LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS

In this article, the author extends his earlier research investigating the relationships among groups, courts, and political processes by starting to evaluate the widely-accepted proposition that groups that lack political power litigate through a case study of American Indian advocacy at the end of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Harvard journal on legislation 2019, Vol.56 (1), p.23
1. Verfasser: Carlson, Kirsten Matoy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Harvard journal on legislation
container_volume 56
creator Carlson, Kirsten Matoy
description In this article, the author extends his earlier research investigating the relationships among groups, courts, and political processes by starting to evaluate the widely-accepted proposition that groups that lack political power litigate through a case study of American Indian advocacy at the end of the twentieth century. American Indian advocacy is a particularly rich setting for investigating how and why groups craft advocacy strategies over time. American Indians, and especially Indian nations, have a long and rich history of engaging with the United States government. Since its formation, the United States has established legal relationships with American Indians, treating them as separate political communities or tribes. During the first century of its existence, the United States government and Indian nations entered into over 400 treaties. These treaties acknowledge the tribes' pre-existing and ongoing rights and governmental authority.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2262077057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2262077057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-64a5cc9ccefddcea1b99eff3f4c2528b754c7b17e903d86534d437d285c709d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjcsKgkAYRocoyC4P0E5oPTBX_5ml3VQQXWRQq9C5LCKyMt8_oVbfOZvzjVBAteBYEjiPUUAIBayIOk_RrOtug9JI6gCt8nKzuWRFEsZJnBXHKqzSfVjudscFmvj63rnlf-fodNhX2xTnZZJt4xw_qeIfHIlaGqONcd5a42raaO28514YJplqQAoDDQWnCbcqklxYwcEyJQ0QPfAcrX_d57t99a77XG9t_34Ml1fGIkYAiAT-BQ6iNbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262077057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS</title><source>HeinOnline</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</creator><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, the author extends his earlier research investigating the relationships among groups, courts, and political processes by starting to evaluate the widely-accepted proposition that groups that lack political power litigate through a case study of American Indian advocacy at the end of the twentieth century. American Indian advocacy is a particularly rich setting for investigating how and why groups craft advocacy strategies over time. American Indians, and especially Indian nations, have a long and rich history of engaging with the United States government. Since its formation, the United States has established legal relationships with American Indians, treating them as separate political communities or tribes. During the first century of its existence, the United States government and Indian nations entered into over 400 treaties. These treaties acknowledge the tribes' pre-existing and ongoing rights and governmental authority.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-808X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-507X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Harvard University Law School - Harvard Journal on Legislation</publisher><subject>20th century ; Advocacy ; American Indians ; Case studies ; Courts ; Lobbying ; Native North Americans ; Political power ; Treaties ; Tribes and tribal systems</subject><ispartof>Harvard journal on legislation, 2019, Vol.56 (1), p.23</ispartof><rights>Copyright Harvard University Law School - Harvard Journal on Legislation 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27868</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</creatorcontrib><title>LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS</title><title>Harvard journal on legislation</title><description>In this article, the author extends his earlier research investigating the relationships among groups, courts, and political processes by starting to evaluate the widely-accepted proposition that groups that lack political power litigate through a case study of American Indian advocacy at the end of the twentieth century. American Indian advocacy is a particularly rich setting for investigating how and why groups craft advocacy strategies over time. American Indians, and especially Indian nations, have a long and rich history of engaging with the United States government. Since its formation, the United States has established legal relationships with American Indians, treating them as separate political communities or tribes. During the first century of its existence, the United States government and Indian nations entered into over 400 treaties. These treaties acknowledge the tribes' pre-existing and ongoing rights and governmental authority.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>American Indians</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>Tribes and tribal systems</subject><issn>0017-808X</issn><issn>1943-507X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNotjcsKgkAYRocoyC4P0E5oPTBX_5ml3VQQXWRQq9C5LCKyMt8_oVbfOZvzjVBAteBYEjiPUUAIBayIOk_RrOtug9JI6gCt8nKzuWRFEsZJnBXHKqzSfVjudscFmvj63rnlf-fodNhX2xTnZZJt4xw_qeIfHIlaGqONcd5a42raaO28514YJplqQAoDDQWnCbcqklxYwcEyJQ0QPfAcrX_d57t99a77XG9t_34Ml1fGIkYAiAT-BQ6iNbw</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</creator><general>Harvard University Law School - Harvard Journal on Legislation</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS</title><author>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-64a5cc9ccefddcea1b99eff3f4c2528b754c7b17e903d86534d437d285c709d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>American Indians</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>Tribes and tribal systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Harvard journal on legislation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carlson, Kirsten Matoy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS</atitle><jtitle>Harvard journal on legislation</jtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><pages>23-</pages><issn>0017-808X</issn><eissn>1943-507X</eissn><abstract>In this article, the author extends his earlier research investigating the relationships among groups, courts, and political processes by starting to evaluate the widely-accepted proposition that groups that lack political power litigate through a case study of American Indian advocacy at the end of the twentieth century. American Indian advocacy is a particularly rich setting for investigating how and why groups craft advocacy strategies over time. American Indians, and especially Indian nations, have a long and rich history of engaging with the United States government. Since its formation, the United States has established legal relationships with American Indians, treating them as separate political communities or tribes. During the first century of its existence, the United States government and Indian nations entered into over 400 treaties. These treaties acknowledge the tribes' pre-existing and ongoing rights and governmental authority.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Harvard University Law School - Harvard Journal on Legislation</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-808X
ispartof Harvard journal on legislation, 2019, Vol.56 (1), p.23
issn 0017-808X
1943-507X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2262077057
source HeinOnline; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects 20th century
Advocacy
American Indians
Case studies
Courts
Lobbying
Native North Americans
Political power
Treaties
Tribes and tribal systems
title LOBBYING AGAINST THE ODDS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T22%3A33%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LOBBYING%20AGAINST%20THE%20ODDS&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20journal%20on%20legislation&rft.au=Carlson,%20Kirsten%20Matoy&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.pages=23-&rft.issn=0017-808X&rft.eissn=1943-507X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2262077057%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262077057&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true