type of acquisition sequence for the full Z‐spectrum. Therefore, an appropriate fitting method should be used to analyze the full Z‐spectrum obtained from the brain.</description><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>full Z‐spectrum</subject><subject>MTR asymmetry</subject><subject>polynomial fitting</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>sequence type</subject><subject>spline fitting</subject><issn>0899-9457</issn><issn>1098-1098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUw8AaWmBjS-qeJk7FEBSpRIUGZLcexqaskTu2kqA_Ae-M2MLLcH-m75-geAG4xmmCEyNTUYkIIxfQMjDDK0uhYzsEIpVkWZbOYXYIr77cIYRyjeAS-c1u3wonO7BVUe1H1YbQNtBp2GwVbWx0aWxtRQdGU0LeVaRTUputM8wlr1W1s6aG27kQ_ICitc0r-SeSL9zVcvS1hKToBhdz1xqkSamdruOlr0cDCCdP4a3ChReXVzW8fg4_HxTp_jl5en5b5_CWSJGM00hoXihSCMIZTluDwk6aUkGRGU1nGCGUUsSKNU6wlYyKdESoTlaoEUYo1I3QM7gbd1tldr3zHt7Z3TbDkQSWjMcMMB-p-oKSz3juleetCru7AMeLHlHnY-CnlwE4H9stU6vA_yJer-XDxA023faQ</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Yoo, Chang Hyun</creator><creator>Oh, Janghoon</creator><creator>Park, Soonchan</creator><creator>Ryu, Chang‐Woo</creator><creator>Kwon, Young Kyun</creator><creator>Jahng, Geon‐Ho</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8881-1884</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of the polynomial and spline fitting methods for the B0 correction of CEST MRI data acquired from human brains</title><author>Yoo, Chang Hyun ; Oh, Janghoon ; Park, Soonchan ; Ryu, Chang‐Woo ; Kwon, Young Kyun ; Jahng, Geon‐Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-ff1be2ba27718761899f33226438cd5009307b8581fc77a8423c6e8e60331f723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>full Z‐spectrum</topic><topic>MTR asymmetry</topic><topic>polynomial fitting</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>sequence type</topic><topic>spline fitting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Chang Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Janghoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Soonchan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Chang‐Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Young Kyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahng, Geon‐Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of imaging systems and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoo, Chang Hyun</au><au>Oh, Janghoon</au><au>Park, Soonchan</au><au>Ryu, Chang‐Woo</au><au>Kwon, Young Kyun</au><au>Jahng, Geon‐Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of the polynomial and spline fitting methods for the B0 correction of CEST MRI data acquired from human brains</atitle><jtitle>International journal of imaging systems and technology</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>272</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>272-282</pages><issn>0899-9457</issn><eissn>1098-1098</eissn><abstract>To compare the magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) values calculated with polynomial and spline fitting methods for B0 correction of the full Z‐spectrum images, full Z‐spectrum data was obtained from 12 elderly healthy subjects by using a 3D segmented EPI sequence, as well as from 17 other subjects by using a 3D GRASE sequence with two different 3 T MRI systems. The full Z‐spectra were analyzed to map MTRasym with three different fitting methods, namely the 10th and 14th polynomial and spline methods, for B0 correction. The MTRasym values for each offset frequency were compared among the three fitting methods. For the 3D segmented EPI sequence, the MTRasym values significantly differed among the three fitting methods at 0.86, 2.14, 3.00, and 3.43 ppm offset frequencies. For the 3D GRASE sequence, the MTRasym values obtained by 14th polynomial and spline fitting methods significantly differed at arbitrary offset frequencies. The MTRasym values are sensitive to the fitting methods of B0 correction and to the type of acquisition sequence for the full Z‐spectrum. Therefore, an appropriate fitting method should be used to analyze the full Z‐spectrum obtained from the brain.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ima.22313</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8881-1884</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-9457
ispartof International journal of imaging systems and technology, 2019-09, Vol.29 (3), p.272-282
issn 0899-9457
1098-1098
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2269357171
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Brain
Data acquisition
full Z‐spectrum
MTR asymmetry
polynomial fitting
Polynomials
sequence type
spline fitting
title Comparative evaluation of the polynomial and spline fitting methods for the B0 correction of CEST MRI data acquired from human brains
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T00%3A05%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20the%20polynomial%20and%20spline%20fitting%20methods%20for%20the%20B0%20correction%20of%20CEST%20MRI%20data%20acquired%20from%20human%20brains&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20imaging%20systems%20and%20technology&rft.au=Yoo,%20Chang%20Hyun&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=272&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=272-282&rft.issn=0899-9457&rft.eissn=1098-1098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ima.22313&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2269357171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2269357171&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true