Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently

There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Paddy and water environment 2019-07, Vol.17 (3), p.391-401
Hauptverfasser: Hashimoto, Shizuka, Sato, Yuta, Morimoto, Hidetsugu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 401
container_issue 3
container_start_page 391
container_title Paddy and water environment
container_volume 17
creator Hashimoto, Shizuka
Sato, Yuta
Morimoto, Hidetsugu
description There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environmental efficiencies, and the differences among them as regards their location and management. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection as a basic input for the quantification of economic conditions and ecosystem services of 223 allotments in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used for analyzing the economic and environmental efficiency of each allotment. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore statistically significant differences in economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, and economic and environmental efficiencies among the four groups of allotment gardens classified by location (i.e., urbanization promotion area [UPA] and urbanization control area [UCA]) and type of actor (i.e., public or private). Our analysis identified that the expenditures of public allotments tended to be significantly larger than those of private allotments, whereas there was no difference in the income among the four groups, which resulted in lower economic efficiency of public allotments. Moreover, although public allotments in UCA and UPA provided a large amount of food production, recreation, and disaster prevention services, DEA revealed that they were less environmentally efficient when expenditures such as land rent, construction cost, and operational cost were considered. Our findings also identified that public allotments provided a significantly large amount of ecosystem services for urban dwellers in exchange of large public expenditures, which often resulted in inefficient allotment operation. If local governments and private actors build a collaborative relationship and strategically divide their roles, the governments could decrease the financial burden in the establishment and operations of allotments while maintaining/increasing benefits arising from allotment gardens.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2268172573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2200088114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-6a4a0859a26430fc905ddfa4ebde6e9758ac45aaae4a6b141294b988a5736b903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRSMEEs8fYGWJdWAcO68lqnhJlWABa2uSTFojJy62W9Qdf8CCP-RLMBTEriuPdc-9tuYmySmHcw5QXngOQogUeJ3Gq5Ap30kOeMF5muUgd_9mWcN-cuj9M0BWSsEPkveHZWN0-_n2sXB6hYFYa43BxjoM2o5MjwyNsWGgMbAZuo5GZhf0q87RszAntrAh6hoNC5YtnF3pjhi11q99oIF5civdkv9Wl67BkXWvZAw5zwbrItn3utUxwayPk70ejaeT3_Moebq-epzcptP7m7vJ5TRtZV6GtECJUOU1ZoUU0Lc15F3Xo6Smo4LqMq8wgohIEouGS57VsqmrCvNSFE0N4ig52-TG374syQf1bJdujE-qLCsqXmaR3E4BQFVxLiOVbajWWe8d9SruckC3VhzUdz1qU4-K9aifehSPJrEx-QiPM3L_0VtcX3ZTlp4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2200088114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hashimoto, Shizuka ; Sato, Yuta ; Morimoto, Hidetsugu</creator><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Shizuka ; Sato, Yuta ; Morimoto, Hidetsugu</creatorcontrib><description>There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environmental efficiencies, and the differences among them as regards their location and management. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection as a basic input for the quantification of economic conditions and ecosystem services of 223 allotments in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used for analyzing the economic and environmental efficiency of each allotment. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore statistically significant differences in economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, and economic and environmental efficiencies among the four groups of allotment gardens classified by location (i.e., urbanization promotion area [UPA] and urbanization control area [UCA]) and type of actor (i.e., public or private). Our analysis identified that the expenditures of public allotments tended to be significantly larger than those of private allotments, whereas there was no difference in the income among the four groups, which resulted in lower economic efficiency of public allotments. Moreover, although public allotments in UCA and UPA provided a large amount of food production, recreation, and disaster prevention services, DEA revealed that they were less environmentally efficient when expenditures such as land rent, construction cost, and operational cost were considered. Our findings also identified that public allotments provided a significantly large amount of ecosystem services for urban dwellers in exchange of large public expenditures, which often resulted in inefficient allotment operation. If local governments and private actors build a collaborative relationship and strategically divide their roles, the governments could decrease the financial burden in the establishment and operations of allotments while maintaining/increasing benefits arising from allotment gardens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1611-2490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1611-2504</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural management ; Agriculture ; Allotments ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Collaboration ; Construction costs ; Data collection ; Data envelopment analysis ; Data processing ; Economic analysis ; Economic conditions ; Economics ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Ecotoxicology ; Emergency preparedness ; Expenditures ; Food production ; Gardens ; Gardens &amp; gardening ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Identification ; Life Sciences ; Local government ; Operating costs ; Operations research ; Rent ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Surveying ; Urban agriculture ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Paddy and water environment, 2019-07, Vol.17 (3), p.391-401</ispartof><rights>The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering 2019</rights><rights>Paddy and Water Environment is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-6a4a0859a26430fc905ddfa4ebde6e9758ac45aaae4a6b141294b988a5736b903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-6a4a0859a26430fc905ddfa4ebde6e9758ac45aaae4a6b141294b988a5736b903</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4423-9374</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Shizuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimoto, Hidetsugu</creatorcontrib><title>Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently</title><title>Paddy and water environment</title><addtitle>Paddy Water Environ</addtitle><description>There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environmental efficiencies, and the differences among them as regards their location and management. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection as a basic input for the quantification of economic conditions and ecosystem services of 223 allotments in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used for analyzing the economic and environmental efficiency of each allotment. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore statistically significant differences in economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, and economic and environmental efficiencies among the four groups of allotment gardens classified by location (i.e., urbanization promotion area [UPA] and urbanization control area [UCA]) and type of actor (i.e., public or private). Our analysis identified that the expenditures of public allotments tended to be significantly larger than those of private allotments, whereas there was no difference in the income among the four groups, which resulted in lower economic efficiency of public allotments. Moreover, although public allotments in UCA and UPA provided a large amount of food production, recreation, and disaster prevention services, DEA revealed that they were less environmentally efficient when expenditures such as land rent, construction cost, and operational cost were considered. Our findings also identified that public allotments provided a significantly large amount of ecosystem services for urban dwellers in exchange of large public expenditures, which often resulted in inefficient allotment operation. If local governments and private actors build a collaborative relationship and strategically divide their roles, the governments could decrease the financial burden in the establishment and operations of allotments while maintaining/increasing benefits arising from allotment gardens.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Allotments</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Gardens</subject><subject>Gardens &amp; gardening</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Rent</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Urban agriculture</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>1611-2490</issn><issn>1611-2504</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRSMEEs8fYGWJdWAcO68lqnhJlWABa2uSTFojJy62W9Qdf8CCP-RLMBTEriuPdc-9tuYmySmHcw5QXngOQogUeJ3Gq5Ap30kOeMF5muUgd_9mWcN-cuj9M0BWSsEPkveHZWN0-_n2sXB6hYFYa43BxjoM2o5MjwyNsWGgMbAZuo5GZhf0q87RszAntrAh6hoNC5YtnF3pjhi11q99oIF5civdkv9Wl67BkXWvZAw5zwbrItn3utUxwayPk70ejaeT3_Moebq-epzcptP7m7vJ5TRtZV6GtECJUOU1ZoUU0Lc15F3Xo6Smo4LqMq8wgohIEouGS57VsqmrCvNSFE0N4ig52-TG374syQf1bJdujE-qLCsqXmaR3E4BQFVxLiOVbajWWe8d9SruckC3VhzUdz1qU4-K9aifehSPJrEx-QiPM3L_0VtcX3ZTlp4</recordid><startdate>20190715</startdate><enddate>20190715</enddate><creator>Hashimoto, Shizuka</creator><creator>Sato, Yuta</creator><creator>Morimoto, Hidetsugu</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-9374</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190715</creationdate><title>Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently</title><author>Hashimoto, Shizuka ; Sato, Yuta ; Morimoto, Hidetsugu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-6a4a0859a26430fc905ddfa4ebde6e9758ac45aaae4a6b141294b988a5736b903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Allotments</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Gardens</topic><topic>Gardens &amp; gardening</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Rent</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Urban agriculture</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Shizuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimoto, Hidetsugu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Paddy and water environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hashimoto, Shizuka</au><au>Sato, Yuta</au><au>Morimoto, Hidetsugu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently</atitle><jtitle>Paddy and water environment</jtitle><stitle>Paddy Water Environ</stitle><date>2019-07-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>401</epage><pages>391-401</pages><issn>1611-2490</issn><eissn>1611-2504</eissn><abstract>There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environmental efficiencies, and the differences among them as regards their location and management. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection as a basic input for the quantification of economic conditions and ecosystem services of 223 allotments in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used for analyzing the economic and environmental efficiency of each allotment. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore statistically significant differences in economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, and economic and environmental efficiencies among the four groups of allotment gardens classified by location (i.e., urbanization promotion area [UPA] and urbanization control area [UCA]) and type of actor (i.e., public or private). Our analysis identified that the expenditures of public allotments tended to be significantly larger than those of private allotments, whereas there was no difference in the income among the four groups, which resulted in lower economic efficiency of public allotments. Moreover, although public allotments in UCA and UPA provided a large amount of food production, recreation, and disaster prevention services, DEA revealed that they were less environmentally efficient when expenditures such as land rent, construction cost, and operational cost were considered. Our findings also identified that public allotments provided a significantly large amount of ecosystem services for urban dwellers in exchange of large public expenditures, which often resulted in inefficient allotment operation. If local governments and private actors build a collaborative relationship and strategically divide their roles, the governments could decrease the financial burden in the establishment and operations of allotments while maintaining/increasing benefits arising from allotment gardens.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-9374</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1611-2490
ispartof Paddy and water environment, 2019-07, Vol.17 (3), p.391-401
issn 1611-2490
1611-2504
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2268172573
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agricultural economics
Agricultural management
Agriculture
Allotments
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Collaboration
Construction costs
Data collection
Data envelopment analysis
Data processing
Economic analysis
Economic conditions
Economics
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Ecotoxicology
Emergency preparedness
Expenditures
Food production
Gardens
Gardens & gardening
Geoecology/Natural Processes
Hydrogeology
Hydrology/Water Resources
Identification
Life Sciences
Local government
Operating costs
Operations research
Rent
Soil Science & Conservation
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Surveying
Urban agriculture
Urbanization
title Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T21%3A14%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%E2%80%93private%20collaboration%20in%20allotment%20garden%20operation%20has%20the%20potential%20to%20provide%20ecosystem%20services%20to%20urban%20dwellers%20more%20efficiently&rft.jtitle=Paddy%20and%20water%20environment&rft.au=Hashimoto,%20Shizuka&rft.date=2019-07-15&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=401&rft.pages=391-401&rft.issn=1611-2490&rft.eissn=1611-2504&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2200088114%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2200088114&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true