A network model for primary production highlights linkages between salmonid populations and autochthonous resources

Spatial variation in fish densities across river networks suggests that the influence of food and habitat resources on assemblages varies greatly throughout watersheds. Conceptual models predict that in situ primary production should vary with river characteristics, but the influence of autochthonou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) D.C), 2018-03, Vol.9 (3), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Saunders, W. Carl, Bouwes, Nicolaas, McHugh, Peter, Jordan, Chris E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 3
container_start_page
container_title Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)
container_volume 9
creator Saunders, W. Carl
Bouwes, Nicolaas
McHugh, Peter
Jordan, Chris E.
description Spatial variation in fish densities across river networks suggests that the influence of food and habitat resources on assemblages varies greatly throughout watersheds. Conceptual models predict that in situ primary production should vary with river characteristics, but the influence of autochthonous resource availability on the capacity for river reaches to support fish is poorly understood. We estimated primary production throughout the South Fork and Middle Fork of the John Day River, Oregon, by measuring diel cycles in dissolved oxygen (DO) during July 2013. Using these data, we (1) evaluated the extent to which juvenile salmonid abundance and resource limitation correlated with areas of high gross primary production (GPP), (2) developed models to predict GPP from both site‐level measurements and remotely sensed data, and (3) made predictions of GPP across the entirety of the Middle Fork John Day River (MFJD) network and assessed the utility of these spatially continuous predictions for describing variation fish densities at broad scales. We produced reliable estimates of GPP at sites where DO loggers were deployed using measurements of solar exposure, water temperature, and conductivity measured at each site, as well as surrogates for these data estimated from remote sensing data sources. Estimates of GPP across fish sampling sites explained, on average, 58–63% of the variation in juvenile salmonid densities during the summer sampling period, and 51–83% during the fall sampling period, while continuous network predictions of GPP explained 44% of the variation in fish densities across 29 km of the MFJD. Further, GPP explained nearly half of the variation in juvenile steelhead dietary resource limitation, as inferred from bioenergetics modeling results. These results comprise a first effort at quantifying variation in autochthonous production across an entire river network and, importantly, provide a much‐needed food‐web context for guiding more effective fish and habitat management.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ecs2.2131
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2268301390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2268301390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-f0921f930e70c55dd5c4123eca8d27ad14685b73f4de53d71e30436b99ad05be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EElXpwD-wxMSQ1h9xk4xVVShSJQZgthz70qRN7WInqvrvcWgHFk463Q3PfbwvQo-UTCkhbAY6sCmjnN6gEaOCJHnBxO2f_h5NQtiRGCLN8pSPUFhgC93J-T0-OAMtrpzHR98clD_H6kyvu8ZZXDfbuo3ZBdw2dq-2EHAZBwEsDqo9ONsYfHTHvlUDH7CyBqu-c7ruamddH7CH4HqvITygu0q1ASbXOkZfL6vP5TrZvL--LRebRHPOaFKRgtGq4AQyooUwRuiUMg5a5YZlytB0nosy41VqQHCTUeAk5fOyKJQhogQ-Rk-XvVHHdw-hk7v4gI0nJWPznBPKCxKp5wulvQvBQyWv8iUlcrBVDrbKwdbIzi7sqWnh_D8oV8sP9jvxA3ube28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2268301390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A network model for primary production highlights linkages between salmonid populations and autochthonous resources</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Saunders, W. Carl ; Bouwes, Nicolaas ; McHugh, Peter ; Jordan, Chris E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saunders, W. Carl ; Bouwes, Nicolaas ; McHugh, Peter ; Jordan, Chris E.</creatorcontrib><description>Spatial variation in fish densities across river networks suggests that the influence of food and habitat resources on assemblages varies greatly throughout watersheds. Conceptual models predict that in situ primary production should vary with river characteristics, but the influence of autochthonous resource availability on the capacity for river reaches to support fish is poorly understood. We estimated primary production throughout the South Fork and Middle Fork of the John Day River, Oregon, by measuring diel cycles in dissolved oxygen (DO) during July 2013. Using these data, we (1) evaluated the extent to which juvenile salmonid abundance and resource limitation correlated with areas of high gross primary production (GPP), (2) developed models to predict GPP from both site‐level measurements and remotely sensed data, and (3) made predictions of GPP across the entirety of the Middle Fork John Day River (MFJD) network and assessed the utility of these spatially continuous predictions for describing variation fish densities at broad scales. We produced reliable estimates of GPP at sites where DO loggers were deployed using measurements of solar exposure, water temperature, and conductivity measured at each site, as well as surrogates for these data estimated from remote sensing data sources. Estimates of GPP across fish sampling sites explained, on average, 58–63% of the variation in juvenile salmonid densities during the summer sampling period, and 51–83% during the fall sampling period, while continuous network predictions of GPP explained 44% of the variation in fish densities across 29 km of the MFJD. Further, GPP explained nearly half of the variation in juvenile steelhead dietary resource limitation, as inferred from bioenergetics modeling results. These results comprise a first effort at quantifying variation in autochthonous production across an entire river network and, importantly, provide a much‐needed food‐web context for guiding more effective fish and habitat management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bioenergetics ; conductivity ; Creeks &amp; streams ; Diet ; Dissolved oxygen ; Ecosystems ; Estimates ; Fish ; Fisheries management ; Habitats ; network model ; Oncorhynchus mykiss ; Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ; Primary production ; Productivity ; Remote sensing ; Resource availability ; River ecology ; River networks ; Rivers ; riverscapes ; Salmon ; Sampling ; solar radiation ; stream salmonids ; Subsidies ; Water temperature ; Watershed management ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2018-03, Vol.9 (3), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2018 Saunders et al.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-f0921f930e70c55dd5c4123eca8d27ad14685b73f4de53d71e30436b99ad05be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-f0921f930e70c55dd5c4123eca8d27ad14685b73f4de53d71e30436b99ad05be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fecs2.2131$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fecs2.2131$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saunders, W. Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwes, Nicolaas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHugh, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Chris E.</creatorcontrib><title>A network model for primary production highlights linkages between salmonid populations and autochthonous resources</title><title>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</title><description>Spatial variation in fish densities across river networks suggests that the influence of food and habitat resources on assemblages varies greatly throughout watersheds. Conceptual models predict that in situ primary production should vary with river characteristics, but the influence of autochthonous resource availability on the capacity for river reaches to support fish is poorly understood. We estimated primary production throughout the South Fork and Middle Fork of the John Day River, Oregon, by measuring diel cycles in dissolved oxygen (DO) during July 2013. Using these data, we (1) evaluated the extent to which juvenile salmonid abundance and resource limitation correlated with areas of high gross primary production (GPP), (2) developed models to predict GPP from both site‐level measurements and remotely sensed data, and (3) made predictions of GPP across the entirety of the Middle Fork John Day River (MFJD) network and assessed the utility of these spatially continuous predictions for describing variation fish densities at broad scales. We produced reliable estimates of GPP at sites where DO loggers were deployed using measurements of solar exposure, water temperature, and conductivity measured at each site, as well as surrogates for these data estimated from remote sensing data sources. Estimates of GPP across fish sampling sites explained, on average, 58–63% of the variation in juvenile salmonid densities during the summer sampling period, and 51–83% during the fall sampling period, while continuous network predictions of GPP explained 44% of the variation in fish densities across 29 km of the MFJD. Further, GPP explained nearly half of the variation in juvenile steelhead dietary resource limitation, as inferred from bioenergetics modeling results. These results comprise a first effort at quantifying variation in autochthonous production across an entire river network and, importantly, provide a much‐needed food‐web context for guiding more effective fish and habitat management.</description><subject>Bioenergetics</subject><subject>conductivity</subject><subject>Creeks &amp; streams</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dissolved oxygen</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>network model</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus mykiss</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>River networks</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>riverscapes</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>solar radiation</subject><subject>stream salmonids</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>2150-8925</issn><issn>2150-8925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EElXpwD-wxMSQ1h9xk4xVVShSJQZgthz70qRN7WInqvrvcWgHFk463Q3PfbwvQo-UTCkhbAY6sCmjnN6gEaOCJHnBxO2f_h5NQtiRGCLN8pSPUFhgC93J-T0-OAMtrpzHR98clD_H6kyvu8ZZXDfbuo3ZBdw2dq-2EHAZBwEsDqo9ONsYfHTHvlUDH7CyBqu-c7ruamddH7CH4HqvITygu0q1ASbXOkZfL6vP5TrZvL--LRebRHPOaFKRgtGq4AQyooUwRuiUMg5a5YZlytB0nosy41VqQHCTUeAk5fOyKJQhogQ-Rk-XvVHHdw-hk7v4gI0nJWPznBPKCxKp5wulvQvBQyWv8iUlcrBVDrbKwdbIzi7sqWnh_D8oV8sP9jvxA3ube28</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Saunders, W. Carl</creator><creator>Bouwes, Nicolaas</creator><creator>McHugh, Peter</creator><creator>Jordan, Chris E.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>A network model for primary production highlights linkages between salmonid populations and autochthonous resources</title><author>Saunders, W. Carl ; Bouwes, Nicolaas ; McHugh, Peter ; Jordan, Chris E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-f0921f930e70c55dd5c4123eca8d27ad14685b73f4de53d71e30436b99ad05be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bioenergetics</topic><topic>conductivity</topic><topic>Creeks &amp; streams</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dissolved oxygen</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>network model</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus mykiss</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>River networks</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>riverscapes</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>solar radiation</topic><topic>stream salmonids</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saunders, W. Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwes, Nicolaas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHugh, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Chris E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saunders, W. Carl</au><au>Bouwes, Nicolaas</au><au>McHugh, Peter</au><au>Jordan, Chris E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A network model for primary production highlights linkages between salmonid populations and autochthonous resources</atitle><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2150-8925</issn><eissn>2150-8925</eissn><abstract>Spatial variation in fish densities across river networks suggests that the influence of food and habitat resources on assemblages varies greatly throughout watersheds. Conceptual models predict that in situ primary production should vary with river characteristics, but the influence of autochthonous resource availability on the capacity for river reaches to support fish is poorly understood. We estimated primary production throughout the South Fork and Middle Fork of the John Day River, Oregon, by measuring diel cycles in dissolved oxygen (DO) during July 2013. Using these data, we (1) evaluated the extent to which juvenile salmonid abundance and resource limitation correlated with areas of high gross primary production (GPP), (2) developed models to predict GPP from both site‐level measurements and remotely sensed data, and (3) made predictions of GPP across the entirety of the Middle Fork John Day River (MFJD) network and assessed the utility of these spatially continuous predictions for describing variation fish densities at broad scales. We produced reliable estimates of GPP at sites where DO loggers were deployed using measurements of solar exposure, water temperature, and conductivity measured at each site, as well as surrogates for these data estimated from remote sensing data sources. Estimates of GPP across fish sampling sites explained, on average, 58–63% of the variation in juvenile salmonid densities during the summer sampling period, and 51–83% during the fall sampling period, while continuous network predictions of GPP explained 44% of the variation in fish densities across 29 km of the MFJD. Further, GPP explained nearly half of the variation in juvenile steelhead dietary resource limitation, as inferred from bioenergetics modeling results. These results comprise a first effort at quantifying variation in autochthonous production across an entire river network and, importantly, provide a much‐needed food‐web context for guiding more effective fish and habitat management.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ecs2.2131</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2150-8925
ispartof Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2018-03, Vol.9 (3), p.n/a
issn 2150-8925
2150-8925
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2268301390
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Bioenergetics
conductivity
Creeks & streams
Diet
Dissolved oxygen
Ecosystems
Estimates
Fish
Fisheries management
Habitats
network model
Oncorhynchus mykiss
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha
Primary production
Productivity
Remote sensing
Resource availability
River ecology
River networks
Rivers
riverscapes
Salmon
Sampling
solar radiation
stream salmonids
Subsidies
Water temperature
Watershed management
Watersheds
title A network model for primary production highlights linkages between salmonid populations and autochthonous resources
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A17%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20network%20model%20for%20primary%20production%20highlights%20linkages%20between%20salmonid%20populations%20and%20autochthonous%20resources&rft.jtitle=Ecosphere%20(Washington,%20D.C)&rft.au=Saunders,%20W.%20Carl&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2150-8925&rft.eissn=2150-8925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecs2.2131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2268301390%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2268301390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true