Animal‐borne wireless network: Remote imaging of community ecology
This article describes the design, construction, and field‐testing of a standalone networked animal‐borne monitoring system conceived to study community ecology remotely. The system consists of an assemblage of identical battery‐powered sensing devices with wireless communication capabilities that a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of field robotics 2019-09, Vol.36 (6), p.1141-1165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1165 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1141 |
container_title | Journal of field robotics |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Park, Shinkyu Aschenbach, Konrad H. Ahmed, Manjur Scott, William L. Leonard, Naomi E. Abernathy, Kyler Marshall, Greg Shepard, Mike Martins, Nuno C. |
description | This article describes the design, construction, and field‐testing of a standalone networked animal‐borne monitoring system conceived to study community ecology remotely. The system consists of an assemblage of identical battery‐powered sensing devices with wireless communication capabilities that are each collar‐mounted on a study animal and together form a mobile ad hoc network. The sensing modalities of each device include high‐definition video, inertial accelerometry, and location resolved via a global positioning system module. Our system is conceived to use information exchange across the network to enable the devices to jointly decide without supervision when and how to use each sensing modality. The ultimate goal is to extend battery life while making sure that important events are appropriately documented. This requires judicious use of highly informative but power‐hungry sensing modalities, such as video, because battery capacity is constrained by stringent weight and dimension restrictions. We have proposed algorithms to regulate sensing rates, data transmission among devices, and triggering for video recording based on location and animal group movements and configuration. We have also developed the hardware and firmware of our devices to reliably execute these algorithms in the exacting conditions of real‐life deployments. We describe validation of the performance and reliability of our system using deployment results for a mission in Gorongosa National Park (Mozambique) to monitor two species in their natural habitat: the waterbuck and the African buffalo. We present movement data and snapshots of animal point‐of‐view videos collected by 14 fully operational devices collared on 10 waterbucks and 4 buffaloes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rob.21891 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2269246275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2269246275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-7aeee00336b0c4dc74487fa20f436ed00cc0da7baa3ca9fdeb333cc556b6a0f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8isWKRdvyI07Arb6RKlSpYW44zqVKSuNipquz4BL6RL8EQxI7VzOLcmatDyDmFCQVgU2fzCaOzjB6QEU0SGYtMpod_e5IdkxPvNwCCz7JkRG7nbdXo-vP9I7euxWhfOazR-6jFbm_d61W0wsZ2GAVqXbXryJaRsU2za6uuj9DY2q77U3JU6trj2e8ck5f7u-ebx3ixfHi6mS9iI4DRONWICMC5zMGIwqRCzNJSMygFl1gAGAOFTnOtudFZWWDOOTcmNM-lhpLyMbkY7m6dfduh79TG7lwbXirGZMaEZGkSqMuBMs5677BUWxfau15RUN-SVJCkfiQFdjqw-6rG_n9QrZbXQ-ILr3VqgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2269246275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Animal‐borne wireless network: Remote imaging of community ecology</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Park, Shinkyu ; Aschenbach, Konrad H. ; Ahmed, Manjur ; Scott, William L. ; Leonard, Naomi E. ; Abernathy, Kyler ; Marshall, Greg ; Shepard, Mike ; Martins, Nuno C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Shinkyu ; Aschenbach, Konrad H. ; Ahmed, Manjur ; Scott, William L. ; Leonard, Naomi E. ; Abernathy, Kyler ; Marshall, Greg ; Shepard, Mike ; Martins, Nuno C.</creatorcontrib><description>This article describes the design, construction, and field‐testing of a standalone networked animal‐borne monitoring system conceived to study community ecology remotely. The system consists of an assemblage of identical battery‐powered sensing devices with wireless communication capabilities that are each collar‐mounted on a study animal and together form a mobile ad hoc network. The sensing modalities of each device include high‐definition video, inertial accelerometry, and location resolved via a global positioning system module. Our system is conceived to use information exchange across the network to enable the devices to jointly decide without supervision when and how to use each sensing modality. The ultimate goal is to extend battery life while making sure that important events are appropriately documented. This requires judicious use of highly informative but power‐hungry sensing modalities, such as video, because battery capacity is constrained by stringent weight and dimension restrictions. We have proposed algorithms to regulate sensing rates, data transmission among devices, and triggering for video recording based on location and animal group movements and configuration. We have also developed the hardware and firmware of our devices to reliably execute these algorithms in the exacting conditions of real‐life deployments. We describe validation of the performance and reliability of our system using deployment results for a mission in Gorongosa National Park (Mozambique) to monitor two species in their natural habitat: the waterbuck and the African buffalo. We present movement data and snapshots of animal point‐of‐view videos collected by 14 fully operational devices collared on 10 waterbucks and 4 buffaloes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-4959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rob.21891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accelerometers ; Algorithms ; Batteries ; Buffalo ; Communities ; Community ecology ; Data exchange ; Data transmission ; Detection ; Ecological monitoring ; Electronic devices ; Energy consumption ; environmental monitoring ; Firmware ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Mobile ad hoc networks ; National parks ; Remote sensing ; sensor networks ; Sensors ; Video transmission ; Wireless communications ; Wireless networks</subject><ispartof>Journal of field robotics, 2019-09, Vol.36 (6), p.1141-1165</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-7aeee00336b0c4dc74487fa20f436ed00cc0da7baa3ca9fdeb333cc556b6a0f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-7aeee00336b0c4dc74487fa20f436ed00cc0da7baa3ca9fdeb333cc556b6a0f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5328-3871 ; 0000-0002-8643-404X ; 0000-0003-2083-8102 ; 0000-0002-0035-0671</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frob.21891$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frob.21891$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Shinkyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aschenbach, Konrad H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Manjur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard, Naomi E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abernathy, Kyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepard, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Nuno C.</creatorcontrib><title>Animal‐borne wireless network: Remote imaging of community ecology</title><title>Journal of field robotics</title><description>This article describes the design, construction, and field‐testing of a standalone networked animal‐borne monitoring system conceived to study community ecology remotely. The system consists of an assemblage of identical battery‐powered sensing devices with wireless communication capabilities that are each collar‐mounted on a study animal and together form a mobile ad hoc network. The sensing modalities of each device include high‐definition video, inertial accelerometry, and location resolved via a global positioning system module. Our system is conceived to use information exchange across the network to enable the devices to jointly decide without supervision when and how to use each sensing modality. The ultimate goal is to extend battery life while making sure that important events are appropriately documented. This requires judicious use of highly informative but power‐hungry sensing modalities, such as video, because battery capacity is constrained by stringent weight and dimension restrictions. We have proposed algorithms to regulate sensing rates, data transmission among devices, and triggering for video recording based on location and animal group movements and configuration. We have also developed the hardware and firmware of our devices to reliably execute these algorithms in the exacting conditions of real‐life deployments. We describe validation of the performance and reliability of our system using deployment results for a mission in Gorongosa National Park (Mozambique) to monitor two species in their natural habitat: the waterbuck and the African buffalo. We present movement data and snapshots of animal point‐of‐view videos collected by 14 fully operational devices collared on 10 waterbucks and 4 buffaloes.</description><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Batteries</subject><subject>Buffalo</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Data exchange</subject><subject>Data transmission</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Electronic devices</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Firmware</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Mobile ad hoc networks</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>sensor networks</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Video transmission</subject><subject>Wireless communications</subject><subject>Wireless networks</subject><issn>1556-4959</issn><issn>1556-4967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8isWKRdvyI07Arb6RKlSpYW44zqVKSuNipquz4BL6RL8EQxI7VzOLcmatDyDmFCQVgU2fzCaOzjB6QEU0SGYtMpod_e5IdkxPvNwCCz7JkRG7nbdXo-vP9I7euxWhfOazR-6jFbm_d61W0wsZ2GAVqXbXryJaRsU2za6uuj9DY2q77U3JU6trj2e8ck5f7u-ebx3ixfHi6mS9iI4DRONWICMC5zMGIwqRCzNJSMygFl1gAGAOFTnOtudFZWWDOOTcmNM-lhpLyMbkY7m6dfduh79TG7lwbXirGZMaEZGkSqMuBMs5677BUWxfau15RUN-SVJCkfiQFdjqw-6rG_n9QrZbXQ-ILr3VqgA</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Park, Shinkyu</creator><creator>Aschenbach, Konrad H.</creator><creator>Ahmed, Manjur</creator><creator>Scott, William L.</creator><creator>Leonard, Naomi E.</creator><creator>Abernathy, Kyler</creator><creator>Marshall, Greg</creator><creator>Shepard, Mike</creator><creator>Martins, Nuno C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-3871</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8643-404X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2083-8102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-0671</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Animal‐borne wireless network: Remote imaging of community ecology</title><author>Park, Shinkyu ; Aschenbach, Konrad H. ; Ahmed, Manjur ; Scott, William L. ; Leonard, Naomi E. ; Abernathy, Kyler ; Marshall, Greg ; Shepard, Mike ; Martins, Nuno C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-7aeee00336b0c4dc74487fa20f436ed00cc0da7baa3ca9fdeb333cc556b6a0f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Batteries</topic><topic>Buffalo</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Data exchange</topic><topic>Data transmission</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Electronic devices</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Firmware</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Mobile ad hoc networks</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>sensor networks</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Video transmission</topic><topic>Wireless communications</topic><topic>Wireless networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Shinkyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aschenbach, Konrad H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Manjur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard, Naomi E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abernathy, Kyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepard, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Nuno C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of field robotics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Shinkyu</au><au>Aschenbach, Konrad H.</au><au>Ahmed, Manjur</au><au>Scott, William L.</au><au>Leonard, Naomi E.</au><au>Abernathy, Kyler</au><au>Marshall, Greg</au><au>Shepard, Mike</au><au>Martins, Nuno C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Animal‐borne wireless network: Remote imaging of community ecology</atitle><jtitle>Journal of field robotics</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1141</spage><epage>1165</epage><pages>1141-1165</pages><issn>1556-4959</issn><eissn>1556-4967</eissn><abstract>This article describes the design, construction, and field‐testing of a standalone networked animal‐borne monitoring system conceived to study community ecology remotely. The system consists of an assemblage of identical battery‐powered sensing devices with wireless communication capabilities that are each collar‐mounted on a study animal and together form a mobile ad hoc network. The sensing modalities of each device include high‐definition video, inertial accelerometry, and location resolved via a global positioning system module. Our system is conceived to use information exchange across the network to enable the devices to jointly decide without supervision when and how to use each sensing modality. The ultimate goal is to extend battery life while making sure that important events are appropriately documented. This requires judicious use of highly informative but power‐hungry sensing modalities, such as video, because battery capacity is constrained by stringent weight and dimension restrictions. We have proposed algorithms to regulate sensing rates, data transmission among devices, and triggering for video recording based on location and animal group movements and configuration. We have also developed the hardware and firmware of our devices to reliably execute these algorithms in the exacting conditions of real‐life deployments. We describe validation of the performance and reliability of our system using deployment results for a mission in Gorongosa National Park (Mozambique) to monitor two species in their natural habitat: the waterbuck and the African buffalo. We present movement data and snapshots of animal point‐of‐view videos collected by 14 fully operational devices collared on 10 waterbucks and 4 buffaloes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/rob.21891</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-3871</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8643-404X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2083-8102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-0671</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1556-4959 |
ispartof | Journal of field robotics, 2019-09, Vol.36 (6), p.1141-1165 |
issn | 1556-4959 1556-4967 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2269246275 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Accelerometers Algorithms Batteries Buffalo Communities Community ecology Data exchange Data transmission Detection Ecological monitoring Electronic devices Energy consumption environmental monitoring Firmware Global positioning systems GPS Mobile ad hoc networks National parks Remote sensing sensor networks Sensors Video transmission Wireless communications Wireless networks |
title | Animal‐borne wireless network: Remote imaging of community ecology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T06%3A19%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Animal%E2%80%90borne%20wireless%20network:%20Remote%20imaging%20of%20community%20ecology&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20field%20robotics&rft.au=Park,%20Shinkyu&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1141&rft.epage=1165&rft.pages=1141-1165&rft.issn=1556-4959&rft.eissn=1556-4967&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rob.21891&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2269246275%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2269246275&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |