What is Said and What is Understood? The Readability and Language of Child Protection Medical Reports
Key Practitioner Messages Child protection medical reports provide the voice and opinion of a paediatrician, and must be readable by all. Child protection medical reports should include a professional opinion even if the opinion is one of being unsure. Simple measures can improve the readability of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child abuse review (Chichester, England : 1992) England : 1992), 2019-03, Vol.28 (2), p.159-165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 165 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 159 |
container_title | Child abuse review (Chichester, England : 1992) |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Cutland, Michelle Sims, Jo Pye, Matthew Rourke, Catherine McMullan, Kirsty Linden, Anna Jones, Steve |
description | Key Practitioner Messages
Child protection medical reports provide the voice and opinion of a paediatrician, and must be readable by all.
Child protection medical reports should include a professional opinion even if the opinion is one of being unsure.
Simple measures can improve the readability of reports.
A number of descriptive words are used in the opinions of reports. Standardisation of these could be encouraged to reduce misinterpretation.
‘Child protection medical reports provide the voice and opinion of a paediatrician, and must be readable by all’ |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/car.2543 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2265583392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2265583392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2933-8874ab5ceae8d121de5161c34a51334b210d219f6743ae2d48a10622ce2267ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-BMCXrxszed29yRS_IKKUls8hmky26asm5pskf57t60ePQ0MzzsDLyGXnA04Y-LGQhwIreQR6XFWlhkrtDgmPVZqkZVc5qfkLKUVY0orxXoEP5bQUp_oO3hHoXH0bzFrHMbUhuBu6XSJdILgYO5r3273bgzNYgMLpKGio6WvHX2LoUXb-tDQF3TeQt2F1iG26ZycVFAnvPidfTJ7uJ-OnrLx6-Pz6G6cWVFKmRXFUMFcWwQsHBfcoeY5t1KB5lKqueDMCV5W-VBJQOFUAZzlQlgUIh8iyj65Otxdx_C1wdSaVdjEpntpOqF1IWUpOnV9UDaGlCJWZh39J8St4czsSjRdiWZXYkezA_32NW7_dWZ0N9n7H18scS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2265583392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is Said and What is Understood? The Readability and Language of Child Protection Medical Reports</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Cutland, Michelle ; Sims, Jo ; Pye, Matthew ; Rourke, Catherine ; McMullan, Kirsty ; Linden, Anna ; Jones, Steve</creator><creatorcontrib>Cutland, Michelle ; Sims, Jo ; Pye, Matthew ; Rourke, Catherine ; McMullan, Kirsty ; Linden, Anna ; Jones, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>Key Practitioner Messages
Child protection medical reports provide the voice and opinion of a paediatrician, and must be readable by all.
Child protection medical reports should include a professional opinion even if the opinion is one of being unsure.
Simple measures can improve the readability of reports.
A number of descriptive words are used in the opinions of reports. Standardisation of these could be encouraged to reduce misinterpretation.
‘Child protection medical reports provide the voice and opinion of a paediatrician, and must be readable by all’</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-9136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/car.2543</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Child welfare ; Children ; Insurance claims ; Medicine ; Pediatricians ; Pediatrics ; Protection ; Readability</subject><ispartof>Child abuse review (Chichester, England : 1992), 2019-03, Vol.28 (2), p.159-165</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2933-8874ab5ceae8d121de5161c34a51334b210d219f6743ae2d48a10622ce2267ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2933-8874ab5ceae8d121de5161c34a51334b210d219f6743ae2d48a10622ce2267ee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8644-7051</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcar.2543$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcar.2543$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,31006,33781,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cutland, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sims, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pye, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rourke, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMullan, Kirsty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linden, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Steve</creatorcontrib><title>What is Said and What is Understood? The Readability and Language of Child Protection Medical Reports</title><title>Child abuse review (Chichester, England : 1992)</title><description>Key Practitioner Messages
Child protection medical reports provide the voice and opinion of a paediatrician, and must be readable by all.
Child protection medical reports should include a professional opinion even if the opinion is one of being unsure.
Simple measures can improve the readability of reports.
A number of descriptive words are used in the opinions of reports. Standardisation of these could be encouraged to reduce misinterpretation.
‘Child protection medical reports provide the voice and opinion of a paediatrician, and must be readable by all’</description><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Insurance claims</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Pediatricians</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Readability</subject><issn>0952-9136</issn><issn>1099-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-BMCXrxszed29yRS_IKKUls8hmky26asm5pskf57t60ePQ0MzzsDLyGXnA04Y-LGQhwIreQR6XFWlhkrtDgmPVZqkZVc5qfkLKUVY0orxXoEP5bQUp_oO3hHoXH0bzFrHMbUhuBu6XSJdILgYO5r3273bgzNYgMLpKGio6WvHX2LoUXb-tDQF3TeQt2F1iG26ZycVFAnvPidfTJ7uJ-OnrLx6-Pz6G6cWVFKmRXFUMFcWwQsHBfcoeY5t1KB5lKqueDMCV5W-VBJQOFUAZzlQlgUIh8iyj65Otxdx_C1wdSaVdjEpntpOqF1IWUpOnV9UDaGlCJWZh39J8St4czsSjRdiWZXYkezA_32NW7_dWZ0N9n7H18scS8</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Cutland, Michelle</creator><creator>Sims, Jo</creator><creator>Pye, Matthew</creator><creator>Rourke, Catherine</creator><creator>McMullan, Kirsty</creator><creator>Linden, Anna</creator><creator>Jones, Steve</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8644-7051</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>What is Said and What is Understood? The Readability and Language of Child Protection Medical Reports</title><author>Cutland, Michelle ; Sims, Jo ; Pye, Matthew ; Rourke, Catherine ; McMullan, Kirsty ; Linden, Anna ; Jones, Steve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2933-8874ab5ceae8d121de5161c34a51334b210d219f6743ae2d48a10622ce2267ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Insurance claims</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Pediatricians</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Readability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cutland, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sims, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pye, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rourke, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMullan, Kirsty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linden, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Steve</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Child abuse review (Chichester, England : 1992)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cutland, Michelle</au><au>Sims, Jo</au><au>Pye, Matthew</au><au>Rourke, Catherine</au><au>McMullan, Kirsty</au><au>Linden, Anna</au><au>Jones, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is Said and What is Understood? The Readability and Language of Child Protection Medical Reports</atitle><jtitle>Child abuse review (Chichester, England : 1992)</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>159-165</pages><issn>0952-9136</issn><eissn>1099-0852</eissn><abstract>Key Practitioner Messages
Child protection medical reports provide the voice and opinion of a paediatrician, and must be readable by all.
Child protection medical reports should include a professional opinion even if the opinion is one of being unsure.
Simple measures can improve the readability of reports.
A number of descriptive words are used in the opinions of reports. Standardisation of these could be encouraged to reduce misinterpretation.
‘Child protection medical reports provide the voice and opinion of a paediatrician, and must be readable by all’</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/car.2543</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8644-7051</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-9136 |
ispartof | Child abuse review (Chichester, England : 1992), 2019-03, Vol.28 (2), p.159-165 |
issn | 0952-9136 1099-0852 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2265583392 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Child welfare Children Insurance claims Medicine Pediatricians Pediatrics Protection Readability |
title | What is Said and What is Understood? The Readability and Language of Child Protection Medical Reports |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T00%3A50%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20Said%20and%20What%20is%20Understood?%20The%20Readability%20and%20Language%20of%20Child%20Protection%20Medical%20Reports&rft.jtitle=Child%20abuse%20review%20(Chichester,%20England%20:%201992)&rft.au=Cutland,%20Michelle&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=159-165&rft.issn=0952-9136&rft.eissn=1099-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/car.2543&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2265583392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2265583392&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |