Geotechnical Properties of Rubber Reinforced Cemented Clayey Soil
This paper focuses on the effect two forms of waste rubber tyres of granulate ( R g ) and fibre ( R f ) categories on the compaction–strength–consolidation–swell–durability behaviour of uncemented/cemented clayey soil. The effect of incorporation of five proportions 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10% R g /...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Transportation infrastructure geotechnology 2019-12, Vol.6 (4), p.337-354 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 354 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 337 |
| container_title | Transportation infrastructure geotechnology |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | Yadav, Jitendra Singh Hussain, Shaik Garg, Ankit Tiwari, S. K. |
| description | This paper focuses on the effect two forms of waste rubber tyres of granulate (
R
g
) and fibre (
R
f
) categories on the compaction–strength–consolidation–swell–durability behaviour of uncemented/cemented clayey soil. The effect of incorporation of five proportions 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10%
R
g
/
R
f
(by weight of soil) and three proportions 0%, 3% and 6% cement (by weight of soil) was assessed. Reduction in maximum dry unit weight (
γ
max
) and optimum water content (
ω
opt
) of clayey soil and cemented clayey soil was observed with the incorporation of ruuber granulates (
R
g)
and rubber fibres (
R
f
). Both unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and split tensile strength (STS) of the clayey soil were primarily controlled by the amount of cement and waste rubber tyres and it was found to be decreased with the enhancement in rubber content. But addition of
R
g
and
R
f
was found to improve the ductility and strain hardening behaviour of cemented clayey soil, prosperously under unconfined compression. Inclusion
R
g
was found to be ineffective to overshadow the brittleness of the cemented clayey soil subjected to tensile loads. The inclusion of higher rubber content had lowered the strength of cemented significantly. Decline in the California bearing ratio (CBR) value, swelling pressure (
σ
s
) and increment in the compression index (
C
c
) and weight loss during wet/dry cycles were observed with the incorporation of
R
g
and
R
f
in cemented clayey soil. The results of all performed tests were cross checked and compared with various Indian standards to reach at the optimum dose of
R
g
and
R
f
that can be added to cemented clayey soil for its possible applications in back filling, construction of embankment (for rural roads), sub-grade course, sub-base course and slide slope of canal. The form of waste rubber tyre i.e.
R
g
and
R
f
had significant effect on the geotechnical characteristics of cemented clayey soil. Overall,
R
f
had outperformed the
R
g
, considering all evaluated geotechnical properties. Maximum dose of
R
g
and
R
f
to be added in cemented clayey soil should not be more than 5% and 7.5%, respectively. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40515-019-00088-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2266691272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2266691272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f9f587d7071f286eee3c32b19999375418619e7e4c96d66a0eaaeeb8a7d45ddc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhi0EElXpCzBFYjb4nNiOx6qCUqkSqMBsOc4FUqVxsdOhb49LEGzccjd8_3_SR8g1sFtgTN3FggkQlIGmjLGypOKMTDhoSRUHdv57M35JZjFuE8ShYCDKCZkv0Q_oPvrW2S57Dn6PYWgxZr7JNoeqwpBtsO0bHxzW2QJ32A-no7NHPGYvvu2uyEVju4iznz0lbw_3r4tHun5arhbzNXU56IE2uhGlqhVT0PBSImLucl6BTpMrUUApQaPCwmlZS2kZWotYlVbVhahrl0_Jzdi7D_7zgHEwW38IfXppOJdSauCKJ4qPlAs-xoCN2Yd2Z8PRADMnW2a0ZZIt823LiBTKx1BMcP-O4a_6n9QXCZtr_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2266691272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geotechnical Properties of Rubber Reinforced Cemented Clayey Soil</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yadav, Jitendra Singh ; Hussain, Shaik ; Garg, Ankit ; Tiwari, S. K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Jitendra Singh ; Hussain, Shaik ; Garg, Ankit ; Tiwari, S. K.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper focuses on the effect two forms of waste rubber tyres of granulate (
R
g
) and fibre (
R
f
) categories on the compaction–strength–consolidation–swell–durability behaviour of uncemented/cemented clayey soil. The effect of incorporation of five proportions 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10%
R
g
/
R
f
(by weight of soil) and three proportions 0%, 3% and 6% cement (by weight of soil) was assessed. Reduction in maximum dry unit weight (
γ
max
) and optimum water content (
ω
opt
) of clayey soil and cemented clayey soil was observed with the incorporation of ruuber granulates (
R
g)
and rubber fibres (
R
f
). Both unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and split tensile strength (STS) of the clayey soil were primarily controlled by the amount of cement and waste rubber tyres and it was found to be decreased with the enhancement in rubber content. But addition of
R
g
and
R
f
was found to improve the ductility and strain hardening behaviour of cemented clayey soil, prosperously under unconfined compression. Inclusion
R
g
was found to be ineffective to overshadow the brittleness of the cemented clayey soil subjected to tensile loads. The inclusion of higher rubber content had lowered the strength of cemented significantly. Decline in the California bearing ratio (CBR) value, swelling pressure (
σ
s
) and increment in the compression index (
C
c
) and weight loss during wet/dry cycles were observed with the incorporation of
R
g
and
R
f
in cemented clayey soil. The results of all performed tests were cross checked and compared with various Indian standards to reach at the optimum dose of
R
g
and
R
f
that can be added to cemented clayey soil for its possible applications in back filling, construction of embankment (for rural roads), sub-grade course, sub-base course and slide slope of canal. The form of waste rubber tyre i.e.
R
g
and
R
f
had significant effect on the geotechnical characteristics of cemented clayey soil. Overall,
R
f
had outperformed the
R
g
, considering all evaluated geotechnical properties. Maximum dose of
R
g
and
R
f
to be added in cemented clayey soil should not be more than 5% and 7.5%, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2196-7202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2196-7210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40515-019-00088-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Backfill ; Brittleness ; Building Materials ; California bearing ratio ; Cement ; Cement reinforcements ; Clay ; Clay soils ; Compression ; Compression index ; Compressive strength ; Concrete ; Dry weight ; Ductility ; Embankments ; Engineering ; Foundations ; Geoengineering ; Geotechnical engineering ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Granulation ; Hydraulics ; Incorporation ; Moisture content ; Penetration tests ; Rubber ; Rural roads ; Slopes ; Soil compaction ; Soil properties ; Soils ; Strain hardening ; Swelling pressure ; Technical Paper ; Tensile strength ; Tensile stress ; Tires ; Water content ; Weight loss</subject><ispartof>Transportation infrastructure geotechnology, 2019-12, Vol.6 (4), p.337-354</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f9f587d7071f286eee3c32b19999375418619e7e4c96d66a0eaaeeb8a7d45ddc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f9f587d7071f286eee3c32b19999375418619e7e4c96d66a0eaaeeb8a7d45ddc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40515-019-00088-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40515-019-00088-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Jitendra Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Shaik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garg, Ankit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, S. K.</creatorcontrib><title>Geotechnical Properties of Rubber Reinforced Cemented Clayey Soil</title><title>Transportation infrastructure geotechnology</title><addtitle>Transp. Infrastruct. Geotech</addtitle><description>This paper focuses on the effect two forms of waste rubber tyres of granulate (
R
g
) and fibre (
R
f
) categories on the compaction–strength–consolidation–swell–durability behaviour of uncemented/cemented clayey soil. The effect of incorporation of five proportions 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10%
R
g
/
R
f
(by weight of soil) and three proportions 0%, 3% and 6% cement (by weight of soil) was assessed. Reduction in maximum dry unit weight (
γ
max
) and optimum water content (
ω
opt
) of clayey soil and cemented clayey soil was observed with the incorporation of ruuber granulates (
R
g)
and rubber fibres (
R
f
). Both unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and split tensile strength (STS) of the clayey soil were primarily controlled by the amount of cement and waste rubber tyres and it was found to be decreased with the enhancement in rubber content. But addition of
R
g
and
R
f
was found to improve the ductility and strain hardening behaviour of cemented clayey soil, prosperously under unconfined compression. Inclusion
R
g
was found to be ineffective to overshadow the brittleness of the cemented clayey soil subjected to tensile loads. The inclusion of higher rubber content had lowered the strength of cemented significantly. Decline in the California bearing ratio (CBR) value, swelling pressure (
σ
s
) and increment in the compression index (
C
c
) and weight loss during wet/dry cycles were observed with the incorporation of
R
g
and
R
f
in cemented clayey soil. The results of all performed tests were cross checked and compared with various Indian standards to reach at the optimum dose of
R
g
and
R
f
that can be added to cemented clayey soil for its possible applications in back filling, construction of embankment (for rural roads), sub-grade course, sub-base course and slide slope of canal. The form of waste rubber tyre i.e.
R
g
and
R
f
had significant effect on the geotechnical characteristics of cemented clayey soil. Overall,
R
f
had outperformed the
R
g
, considering all evaluated geotechnical properties. Maximum dose of
R
g
and
R
f
to be added in cemented clayey soil should not be more than 5% and 7.5%, respectively.</description><subject>Backfill</subject><subject>Brittleness</subject><subject>Building Materials</subject><subject>California bearing ratio</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Cement reinforcements</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Clay soils</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Compression index</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Dry weight</subject><subject>Ductility</subject><subject>Embankments</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Geoengineering</subject><subject>Geotechnical engineering</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Granulation</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Incorporation</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Penetration tests</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>Rural roads</subject><subject>Slopes</subject><subject>Soil compaction</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Strain hardening</subject><subject>Swelling pressure</subject><subject>Technical Paper</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Tensile stress</subject><subject>Tires</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><issn>2196-7202</issn><issn>2196-7210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhi0EElXpCzBFYjb4nNiOx6qCUqkSqMBsOc4FUqVxsdOhb49LEGzccjd8_3_SR8g1sFtgTN3FggkQlIGmjLGypOKMTDhoSRUHdv57M35JZjFuE8ShYCDKCZkv0Q_oPvrW2S57Dn6PYWgxZr7JNoeqwpBtsO0bHxzW2QJ32A-no7NHPGYvvu2uyEVju4iznz0lbw_3r4tHun5arhbzNXU56IE2uhGlqhVT0PBSImLucl6BTpMrUUApQaPCwmlZS2kZWotYlVbVhahrl0_Jzdi7D_7zgHEwW38IfXppOJdSauCKJ4qPlAs-xoCN2Yd2Z8PRADMnW2a0ZZIt823LiBTKx1BMcP-O4a_6n9QXCZtr_g</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Yadav, Jitendra Singh</creator><creator>Hussain, Shaik</creator><creator>Garg, Ankit</creator><creator>Tiwari, S. K.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Geotechnical Properties of Rubber Reinforced Cemented Clayey Soil</title><author>Yadav, Jitendra Singh ; Hussain, Shaik ; Garg, Ankit ; Tiwari, S. K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f9f587d7071f286eee3c32b19999375418619e7e4c96d66a0eaaeeb8a7d45ddc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Backfill</topic><topic>Brittleness</topic><topic>Building Materials</topic><topic>California bearing ratio</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Cement reinforcements</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Clay soils</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Compression index</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Dry weight</topic><topic>Ductility</topic><topic>Embankments</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Geoengineering</topic><topic>Geotechnical engineering</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Granulation</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Incorporation</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Penetration tests</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>Rural roads</topic><topic>Slopes</topic><topic>Soil compaction</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Strain hardening</topic><topic>Swelling pressure</topic><topic>Technical Paper</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Tensile stress</topic><topic>Tires</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Jitendra Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Shaik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garg, Ankit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, S. K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Transportation infrastructure geotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yadav, Jitendra Singh</au><au>Hussain, Shaik</au><au>Garg, Ankit</au><au>Tiwari, S. K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geotechnical Properties of Rubber Reinforced Cemented Clayey Soil</atitle><jtitle>Transportation infrastructure geotechnology</jtitle><stitle>Transp. Infrastruct. Geotech</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>337-354</pages><issn>2196-7202</issn><eissn>2196-7210</eissn><abstract>This paper focuses on the effect two forms of waste rubber tyres of granulate (
R
g
) and fibre (
R
f
) categories on the compaction–strength–consolidation–swell–durability behaviour of uncemented/cemented clayey soil. The effect of incorporation of five proportions 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10%
R
g
/
R
f
(by weight of soil) and three proportions 0%, 3% and 6% cement (by weight of soil) was assessed. Reduction in maximum dry unit weight (
γ
max
) and optimum water content (
ω
opt
) of clayey soil and cemented clayey soil was observed with the incorporation of ruuber granulates (
R
g)
and rubber fibres (
R
f
). Both unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and split tensile strength (STS) of the clayey soil were primarily controlled by the amount of cement and waste rubber tyres and it was found to be decreased with the enhancement in rubber content. But addition of
R
g
and
R
f
was found to improve the ductility and strain hardening behaviour of cemented clayey soil, prosperously under unconfined compression. Inclusion
R
g
was found to be ineffective to overshadow the brittleness of the cemented clayey soil subjected to tensile loads. The inclusion of higher rubber content had lowered the strength of cemented significantly. Decline in the California bearing ratio (CBR) value, swelling pressure (
σ
s
) and increment in the compression index (
C
c
) and weight loss during wet/dry cycles were observed with the incorporation of
R
g
and
R
f
in cemented clayey soil. The results of all performed tests were cross checked and compared with various Indian standards to reach at the optimum dose of
R
g
and
R
f
that can be added to cemented clayey soil for its possible applications in back filling, construction of embankment (for rural roads), sub-grade course, sub-base course and slide slope of canal. The form of waste rubber tyre i.e.
R
g
and
R
f
had significant effect on the geotechnical characteristics of cemented clayey soil. Overall,
R
f
had outperformed the
R
g
, considering all evaluated geotechnical properties. Maximum dose of
R
g
and
R
f
to be added in cemented clayey soil should not be more than 5% and 7.5%, respectively.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s40515-019-00088-5</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2196-7202 |
| ispartof | Transportation infrastructure geotechnology, 2019-12, Vol.6 (4), p.337-354 |
| issn | 2196-7202 2196-7210 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2266691272 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Backfill Brittleness Building Materials California bearing ratio Cement Cement reinforcements Clay Clay soils Compression Compression index Compressive strength Concrete Dry weight Ductility Embankments Engineering Foundations Geoengineering Geotechnical engineering Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Granulation Hydraulics Incorporation Moisture content Penetration tests Rubber Rural roads Slopes Soil compaction Soil properties Soils Strain hardening Swelling pressure Technical Paper Tensile strength Tensile stress Tires Water content Weight loss |
| title | Geotechnical Properties of Rubber Reinforced Cemented Clayey Soil |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A36%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geotechnical%20Properties%20of%20Rubber%20Reinforced%20Cemented%20Clayey%20Soil&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20infrastructure%20geotechnology&rft.au=Yadav,%20Jitendra%20Singh&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=337-354&rft.issn=2196-7202&rft.eissn=2196-7210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40515-019-00088-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2266691272%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2266691272&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |