A comparison between optimization-based human motion prediction methods: data-based, knowledge-based and hybrid approaches
In this paper an optimization-based hybrid dynamic motion prediction method is presented. The method is hybrid as the prediction relies both on actually performed motions for reference (following a data-based approach) and on the definition of appropriate performance measures (following a knowledge-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Structural and multidisciplinary optimization 2014, Vol.49 (1), p.169-183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 183 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Structural and multidisciplinary optimization |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Pasciuto, Ilaria Ausejo, Sergio Celigüeta, Juan Tomás Suescun, Ángel Cazón, Aitor |
description | In this paper an optimization-based hybrid dynamic motion prediction method is presented. The method is hybrid as the prediction relies both on actually performed motions for reference (following a data-based approach) and on the definition of appropriate performance measures (following a knowledge-based approach). The prediction is carried out through the definition of a constrained non-linear optimization problem, in which the objective function is composed of a weighted combination of data-based and knowledge-based contributions. The weights of each contribution are varied in order to generate a battery of hybrid predictions, which range from purely data-based to purely knowledge-based. The results of the predictions are analyzed and compared against actually performed motions both qualitatively and quantitatively, using a measure of realism defined as the distance of the predicted motions from the mean of the actually performed motions. The method is applied to clutch pedal depression motions and the comparison between the different approaches favors the hybrid solution, which seems to combine the strengths of both data- and knowledge-based approaches, enhancing the realism of the predicted motion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00158-013-0960-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2262595362</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2262595362</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d8004965d4bacd550c065a2a367b5f344ca0793c5404bf0c174bfeb67597adef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UF1LwzAUDaKgTn-AbwFfjd40Tdr6NoZfMPBFwbeQJunWaZOadMj2683s0CefzuFyPi4HoQsK1xSguIkAlJcEKCNQCSDsAJ1QQTmheVke_vLi7RidxrgCgBLy6gRtp1j7rlehjd7h2g5f1jrs-6Ht2q0aWu9IraI1eLnulMOd351wH6xp9Q_t7LD0Jt5iowY1aq_wu_NfH9Ys7N6sXArY1KFNtO-DV3pp4xk6atRHtOd7nKDX-7uX2SOZPz88zaZzohkVAzElpE8FN3mttOEcNAiuMsVEUfOG5blWUFRM8xzyugFNiwS2FgWvCmVswybocsxNxZ9rGwe58uvgUqXMMpHxijORJRUdVTr4GINtZB_aToWNpCB3E8txYpkmlruJJUuebPTEpHULG_6S_zd9AxypgLI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262595362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison between optimization-based human motion prediction methods: data-based, knowledge-based and hybrid approaches</title><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Pasciuto, Ilaria ; Ausejo, Sergio ; Celigüeta, Juan Tomás ; Suescun, Ángel ; Cazón, Aitor</creator><creatorcontrib>Pasciuto, Ilaria ; Ausejo, Sergio ; Celigüeta, Juan Tomás ; Suescun, Ángel ; Cazón, Aitor</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper an optimization-based hybrid dynamic motion prediction method is presented. The method is hybrid as the prediction relies both on actually performed motions for reference (following a data-based approach) and on the definition of appropriate performance measures (following a knowledge-based approach). The prediction is carried out through the definition of a constrained non-linear optimization problem, in which the objective function is composed of a weighted combination of data-based and knowledge-based contributions. The weights of each contribution are varied in order to generate a battery of hybrid predictions, which range from purely data-based to purely knowledge-based. The results of the predictions are analyzed and compared against actually performed motions both qualitatively and quantitatively, using a measure of realism defined as the distance of the predicted motions from the mean of the actually performed motions. The method is applied to clutch pedal depression motions and the comparison between the different approaches favors the hybrid solution, which seems to combine the strengths of both data- and knowledge-based approaches, enhancing the realism of the predicted motion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-147X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-1488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00158-013-0960-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis ; Engineering ; Engineering Design ; Human motion ; Knowledge base ; Optimization ; Predictions ; Realism ; Research Paper ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><ispartof>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2014, Vol.49 (1), p.169-183</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization is a copyright of Springer, (2013). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d8004965d4bacd550c065a2a367b5f344ca0793c5404bf0c174bfeb67597adef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d8004965d4bacd550c065a2a367b5f344ca0793c5404bf0c174bfeb67597adef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00158-013-0960-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00158-013-0960-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pasciuto, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ausejo, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celigüeta, Juan Tomás</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suescun, Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cazón, Aitor</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison between optimization-based human motion prediction methods: data-based, knowledge-based and hybrid approaches</title><title>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</title><addtitle>Struct Multidisc Optim</addtitle><description>In this paper an optimization-based hybrid dynamic motion prediction method is presented. The method is hybrid as the prediction relies both on actually performed motions for reference (following a data-based approach) and on the definition of appropriate performance measures (following a knowledge-based approach). The prediction is carried out through the definition of a constrained non-linear optimization problem, in which the objective function is composed of a weighted combination of data-based and knowledge-based contributions. The weights of each contribution are varied in order to generate a battery of hybrid predictions, which range from purely data-based to purely knowledge-based. The results of the predictions are analyzed and compared against actually performed motions both qualitatively and quantitatively, using a measure of realism defined as the distance of the predicted motions from the mean of the actually performed motions. The method is applied to clutch pedal depression motions and the comparison between the different approaches favors the hybrid solution, which seems to combine the strengths of both data- and knowledge-based approaches, enhancing the realism of the predicted motion.</description><subject>Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Design</subject><subject>Human motion</subject><subject>Knowledge base</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><issn>1615-147X</issn><issn>1615-1488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UF1LwzAUDaKgTn-AbwFfjd40Tdr6NoZfMPBFwbeQJunWaZOadMj2683s0CefzuFyPi4HoQsK1xSguIkAlJcEKCNQCSDsAJ1QQTmheVke_vLi7RidxrgCgBLy6gRtp1j7rlehjd7h2g5f1jrs-6Ht2q0aWu9IraI1eLnulMOd351wH6xp9Q_t7LD0Jt5iowY1aq_wu_NfH9Ys7N6sXArY1KFNtO-DV3pp4xk6atRHtOd7nKDX-7uX2SOZPz88zaZzohkVAzElpE8FN3mttOEcNAiuMsVEUfOG5blWUFRM8xzyugFNiwS2FgWvCmVswybocsxNxZ9rGwe58uvgUqXMMpHxijORJRUdVTr4GINtZB_aToWNpCB3E8txYpkmlruJJUuebPTEpHULG_6S_zd9AxypgLI</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Pasciuto, Ilaria</creator><creator>Ausejo, Sergio</creator><creator>Celigüeta, Juan Tomás</creator><creator>Suescun, Ángel</creator><creator>Cazón, Aitor</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>A comparison between optimization-based human motion prediction methods: data-based, knowledge-based and hybrid approaches</title><author>Pasciuto, Ilaria ; Ausejo, Sergio ; Celigüeta, Juan Tomás ; Suescun, Ángel ; Cazón, Aitor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d8004965d4bacd550c065a2a367b5f344ca0793c5404bf0c174bfeb67597adef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Design</topic><topic>Human motion</topic><topic>Knowledge base</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pasciuto, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ausejo, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celigüeta, Juan Tomás</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suescun, Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cazón, Aitor</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pasciuto, Ilaria</au><au>Ausejo, Sergio</au><au>Celigüeta, Juan Tomás</au><au>Suescun, Ángel</au><au>Cazón, Aitor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison between optimization-based human motion prediction methods: data-based, knowledge-based and hybrid approaches</atitle><jtitle>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</jtitle><stitle>Struct Multidisc Optim</stitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>169-183</pages><issn>1615-147X</issn><eissn>1615-1488</eissn><abstract>In this paper an optimization-based hybrid dynamic motion prediction method is presented. The method is hybrid as the prediction relies both on actually performed motions for reference (following a data-based approach) and on the definition of appropriate performance measures (following a knowledge-based approach). The prediction is carried out through the definition of a constrained non-linear optimization problem, in which the objective function is composed of a weighted combination of data-based and knowledge-based contributions. The weights of each contribution are varied in order to generate a battery of hybrid predictions, which range from purely data-based to purely knowledge-based. The results of the predictions are analyzed and compared against actually performed motions both qualitatively and quantitatively, using a measure of realism defined as the distance of the predicted motions from the mean of the actually performed motions. The method is applied to clutch pedal depression motions and the comparison between the different approaches favors the hybrid solution, which seems to combine the strengths of both data- and knowledge-based approaches, enhancing the realism of the predicted motion.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00158-013-0960-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1615-147X |
ispartof | Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2014, Vol.49 (1), p.169-183 |
issn | 1615-147X 1615-1488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2262595362 |
source | SpringerLink |
subjects | Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis Engineering Engineering Design Human motion Knowledge base Optimization Predictions Realism Research Paper Theoretical and Applied Mechanics |
title | A comparison between optimization-based human motion prediction methods: data-based, knowledge-based and hybrid approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T15%3A48%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20between%20optimization-based%20human%20motion%20prediction%20methods:%20data-based,%20knowledge-based%20and%20hybrid%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Structural%20and%20multidisciplinary%20optimization&rft.au=Pasciuto,%20Ilaria&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=169-183&rft.issn=1615-147X&rft.eissn=1615-1488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00158-013-0960-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2262595362%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262595362&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |