Assessment of coverage quality of sensor networks for IoT applications
The advances in sensors and IOT technologies has prompted a plethora of applications, many of them require a large number of sensors distributed over a large geographical area. These sensors collectively form a network with a sole purpose of providing the application with high fidelity representatio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Peer-to-peer networking and applications 2020, Vol.13 (1), p.320-332 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 332 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 320 |
| container_title | Peer-to-peer networking and applications |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Elsaadany, Amr Khalil, Khalid |
| description | The advances in sensors and IOT technologies has prompted a plethora of applications, many of them require a large number of sensors distributed over a large geographical area. These sensors collectively form a network with a sole purpose of providing the application with high fidelity representation of the actual physical world. The Quality of Coverage (QoC) metric is typically refers to how well this representation is. The issue of coverage has been studied in the literatures, however, most research focused on various aspects of physical sensor network coverage with less attention to the diverse requirements of the applications which use the underlying sensor layer. In this paper, we introduce multiple metrics to measure the quality of coverage which can then be tailored to meet the requirements of different types of applications. In addition, we propose algorithms to measure these metrics and use evaluation techniques to demonstrate and test the performance of proposed algorithms. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12083-019-00796-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2268459880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2268459880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-24b246a89e0cc204944157b6c5821401af91b97e34d6798f490c2960f02628903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wNOC5-hkNptNjqVYLRS81HNIY7ZsbTfbzFbpv3frit48zbzhvTfwMXYr4F4AlA8kEHTOQRjeS6M4nrGRMLniShZw_rtLvGRXRBsAJfICR2w2IQpEu9B0WawyHz9CcuuQ7Q9uW3fH041CQzFlTeg-Y3qnrOrFPC4z17bb2ruujg1ds4vKbSnc_Mwxe509LqfPfPHyNJ9OFtznwnQc5QqlctoE8B5BGilFUa6ULzQKCcJVRqxMGXL5pkqjK2nAo1FQASrUBvIxuxt62xT3h0Cd3cRDavqXFlFpWRitTy4cXD5FohQq26Z659LRCrAnXnbgZXte9puXxT6UDyHqzc06pL_qf1JfPxdsCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2268459880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of coverage quality of sensor networks for IoT applications</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Elsaadany, Amr ; Khalil, Khalid</creator><creatorcontrib>Elsaadany, Amr ; Khalil, Khalid</creatorcontrib><description>The advances in sensors and IOT technologies has prompted a plethora of applications, many of them require a large number of sensors distributed over a large geographical area. These sensors collectively form a network with a sole purpose of providing the application with high fidelity representation of the actual physical world. The Quality of Coverage (QoC) metric is typically refers to how well this representation is. The issue of coverage has been studied in the literatures, however, most research focused on various aspects of physical sensor network coverage with less attention to the diverse requirements of the applications which use the underlying sensor layer. In this paper, we introduce multiple metrics to measure the quality of coverage which can then be tailored to meet the requirements of different types of applications. In addition, we propose algorithms to measure these metrics and use evaluation techniques to demonstrate and test the performance of proposed algorithms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-6442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-6450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12083-019-00796-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Communications Engineering ; Computer Communication Networks ; Engineering ; Geographical distribution ; Information Systems and Communication Service ; Networks ; Quality assessment ; Representations ; Sensors ; Signal,Image and Speech Processing</subject><ispartof>Peer-to-peer networking and applications, 2020, Vol.13 (1), p.320-332</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-24b246a89e0cc204944157b6c5821401af91b97e34d6798f490c2960f02628903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-24b246a89e0cc204944157b6c5821401af91b97e34d6798f490c2960f02628903</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4680-762X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12083-019-00796-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12083-019-00796-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elsaadany, Amr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Khalid</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of coverage quality of sensor networks for IoT applications</title><title>Peer-to-peer networking and applications</title><addtitle>Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl</addtitle><description>The advances in sensors and IOT technologies has prompted a plethora of applications, many of them require a large number of sensors distributed over a large geographical area. These sensors collectively form a network with a sole purpose of providing the application with high fidelity representation of the actual physical world. The Quality of Coverage (QoC) metric is typically refers to how well this representation is. The issue of coverage has been studied in the literatures, however, most research focused on various aspects of physical sensor network coverage with less attention to the diverse requirements of the applications which use the underlying sensor layer. In this paper, we introduce multiple metrics to measure the quality of coverage which can then be tailored to meet the requirements of different types of applications. In addition, we propose algorithms to measure these metrics and use evaluation techniques to demonstrate and test the performance of proposed algorithms.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Communications Engineering</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Information Systems and Communication Service</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Signal,Image and Speech Processing</subject><issn>1936-6442</issn><issn>1936-6450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wNOC5-hkNptNjqVYLRS81HNIY7ZsbTfbzFbpv3frit48zbzhvTfwMXYr4F4AlA8kEHTOQRjeS6M4nrGRMLniShZw_rtLvGRXRBsAJfICR2w2IQpEu9B0WawyHz9CcuuQ7Q9uW3fH041CQzFlTeg-Y3qnrOrFPC4z17bb2ruujg1ds4vKbSnc_Mwxe509LqfPfPHyNJ9OFtznwnQc5QqlctoE8B5BGilFUa6ULzQKCcJVRqxMGXL5pkqjK2nAo1FQASrUBvIxuxt62xT3h0Cd3cRDavqXFlFpWRitTy4cXD5FohQq26Z659LRCrAnXnbgZXte9puXxT6UDyHqzc06pL_qf1JfPxdsCw</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Elsaadany, Amr</creator><creator>Khalil, Khalid</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4680-762X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Assessment of coverage quality of sensor networks for IoT applications</title><author>Elsaadany, Amr ; Khalil, Khalid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-24b246a89e0cc204944157b6c5821401af91b97e34d6798f490c2960f02628903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Communications Engineering</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Information Systems and Communication Service</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Signal,Image and Speech Processing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elsaadany, Amr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Khalid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Peer-to-peer networking and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elsaadany, Amr</au><au>Khalil, Khalid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of coverage quality of sensor networks for IoT applications</atitle><jtitle>Peer-to-peer networking and applications</jtitle><stitle>Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl</stitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>320</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>320-332</pages><issn>1936-6442</issn><eissn>1936-6450</eissn><abstract>The advances in sensors and IOT technologies has prompted a plethora of applications, many of them require a large number of sensors distributed over a large geographical area. These sensors collectively form a network with a sole purpose of providing the application with high fidelity representation of the actual physical world. The Quality of Coverage (QoC) metric is typically refers to how well this representation is. The issue of coverage has been studied in the literatures, however, most research focused on various aspects of physical sensor network coverage with less attention to the diverse requirements of the applications which use the underlying sensor layer. In this paper, we introduce multiple metrics to measure the quality of coverage which can then be tailored to meet the requirements of different types of applications. In addition, we propose algorithms to measure these metrics and use evaluation techniques to demonstrate and test the performance of proposed algorithms.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12083-019-00796-2</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4680-762X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1936-6442 |
| ispartof | Peer-to-peer networking and applications, 2020, Vol.13 (1), p.320-332 |
| issn | 1936-6442 1936-6450 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2268459880 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Algorithms Communications Engineering Computer Communication Networks Engineering Geographical distribution Information Systems and Communication Service Networks Quality assessment Representations Sensors Signal,Image and Speech Processing |
| title | Assessment of coverage quality of sensor networks for IoT applications |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A56%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20coverage%20quality%20of%20sensor%20networks%20for%20IoT%20applications&rft.jtitle=Peer-to-peer%20networking%20and%20applications&rft.au=Elsaadany,%20Amr&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=320&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=320-332&rft.issn=1936-6442&rft.eissn=1936-6450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12083-019-00796-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2268459880%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2268459880&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |