Spatiotemporal changes in fungal growth and host responses of six yellow rust resistant near‐isogenic lines of wheat
The objective of the present study was to investigate to what extent the macroscopic phenotype of incompatible host–pathogen interactions reflects differences in fungal development and host responses at the histological level. This was done by conventional and advanced microscopic analysis of six wh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant pathology 2019-09, Vol.68 (7), p.1320-1330 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1330 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1320 |
container_title | Plant pathology |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Saleem, K. Sørensen, C. K. Labouriau, R. Hovmøller, M. S. |
description | The objective of the present study was to investigate to what extent the macroscopic phenotype of incompatible host–pathogen interactions reflects differences in fungal development and host responses at the histological level. This was done by conventional and advanced microscopic analysis of six wheat near‐isogenic lines differing by individual R genes and inoculated with an avirulent isolate of Puccinia striiformis. Wheat line AvocetYr15 had the lowest macroscopic infection type (IT) 0–1, in which fungal growth was stopped at early stages due to extensive expression of a hypersensitive response (HR) at all time points (4, 8 and 16 days post‐inoculation, dpi) without any sign of haustorial bodies. AvocetYr5 and AvocetYr1 had IT 1, in which most fungal colonies developed secondary hyphae. Many colonies were encased by HR at 16 dpi, more extensively in AvocetYr1 than AvocetYr5. In AvocetYr6 (IT 2), HR was expressed after the formation of secondary hyphae at 4 dpi, after which fungal growth and HR increased simultaneously until most colonies became encased by HR. AvocetYr27 (IT 2–3) and AvocetYr17 (IT 4–5) showed similar fungal growth and HR at 4 dpi, where HR was only weakly expressed in a few host cells. Encasement of secondary and runner hyphae increased significantly in AvocetYr27, but at 16 dpi, HR was often circumvented by large, intermingled fungal colonies in both lines. No resistance responses were observed in Avocet S (susceptible control). The very different histological patterns conferred by the six R genes suggests differences in the timing of the host–pathogen recognition and onset of host defence pathways. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ppa.13052 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2268233554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2268233554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3322-cbc43ff35113dd34808833a960a0d88922728ca0f5ab3591433c56972eac16a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AaWWLFIa3vi1FlWFX9SJSoB68h1nMRVagc7IXTHETgjJyEQtsxmRjPfeyM9hC4pmdGh5k0jZxQIZ0doQiHh0TCnx2hCCLCIiISdorMQdoRQnqZigt6eGtka1-p947yssaqkLXXAxuKis-WwKb3r2wpLm-PKhRZ7HRpnw8C4Agfzjg-6rl2PfTceTWilbbHV0n99fJrgSm2NwrWxo6SvtGzP0Ukh66Av_voUvdzePK_uo_Xj3cNquY4UAGOR2qoYigI4pZDnEAsiBIBMEyJJLkTK2IIJJUnB5RZ4SmMAxZN0wbRUNJEJTNHV6Nt499rp0GY713k7vMwYSwQD4DweqOuRUt6F4HWRNd7spT9klGQ_sWZDrNlvrAM7H9ne1PrwP5htNstR8Q31jntm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2268233554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatiotemporal changes in fungal growth and host responses of six yellow rust resistant near‐isogenic lines of wheat</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Saleem, K. ; Sørensen, C. K. ; Labouriau, R. ; Hovmøller, M. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saleem, K. ; Sørensen, C. K. ; Labouriau, R. ; Hovmøller, M. S.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the present study was to investigate to what extent the macroscopic phenotype of incompatible host–pathogen interactions reflects differences in fungal development and host responses at the histological level. This was done by conventional and advanced microscopic analysis of six wheat near‐isogenic lines differing by individual R genes and inoculated with an avirulent isolate of Puccinia striiformis. Wheat line AvocetYr15 had the lowest macroscopic infection type (IT) 0–1, in which fungal growth was stopped at early stages due to extensive expression of a hypersensitive response (HR) at all time points (4, 8 and 16 days post‐inoculation, dpi) without any sign of haustorial bodies. AvocetYr5 and AvocetYr1 had IT 1, in which most fungal colonies developed secondary hyphae. Many colonies were encased by HR at 16 dpi, more extensively in AvocetYr1 than AvocetYr5. In AvocetYr6 (IT 2), HR was expressed after the formation of secondary hyphae at 4 dpi, after which fungal growth and HR increased simultaneously until most colonies became encased by HR. AvocetYr27 (IT 2–3) and AvocetYr17 (IT 4–5) showed similar fungal growth and HR at 4 dpi, where HR was only weakly expressed in a few host cells. Encasement of secondary and runner hyphae increased significantly in AvocetYr27, but at 16 dpi, HR was often circumvented by large, intermingled fungal colonies in both lines. No resistance responses were observed in Avocet S (susceptible control). The very different histological patterns conferred by the six R genes suggests differences in the timing of the host–pathogen recognition and onset of host defence pathways.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ppa.13052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Colonies ; Fungi ; Genes ; histopathology ; Hypersensitive response ; Hyphae ; Inoculation ; Microscopic analysis ; microscopy ; Pathogens ; Phenotypes ; Puccinia striiformis ; R gene ; Stripe rust ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Plant pathology, 2019-09, Vol.68 (7), p.1320-1330</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society for Plant Pathology.</rights><rights>Plant Pathology © 2019 British Society for Plant Pathology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3322-cbc43ff35113dd34808833a960a0d88922728ca0f5ab3591433c56972eac16a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3322-cbc43ff35113dd34808833a960a0d88922728ca0f5ab3591433c56972eac16a63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3187-5462 ; 0000-0002-3025-5843</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fppa.13052$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fppa.13052$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saleem, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labouriau, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovmøller, M. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatiotemporal changes in fungal growth and host responses of six yellow rust resistant near‐isogenic lines of wheat</title><title>Plant pathology</title><description>The objective of the present study was to investigate to what extent the macroscopic phenotype of incompatible host–pathogen interactions reflects differences in fungal development and host responses at the histological level. This was done by conventional and advanced microscopic analysis of six wheat near‐isogenic lines differing by individual R genes and inoculated with an avirulent isolate of Puccinia striiformis. Wheat line AvocetYr15 had the lowest macroscopic infection type (IT) 0–1, in which fungal growth was stopped at early stages due to extensive expression of a hypersensitive response (HR) at all time points (4, 8 and 16 days post‐inoculation, dpi) without any sign of haustorial bodies. AvocetYr5 and AvocetYr1 had IT 1, in which most fungal colonies developed secondary hyphae. Many colonies were encased by HR at 16 dpi, more extensively in AvocetYr1 than AvocetYr5. In AvocetYr6 (IT 2), HR was expressed after the formation of secondary hyphae at 4 dpi, after which fungal growth and HR increased simultaneously until most colonies became encased by HR. AvocetYr27 (IT 2–3) and AvocetYr17 (IT 4–5) showed similar fungal growth and HR at 4 dpi, where HR was only weakly expressed in a few host cells. Encasement of secondary and runner hyphae increased significantly in AvocetYr27, but at 16 dpi, HR was often circumvented by large, intermingled fungal colonies in both lines. No resistance responses were observed in Avocet S (susceptible control). The very different histological patterns conferred by the six R genes suggests differences in the timing of the host–pathogen recognition and onset of host defence pathways.</description><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>histopathology</subject><subject>Hypersensitive response</subject><subject>Hyphae</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Microscopic analysis</subject><subject>microscopy</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Puccinia striiformis</subject><subject>R gene</subject><subject>Stripe rust</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0032-0862</issn><issn>1365-3059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AaWWLFIa3vi1FlWFX9SJSoB68h1nMRVagc7IXTHETgjJyEQtsxmRjPfeyM9hC4pmdGh5k0jZxQIZ0doQiHh0TCnx2hCCLCIiISdorMQdoRQnqZigt6eGtka1-p947yssaqkLXXAxuKis-WwKb3r2wpLm-PKhRZ7HRpnw8C4Agfzjg-6rl2PfTceTWilbbHV0n99fJrgSm2NwrWxo6SvtGzP0Ukh66Av_voUvdzePK_uo_Xj3cNquY4UAGOR2qoYigI4pZDnEAsiBIBMEyJJLkTK2IIJJUnB5RZ4SmMAxZN0wbRUNJEJTNHV6Nt499rp0GY713k7vMwYSwQD4DweqOuRUt6F4HWRNd7spT9klGQ_sWZDrNlvrAM7H9ne1PrwP5htNstR8Q31jntm</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Saleem, K.</creator><creator>Sørensen, C. K.</creator><creator>Labouriau, R.</creator><creator>Hovmøller, M. S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3187-5462</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3025-5843</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Spatiotemporal changes in fungal growth and host responses of six yellow rust resistant near‐isogenic lines of wheat</title><author>Saleem, K. ; Sørensen, C. K. ; Labouriau, R. ; Hovmøller, M. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3322-cbc43ff35113dd34808833a960a0d88922728ca0f5ab3591433c56972eac16a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>histopathology</topic><topic>Hypersensitive response</topic><topic>Hyphae</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Microscopic analysis</topic><topic>microscopy</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Puccinia striiformis</topic><topic>R gene</topic><topic>Stripe rust</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saleem, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labouriau, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovmøller, M. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saleem, K.</au><au>Sørensen, C. K.</au><au>Labouriau, R.</au><au>Hovmøller, M. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatiotemporal changes in fungal growth and host responses of six yellow rust resistant near‐isogenic lines of wheat</atitle><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1320</spage><epage>1330</epage><pages>1320-1330</pages><issn>0032-0862</issn><eissn>1365-3059</eissn><abstract>The objective of the present study was to investigate to what extent the macroscopic phenotype of incompatible host–pathogen interactions reflects differences in fungal development and host responses at the histological level. This was done by conventional and advanced microscopic analysis of six wheat near‐isogenic lines differing by individual R genes and inoculated with an avirulent isolate of Puccinia striiformis. Wheat line AvocetYr15 had the lowest macroscopic infection type (IT) 0–1, in which fungal growth was stopped at early stages due to extensive expression of a hypersensitive response (HR) at all time points (4, 8 and 16 days post‐inoculation, dpi) without any sign of haustorial bodies. AvocetYr5 and AvocetYr1 had IT 1, in which most fungal colonies developed secondary hyphae. Many colonies were encased by HR at 16 dpi, more extensively in AvocetYr1 than AvocetYr5. In AvocetYr6 (IT 2), HR was expressed after the formation of secondary hyphae at 4 dpi, after which fungal growth and HR increased simultaneously until most colonies became encased by HR. AvocetYr27 (IT 2–3) and AvocetYr17 (IT 4–5) showed similar fungal growth and HR at 4 dpi, where HR was only weakly expressed in a few host cells. Encasement of secondary and runner hyphae increased significantly in AvocetYr27, but at 16 dpi, HR was often circumvented by large, intermingled fungal colonies in both lines. No resistance responses were observed in Avocet S (susceptible control). The very different histological patterns conferred by the six R genes suggests differences in the timing of the host–pathogen recognition and onset of host defence pathways.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ppa.13052</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3187-5462</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3025-5843</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-0862 |
ispartof | Plant pathology, 2019-09, Vol.68 (7), p.1320-1330 |
issn | 0032-0862 1365-3059 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2268233554 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Colonies Fungi Genes histopathology Hypersensitive response Hyphae Inoculation Microscopic analysis microscopy Pathogens Phenotypes Puccinia striiformis R gene Stripe rust Wheat |
title | Spatiotemporal changes in fungal growth and host responses of six yellow rust resistant near‐isogenic lines of wheat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A16%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatiotemporal%20changes%20in%20fungal%20growth%20and%20host%20responses%20of%20six%20yellow%20rust%20resistant%20near%E2%80%90isogenic%20lines%20of%20wheat&rft.jtitle=Plant%20pathology&rft.au=Saleem,%20K.&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1320&rft.epage=1330&rft.pages=1320-1330&rft.issn=0032-0862&rft.eissn=1365-3059&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ppa.13052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2268233554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2268233554&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |