“We’re not uber:” control, autonomy, and entrepreneurship in the gig economy
Purpose Unlike the effect of management styles on employee attitudes, little is known about the effect of managerial assumptions on workers within the gig economy. The purpose of this paper is to utilize McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y as a framework to discuss two gig economy platforms and how the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of managerial psychology 2019-07, Vol.34 (4), p.269-285 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 269 |
container_title | Journal of managerial psychology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Ravenelle, Alexandrea J |
description | Purpose
Unlike the effect of management styles on employee attitudes, little is known about the effect of managerial assumptions on workers within the gig economy. The purpose of this paper is to utilize McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y as a framework to discuss two gig economy platforms and how their differing management assumptions affect worker perceptions of themselves as entrepreneurs.
Design/methodology/approach
The author utilized qualitative interviews and demographic surveys with 41 contract workers from TaskRabbit, a personal assistant platform, and Kitchensurfing, a “rent-a-chef” service, to examine the impact of differing management assumptions on independent contractor perceptions of themselves as entrepreneurs.
Findings
The Theory X management assumptions and correlated behaviors directly contradict the entrepreneurial ethos marketed by the platforms, resulting in a psychological contract violation for workers and negative responses to the platform. In comparison, Theory Y managerial assumptions and correlated behaviors can be utilized to encourage worker innovation, creativity and sense of self as an entrepreneur.
Practical implications
As the gig economy continues to grow, algorithms are likely to take on increased importance as a management tool. Although some have suggested that such algorithms may reduce the impact of a capricious manager, the fact remains that algorithms are created by management. If the gig economy intends to encourage entrepreneurship, additional attention must be paid to how differing management assumptions, and their resulting behaviors and algorithms, affect worker attitudes and experience.
Originality/value
This study represents one of the initial academic investigations into how the Theory X and Theory Y management assumptions and correlated perspectives may be applied to independent contractors within the gig economy. Additionally, this study is among the first to examine how gig worker attitudes toward platform firms, and views of themselves as entrepreneurs, are affected by algorithm-implemented management policies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0256 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2262038537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2262038537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-92bd1057741fc39c14e2e43935f757cbe5f3547e76a4e834500a78a3a1d4268b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHhe8unY_sxtvIn5SUUTxuGySSZvSZuMmOfTWvyHon-svcWu9CJ5mGN5nhnkQOmb0jDFqRvcPT4QmhFNmCOUq2UEDppUhWmuziwaUJ4aIVCb76KBtZ5QyoUQ6QM_r1ecbrFcfAXDtO9xnEM7Xqy-c-7oLfn6KXd_52i-WsasLDHEKTYAa-tBOqwZXNe6mgCfVBEP-EzxEe6Wbt3D0W4fo9frq5fKWjB9v7i4vxiQXynQk5VnBqNJasjIXac4kcJAiFarUSucZqFIoqUEnToIRUlHqtHHCsULGZzIxRCfbvU3w7z20nZ35PtTxpOU84VQYJXRM0W0qD75tA5S2CdXChaVl1G7M2WjO0sRuzNmNuYiMtggsILh58R_xx7X4BovScNc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262038537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“We’re not uber:” control, autonomy, and entrepreneurship in the gig economy</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Ravenelle, Alexandrea J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ravenelle, Alexandrea J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Unlike the effect of management styles on employee attitudes, little is known about the effect of managerial assumptions on workers within the gig economy. The purpose of this paper is to utilize McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y as a framework to discuss two gig economy platforms and how their differing management assumptions affect worker perceptions of themselves as entrepreneurs.
Design/methodology/approach
The author utilized qualitative interviews and demographic surveys with 41 contract workers from TaskRabbit, a personal assistant platform, and Kitchensurfing, a “rent-a-chef” service, to examine the impact of differing management assumptions on independent contractor perceptions of themselves as entrepreneurs.
Findings
The Theory X management assumptions and correlated behaviors directly contradict the entrepreneurial ethos marketed by the platforms, resulting in a psychological contract violation for workers and negative responses to the platform. In comparison, Theory Y managerial assumptions and correlated behaviors can be utilized to encourage worker innovation, creativity and sense of self as an entrepreneur.
Practical implications
As the gig economy continues to grow, algorithms are likely to take on increased importance as a management tool. Although some have suggested that such algorithms may reduce the impact of a capricious manager, the fact remains that algorithms are created by management. If the gig economy intends to encourage entrepreneurship, additional attention must be paid to how differing management assumptions, and their resulting behaviors and algorithms, affect worker attitudes and experience.
Originality/value
This study represents one of the initial academic investigations into how the Theory X and Theory Y management assumptions and correlated perspectives may be applied to independent contractors within the gig economy. Additionally, this study is among the first to examine how gig worker attitudes toward platform firms, and views of themselves as entrepreneurs, are affected by algorithm-implemented management policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7778</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Assumptions ; Attitudes ; Autonomy ; Behavior ; Creativity ; Employee attitude ; Employees ; Employment ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; Gig economy ; Independent contractors ; Innovations ; Management styles ; Occupational psychology ; Part time employment ; Perceptions ; Self concept ; Self employment ; Self-efficacy ; Theory X ; Theory Y ; Wages & salaries ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Journal of managerial psychology, 2019-07, Vol.34 (4), p.269-285</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-92bd1057741fc39c14e2e43935f757cbe5f3547e76a4e834500a78a3a1d4268b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-92bd1057741fc39c14e2e43935f757cbe5f3547e76a4e834500a78a3a1d4268b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2421-3337</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0256/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,966,11633,12844,27922,27923,30997,52687</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ravenelle, Alexandrea J</creatorcontrib><title>“We’re not uber:” control, autonomy, and entrepreneurship in the gig economy</title><title>Journal of managerial psychology</title><description>Purpose
Unlike the effect of management styles on employee attitudes, little is known about the effect of managerial assumptions on workers within the gig economy. The purpose of this paper is to utilize McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y as a framework to discuss two gig economy platforms and how their differing management assumptions affect worker perceptions of themselves as entrepreneurs.
Design/methodology/approach
The author utilized qualitative interviews and demographic surveys with 41 contract workers from TaskRabbit, a personal assistant platform, and Kitchensurfing, a “rent-a-chef” service, to examine the impact of differing management assumptions on independent contractor perceptions of themselves as entrepreneurs.
Findings
The Theory X management assumptions and correlated behaviors directly contradict the entrepreneurial ethos marketed by the platforms, resulting in a psychological contract violation for workers and negative responses to the platform. In comparison, Theory Y managerial assumptions and correlated behaviors can be utilized to encourage worker innovation, creativity and sense of self as an entrepreneur.
Practical implications
As the gig economy continues to grow, algorithms are likely to take on increased importance as a management tool. Although some have suggested that such algorithms may reduce the impact of a capricious manager, the fact remains that algorithms are created by management. If the gig economy intends to encourage entrepreneurship, additional attention must be paid to how differing management assumptions, and their resulting behaviors and algorithms, affect worker attitudes and experience.
Originality/value
This study represents one of the initial academic investigations into how the Theory X and Theory Y management assumptions and correlated perspectives may be applied to independent contractors within the gig economy. Additionally, this study is among the first to examine how gig worker attitudes toward platform firms, and views of themselves as entrepreneurs, are affected by algorithm-implemented management policies.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Assumptions</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Employee attitude</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Gig economy</subject><subject>Independent contractors</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Management styles</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Part time employment</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Self concept</subject><subject>Self employment</subject><subject>Self-efficacy</subject><subject>Theory X</subject><subject>Theory Y</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0268-3946</issn><issn>1758-7778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHhe8unY_sxtvIn5SUUTxuGySSZvSZuMmOfTWvyHon-svcWu9CJ5mGN5nhnkQOmb0jDFqRvcPT4QmhFNmCOUq2UEDppUhWmuziwaUJ4aIVCb76KBtZ5QyoUQ6QM_r1ecbrFcfAXDtO9xnEM7Xqy-c-7oLfn6KXd_52i-WsasLDHEKTYAa-tBOqwZXNe6mgCfVBEP-EzxEe6Wbt3D0W4fo9frq5fKWjB9v7i4vxiQXynQk5VnBqNJasjIXac4kcJAiFarUSucZqFIoqUEnToIRUlHqtHHCsULGZzIxRCfbvU3w7z20nZ35PtTxpOU84VQYJXRM0W0qD75tA5S2CdXChaVl1G7M2WjO0sRuzNmNuYiMtggsILh58R_xx7X4BovScNc</recordid><startdate>20190723</startdate><enddate>20190723</enddate><creator>Ravenelle, Alexandrea J</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-3337</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190723</creationdate><title>“We’re not uber:” control, autonomy, and entrepreneurship in the gig economy</title><author>Ravenelle, Alexandrea J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-92bd1057741fc39c14e2e43935f757cbe5f3547e76a4e834500a78a3a1d4268b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Assumptions</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Employee attitude</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Gig economy</topic><topic>Independent contractors</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Management styles</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Part time employment</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Self concept</topic><topic>Self employment</topic><topic>Self-efficacy</topic><topic>Theory X</topic><topic>Theory Y</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ravenelle, Alexandrea J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of managerial psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ravenelle, Alexandrea J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“We’re not uber:” control, autonomy, and entrepreneurship in the gig economy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of managerial psychology</jtitle><date>2019-07-23</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>269-285</pages><issn>0268-3946</issn><eissn>1758-7778</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Unlike the effect of management styles on employee attitudes, little is known about the effect of managerial assumptions on workers within the gig economy. The purpose of this paper is to utilize McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y as a framework to discuss two gig economy platforms and how their differing management assumptions affect worker perceptions of themselves as entrepreneurs.
Design/methodology/approach
The author utilized qualitative interviews and demographic surveys with 41 contract workers from TaskRabbit, a personal assistant platform, and Kitchensurfing, a “rent-a-chef” service, to examine the impact of differing management assumptions on independent contractor perceptions of themselves as entrepreneurs.
Findings
The Theory X management assumptions and correlated behaviors directly contradict the entrepreneurial ethos marketed by the platforms, resulting in a psychological contract violation for workers and negative responses to the platform. In comparison, Theory Y managerial assumptions and correlated behaviors can be utilized to encourage worker innovation, creativity and sense of self as an entrepreneur.
Practical implications
As the gig economy continues to grow, algorithms are likely to take on increased importance as a management tool. Although some have suggested that such algorithms may reduce the impact of a capricious manager, the fact remains that algorithms are created by management. If the gig economy intends to encourage entrepreneurship, additional attention must be paid to how differing management assumptions, and their resulting behaviors and algorithms, affect worker attitudes and experience.
Originality/value
This study represents one of the initial academic investigations into how the Theory X and Theory Y management assumptions and correlated perspectives may be applied to independent contractors within the gig economy. Additionally, this study is among the first to examine how gig worker attitudes toward platform firms, and views of themselves as entrepreneurs, are affected by algorithm-implemented management policies.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0256</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-3337</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-3946 |
ispartof | Journal of managerial psychology, 2019-07, Vol.34 (4), p.269-285 |
issn | 0268-3946 1758-7778 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2262038537 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Emerald Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Assumptions Attitudes Autonomy Behavior Creativity Employee attitude Employees Employment Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship Gig economy Independent contractors Innovations Management styles Occupational psychology Part time employment Perceptions Self concept Self employment Self-efficacy Theory X Theory Y Wages & salaries Workers |
title | “We’re not uber:” control, autonomy, and entrepreneurship in the gig economy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T07%3A05%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CWe%E2%80%99re%20not%20uber:%E2%80%9D%20control,%20autonomy,%20and%20entrepreneurship%20in%20the%20gig%20economy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20managerial%20psychology&rft.au=Ravenelle,%20Alexandrea%20J&rft.date=2019-07-23&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=269-285&rft.issn=0268-3946&rft.eissn=1758-7778&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2262038537%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262038537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |