Children like it more but don’t learn more: Effects of esthetic visual design in educational games

Little is known about what design elements in digital learning games enhance learning; especially in the case of child audiences. This study examines the effects of a learning game’s visual design on perceived attractiveness and learning outcomes. We developed two visual designs for the game: one wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of educational technology 2019-07, Vol.50 (4), p.1942-1960
Hauptverfasser: Javora, Ondřej, Hannemann, Tereza, Stárková, Tereza, Volná, Kristina, Brom, Cyril
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1960
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1942
container_title British journal of educational technology
container_volume 50
creator Javora, Ondřej
Hannemann, Tereza
Stárková, Tereza
Volná, Kristina
Brom, Cyril
description Little is known about what design elements in digital learning games enhance learning; especially in the case of child audiences. This study examines the effects of a learning game’s visual design on perceived attractiveness and learning outcomes. We developed two visual designs for the game: one with supposedly high esthetic value and another with a low esthetic value. Participants (children between 9 and 11 years of age, N = 53) were randomly divided into two groups. Each group interacted with their assigned version for about 20 minutes and then evaluated its visual attractiveness without knowing about the other version. Then, they evaluated the attractiveness of the complementary version. As the next step, they evaluated both versions side‐by‐side. During the free‐choice period, children could continue playing one of the game versions or a different game. They clearly preferred the high esthetic version in evaluations (d > 0.86) and in the free‐choice period (62% preferred the high esthetic version of the target game), but this did not improve their learning outcomes (comprehension: d = –0.59; transfer: d = –0.16). Possible explanations of this effect are discussed in terms of cognitive load theory and cognitive‐affective theory of learning from media.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bjet.12701
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2265566967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1223309</ericid><sourcerecordid>2265566967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3231-86f1d44aefc745c73698de725ed54175a5de2ad4009d763b6ba305862d4306c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4Y5kiRtSin9iO-UGVfipKnEp58ixN61LmhQ7AfXGa_B6PAlpgziyl9XOfBqtBqFzSka0m-t8Bc2IMkXoARrQWKooEVwcogEhREWUUH6MTkJYdSfhIh4gO1m60nqocOleAbsGr2sPOG8bbOvq-_OrwSVoX-3lG5wWBZgm4LrAEJolNM7gdxdaXWILwS0q7CoMtjW6cXXVqQu9hnCKjgpdBjj73UP0cp_OJ4_R7PnhaXI7iwxnnEaJLKiNYw2FUbEwistxYkExAVbEVAktLDBtY0LGVkmey1xzIhLJbMyJNIIP0WWfu_H1W9s9mK3q1ndvhIwxKYSUY6k66qqnjK9D8FBkG-_W2m8zSrJdi9muxWzfYgdf9DB4Z_7AdEoZ45yMO5_2_ocrYftPUnY3Ted95g_QDH5J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2265566967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Children like it more but don’t learn more: Effects of esthetic visual design in educational games</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Javora, Ondřej ; Hannemann, Tereza ; Stárková, Tereza ; Volná, Kristina ; Brom, Cyril</creator><creatorcontrib>Javora, Ondřej ; Hannemann, Tereza ; Stárková, Tereza ; Volná, Kristina ; Brom, Cyril</creatorcontrib><description>Little is known about what design elements in digital learning games enhance learning; especially in the case of child audiences. This study examines the effects of a learning game’s visual design on perceived attractiveness and learning outcomes. We developed two visual designs for the game: one with supposedly high esthetic value and another with a low esthetic value. Participants (children between 9 and 11 years of age, N = 53) were randomly divided into two groups. Each group interacted with their assigned version for about 20 minutes and then evaluated its visual attractiveness without knowing about the other version. Then, they evaluated the attractiveness of the complementary version. As the next step, they evaluated both versions side‐by‐side. During the free‐choice period, children could continue playing one of the game versions or a different game. They clearly preferred the high esthetic version in evaluations (d &gt; 0.86) and in the free‐choice period (62% preferred the high esthetic version of the target game), but this did not improve their learning outcomes (comprehension: d = –0.59; transfer: d = –0.16). Possible explanations of this effect are discussed in terms of cognitive load theory and cognitive‐affective theory of learning from media.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12701</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Coventry: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; Affective Behavior ; Audiences ; Children ; Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive Processes ; Computer Games ; Computer Software ; Design ; Educational Games ; Games ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Learning Theories ; Learning theory ; Outcomes of Education ; Transfer of Training ; Video Games ; Visual effects ; Visual perception</subject><ispartof>British journal of educational technology, 2019-07, Vol.50 (4), p.1942-1960</ispartof><rights>2018 British Educational Research Association</rights><rights>2019 British Educational Research Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3231-86f1d44aefc745c73698de725ed54175a5de2ad4009d763b6ba305862d4306c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3231-86f1d44aefc745c73698de725ed54175a5de2ad4009d763b6ba305862d4306c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5945-0514</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjet.12701$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjet.12701$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1223309$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Javora, Ondřej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannemann, Tereza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stárková, Tereza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volná, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brom, Cyril</creatorcontrib><title>Children like it more but don’t learn more: Effects of esthetic visual design in educational games</title><title>British journal of educational technology</title><description>Little is known about what design elements in digital learning games enhance learning; especially in the case of child audiences. This study examines the effects of a learning game’s visual design on perceived attractiveness and learning outcomes. We developed two visual designs for the game: one with supposedly high esthetic value and another with a low esthetic value. Participants (children between 9 and 11 years of age, N = 53) were randomly divided into two groups. Each group interacted with their assigned version for about 20 minutes and then evaluated its visual attractiveness without knowing about the other version. Then, they evaluated the attractiveness of the complementary version. As the next step, they evaluated both versions side‐by‐side. During the free‐choice period, children could continue playing one of the game versions or a different game. They clearly preferred the high esthetic version in evaluations (d &gt; 0.86) and in the free‐choice period (62% preferred the high esthetic version of the target game), but this did not improve their learning outcomes (comprehension: d = –0.59; transfer: d = –0.16). Possible explanations of this effect are discussed in terms of cognitive load theory and cognitive‐affective theory of learning from media.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Affective Behavior</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Computer Games</subject><subject>Computer Software</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Educational Games</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Transfer of Training</subject><subject>Video Games</subject><subject>Visual effects</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><issn>0007-1013</issn><issn>1467-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4Y5kiRtSin9iO-UGVfipKnEp58ixN61LmhQ7AfXGa_B6PAlpgziyl9XOfBqtBqFzSka0m-t8Bc2IMkXoARrQWKooEVwcogEhREWUUH6MTkJYdSfhIh4gO1m60nqocOleAbsGr2sPOG8bbOvq-_OrwSVoX-3lG5wWBZgm4LrAEJolNM7gdxdaXWILwS0q7CoMtjW6cXXVqQu9hnCKjgpdBjj73UP0cp_OJ4_R7PnhaXI7iwxnnEaJLKiNYw2FUbEwistxYkExAVbEVAktLDBtY0LGVkmey1xzIhLJbMyJNIIP0WWfu_H1W9s9mK3q1ndvhIwxKYSUY6k66qqnjK9D8FBkG-_W2m8zSrJdi9muxWzfYgdf9DB4Z_7AdEoZ45yMO5_2_ocrYftPUnY3Ted95g_QDH5J</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Javora, Ondřej</creator><creator>Hannemann, Tereza</creator><creator>Stárková, Tereza</creator><creator>Volná, Kristina</creator><creator>Brom, Cyril</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5945-0514</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Children like it more but don’t learn more: Effects of esthetic visual design in educational games</title><author>Javora, Ondřej ; Hannemann, Tereza ; Stárková, Tereza ; Volná, Kristina ; Brom, Cyril</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3231-86f1d44aefc745c73698de725ed54175a5de2ad4009d763b6ba305862d4306c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Affective Behavior</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Computer Games</topic><topic>Computer Software</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Educational Games</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Transfer of Training</topic><topic>Video Games</topic><topic>Visual effects</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Javora, Ondřej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannemann, Tereza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stárková, Tereza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volná, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brom, Cyril</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>British journal of educational technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Javora, Ondřej</au><au>Hannemann, Tereza</au><au>Stárková, Tereza</au><au>Volná, Kristina</au><au>Brom, Cyril</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1223309</ericid><atitle>Children like it more but don’t learn more: Effects of esthetic visual design in educational games</atitle><jtitle>British journal of educational technology</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1942</spage><epage>1960</epage><pages>1942-1960</pages><issn>0007-1013</issn><eissn>1467-8535</eissn><abstract>Little is known about what design elements in digital learning games enhance learning; especially in the case of child audiences. This study examines the effects of a learning game’s visual design on perceived attractiveness and learning outcomes. We developed two visual designs for the game: one with supposedly high esthetic value and another with a low esthetic value. Participants (children between 9 and 11 years of age, N = 53) were randomly divided into two groups. Each group interacted with their assigned version for about 20 minutes and then evaluated its visual attractiveness without knowing about the other version. Then, they evaluated the attractiveness of the complementary version. As the next step, they evaluated both versions side‐by‐side. During the free‐choice period, children could continue playing one of the game versions or a different game. They clearly preferred the high esthetic version in evaluations (d &gt; 0.86) and in the free‐choice period (62% preferred the high esthetic version of the target game), but this did not improve their learning outcomes (comprehension: d = –0.59; transfer: d = –0.16). Possible explanations of this effect are discussed in terms of cognitive load theory and cognitive‐affective theory of learning from media.</abstract><cop>Coventry</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><doi>10.1111/bjet.12701</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5945-0514</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1013
ispartof British journal of educational technology, 2019-07, Vol.50 (4), p.1942-1960
issn 0007-1013
1467-8535
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2265566967
source Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aesthetics
Affective Behavior
Audiences
Children
Cognitive Ability
Cognitive Processes
Computer Games
Computer Software
Design
Educational Games
Games
Interpersonal Relationship
Learning Theories
Learning theory
Outcomes of Education
Transfer of Training
Video Games
Visual effects
Visual perception
title Children like it more but don’t learn more: Effects of esthetic visual design in educational games
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A03%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Children%20like%20it%20more%20but%20don%E2%80%99t%20learn%20more:%20Effects%20of%20esthetic%20visual%20design%20in%20educational%20games&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20educational%20technology&rft.au=Javora,%20Ond%C5%99ej&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1942&rft.epage=1960&rft.pages=1942-1960&rft.issn=0007-1013&rft.eissn=1467-8535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjet.12701&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2265566967%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2265566967&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1223309&rfr_iscdi=true