On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ
In the recent literature there has been a spate of essays, articles and books discussing the question of whether Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This article offers a new argument for the conclusion that Christ had a fallen but not sinful human nature that was ‘healed’ of its fallenness at the m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of systematic theology : IJST 2019-07, Vol.21 (3), p.235-250 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 250 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 235 |
container_title | International journal of systematic theology : IJST |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Crisp, Oliver D. |
description | In the recent literature there has been a spate of essays, articles and books discussing the question of whether Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This article offers a new argument for the conclusion that Christ had a fallen but not sinful human nature that was ‘healed’ of its fallenness at the moment of assumption by the Word – what we shall call, the vicarious humanity of Christ view. This account concedes to the defender of Christ's ‘fallen’ humanity that his human nature is generated in a fallen state (and immediately cleansed of fallenness in the act of assumption). And it concedes to the defender of Christ's sinlessness the claim that Christ is without sin from the first moment of incarnation. This represents an important via media in the contemporary debate about this vexed christological topic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ijst.12363 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2266199444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2266199444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3013-f437e19e0b15c01552337c8d3129595056f71945d46fae6394707ff3b82a06b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQhhujiYhefIJNuJksznTaLj2ajQqGhIPotVmWNpQAi-1uzL49C-vZucwcvvn_5GPsEWGM3Tz7bazHyEnRFRugUJOUC4Dry00pKslv2V2MWwBArmjARotDUm9s8u3LIviqicm02RcHX7dJ5ZJ8E3ys79mNK3bRPvztIft6e13m03S-eJ_lL_O0JEBKnaDMorawQlkCSsmJsnKyJuRaaglSuQy1kGuhXGEVaZFB5hytJrwAtcpoyEZ97jFUP42NtdlWTTh0lYZzpVBrIURHPfVUGaoYg3XmGPy-CK1BMGcJ5izBXCR0MPbwr9_Z9h_SzD4-l_3PCVcVW3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2266199444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Crisp, Oliver D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Oliver D.</creatorcontrib><description>In the recent literature there has been a spate of essays, articles and books discussing the question of whether Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This article offers a new argument for the conclusion that Christ had a fallen but not sinful human nature that was ‘healed’ of its fallenness at the moment of assumption by the Word – what we shall call, the vicarious humanity of Christ view. This account concedes to the defender of Christ's ‘fallen’ humanity that his human nature is generated in a fallen state (and immediately cleansed of fallenness in the act of assumption). And it concedes to the defender of Christ's sinlessness the claim that Christ is without sin from the first moment of incarnation. This represents an important via media in the contemporary debate about this vexed christological topic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-1652</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2400</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijst.12363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Christianity ; Christology ; Human nature ; Jesus Christ</subject><ispartof>International journal of systematic theology : IJST, 2019-07, Vol.21 (3), p.235-250</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3013-f437e19e0b15c01552337c8d3129595056f71945d46fae6394707ff3b82a06b73</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-1740-6771</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijst.12363$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijst.12363$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Oliver D.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ</title><title>International journal of systematic theology : IJST</title><description>In the recent literature there has been a spate of essays, articles and books discussing the question of whether Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This article offers a new argument for the conclusion that Christ had a fallen but not sinful human nature that was ‘healed’ of its fallenness at the moment of assumption by the Word – what we shall call, the vicarious humanity of Christ view. This account concedes to the defender of Christ's ‘fallen’ humanity that his human nature is generated in a fallen state (and immediately cleansed of fallenness in the act of assumption). And it concedes to the defender of Christ's sinlessness the claim that Christ is without sin from the first moment of incarnation. This represents an important via media in the contemporary debate about this vexed christological topic.</description><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Christology</subject><subject>Human nature</subject><subject>Jesus Christ</subject><issn>1463-1652</issn><issn>1468-2400</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQhhujiYhefIJNuJksznTaLj2ajQqGhIPotVmWNpQAi-1uzL49C-vZucwcvvn_5GPsEWGM3Tz7bazHyEnRFRugUJOUC4Dry00pKslv2V2MWwBArmjARotDUm9s8u3LIviqicm02RcHX7dJ5ZJ8E3ys79mNK3bRPvztIft6e13m03S-eJ_lL_O0JEBKnaDMorawQlkCSsmJsnKyJuRaaglSuQy1kGuhXGEVaZFB5hytJrwAtcpoyEZ97jFUP42NtdlWTTh0lYZzpVBrIURHPfVUGaoYg3XmGPy-CK1BMGcJ5izBXCR0MPbwr9_Z9h_SzD4-l_3PCVcVW3M</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Crisp, Oliver D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1740-6771</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ</title><author>Crisp, Oliver D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3013-f437e19e0b15c01552337c8d3129595056f71945d46fae6394707ff3b82a06b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Christology</topic><topic>Human nature</topic><topic>Jesus Christ</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Oliver D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of systematic theology : IJST</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crisp, Oliver D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ</atitle><jtitle>International journal of systematic theology : IJST</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>235-250</pages><issn>1463-1652</issn><eissn>1468-2400</eissn><abstract>In the recent literature there has been a spate of essays, articles and books discussing the question of whether Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This article offers a new argument for the conclusion that Christ had a fallen but not sinful human nature that was ‘healed’ of its fallenness at the moment of assumption by the Word – what we shall call, the vicarious humanity of Christ view. This account concedes to the defender of Christ's ‘fallen’ humanity that his human nature is generated in a fallen state (and immediately cleansed of fallenness in the act of assumption). And it concedes to the defender of Christ's sinlessness the claim that Christ is without sin from the first moment of incarnation. This represents an important via media in the contemporary debate about this vexed christological topic.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ijst.12363</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1740-6771</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1463-1652 |
ispartof | International journal of systematic theology : IJST, 2019-07, Vol.21 (3), p.235-250 |
issn | 1463-1652 1468-2400 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2266199444 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals |
subjects | Christianity Christology Human nature Jesus Christ |
title | On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A09%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Vicarious%20Humanity%20of%20Christ&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20systematic%20theology%20:%20IJST&rft.au=Crisp,%20Oliver%20D.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=235-250&rft.issn=1463-1652&rft.eissn=1468-2400&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijst.12363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2266199444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2266199444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |