Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan
This article maps the controversy over whether and where glaciers once flowed through the Japanese Alps. Focusing on the first decades of this century-long debate, we examine how a small-scale revolution in geological thinking was shaped by the particular institutional constraints and alpine enthusi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Historical studies in the natural sciences 2019-06, Vol.49 (3), p.273-299 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 299 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 273 |
container_title | Historical studies in the natural sciences |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | FEDMAN, DAVID HOOD, MARTIN |
description | This article maps the controversy over whether and where glaciers once flowed through the Japanese Alps. Focusing on the first decades of this century-long debate, we examine how a small-scale revolution in geological thinking was shaped by the particular institutional constraints and alpine enthusiasms of Meiji Japan (1868–1912). To do so, we turn to Yamasaki Naomasa and Kojima Usui—close friends and pioneers in their respective fields of geography and mountaineering—to show how alpinism helped to launch glaciology as a scientific discipline in Japan. By chronicling the hunt for evidence of ancient glaciers, we further reveal how the Japanese Alpine Club formed a vital forum for the glacier debate pending the emergence of a community of professional glaciologists. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1525/hsns.2019.49.3.273 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2269018973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26856431</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26856431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j205t-d3aa7112842635fe2b4265c21d1082ddc65ca239bf55739bd230455e89534cbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jU1LAzEURYMoWKsLt4JQ6Hpi3nt5mWQp9aOFghsFd0NmkkGH2qmTdNF_70CLq3suHO4V4g6UBEZ--ErbJFGBk9pJkljSmZiAI1eAxc_zfwa4FFcpdUoZ5SxPxO2yz5vD7CnWPscwWzXxWly0fpPizSmn4uPl-X2xLNZvr6vF47roUHEuAnlfAqDVaIjbiPUI3CAEUBZDaMbikVzdMpdjBCSlmaN1TLqpA03F_Li7G_rffUy56vr9sB0vK0TjFFhX0mjdH60u5X6odsP3jx8OFRrLRhPQH5ynQ0I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2269018973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>FEDMAN, DAVID ; HOOD, MARTIN</creator><creatorcontrib>FEDMAN, DAVID ; HOOD, MARTIN</creatorcontrib><description>This article maps the controversy over whether and where glaciers once flowed through the Japanese Alps. Focusing on the first decades of this century-long debate, we examine how a small-scale revolution in geological thinking was shaped by the particular institutional constraints and alpine enthusiasms of Meiji Japan (1868–1912). To do so, we turn to Yamasaki Naomasa and Kojima Usui—close friends and pioneers in their respective fields of geography and mountaineering—to show how alpinism helped to launch glaciology as a scientific discipline in Japan. By chronicling the hunt for evidence of ancient glaciers, we further reveal how the Japanese Alpine Club formed a vital forum for the glacier debate pending the emergence of a community of professional glaciologists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-1811</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-182X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/hsns.2019.49.3.273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Debates ; Geography ; Glaciers ; Glaciology ; Institutional constraints ; Mountaineering</subject><ispartof>Historical studies in the natural sciences, 2019-06, Vol.49 (3), p.273-299</ispartof><rights>2019 by the Regents of the University of California</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Books Division Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26856431$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26856431$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>FEDMAN, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOOD, MARTIN</creatorcontrib><title>Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan</title><title>Historical studies in the natural sciences</title><description>This article maps the controversy over whether and where glaciers once flowed through the Japanese Alps. Focusing on the first decades of this century-long debate, we examine how a small-scale revolution in geological thinking was shaped by the particular institutional constraints and alpine enthusiasms of Meiji Japan (1868–1912). To do so, we turn to Yamasaki Naomasa and Kojima Usui—close friends and pioneers in their respective fields of geography and mountaineering—to show how alpinism helped to launch glaciology as a scientific discipline in Japan. By chronicling the hunt for evidence of ancient glaciers, we further reveal how the Japanese Alpine Club formed a vital forum for the glacier debate pending the emergence of a community of professional glaciologists.</description><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Glaciers</subject><subject>Glaciology</subject><subject>Institutional constraints</subject><subject>Mountaineering</subject><issn>1939-1811</issn><issn>1939-182X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9jU1LAzEURYMoWKsLt4JQ6Hpi3nt5mWQp9aOFghsFd0NmkkGH2qmTdNF_70CLq3suHO4V4g6UBEZ--ErbJFGBk9pJkljSmZiAI1eAxc_zfwa4FFcpdUoZ5SxPxO2yz5vD7CnWPscwWzXxWly0fpPizSmn4uPl-X2xLNZvr6vF47roUHEuAnlfAqDVaIjbiPUI3CAEUBZDaMbikVzdMpdjBCSlmaN1TLqpA03F_Li7G_rffUy56vr9sB0vK0TjFFhX0mjdH60u5X6odsP3jx8OFRrLRhPQH5ynQ0I</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>FEDMAN, DAVID</creator><creator>HOOD, MARTIN</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>University of California Press Books Division</general><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Hotly Debated Ice</title><author>FEDMAN, DAVID ; HOOD, MARTIN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j205t-d3aa7112842635fe2b4265c21d1082ddc65ca239bf55739bd230455e89534cbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Glaciers</topic><topic>Glaciology</topic><topic>Institutional constraints</topic><topic>Mountaineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FEDMAN, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOOD, MARTIN</creatorcontrib><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Historical studies in the natural sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FEDMAN, DAVID</au><au>HOOD, MARTIN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan</atitle><jtitle>Historical studies in the natural sciences</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>273-299</pages><issn>1939-1811</issn><eissn>1939-182X</eissn><abstract>This article maps the controversy over whether and where glaciers once flowed through the Japanese Alps. Focusing on the first decades of this century-long debate, we examine how a small-scale revolution in geological thinking was shaped by the particular institutional constraints and alpine enthusiasms of Meiji Japan (1868–1912). To do so, we turn to Yamasaki Naomasa and Kojima Usui—close friends and pioneers in their respective fields of geography and mountaineering—to show how alpinism helped to launch glaciology as a scientific discipline in Japan. By chronicling the hunt for evidence of ancient glaciers, we further reveal how the Japanese Alpine Club formed a vital forum for the glacier debate pending the emergence of a community of professional glaciologists.</abstract><cop>Berkeley</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/hsns.2019.49.3.273</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1939-1811 |
ispartof | Historical studies in the natural sciences, 2019-06, Vol.49 (3), p.273-299 |
issn | 1939-1811 1939-182X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2269018973 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Debates Geography Glaciers Glaciology Institutional constraints Mountaineering |
title | Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A39%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hotly%20Debated%20Ice:%20Scholar%20Alpinism%20and%20the%20Great%20Glacier%20Controversy%20in%20Modern%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Historical%20studies%20in%20the%20natural%20sciences&rft.au=FEDMAN,%20DAVID&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=273-299&rft.issn=1939-1811&rft.eissn=1939-182X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/hsns.2019.49.3.273&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26856431%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2269018973&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26856431&rfr_iscdi=true |