On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ

In the recent literature there has been a spate of essays, articles and books discussing the question of whether Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This article offers a new argument for the conclusion that Christ had a fallen but not sinful human nature that was ‘healed’ of its fallenness at the m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of systematic theology : IJST 2019-07, Vol.21 (3), p.235-250
1. Verfasser: Crisp, Oliver D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 250
container_issue 3
container_start_page 235
container_title International journal of systematic theology : IJST
container_volume 21
creator Crisp, Oliver D.
description In the recent literature there has been a spate of essays, articles and books discussing the question of whether Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This article offers a new argument for the conclusion that Christ had a fallen but not sinful human nature that was ‘healed’ of its fallenness at the moment of assumption by the Word – what we shall call, the vicarious humanity of Christ view. This account concedes to the defender of Christ's ‘fallen’ humanity that his human nature is generated in a fallen state (and immediately cleansed of fallenness in the act of assumption). And it concedes to the defender of Christ's sinlessness the claim that Christ is without sin from the first moment of incarnation. This represents an important via media in the contemporary debate about this vexed christological topic.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijst.12363
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2266199444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2266199444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3013-f437e19e0b15c01552337c8d3129595056f71945d46fae6394707ff3b82a06b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQhhujiYhefIJNuJksznTaLj2ajQqGhIPotVmWNpQAi-1uzL49C-vZucwcvvn_5GPsEWGM3Tz7bazHyEnRFRugUJOUC4Dry00pKslv2V2MWwBArmjARotDUm9s8u3LIviqicm02RcHX7dJ5ZJ8E3ys79mNK3bRPvztIft6e13m03S-eJ_lL_O0JEBKnaDMorawQlkCSsmJsnKyJuRaaglSuQy1kGuhXGEVaZFB5hytJrwAtcpoyEZ97jFUP42NtdlWTTh0lYZzpVBrIURHPfVUGaoYg3XmGPy-CK1BMGcJ5izBXCR0MPbwr9_Z9h_SzD4-l_3PCVcVW3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2266199444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Crisp, Oliver D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Oliver D.</creatorcontrib><description>In the recent literature there has been a spate of essays, articles and books discussing the question of whether Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This article offers a new argument for the conclusion that Christ had a fallen but not sinful human nature that was ‘healed’ of its fallenness at the moment of assumption by the Word – what we shall call, the vicarious humanity of Christ view. This account concedes to the defender of Christ's ‘fallen’ humanity that his human nature is generated in a fallen state (and immediately cleansed of fallenness in the act of assumption). And it concedes to the defender of Christ's sinlessness the claim that Christ is without sin from the first moment of incarnation. This represents an important via media in the contemporary debate about this vexed christological topic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-1652</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2400</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijst.12363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Christianity ; Christology ; Human nature ; Jesus Christ</subject><ispartof>International journal of systematic theology : IJST, 2019-07, Vol.21 (3), p.235-250</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3013-f437e19e0b15c01552337c8d3129595056f71945d46fae6394707ff3b82a06b73</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-1740-6771</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijst.12363$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijst.12363$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Oliver D.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ</title><title>International journal of systematic theology : IJST</title><description>In the recent literature there has been a spate of essays, articles and books discussing the question of whether Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This article offers a new argument for the conclusion that Christ had a fallen but not sinful human nature that was ‘healed’ of its fallenness at the moment of assumption by the Word – what we shall call, the vicarious humanity of Christ view. This account concedes to the defender of Christ's ‘fallen’ humanity that his human nature is generated in a fallen state (and immediately cleansed of fallenness in the act of assumption). And it concedes to the defender of Christ's sinlessness the claim that Christ is without sin from the first moment of incarnation. This represents an important via media in the contemporary debate about this vexed christological topic.</description><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Christology</subject><subject>Human nature</subject><subject>Jesus Christ</subject><issn>1463-1652</issn><issn>1468-2400</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQhhujiYhefIJNuJksznTaLj2ajQqGhIPotVmWNpQAi-1uzL49C-vZucwcvvn_5GPsEWGM3Tz7bazHyEnRFRugUJOUC4Dry00pKslv2V2MWwBArmjARotDUm9s8u3LIviqicm02RcHX7dJ5ZJ8E3ys79mNK3bRPvztIft6e13m03S-eJ_lL_O0JEBKnaDMorawQlkCSsmJsnKyJuRaaglSuQy1kGuhXGEVaZFB5hytJrwAtcpoyEZ97jFUP42NtdlWTTh0lYZzpVBrIURHPfVUGaoYg3XmGPy-CK1BMGcJ5izBXCR0MPbwr9_Z9h_SzD4-l_3PCVcVW3M</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Crisp, Oliver D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1740-6771</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ</title><author>Crisp, Oliver D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3013-f437e19e0b15c01552337c8d3129595056f71945d46fae6394707ff3b82a06b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Christology</topic><topic>Human nature</topic><topic>Jesus Christ</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Oliver D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of systematic theology : IJST</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crisp, Oliver D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ</atitle><jtitle>International journal of systematic theology : IJST</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>235-250</pages><issn>1463-1652</issn><eissn>1468-2400</eissn><abstract>In the recent literature there has been a spate of essays, articles and books discussing the question of whether Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This article offers a new argument for the conclusion that Christ had a fallen but not sinful human nature that was ‘healed’ of its fallenness at the moment of assumption by the Word – what we shall call, the vicarious humanity of Christ view. This account concedes to the defender of Christ's ‘fallen’ humanity that his human nature is generated in a fallen state (and immediately cleansed of fallenness in the act of assumption). And it concedes to the defender of Christ's sinlessness the claim that Christ is without sin from the first moment of incarnation. This represents an important via media in the contemporary debate about this vexed christological topic.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ijst.12363</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1740-6771</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1463-1652
ispartof International journal of systematic theology : IJST, 2019-07, Vol.21 (3), p.235-250
issn 1463-1652
1468-2400
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2266199444
source Wiley Online Library Journals
subjects Christianity
Christology
Human nature
Jesus Christ
title On the Vicarious Humanity of Christ
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A09%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Vicarious%20Humanity%20of%20Christ&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20systematic%20theology%20:%20IJST&rft.au=Crisp,%20Oliver%20D.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=235-250&rft.issn=1463-1652&rft.eissn=1468-2400&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijst.12363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2266199444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2266199444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true