Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently
There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Paddy and water environment 2019-07, Vol.17 (3), p.391-401 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 401 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 391 |
container_title | Paddy and water environment |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Hashimoto, Shizuka Sato, Yuta Morimoto, Hidetsugu |
description | There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environmental efficiencies, and the differences among them as regards their location and management. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection as a basic input for the quantification of economic conditions and ecosystem services of 223 allotments in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used for analyzing the economic and environmental efficiency of each allotment. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore statistically significant differences in economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, and economic and environmental efficiencies among the four groups of allotment gardens classified by location (i.e., urbanization promotion area [UPA] and urbanization control area [UCA]) and type of actor (i.e., public or private). Our analysis identified that the expenditures of public allotments tended to be significantly larger than those of private allotments, whereas there was no difference in the income among the four groups, which resulted in lower economic efficiency of public allotments. Moreover, although public allotments in UCA and UPA provided a large amount of food production, recreation, and disaster prevention services, DEA revealed that they were less environmentally efficient when expenditures such as land rent, construction cost, and operational cost were considered. Our findings also identified that public allotments provided a significantly large amount of ecosystem services for urban dwellers in exchange of large public expenditures, which often resulted in inefficient allotment operation. If local governments and private actors build a collaborative relationship and strategically divide their roles, the governments could decrease the financial burden in the establishment and operations of allotments while maintaining/increasing benefits arising from allotment gardens. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2268172573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2200088114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-6a4a0859a26430fc905ddfa4ebde6e9758ac45aaae4a6b141294b988a5736b903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRSMEEs8fYGWJdWAcO68lqnhJlWABa2uSTFojJy62W9Qdf8CCP-RLMBTEriuPdc-9tuYmySmHcw5QXngOQogUeJ3Gq5Ap30kOeMF5muUgd_9mWcN-cuj9M0BWSsEPkveHZWN0-_n2sXB6hYFYa43BxjoM2o5MjwyNsWGgMbAZuo5GZhf0q87RszAntrAh6hoNC5YtnF3pjhi11q99oIF5civdkv9Wl67BkXWvZAw5zwbrItn3utUxwayPk70ejaeT3_Moebq-epzcptP7m7vJ5TRtZV6GtECJUOU1ZoUU0Lc15F3Xo6Smo4LqMq8wgohIEouGS57VsqmrCvNSFE0N4ig52-TG374syQf1bJdujE-qLCsqXmaR3E4BQFVxLiOVbajWWe8d9SruckC3VhzUdz1qU4-K9aifehSPJrEx-QiPM3L_0VtcX3ZTlp4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2200088114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hashimoto, Shizuka ; Sato, Yuta ; Morimoto, Hidetsugu</creator><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Shizuka ; Sato, Yuta ; Morimoto, Hidetsugu</creatorcontrib><description>There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environmental efficiencies, and the differences among them as regards their location and management. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection as a basic input for the quantification of economic conditions and ecosystem services of 223 allotments in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used for analyzing the economic and environmental efficiency of each allotment. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore statistically significant differences in economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, and economic and environmental efficiencies among the four groups of allotment gardens classified by location (i.e., urbanization promotion area [UPA] and urbanization control area [UCA]) and type of actor (i.e., public or private). Our analysis identified that the expenditures of public allotments tended to be significantly larger than those of private allotments, whereas there was no difference in the income among the four groups, which resulted in lower economic efficiency of public allotments. Moreover, although public allotments in UCA and UPA provided a large amount of food production, recreation, and disaster prevention services, DEA revealed that they were less environmentally efficient when expenditures such as land rent, construction cost, and operational cost were considered. Our findings also identified that public allotments provided a significantly large amount of ecosystem services for urban dwellers in exchange of large public expenditures, which often resulted in inefficient allotment operation. If local governments and private actors build a collaborative relationship and strategically divide their roles, the governments could decrease the financial burden in the establishment and operations of allotments while maintaining/increasing benefits arising from allotment gardens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1611-2490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1611-2504</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural management ; Agriculture ; Allotments ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Collaboration ; Construction costs ; Data collection ; Data envelopment analysis ; Data processing ; Economic analysis ; Economic conditions ; Economics ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Ecotoxicology ; Emergency preparedness ; Expenditures ; Food production ; Gardens ; Gardens & gardening ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Identification ; Life Sciences ; Local government ; Operating costs ; Operations research ; Rent ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Surveying ; Urban agriculture ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Paddy and water environment, 2019-07, Vol.17 (3), p.391-401</ispartof><rights>The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering 2019</rights><rights>Paddy and Water Environment is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-6a4a0859a26430fc905ddfa4ebde6e9758ac45aaae4a6b141294b988a5736b903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-6a4a0859a26430fc905ddfa4ebde6e9758ac45aaae4a6b141294b988a5736b903</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4423-9374</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Shizuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimoto, Hidetsugu</creatorcontrib><title>Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently</title><title>Paddy and water environment</title><addtitle>Paddy Water Environ</addtitle><description>There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environmental efficiencies, and the differences among them as regards their location and management. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection as a basic input for the quantification of economic conditions and ecosystem services of 223 allotments in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used for analyzing the economic and environmental efficiency of each allotment. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore statistically significant differences in economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, and economic and environmental efficiencies among the four groups of allotment gardens classified by location (i.e., urbanization promotion area [UPA] and urbanization control area [UCA]) and type of actor (i.e., public or private). Our analysis identified that the expenditures of public allotments tended to be significantly larger than those of private allotments, whereas there was no difference in the income among the four groups, which resulted in lower economic efficiency of public allotments. Moreover, although public allotments in UCA and UPA provided a large amount of food production, recreation, and disaster prevention services, DEA revealed that they were less environmentally efficient when expenditures such as land rent, construction cost, and operational cost were considered. Our findings also identified that public allotments provided a significantly large amount of ecosystem services for urban dwellers in exchange of large public expenditures, which often resulted in inefficient allotment operation. If local governments and private actors build a collaborative relationship and strategically divide their roles, the governments could decrease the financial burden in the establishment and operations of allotments while maintaining/increasing benefits arising from allotment gardens.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Allotments</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Gardens</subject><subject>Gardens & gardening</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Rent</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Urban agriculture</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>1611-2490</issn><issn>1611-2504</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRSMEEs8fYGWJdWAcO68lqnhJlWABa2uSTFojJy62W9Qdf8CCP-RLMBTEriuPdc-9tuYmySmHcw5QXngOQogUeJ3Gq5Ap30kOeMF5muUgd_9mWcN-cuj9M0BWSsEPkveHZWN0-_n2sXB6hYFYa43BxjoM2o5MjwyNsWGgMbAZuo5GZhf0q87RszAntrAh6hoNC5YtnF3pjhi11q99oIF5civdkv9Wl67BkXWvZAw5zwbrItn3utUxwayPk70ejaeT3_Moebq-epzcptP7m7vJ5TRtZV6GtECJUOU1ZoUU0Lc15F3Xo6Smo4LqMq8wgohIEouGS57VsqmrCvNSFE0N4ig52-TG374syQf1bJdujE-qLCsqXmaR3E4BQFVxLiOVbajWWe8d9SruckC3VhzUdz1qU4-K9aifehSPJrEx-QiPM3L_0VtcX3ZTlp4</recordid><startdate>20190715</startdate><enddate>20190715</enddate><creator>Hashimoto, Shizuka</creator><creator>Sato, Yuta</creator><creator>Morimoto, Hidetsugu</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-9374</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190715</creationdate><title>Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently</title><author>Hashimoto, Shizuka ; Sato, Yuta ; Morimoto, Hidetsugu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-6a4a0859a26430fc905ddfa4ebde6e9758ac45aaae4a6b141294b988a5736b903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Allotments</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Gardens</topic><topic>Gardens & gardening</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Rent</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Urban agriculture</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Shizuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimoto, Hidetsugu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Paddy and water environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hashimoto, Shizuka</au><au>Sato, Yuta</au><au>Morimoto, Hidetsugu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently</atitle><jtitle>Paddy and water environment</jtitle><stitle>Paddy Water Environ</stitle><date>2019-07-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>401</epage><pages>391-401</pages><issn>1611-2490</issn><eissn>1611-2504</eissn><abstract>There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environmental efficiencies, and the differences among them as regards their location and management. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection as a basic input for the quantification of economic conditions and ecosystem services of 223 allotments in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used for analyzing the economic and environmental efficiency of each allotment. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore statistically significant differences in economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, and economic and environmental efficiencies among the four groups of allotment gardens classified by location (i.e., urbanization promotion area [UPA] and urbanization control area [UCA]) and type of actor (i.e., public or private). Our analysis identified that the expenditures of public allotments tended to be significantly larger than those of private allotments, whereas there was no difference in the income among the four groups, which resulted in lower economic efficiency of public allotments. Moreover, although public allotments in UCA and UPA provided a large amount of food production, recreation, and disaster prevention services, DEA revealed that they were less environmentally efficient when expenditures such as land rent, construction cost, and operational cost were considered. Our findings also identified that public allotments provided a significantly large amount of ecosystem services for urban dwellers in exchange of large public expenditures, which often resulted in inefficient allotment operation. If local governments and private actors build a collaborative relationship and strategically divide their roles, the governments could decrease the financial burden in the establishment and operations of allotments while maintaining/increasing benefits arising from allotment gardens.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-9374</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1611-2490 |
ispartof | Paddy and water environment, 2019-07, Vol.17 (3), p.391-401 |
issn | 1611-2490 1611-2504 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2268172573 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agricultural economics Agricultural management Agriculture Allotments Biomedical and Life Sciences Collaboration Construction costs Data collection Data envelopment analysis Data processing Economic analysis Economic conditions Economics Ecosystem services Ecosystems Ecotoxicology Emergency preparedness Expenditures Food production Gardens Gardens & gardening Geoecology/Natural Processes Hydrogeology Hydrology/Water Resources Identification Life Sciences Local government Operating costs Operations research Rent Soil Science & Conservation Statistical analysis Statistical methods Surveying Urban agriculture Urbanization |
title | Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T21%3A14%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%E2%80%93private%20collaboration%20in%20allotment%20garden%20operation%20has%20the%20potential%20to%20provide%20ecosystem%20services%20to%20urban%20dwellers%20more%20efficiently&rft.jtitle=Paddy%20and%20water%20environment&rft.au=Hashimoto,%20Shizuka&rft.date=2019-07-15&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=401&rft.pages=391-401&rft.issn=1611-2490&rft.eissn=1611-2504&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2200088114%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2200088114&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |