Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan

This article maps the controversy over whether and where glaciers once flowed through the Japanese Alps. Focusing on the first decades of this century-long debate, we examine how a small-scale revolution in geological thinking was shaped by the particular institutional constraints and alpine enthusi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Historical studies in the natural sciences 2019-06, Vol.49 (3), p.273-299
Hauptverfasser: FEDMAN, DAVID, HOOD, MARTIN
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 299
container_issue 3
container_start_page 273
container_title Historical studies in the natural sciences
container_volume 49
creator FEDMAN, DAVID
HOOD, MARTIN
description This article maps the controversy over whether and where glaciers once flowed through the Japanese Alps. Focusing on the first decades of this century-long debate, we examine how a small-scale revolution in geological thinking was shaped by the particular institutional constraints and alpine enthusiasms of Meiji Japan (1868–1912). To do so, we turn to Yamasaki Naomasa and Kojima Usui—close friends and pioneers in their respective fields of geography and mountaineering—to show how alpinism helped to launch glaciology as a scientific discipline in Japan. By chronicling the hunt for evidence of ancient glaciers, we further reveal how the Japanese Alpine Club formed a vital forum for the glacier debate pending the emergence of a community of professional glaciologists.
doi_str_mv 10.1525/hsns.2019.49.3.273
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2269018973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26856431</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26856431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j205t-d3aa7112842635fe2b4265c21d1082ddc65ca239bf55739bd230455e89534cbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jU1LAzEURYMoWKsLt4JQ6Hpi3nt5mWQp9aOFghsFd0NmkkGH2qmTdNF_70CLq3suHO4V4g6UBEZ--ErbJFGBk9pJkljSmZiAI1eAxc_zfwa4FFcpdUoZ5SxPxO2yz5vD7CnWPscwWzXxWly0fpPizSmn4uPl-X2xLNZvr6vF47roUHEuAnlfAqDVaIjbiPUI3CAEUBZDaMbikVzdMpdjBCSlmaN1TLqpA03F_Li7G_rffUy56vr9sB0vK0TjFFhX0mjdH60u5X6odsP3jx8OFRrLRhPQH5ynQ0I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2269018973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>FEDMAN, DAVID ; HOOD, MARTIN</creator><creatorcontrib>FEDMAN, DAVID ; HOOD, MARTIN</creatorcontrib><description>This article maps the controversy over whether and where glaciers once flowed through the Japanese Alps. Focusing on the first decades of this century-long debate, we examine how a small-scale revolution in geological thinking was shaped by the particular institutional constraints and alpine enthusiasms of Meiji Japan (1868–1912). To do so, we turn to Yamasaki Naomasa and Kojima Usui—close friends and pioneers in their respective fields of geography and mountaineering—to show how alpinism helped to launch glaciology as a scientific discipline in Japan. By chronicling the hunt for evidence of ancient glaciers, we further reveal how the Japanese Alpine Club formed a vital forum for the glacier debate pending the emergence of a community of professional glaciologists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-1811</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-182X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/hsns.2019.49.3.273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Debates ; Geography ; Glaciers ; Glaciology ; Institutional constraints ; Mountaineering</subject><ispartof>Historical studies in the natural sciences, 2019-06, Vol.49 (3), p.273-299</ispartof><rights>2019 by the Regents of the University of California</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Books Division Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26856431$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26856431$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>FEDMAN, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOOD, MARTIN</creatorcontrib><title>Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan</title><title>Historical studies in the natural sciences</title><description>This article maps the controversy over whether and where glaciers once flowed through the Japanese Alps. Focusing on the first decades of this century-long debate, we examine how a small-scale revolution in geological thinking was shaped by the particular institutional constraints and alpine enthusiasms of Meiji Japan (1868–1912). To do so, we turn to Yamasaki Naomasa and Kojima Usui—close friends and pioneers in their respective fields of geography and mountaineering—to show how alpinism helped to launch glaciology as a scientific discipline in Japan. By chronicling the hunt for evidence of ancient glaciers, we further reveal how the Japanese Alpine Club formed a vital forum for the glacier debate pending the emergence of a community of professional glaciologists.</description><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Glaciers</subject><subject>Glaciology</subject><subject>Institutional constraints</subject><subject>Mountaineering</subject><issn>1939-1811</issn><issn>1939-182X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9jU1LAzEURYMoWKsLt4JQ6Hpi3nt5mWQp9aOFghsFd0NmkkGH2qmTdNF_70CLq3suHO4V4g6UBEZ--ErbJFGBk9pJkljSmZiAI1eAxc_zfwa4FFcpdUoZ5SxPxO2yz5vD7CnWPscwWzXxWly0fpPizSmn4uPl-X2xLNZvr6vF47roUHEuAnlfAqDVaIjbiPUI3CAEUBZDaMbikVzdMpdjBCSlmaN1TLqpA03F_Li7G_rffUy56vr9sB0vK0TjFFhX0mjdH60u5X6odsP3jx8OFRrLRhPQH5ynQ0I</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>FEDMAN, DAVID</creator><creator>HOOD, MARTIN</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>University of California Press Books Division</general><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Hotly Debated Ice</title><author>FEDMAN, DAVID ; HOOD, MARTIN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j205t-d3aa7112842635fe2b4265c21d1082ddc65ca239bf55739bd230455e89534cbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Glaciers</topic><topic>Glaciology</topic><topic>Institutional constraints</topic><topic>Mountaineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FEDMAN, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOOD, MARTIN</creatorcontrib><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Historical studies in the natural sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FEDMAN, DAVID</au><au>HOOD, MARTIN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan</atitle><jtitle>Historical studies in the natural sciences</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>273-299</pages><issn>1939-1811</issn><eissn>1939-182X</eissn><abstract>This article maps the controversy over whether and where glaciers once flowed through the Japanese Alps. Focusing on the first decades of this century-long debate, we examine how a small-scale revolution in geological thinking was shaped by the particular institutional constraints and alpine enthusiasms of Meiji Japan (1868–1912). To do so, we turn to Yamasaki Naomasa and Kojima Usui—close friends and pioneers in their respective fields of geography and mountaineering—to show how alpinism helped to launch glaciology as a scientific discipline in Japan. By chronicling the hunt for evidence of ancient glaciers, we further reveal how the Japanese Alpine Club formed a vital forum for the glacier debate pending the emergence of a community of professional glaciologists.</abstract><cop>Berkeley</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/hsns.2019.49.3.273</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1939-1811
ispartof Historical studies in the natural sciences, 2019-06, Vol.49 (3), p.273-299
issn 1939-1811
1939-182X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2269018973
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Debates
Geography
Glaciers
Glaciology
Institutional constraints
Mountaineering
title Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A39%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hotly%20Debated%20Ice:%20Scholar%20Alpinism%20and%20the%20Great%20Glacier%20Controversy%20in%20Modern%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Historical%20studies%20in%20the%20natural%20sciences&rft.au=FEDMAN,%20DAVID&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=273-299&rft.issn=1939-1811&rft.eissn=1939-182X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/hsns.2019.49.3.273&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26856431%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2269018973&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26856431&rfr_iscdi=true