El informe de arbitraje de rechazo: su microvariación según los tipos de evaluador
We analyzed reports in which it was recommended to reject the publication of manuscripts sent to a Chilean humanities journal. We sought to establish whether these reports varied according to two attributes of the referees: the number of publications and the type of participation in the journal. The...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Literatura y lingüística 2019-06 (39), p.301 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | spa |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 39 |
| container_start_page | 301 |
| container_title | Literatura y lingüística |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Astudillo, César Cabezas, Paula Sabaj, Omar Varas, Germán |
| description | We analyzed reports in which it was recommended to reject the publication of manuscripts sent to a Chilean humanities journal. We sought to establish whether these reports varied according to two attributes of the referees: the number of publications and the type of participation in the journal. The results show that, regardless of their status, when rejecting an article of scientific research, the referees make evaluations centered on the article as a unit. Descriptions, descriptions of errors, and descriptions of what is missing are the most frequent communicative purposes in this genre. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2261244111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261244111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_22612441113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNijEOgjAYhRujiUS5QxNnEgq1EFeD8QAMbqRA0ZLS4l_K4LXcXLmYhHgAl_fel_etkBcmJAlYRG7rZbPgmBKyRb61sgwpYwlNWeyhPFNY6sZAJ3AtMIdSDsDbBUBUD_4yJ2wd7mQFZuQgeSWnt8ZW3KePxspYPMh-ztkXI1eO1wb2aNNwZYX_6x06XLL8fA16ME8n7FC0xoGeryKKGIkoJYTE_1lf0U9Dyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261244111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>El informe de arbitraje de rechazo: su microvariación según los tipos de evaluador</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Astudillo, César ; Cabezas, Paula ; Sabaj, Omar ; Varas, Germán</creator><creatorcontrib>Astudillo, César ; Cabezas, Paula ; Sabaj, Omar ; Varas, Germán</creatorcontrib><description>We analyzed reports in which it was recommended to reject the publication of manuscripts sent to a Chilean humanities journal. We sought to establish whether these reports varied according to two attributes of the referees: the number of publications and the type of participation in the journal. The results show that, regardless of their status, when rejecting an article of scientific research, the referees make evaluations centered on the article as a unit. Descriptions, descriptions of errors, and descriptions of what is missing are the most frequent communicative purposes in this genre.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0716-5811</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0717-621X</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Santiago: Universidad Catolica Cardenal Raul Silva Henriquez</publisher><subject>Genre ; Journals (Academic) ; Peer review ; Text analysis</subject><ispartof>Literatura y lingüística, 2019-06 (39), p.301</ispartof><rights>Copyright Universidad Catolica Cardenal Raul Silva Henriquez Jun 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Astudillo, César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabezas, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabaj, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varas, Germán</creatorcontrib><title>El informe de arbitraje de rechazo: su microvariación según los tipos de evaluador</title><title>Literatura y lingüística</title><description>We analyzed reports in which it was recommended to reject the publication of manuscripts sent to a Chilean humanities journal. We sought to establish whether these reports varied according to two attributes of the referees: the number of publications and the type of participation in the journal. The results show that, regardless of their status, when rejecting an article of scientific research, the referees make evaluations centered on the article as a unit. Descriptions, descriptions of errors, and descriptions of what is missing are the most frequent communicative purposes in this genre.</description><subject>Genre</subject><subject>Journals (Academic)</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Text analysis</subject><issn>0716-5811</issn><issn>0717-621X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNijEOgjAYhRujiUS5QxNnEgq1EFeD8QAMbqRA0ZLS4l_K4LXcXLmYhHgAl_fel_etkBcmJAlYRG7rZbPgmBKyRb61sgwpYwlNWeyhPFNY6sZAJ3AtMIdSDsDbBUBUD_4yJ2wd7mQFZuQgeSWnt8ZW3KePxspYPMh-ztkXI1eO1wb2aNNwZYX_6x06XLL8fA16ME8n7FC0xoGeryKKGIkoJYTE_1lf0U9Dyw</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Astudillo, César</creator><creator>Cabezas, Paula</creator><creator>Sabaj, Omar</creator><creator>Varas, Germán</creator><general>Universidad Catolica Cardenal Raul Silva Henriquez</general><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>El informe de arbitraje de rechazo: su microvariación según los tipos de evaluador</title><author>Astudillo, César ; Cabezas, Paula ; Sabaj, Omar ; Varas, Germán</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22612441113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Genre</topic><topic>Journals (Academic)</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Text analysis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Astudillo, César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabezas, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabaj, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varas, Germán</creatorcontrib><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Literatura y lingüística</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Astudillo, César</au><au>Cabezas, Paula</au><au>Sabaj, Omar</au><au>Varas, Germán</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>El informe de arbitraje de rechazo: su microvariación según los tipos de evaluador</atitle><jtitle>Literatura y lingüística</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><issue>39</issue><spage>301</spage><pages>301-</pages><issn>0716-5811</issn><eissn>0717-621X</eissn><abstract>We analyzed reports in which it was recommended to reject the publication of manuscripts sent to a Chilean humanities journal. We sought to establish whether these reports varied according to two attributes of the referees: the number of publications and the type of participation in the journal. The results show that, regardless of their status, when rejecting an article of scientific research, the referees make evaluations centered on the article as a unit. Descriptions, descriptions of errors, and descriptions of what is missing are the most frequent communicative purposes in this genre.</abstract><cop>Santiago</cop><pub>Universidad Catolica Cardenal Raul Silva Henriquez</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0716-5811 |
| ispartof | Literatura y lingüística, 2019-06 (39), p.301 |
| issn | 0716-5811 0717-621X |
| language | spa |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2261244111 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Genre Journals (Academic) Peer review Text analysis |
| title | El informe de arbitraje de rechazo: su microvariación según los tipos de evaluador |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A05%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=El%20informe%20de%20arbitraje%20de%20rechazo:%20su%20microvariaci%C3%B3n%20seg%C3%BAn%20los%20tipos%20de%20evaluador&rft.jtitle=Literatura%20y%20ling%C3%BC%C3%ADstica&rft.au=Astudillo,%20C%C3%A9sar&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.issue=39&rft.spage=301&rft.pages=301-&rft.issn=0716-5811&rft.eissn=0717-621X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2261244111%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261244111&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |