Efficient management of production-inventory system in a multi-item manufacturing facility: MTS vs. MTO
Suppliers produce a variety of products to serve both large and small customer orders with unreliable demand information. Furthermore, suppliers also face customer pressure to improve quality, lower cost, and reduce delivery delay. These conflicting objectives lead firms to use both make-to-stock an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2011-06, Vol.54 (9-12), p.1179-1186 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9-12 |
container_start_page | 1179 |
container_title | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Günalay, Yavuz |
description | Suppliers produce a variety of products to serve both large and small customer orders with unreliable demand information. Furthermore, suppliers also face customer pressure to improve quality, lower cost, and reduce delivery delay. These conflicting objectives lead firms to use both make-to-stock and make-to-order production strategies together. These manufacturing strategies were known to be competing policies and in some cases the choice depends on characteristics of the product. In this study, the firms that manufactured multiple-item types are considered to be free to choose either production policy for each product type (no product-specific requirements are present). Then, using the order-arrival characteristics and cost parameters for each product type, the firm wants to decide which production/scheduling policy to use for each product type. Two production policy (MTS vs MTO) and two scheduling strategy (FIFO vs cyclic) are considered in this study. The analysis and numerical study show that there is no dominant strategy neither for production policy, nor product scheduling policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00170-010-2984-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2262415812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2262415812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-db20364d4301b0cd6ec5b7e1b7850ee0c22e3c149aecf0a5aae1374d6ee243313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4AbwHPqTPJfnqTUj-g0oP1HLLZbEnp7tYkW-i_N8sKnjzNm-G9mTePkHuEBQLkjx4Ac2CAwHhZJKy8IDNMhGACML0kM-BZwUSeFdfkxvt9ZGeYFTOyWzWN1dZ0gbaqUzvTjrBv6NH19aCD7Ttmu1Mc9u5M_dkH01LbUUXb4RAss2MflUOjdBic7XY0Inuw4fxEP7af9OQXsW5uyVWjDt7c_dY5-XpZbZdvbL15fV8-r5kWmAVWVxxEltRJtF2BrjOj0yo3WOVFCsaA5twIjUmpjG5ApUoZFHkSeYbHb1HMycO0N_r_HowPct8ProsnJecZTzAtkEcWTizteu-daeTR2Va5s0SQY55yylPGPOWYpyyjhk8afxzfNO5v8_-iH406eQE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262415812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficient management of production-inventory system in a multi-item manufacturing facility: MTS vs. MTO</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Günalay, Yavuz</creator><creatorcontrib>Günalay, Yavuz</creatorcontrib><description>Suppliers produce a variety of products to serve both large and small customer orders with unreliable demand information. Furthermore, suppliers also face customer pressure to improve quality, lower cost, and reduce delivery delay. These conflicting objectives lead firms to use both make-to-stock and make-to-order production strategies together. These manufacturing strategies were known to be competing policies and in some cases the choice depends on characteristics of the product. In this study, the firms that manufactured multiple-item types are considered to be free to choose either production policy for each product type (no product-specific requirements are present). Then, using the order-arrival characteristics and cost parameters for each product type, the firm wants to decide which production/scheduling policy to use for each product type. Two production policy (MTS vs MTO) and two scheduling strategy (FIFO vs cyclic) are considered in this study. The analysis and numerical study show that there is no dominant strategy neither for production policy, nor product scheduling policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2984-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>CAE) and Design ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Customers ; Engineering ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Industrial plants ; Inventory management ; Mechanical Engineering ; Media Management ; Original Article ; Production planning ; Production scheduling ; Suppliers</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2011-06, Vol.54 (9-12), p.1179-1186</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010</rights><rights>The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology is a copyright of Springer, (2010). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-db20364d4301b0cd6ec5b7e1b7850ee0c22e3c149aecf0a5aae1374d6ee243313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-db20364d4301b0cd6ec5b7e1b7850ee0c22e3c149aecf0a5aae1374d6ee243313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00170-010-2984-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00170-010-2984-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Günalay, Yavuz</creatorcontrib><title>Efficient management of production-inventory system in a multi-item manufacturing facility: MTS vs. MTO</title><title>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</title><addtitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</addtitle><description>Suppliers produce a variety of products to serve both large and small customer orders with unreliable demand information. Furthermore, suppliers also face customer pressure to improve quality, lower cost, and reduce delivery delay. These conflicting objectives lead firms to use both make-to-stock and make-to-order production strategies together. These manufacturing strategies were known to be competing policies and in some cases the choice depends on characteristics of the product. In this study, the firms that manufactured multiple-item types are considered to be free to choose either production policy for each product type (no product-specific requirements are present). Then, using the order-arrival characteristics and cost parameters for each product type, the firm wants to decide which production/scheduling policy to use for each product type. Two production policy (MTS vs MTO) and two scheduling strategy (FIFO vs cyclic) are considered in this study. The analysis and numerical study show that there is no dominant strategy neither for production policy, nor product scheduling policy.</description><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Industrial plants</subject><subject>Inventory management</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Media Management</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Production planning</subject><subject>Production scheduling</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><issn>0268-3768</issn><issn>1433-3015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4AbwHPqTPJfnqTUj-g0oP1HLLZbEnp7tYkW-i_N8sKnjzNm-G9mTePkHuEBQLkjx4Ac2CAwHhZJKy8IDNMhGACML0kM-BZwUSeFdfkxvt9ZGeYFTOyWzWN1dZ0gbaqUzvTjrBv6NH19aCD7Ttmu1Mc9u5M_dkH01LbUUXb4RAss2MflUOjdBic7XY0Inuw4fxEP7af9OQXsW5uyVWjDt7c_dY5-XpZbZdvbL15fV8-r5kWmAVWVxxEltRJtF2BrjOj0yo3WOVFCsaA5twIjUmpjG5ApUoZFHkSeYbHb1HMycO0N_r_HowPct8ProsnJecZTzAtkEcWTizteu-daeTR2Va5s0SQY55yylPGPOWYpyyjhk8afxzfNO5v8_-iH406eQE</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Günalay, Yavuz</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Efficient management of production-inventory system in a multi-item manufacturing facility: MTS vs. MTO</title><author>Günalay, Yavuz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-db20364d4301b0cd6ec5b7e1b7850ee0c22e3c149aecf0a5aae1374d6ee243313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Industrial plants</topic><topic>Inventory management</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Media Management</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Production planning</topic><topic>Production scheduling</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Günalay, Yavuz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Günalay, Yavuz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficient management of production-inventory system in a multi-item manufacturing facility: MTS vs. MTO</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle><stitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</stitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>9-12</issue><spage>1179</spage><epage>1186</epage><pages>1179-1186</pages><issn>0268-3768</issn><eissn>1433-3015</eissn><abstract>Suppliers produce a variety of products to serve both large and small customer orders with unreliable demand information. Furthermore, suppliers also face customer pressure to improve quality, lower cost, and reduce delivery delay. These conflicting objectives lead firms to use both make-to-stock and make-to-order production strategies together. These manufacturing strategies were known to be competing policies and in some cases the choice depends on characteristics of the product. In this study, the firms that manufactured multiple-item types are considered to be free to choose either production policy for each product type (no product-specific requirements are present). Then, using the order-arrival characteristics and cost parameters for each product type, the firm wants to decide which production/scheduling policy to use for each product type. Two production policy (MTS vs MTO) and two scheduling strategy (FIFO vs cyclic) are considered in this study. The analysis and numerical study show that there is no dominant strategy neither for production policy, nor product scheduling policy.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00170-010-2984-9</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-3768 |
ispartof | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2011-06, Vol.54 (9-12), p.1179-1186 |
issn | 0268-3768 1433-3015 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2262415812 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | CAE) and Design Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD Customers Engineering Industrial and Production Engineering Industrial plants Inventory management Mechanical Engineering Media Management Original Article Production planning Production scheduling Suppliers |
title | Efficient management of production-inventory system in a multi-item manufacturing facility: MTS vs. MTO |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A58%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficient%20management%20of%20production-inventory%20system%20in%20a%20multi-item%20manufacturing%20facility:%20MTS%20vs.%20MTO&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology&rft.au=G%C3%BCnalay,%20Yavuz&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=9-12&rft.spage=1179&rft.epage=1186&rft.pages=1179-1186&rft.issn=0268-3768&rft.eissn=1433-3015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00170-010-2984-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2262415812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262415812&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |