The capacity to emit isoprene differentiates the photosynthetic temperature responses of tropical plant species

Experimental research shows that isoprene emission by plants can improve photosynthetic performance at high temperatures. But whether species that emit isoprene have higher thermal limits than non‐emitting species remains largely untested. Tropical plants are adapted to narrow temperature ranges and global warming could result in significant ecosystem restructuring due to small variations in species' thermal tolerances. We compared photosynthetic temperature responses of 26 co‐occurring tropical tree and liana species to test whether isoprene‐emitting species are more tolerant to high temperatures. We classified species as isoprene emitters versus non‐emitters based on published datasets. Maximum temperatures for net photosynthesis were ~1.8°C higher for isoprene‐emitting species than for non‐emitters, and thermal response curves were 24% wider; differences in optimum temperatures (Topt) or photosynthetic rates at Topt were not significant. Modelling the carbon cost of isoprene emission, we show that even strong emission rates cause little reduction in the net carbon assimilation advantage over non‐emitters at supraoptimal temperatures. Isoprene emissions may alleviate biochemical limitations, which together with stomatal conductance, co‐limit photosynthesis above Topt. Our findings provide evidence that isoprene emission may be an adaptation to warmer thermal niches, and that emitting species may fare better under global warming than co‐occurring non‐emitting species. That isoprene emission enhances the thermal tolerance of photosynthesis is supported by decades of experimental physiology. But whether isoprene differentiates the thermal niches of emitting from non‐emitting species remains untested in the real world. We provide evidence that isoprene‐emitting tropical woody plant species photosynthesize to higher maximum temperatures, and over a broader thermal range, compared with co‐occurring, non‐emitting species. Even accounting for the carbon cost of isoprene emissions, we find no substantial trade‐offs associated with this high‐temperature advantage.