LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS
In this article, the author extends his earlier research investigating the relationships among groups, courts, and political processes by starting to evaluate the widely-accepted proposition that groups that lack political power litigate through a case study of American Indian advocacy at the end of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Harvard journal on legislation 2019, Vol.56 (1), p.23 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Harvard journal on legislation |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Carlson, Kirsten Matoy |
description | In this article, the author extends his earlier research investigating the relationships among groups, courts, and political processes by starting to evaluate the widely-accepted proposition that groups that lack political power litigate through a case study of American Indian advocacy at the end of the twentieth century. American Indian advocacy is a particularly rich setting for investigating how and why groups craft advocacy strategies over time. American Indians, and especially Indian nations, have a long and rich history of engaging with the United States government. Since its formation, the United States has established legal relationships with American Indians, treating them as separate political communities or tribes. During the first century of its existence, the United States government and Indian nations entered into over 400 treaties. These treaties acknowledge the tribes' pre-existing and ongoing rights and governmental authority. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2262077057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2262077057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-64a5cc9ccefddcea1b99eff3f4c2528b754c7b17e903d86534d437d285c709d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjcsKgkAYRocoyC4P0E5oPTBX_5ml3VQQXWRQq9C5LCKyMt8_oVbfOZvzjVBAteBYEjiPUUAIBayIOk_RrOtug9JI6gCt8nKzuWRFEsZJnBXHKqzSfVjudscFmvj63rnlf-fodNhX2xTnZZJt4xw_qeIfHIlaGqONcd5a42raaO28514YJplqQAoDDQWnCbcqklxYwcEyJQ0QPfAcrX_d57t99a77XG9t_34Ml1fGIkYAiAT-BQ6iNbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262077057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS</title><source>HeinOnline</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</creator><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, the author extends his earlier research investigating the relationships among groups, courts, and political processes by starting to evaluate the widely-accepted proposition that groups that lack political power litigate through a case study of American Indian advocacy at the end of the twentieth century. American Indian advocacy is a particularly rich setting for investigating how and why groups craft advocacy strategies over time. American Indians, and especially Indian nations, have a long and rich history of engaging with the United States government. Since its formation, the United States has established legal relationships with American Indians, treating them as separate political communities or tribes. During the first century of its existence, the United States government and Indian nations entered into over 400 treaties. These treaties acknowledge the tribes' pre-existing and ongoing rights and governmental authority.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-808X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-507X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Harvard University Law School - Harvard Journal on Legislation</publisher><subject>20th century ; Advocacy ; American Indians ; Case studies ; Courts ; Lobbying ; Native North Americans ; Political power ; Treaties ; Tribes and tribal systems</subject><ispartof>Harvard journal on legislation, 2019, Vol.56 (1), p.23</ispartof><rights>Copyright Harvard University Law School - Harvard Journal on Legislation 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27868</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</creatorcontrib><title>LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS</title><title>Harvard journal on legislation</title><description>In this article, the author extends his earlier research investigating the relationships among groups, courts, and political processes by starting to evaluate the widely-accepted proposition that groups that lack political power litigate through a case study of American Indian advocacy at the end of the twentieth century. American Indian advocacy is a particularly rich setting for investigating how and why groups craft advocacy strategies over time. American Indians, and especially Indian nations, have a long and rich history of engaging with the United States government. Since its formation, the United States has established legal relationships with American Indians, treating them as separate political communities or tribes. During the first century of its existence, the United States government and Indian nations entered into over 400 treaties. These treaties acknowledge the tribes' pre-existing and ongoing rights and governmental authority.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>American Indians</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>Tribes and tribal systems</subject><issn>0017-808X</issn><issn>1943-507X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNotjcsKgkAYRocoyC4P0E5oPTBX_5ml3VQQXWRQq9C5LCKyMt8_oVbfOZvzjVBAteBYEjiPUUAIBayIOk_RrOtug9JI6gCt8nKzuWRFEsZJnBXHKqzSfVjudscFmvj63rnlf-fodNhX2xTnZZJt4xw_qeIfHIlaGqONcd5a42raaO28514YJplqQAoDDQWnCbcqklxYwcEyJQ0QPfAcrX_d57t99a77XG9t_34Ml1fGIkYAiAT-BQ6iNbw</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</creator><general>Harvard University Law School - Harvard Journal on Legislation</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS</title><author>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-64a5cc9ccefddcea1b99eff3f4c2528b754c7b17e903d86534d437d285c709d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>American Indians</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>Tribes and tribal systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Harvard journal on legislation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS</atitle><jtitle>Harvard journal on legislation</jtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><pages>23-</pages><issn>0017-808X</issn><eissn>1943-507X</eissn><abstract>In this article, the author extends his earlier research investigating the relationships among groups, courts, and political processes by starting to evaluate the widely-accepted proposition that groups that lack political power litigate through a case study of American Indian advocacy at the end of the twentieth century. American Indian advocacy is a particularly rich setting for investigating how and why groups craft advocacy strategies over time. American Indians, and especially Indian nations, have a long and rich history of engaging with the United States government. Since its formation, the United States has established legal relationships with American Indians, treating them as separate political communities or tribes. During the first century of its existence, the United States government and Indian nations entered into over 400 treaties. These treaties acknowledge the tribes' pre-existing and ongoing rights and governmental authority.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Harvard University Law School - Harvard Journal on Legislation</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-808X |
ispartof | Harvard journal on legislation, 2019, Vol.56 (1), p.23 |
issn | 0017-808X 1943-507X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2262077057 |
source | HeinOnline; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | 20th century Advocacy American Indians Case studies Courts Lobbying Native North Americans Political power Treaties Tribes and tribal systems |
title | LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T22%3A33%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LOBBYING%20AGAINST%20THE%20ODDS&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20journal%20on%20legislation&rft.au=Carlson,%20Kirsten%20Matoy&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.pages=23-&rft.issn=0017-808X&rft.eissn=1943-507X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2262077057%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262077057&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |