Ground Response of a Gob-side Entry in a Longwall Panel Extracting 17 m-Thick Coal Seam: A Case Study

This study presents a comprehensive field investigation of the ground response of a gateroad subjected to high stress induced by extracting a 17 m-thick coal seam. The test site is located at Datong City, Shanxi Province, China. The measurement results of the entry convergence and fracture developme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rock mechanics and rock engineering 2020-02, Vol.53 (2), p.497-516
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, G. C., Wen, Z. J., Liang, S. J., Tan, Y. L., Tian, L., Zhao, Y. Q., Zhao, D. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 516
container_issue 2
container_start_page 497
container_title Rock mechanics and rock engineering
container_volume 53
creator Zhang, G. C.
Wen, Z. J.
Liang, S. J.
Tan, Y. L.
Tian, L.
Zhao, Y. Q.
Zhao, D. S.
description This study presents a comprehensive field investigation of the ground response of a gateroad subjected to high stress induced by extracting a 17 m-thick coal seam. The test site is located at Datong City, Shanxi Province, China. The measurement results of the entry convergence and fracture development indicated that the gateroad with a 30 m-wide coal pillar maintained a good performance during the development period but suffered a strong response, including roof sag, floor heave, support unit failure and internal fractures sharply developed during the current panel-retreating period. During panel retreating, the impact range of the mining disturbance was about 110 m ahead of the active panel, and the mining disturbance accelerated dramatically at 50–60 m ahead of the mining panel. The results of the borehole stress measurement showed that the maximum stress induced in the virgin coal pillar and the coal pillar reached 15.3 MPa and 23.9 MPa, which are about 1.5 and 2.3 times the initial ground stress, respectively. This high stress contributed significantly to the instability of the gateroad. The average stress within the coal pillar was greater than that in the virgin coal pillar, and a high-stress zone was found at the coal pillar depth of 11–20 m. This stress distribution characteristics implies that the 30 m-wide coal pillar has a relatively sufficient bearing capacity to withstand the majority of mining-induced loads and that the coal pillar size could be reduced from 30 to 15–20 m wide to decrease the range of high stress in the coal pillar. Furthermore, taking into consideration of intense mining disturbance and abundant time interval for gateroad development as well as a high-strength support scheme, a small-width coal pillar of 8 m was recommended and tentatively applied in the field. The field application demonstrated that the newly designed pillar size and support pattern could ensure gateroad stability at some level. The study finding can help to better understand the stability control of entry driven along gob-side and its correlation with coal pillar size as well as the mining disturbance in specially thick coal seam (ETCS). In addition, the design principle and support strategy for the coal pillar in ETCS presented in this study can potentially be applied to other similar projects.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00603-019-01922-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2267997610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2267997610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-9c9a2f722c23af55e79f3a4ea3ada4f2fb1f31eb3c8f6a9c9d69a3d12cce7c923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsv4CrgOpqfmUnHXSm1CgXFVnAXbjNJnTpNajKD9m18Fp_M1AruXFwCN-f7LhyEzhm9ZJTKq0hpQQWhrNwN5yQ_QD2WiYxkuXg-RD0quSC8EPwYncS4ojR9ykEP2Unwnavwo4kb76LB3mLAE78gsa4MHrs2bHHt0m7q3fIdmgY_gDMNHn-0AXRbuyVm8utzTeYvtX7FIw8NnhlYX-MhHkEqnLVdtT1FRxaaaM5-3z56uhnPR7dkej-5Gw2nBETGW1LqEriVnGsuwOa5kaUVkBkQUEFmuV0wK5hZCD2wBSS6KkoQFeNaG6lLLvroYt-7Cf6tM7FVK98Fl04qzgtZlrJgNFF8T-ngYwzGqk2o1xC2ilG186n2PlVyqX58qjyFxD4UE-yWJvxV_5P6BoHMeD8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2267997610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ground Response of a Gob-side Entry in a Longwall Panel Extracting 17 m-Thick Coal Seam: A Case Study</title><source>Springer Online Journals</source><creator>Zhang, G. C. ; Wen, Z. J. ; Liang, S. J. ; Tan, Y. L. ; Tian, L. ; Zhao, Y. Q. ; Zhao, D. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, G. C. ; Wen, Z. J. ; Liang, S. J. ; Tan, Y. L. ; Tian, L. ; Zhao, Y. Q. ; Zhao, D. S.</creatorcontrib><description>This study presents a comprehensive field investigation of the ground response of a gateroad subjected to high stress induced by extracting a 17 m-thick coal seam. The test site is located at Datong City, Shanxi Province, China. The measurement results of the entry convergence and fracture development indicated that the gateroad with a 30 m-wide coal pillar maintained a good performance during the development period but suffered a strong response, including roof sag, floor heave, support unit failure and internal fractures sharply developed during the current panel-retreating period. During panel retreating, the impact range of the mining disturbance was about 110 m ahead of the active panel, and the mining disturbance accelerated dramatically at 50–60 m ahead of the mining panel. The results of the borehole stress measurement showed that the maximum stress induced in the virgin coal pillar and the coal pillar reached 15.3 MPa and 23.9 MPa, which are about 1.5 and 2.3 times the initial ground stress, respectively. This high stress contributed significantly to the instability of the gateroad. The average stress within the coal pillar was greater than that in the virgin coal pillar, and a high-stress zone was found at the coal pillar depth of 11–20 m. This stress distribution characteristics implies that the 30 m-wide coal pillar has a relatively sufficient bearing capacity to withstand the majority of mining-induced loads and that the coal pillar size could be reduced from 30 to 15–20 m wide to decrease the range of high stress in the coal pillar. Furthermore, taking into consideration of intense mining disturbance and abundant time interval for gateroad development as well as a high-strength support scheme, a small-width coal pillar of 8 m was recommended and tentatively applied in the field. The field application demonstrated that the newly designed pillar size and support pattern could ensure gateroad stability at some level. The study finding can help to better understand the stability control of entry driven along gob-side and its correlation with coal pillar size as well as the mining disturbance in specially thick coal seam (ETCS). In addition, the design principle and support strategy for the coal pillar in ETCS presented in this study can potentially be applied to other similar projects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0723-2632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-453X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00603-019-01922-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Bearing capacity ; Boreholes ; Civil Engineering ; Coal ; Coal mines ; Coal mining ; Control stability ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Field investigations ; Fractures ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Ground motion ; Instability ; Longwall mining ; Measurement ; Mining ; Original Paper ; Stability ; Stress ; Stress concentration ; Stress distribution ; Stress measurement</subject><ispartof>Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 2020-02, Vol.53 (2), p.497-516</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-9c9a2f722c23af55e79f3a4ea3ada4f2fb1f31eb3c8f6a9c9d69a3d12cce7c923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-9c9a2f722c23af55e79f3a4ea3ada4f2fb1f31eb3c8f6a9c9d69a3d12cce7c923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00603-019-01922-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00603-019-01922-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, G. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Z. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Y. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Y. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, D. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Ground Response of a Gob-side Entry in a Longwall Panel Extracting 17 m-Thick Coal Seam: A Case Study</title><title>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</title><addtitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</addtitle><description>This study presents a comprehensive field investigation of the ground response of a gateroad subjected to high stress induced by extracting a 17 m-thick coal seam. The test site is located at Datong City, Shanxi Province, China. The measurement results of the entry convergence and fracture development indicated that the gateroad with a 30 m-wide coal pillar maintained a good performance during the development period but suffered a strong response, including roof sag, floor heave, support unit failure and internal fractures sharply developed during the current panel-retreating period. During panel retreating, the impact range of the mining disturbance was about 110 m ahead of the active panel, and the mining disturbance accelerated dramatically at 50–60 m ahead of the mining panel. The results of the borehole stress measurement showed that the maximum stress induced in the virgin coal pillar and the coal pillar reached 15.3 MPa and 23.9 MPa, which are about 1.5 and 2.3 times the initial ground stress, respectively. This high stress contributed significantly to the instability of the gateroad. The average stress within the coal pillar was greater than that in the virgin coal pillar, and a high-stress zone was found at the coal pillar depth of 11–20 m. This stress distribution characteristics implies that the 30 m-wide coal pillar has a relatively sufficient bearing capacity to withstand the majority of mining-induced loads and that the coal pillar size could be reduced from 30 to 15–20 m wide to decrease the range of high stress in the coal pillar. Furthermore, taking into consideration of intense mining disturbance and abundant time interval for gateroad development as well as a high-strength support scheme, a small-width coal pillar of 8 m was recommended and tentatively applied in the field. The field application demonstrated that the newly designed pillar size and support pattern could ensure gateroad stability at some level. The study finding can help to better understand the stability control of entry driven along gob-side and its correlation with coal pillar size as well as the mining disturbance in specially thick coal seam (ETCS). In addition, the design principle and support strategy for the coal pillar in ETCS presented in this study can potentially be applied to other similar projects.</description><subject>Bearing capacity</subject><subject>Boreholes</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coal mines</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>Control stability</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Field investigations</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Instability</subject><subject>Longwall mining</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Stress distribution</subject><subject>Stress measurement</subject><issn>0723-2632</issn><issn>1434-453X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsv4CrgOpqfmUnHXSm1CgXFVnAXbjNJnTpNajKD9m18Fp_M1AruXFwCN-f7LhyEzhm9ZJTKq0hpQQWhrNwN5yQ_QD2WiYxkuXg-RD0quSC8EPwYncS4ojR9ykEP2Unwnavwo4kb76LB3mLAE78gsa4MHrs2bHHt0m7q3fIdmgY_gDMNHn-0AXRbuyVm8utzTeYvtX7FIw8NnhlYX-MhHkEqnLVdtT1FRxaaaM5-3z56uhnPR7dkej-5Gw2nBETGW1LqEriVnGsuwOa5kaUVkBkQUEFmuV0wK5hZCD2wBSS6KkoQFeNaG6lLLvroYt-7Cf6tM7FVK98Fl04qzgtZlrJgNFF8T-ngYwzGqk2o1xC2ilG186n2PlVyqX58qjyFxD4UE-yWJvxV_5P6BoHMeD8</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Zhang, G. C.</creator><creator>Wen, Z. J.</creator><creator>Liang, S. J.</creator><creator>Tan, Y. L.</creator><creator>Tian, L.</creator><creator>Zhao, Y. Q.</creator><creator>Zhao, D. S.</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Ground Response of a Gob-side Entry in a Longwall Panel Extracting 17 m-Thick Coal Seam: A Case Study</title><author>Zhang, G. C. ; Wen, Z. J. ; Liang, S. J. ; Tan, Y. L. ; Tian, L. ; Zhao, Y. Q. ; Zhao, D. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-9c9a2f722c23af55e79f3a4ea3ada4f2fb1f31eb3c8f6a9c9d69a3d12cce7c923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bearing capacity</topic><topic>Boreholes</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coal mines</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>Control stability</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Field investigations</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Instability</topic><topic>Longwall mining</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Stress distribution</topic><topic>Stress measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, G. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Z. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Y. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Y. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, D. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, G. C.</au><au>Wen, Z. J.</au><au>Liang, S. J.</au><au>Tan, Y. L.</au><au>Tian, L.</au><au>Zhao, Y. Q.</au><au>Zhao, D. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ground Response of a Gob-side Entry in a Longwall Panel Extracting 17 m-Thick Coal Seam: A Case Study</atitle><jtitle>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</jtitle><stitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</stitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>497</spage><epage>516</epage><pages>497-516</pages><issn>0723-2632</issn><eissn>1434-453X</eissn><abstract>This study presents a comprehensive field investigation of the ground response of a gateroad subjected to high stress induced by extracting a 17 m-thick coal seam. The test site is located at Datong City, Shanxi Province, China. The measurement results of the entry convergence and fracture development indicated that the gateroad with a 30 m-wide coal pillar maintained a good performance during the development period but suffered a strong response, including roof sag, floor heave, support unit failure and internal fractures sharply developed during the current panel-retreating period. During panel retreating, the impact range of the mining disturbance was about 110 m ahead of the active panel, and the mining disturbance accelerated dramatically at 50–60 m ahead of the mining panel. The results of the borehole stress measurement showed that the maximum stress induced in the virgin coal pillar and the coal pillar reached 15.3 MPa and 23.9 MPa, which are about 1.5 and 2.3 times the initial ground stress, respectively. This high stress contributed significantly to the instability of the gateroad. The average stress within the coal pillar was greater than that in the virgin coal pillar, and a high-stress zone was found at the coal pillar depth of 11–20 m. This stress distribution characteristics implies that the 30 m-wide coal pillar has a relatively sufficient bearing capacity to withstand the majority of mining-induced loads and that the coal pillar size could be reduced from 30 to 15–20 m wide to decrease the range of high stress in the coal pillar. Furthermore, taking into consideration of intense mining disturbance and abundant time interval for gateroad development as well as a high-strength support scheme, a small-width coal pillar of 8 m was recommended and tentatively applied in the field. The field application demonstrated that the newly designed pillar size and support pattern could ensure gateroad stability at some level. The study finding can help to better understand the stability control of entry driven along gob-side and its correlation with coal pillar size as well as the mining disturbance in specially thick coal seam (ETCS). In addition, the design principle and support strategy for the coal pillar in ETCS presented in this study can potentially be applied to other similar projects.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><doi>10.1007/s00603-019-01922-5</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0723-2632
ispartof Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 2020-02, Vol.53 (2), p.497-516
issn 0723-2632
1434-453X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2267997610
source Springer Online Journals
subjects Bearing capacity
Boreholes
Civil Engineering
Coal
Coal mines
Coal mining
Control stability
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Field investigations
Fractures
Geophysics/Geodesy
Ground motion
Instability
Longwall mining
Measurement
Mining
Original Paper
Stability
Stress
Stress concentration
Stress distribution
Stress measurement
title Ground Response of a Gob-side Entry in a Longwall Panel Extracting 17 m-Thick Coal Seam: A Case Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A19%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ground%20Response%20of%20a%20Gob-side%20Entry%20in%20a%20Longwall%20Panel%20Extracting%2017%C2%A0m-Thick%20Coal%20Seam:%20A%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=Rock%20mechanics%20and%20rock%20engineering&rft.au=Zhang,%20G.%20C.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=516&rft.pages=497-516&rft.issn=0723-2632&rft.eissn=1434-453X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00603-019-01922-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2267997610%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2267997610&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true