Comparison Between Different Finite Element Analyses of Unbonded Flexible Pipe via Different Modeling Patterns
Three kinds of models based on the same flexible pipe with 8 layers have been separately created to investigate the effects of different modeling approaches on numerical simulation results of finite element (FE) models for unbonded flexible pipes. Then the mechanical property of the unbonded flexibl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Shanghai jiao tong da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban 2019-06, Vol.24 (3), p.357 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | chi |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 357 |
container_title | Shanghai jiao tong da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Pang, Guoliang Chen, Chaohe Shen, Yijun Liu, Fuyong |
description | Three kinds of models based on the same flexible pipe with 8 layers have been separately created to investigate the effects of different modeling approaches on numerical simulation results of finite element (FE) models for unbonded flexible pipes. Then the mechanical property of the unbonded flexible pipe under tension, torsion and bending load has been analyzed and compared via ABAQUS software on the basis of three created models. The research shows that different modeling methods of flexible pipes make a great difference in the results. Especially, modeling simplifications of the carcass and pressure armor have a great impact on the accuracy of the results. Model 3, in which the carcass is simulated by spiral isotropic shell and other layers are simulated by solid element, possesses good adaptability, which has been proved by comparing the experiment data and other models. This paper can offer a reference for the FE modeling methods' selection and mechanical property analysis of unbonded flexible pipe. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12204-019-2064-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2266334478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2266334478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_22663344783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjT1PwzAURT0UqRX0B7A9qXPAdlKnHaE0YqnUocyVo7ygh9zn4Ofy8e8JEgNjp3uudK6uUrdG3xmt63sx1uqq0GZdWO2qYjVRM-PqEYxZTtVchNrRc-vS1nqmeBNPg08kkeER8yciwxP1PSbkDA0xZYRtwNNvfWAfvgUFYg8v3EbusIMm4Be1AWFPA8IH-X_7XewwEL_C3ueMieVGXfU-CM7_8lotmu1h81wMKb6fUfLxLZ7TeCNHa50ry6qqV-Vl1g9Nik9V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2266334478</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison Between Different Finite Element Analyses of Unbonded Flexible Pipe via Different Modeling Patterns</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Pang, Guoliang ; Chen, Chaohe ; Shen, Yijun ; Liu, Fuyong</creator><creatorcontrib>Pang, Guoliang ; Chen, Chaohe ; Shen, Yijun ; Liu, Fuyong</creatorcontrib><description>Three kinds of models based on the same flexible pipe with 8 layers have been separately created to investigate the effects of different modeling approaches on numerical simulation results of finite element (FE) models for unbonded flexible pipes. Then the mechanical property of the unbonded flexible pipe under tension, torsion and bending load has been analyzed and compared via ABAQUS software on the basis of three created models. The research shows that different modeling methods of flexible pipes make a great difference in the results. Especially, modeling simplifications of the carcass and pressure armor have a great impact on the accuracy of the results. Model 3, in which the carcass is simulated by spiral isotropic shell and other layers are simulated by solid element, possesses good adaptability, which has been proved by comparing the experiment data and other models. This paper can offer a reference for the FE modeling methods' selection and mechanical property analysis of unbonded flexible pipe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1674-8115</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12204-019-2064-8</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Armor ; Computer simulation ; Finite element method ; Flexible pipes ; Iron ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Model accuracy ; Pipes ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>Shanghai jiao tong da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban, 2019-06, Vol.24 (3), p.357</ispartof><rights>Copyright Shanghai Jiaotong University Press Jun 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pang, Guoliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chaohe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Yijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fuyong</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison Between Different Finite Element Analyses of Unbonded Flexible Pipe via Different Modeling Patterns</title><title>Shanghai jiao tong da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban</title><description>Three kinds of models based on the same flexible pipe with 8 layers have been separately created to investigate the effects of different modeling approaches on numerical simulation results of finite element (FE) models for unbonded flexible pipes. Then the mechanical property of the unbonded flexible pipe under tension, torsion and bending load has been analyzed and compared via ABAQUS software on the basis of three created models. The research shows that different modeling methods of flexible pipes make a great difference in the results. Especially, modeling simplifications of the carcass and pressure armor have a great impact on the accuracy of the results. Model 3, in which the carcass is simulated by spiral isotropic shell and other layers are simulated by solid element, possesses good adaptability, which has been proved by comparing the experiment data and other models. This paper can offer a reference for the FE modeling methods' selection and mechanical property analysis of unbonded flexible pipe.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Armor</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Flexible pipes</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Pipes</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>1674-8115</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjT1PwzAURT0UqRX0B7A9qXPAdlKnHaE0YqnUocyVo7ygh9zn4Ofy8e8JEgNjp3uudK6uUrdG3xmt63sx1uqq0GZdWO2qYjVRM-PqEYxZTtVchNrRc-vS1nqmeBNPg08kkeER8yciwxP1PSbkDA0xZYRtwNNvfWAfvgUFYg8v3EbusIMm4Be1AWFPA8IH-X_7XewwEL_C3ueMieVGXfU-CM7_8lotmu1h81wMKb6fUfLxLZ7TeCNHa50ry6qqV-Vl1g9Nik9V</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Pang, Guoliang</creator><creator>Chen, Chaohe</creator><creator>Shen, Yijun</creator><creator>Liu, Fuyong</creator><general>Shanghai Jiaotong University Press</general><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Comparison Between Different Finite Element Analyses of Unbonded Flexible Pipe via Different Modeling Patterns</title><author>Pang, Guoliang ; Chen, Chaohe ; Shen, Yijun ; Liu, Fuyong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22663344783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Armor</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Flexible pipes</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Pipes</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pang, Guoliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chaohe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Yijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fuyong</creatorcontrib><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Shanghai jiao tong da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pang, Guoliang</au><au>Chen, Chaohe</au><au>Shen, Yijun</au><au>Liu, Fuyong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison Between Different Finite Element Analyses of Unbonded Flexible Pipe via Different Modeling Patterns</atitle><jtitle>Shanghai jiao tong da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>357</spage><pages>357-</pages><issn>1674-8115</issn><abstract>Three kinds of models based on the same flexible pipe with 8 layers have been separately created to investigate the effects of different modeling approaches on numerical simulation results of finite element (FE) models for unbonded flexible pipes. Then the mechanical property of the unbonded flexible pipe under tension, torsion and bending load has been analyzed and compared via ABAQUS software on the basis of three created models. The research shows that different modeling methods of flexible pipes make a great difference in the results. Especially, modeling simplifications of the carcass and pressure armor have a great impact on the accuracy of the results. Model 3, in which the carcass is simulated by spiral isotropic shell and other layers are simulated by solid element, possesses good adaptability, which has been proved by comparing the experiment data and other models. This paper can offer a reference for the FE modeling methods' selection and mechanical property analysis of unbonded flexible pipe.</abstract><cop>Shanghai</cop><pub>Shanghai Jiaotong University Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s12204-019-2064-8</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1674-8115 |
ispartof | Shanghai jiao tong da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban, 2019-06, Vol.24 (3), p.357 |
issn | 1674-8115 |
language | chi |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2266334478 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Adaptability Armor Computer simulation Finite element method Flexible pipes Iron Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Model accuracy Pipes Simulation |
title | Comparison Between Different Finite Element Analyses of Unbonded Flexible Pipe via Different Modeling Patterns |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A32%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20Between%20Different%20Finite%20Element%20Analyses%20of%20Unbonded%20Flexible%20Pipe%20via%20Different%20Modeling%20Patterns&rft.jtitle=Shanghai%20jiao%20tong%20da%20xue%20xue%20bao.%20Yi%20xue%20ban&rft.au=Pang,%20Guoliang&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=357&rft.pages=357-&rft.issn=1674-8115&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12204-019-2064-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2266334478%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2266334478&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |