Connectivity and zebra mussel invasion offer short-term buffering of eutrophication impacts on floodplain lake landscape biodiversity
Aim To investigate if connectivity and zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) occurrence can mitigate effects of eutrophication in a lowland lake landscape. Location Upper Lough Erne, Northern Ireland, UK. Methods Data on environment, macrophytes and invertebrates were assembled for three basins of a l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diversity & distributions 2019-08, Vol.25 (8), p.1334-1347 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1347 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1334 |
container_title | Diversity & distributions |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Salgado, Jorge Sayer, Carl D. Brooks, Stephen J. Davidson, Thomas A. Baker, Ambroise G. Willby, Nigel Patmore, Ian R. Goldsmith, Ben Bennion, Helen Okamura, Beth |
description | Aim
To investigate if connectivity and zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) occurrence can mitigate effects of eutrophication in a lowland lake landscape.
Location
Upper Lough Erne, Northern Ireland, UK.
Methods
Data on environment, macrophytes and invertebrates were assembled for three basins of a large central lake and its satellite floodplain lakes via field surveys and palaeolimnological analyses. Space–time interaction analyses of palaeoecological data were compared pre‐1950 and post‐1950. Multivariate analyses examined how connectivity, environment and zebra mussels influenced contemporary lake communities, and explain their divergence from historical communities in the past.
Results
Pre‐1950, we found high community variation across sites and low within‐lake variation in macrophytes, but progressive eutrophication accentuated within‐lake community variation after 1950. Partitioning analysis showed larger effects of connectivity than nutrient enrichment on contemporary macrophyte composition, while local effects structured invertebrate communities. Three clusters of lakes were revealed according to variation in macrophyte composition, isolation from the central lake and nutrient enrichment: Group 1– the central lake and six nearby lakes were meso‐eutrophic (TP = 66.7 ± 47.6 μg/L; TN = 0.79 ± 0.41 mg/L) and had the highest zebra mussel abundances and organismal biodiversity; Group 2– Eight eutrophic (TP = 112±36.6 μg/L; TN = 1.25 ± 0.5 mg/L) and connected lakes; Group 3– Seven isolated and hypertrophic (TP = 163.2 ± 101.5 μg/L; TN = 1.55 ± 0.3 mg/L) lakes. Pre‐1950 palaeolimnological data for macrophytes and invertebrates for 5 lakes and a basin in the central lake most resembled extant lake communities of Group 1. However, palaeo‐records revealed that macrophytes and invertebrates subsequently converged towards those of Groups 2 and 3.
Main conclusions
Our study reveals that the central “mother” lake acts as a hub for preserving biodiversity via shared hydrological connectivity with satellite lakes and high zebra mussel abundances. These may buffer the impoverishing effects of eutrophication and sustain unexpectedly high biodiversity in the short term. Such protective buffering, however, cannot be relied upon indefinitely to conserve biodiversity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ddi.12938 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2260822299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26702633</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26702633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-f510da44036489e75fcc12caa3d0184624384714e4962e59505d63b3479d19d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhSMEEqUw8AOQLDExpPgVJx5Ry6NSJRaYI8d2qEtqB9spKjv_G5cCG3fwPbK_4yOdLDtHcILSXCtlJghzUh1kI0RLnFNG8WHShLGcF4gdZychrCCEhBR4lH1OnbVaRrMxcQuEVeBDN16A9RCC7oCxGxGMs8C1rfYgLJ2PedR-DZphd2PsS3oCeoje9UsjRdzBZt0LGQNIsu2cU30njAWdeNXpsCpI0WvQGKfMRvuQgk-zo1Z0QZ_97HH2fHf7NH3IF4_38-nNIpekoFXeFggqQSkkjFZcl0UrJcJSCKIgqijDlFS0RFRTzrAueAELxUhDaMkV4kmOs8v9v713b4MOsV65wdsUWWPMYIUx5jxRV3tKeheC123de7MWflsjWO9arlPL9XfLib3es--m09v_wXo2m_86LvaOVYjO_zkwKyFmhJAvp7eJwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2260822299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Connectivity and zebra mussel invasion offer short-term buffering of eutrophication impacts on floodplain lake landscape biodiversity</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Salgado, Jorge ; Sayer, Carl D. ; Brooks, Stephen J. ; Davidson, Thomas A. ; Baker, Ambroise G. ; Willby, Nigel ; Patmore, Ian R. ; Goldsmith, Ben ; Bennion, Helen ; Okamura, Beth</creator><contributor>Leung, Brian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Salgado, Jorge ; Sayer, Carl D. ; Brooks, Stephen J. ; Davidson, Thomas A. ; Baker, Ambroise G. ; Willby, Nigel ; Patmore, Ian R. ; Goldsmith, Ben ; Bennion, Helen ; Okamura, Beth ; Leung, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To investigate if connectivity and zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) occurrence can mitigate effects of eutrophication in a lowland lake landscape.
Location
Upper Lough Erne, Northern Ireland, UK.
Methods
Data on environment, macrophytes and invertebrates were assembled for three basins of a large central lake and its satellite floodplain lakes via field surveys and palaeolimnological analyses. Space–time interaction analyses of palaeoecological data were compared pre‐1950 and post‐1950. Multivariate analyses examined how connectivity, environment and zebra mussels influenced contemporary lake communities, and explain their divergence from historical communities in the past.
Results
Pre‐1950, we found high community variation across sites and low within‐lake variation in macrophytes, but progressive eutrophication accentuated within‐lake community variation after 1950. Partitioning analysis showed larger effects of connectivity than nutrient enrichment on contemporary macrophyte composition, while local effects structured invertebrate communities. Three clusters of lakes were revealed according to variation in macrophyte composition, isolation from the central lake and nutrient enrichment: Group 1– the central lake and six nearby lakes were meso‐eutrophic (TP = 66.7 ± 47.6 μg/L; TN = 0.79 ± 0.41 mg/L) and had the highest zebra mussel abundances and organismal biodiversity; Group 2– Eight eutrophic (TP = 112±36.6 μg/L; TN = 1.25 ± 0.5 mg/L) and connected lakes; Group 3– Seven isolated and hypertrophic (TP = 163.2 ± 101.5 μg/L; TN = 1.55 ± 0.3 mg/L) lakes. Pre‐1950 palaeolimnological data for macrophytes and invertebrates for 5 lakes and a basin in the central lake most resembled extant lake communities of Group 1. However, palaeo‐records revealed that macrophytes and invertebrates subsequently converged towards those of Groups 2 and 3.
Main conclusions
Our study reveals that the central “mother” lake acts as a hub for preserving biodiversity via shared hydrological connectivity with satellite lakes and high zebra mussel abundances. These may buffer the impoverishing effects of eutrophication and sustain unexpectedly high biodiversity in the short term. Such protective buffering, however, cannot be relied upon indefinitely to conserve biodiversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12938</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Aquatic plants ; asymmetric eigenvector maps ; Basins ; Biodiversity ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Buffers ; Communities ; Composition effects ; dispersal ; Divergence ; Dreissena polymorpha ; ecosystem resilience ; Eutrophic lakes ; Eutrophication ; Floodplains ; Hydrology ; invasive species ; Invertebrates ; Lakes ; Landscape ; Macrophytes ; Mollusks ; Mussels ; Nutrient enrichment ; Nutrients ; palaeoecology ; Satellites ; space–time interactions ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Diversity & distributions, 2019-08, Vol.25 (8), p.1334-1347</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-f510da44036489e75fcc12caa3d0184624384714e4962e59505d63b3479d19d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-f510da44036489e75fcc12caa3d0184624384714e4962e59505d63b3479d19d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0670-0334</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26702633$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26702633$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,1411,11542,25333,27903,27904,45553,45554,46030,46454,54502,54508</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26702633$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Leung, Brian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Salgado, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayer, Carl D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Ambroise G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willby, Nigel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patmore, Ian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennion, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Beth</creatorcontrib><title>Connectivity and zebra mussel invasion offer short-term buffering of eutrophication impacts on floodplain lake landscape biodiversity</title><title>Diversity & distributions</title><description>Aim
To investigate if connectivity and zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) occurrence can mitigate effects of eutrophication in a lowland lake landscape.
Location
Upper Lough Erne, Northern Ireland, UK.
Methods
Data on environment, macrophytes and invertebrates were assembled for three basins of a large central lake and its satellite floodplain lakes via field surveys and palaeolimnological analyses. Space–time interaction analyses of palaeoecological data were compared pre‐1950 and post‐1950. Multivariate analyses examined how connectivity, environment and zebra mussels influenced contemporary lake communities, and explain their divergence from historical communities in the past.
Results
Pre‐1950, we found high community variation across sites and low within‐lake variation in macrophytes, but progressive eutrophication accentuated within‐lake community variation after 1950. Partitioning analysis showed larger effects of connectivity than nutrient enrichment on contemporary macrophyte composition, while local effects structured invertebrate communities. Three clusters of lakes were revealed according to variation in macrophyte composition, isolation from the central lake and nutrient enrichment: Group 1– the central lake and six nearby lakes were meso‐eutrophic (TP = 66.7 ± 47.6 μg/L; TN = 0.79 ± 0.41 mg/L) and had the highest zebra mussel abundances and organismal biodiversity; Group 2– Eight eutrophic (TP = 112±36.6 μg/L; TN = 1.25 ± 0.5 mg/L) and connected lakes; Group 3– Seven isolated and hypertrophic (TP = 163.2 ± 101.5 μg/L; TN = 1.55 ± 0.3 mg/L) lakes. Pre‐1950 palaeolimnological data for macrophytes and invertebrates for 5 lakes and a basin in the central lake most resembled extant lake communities of Group 1. However, palaeo‐records revealed that macrophytes and invertebrates subsequently converged towards those of Groups 2 and 3.
Main conclusions
Our study reveals that the central “mother” lake acts as a hub for preserving biodiversity via shared hydrological connectivity with satellite lakes and high zebra mussel abundances. These may buffer the impoverishing effects of eutrophication and sustain unexpectedly high biodiversity in the short term. Such protective buffering, however, cannot be relied upon indefinitely to conserve biodiversity.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>asymmetric eigenvector maps</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>dispersal</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Dreissena polymorpha</subject><subject>ecosystem resilience</subject><subject>Eutrophic lakes</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>invasive species</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Macrophytes</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Mussels</subject><subject>Nutrient enrichment</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>palaeoecology</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>space–time interactions</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhSMEEqUw8AOQLDExpPgVJx5Ry6NSJRaYI8d2qEtqB9spKjv_G5cCG3fwPbK_4yOdLDtHcILSXCtlJghzUh1kI0RLnFNG8WHShLGcF4gdZychrCCEhBR4lH1OnbVaRrMxcQuEVeBDN16A9RCC7oCxGxGMs8C1rfYgLJ2PedR-DZphd2PsS3oCeoje9UsjRdzBZt0LGQNIsu2cU30njAWdeNXpsCpI0WvQGKfMRvuQgk-zo1Z0QZ_97HH2fHf7NH3IF4_38-nNIpekoFXeFggqQSkkjFZcl0UrJcJSCKIgqijDlFS0RFRTzrAueAELxUhDaMkV4kmOs8v9v713b4MOsV65wdsUWWPMYIUx5jxRV3tKeheC123de7MWflsjWO9arlPL9XfLib3es--m09v_wXo2m_86LvaOVYjO_zkwKyFmhJAvp7eJwA</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Salgado, Jorge</creator><creator>Sayer, Carl D.</creator><creator>Brooks, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Davidson, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Baker, Ambroise G.</creator><creator>Willby, Nigel</creator><creator>Patmore, Ian R.</creator><creator>Goldsmith, Ben</creator><creator>Bennion, Helen</creator><creator>Okamura, Beth</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0670-0334</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Connectivity and zebra mussel invasion offer short-term buffering of eutrophication impacts on floodplain lake landscape biodiversity</title><author>Salgado, Jorge ; Sayer, Carl D. ; Brooks, Stephen J. ; Davidson, Thomas A. ; Baker, Ambroise G. ; Willby, Nigel ; Patmore, Ian R. ; Goldsmith, Ben ; Bennion, Helen ; Okamura, Beth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-f510da44036489e75fcc12caa3d0184624384714e4962e59505d63b3479d19d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>asymmetric eigenvector maps</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>dispersal</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Dreissena polymorpha</topic><topic>ecosystem resilience</topic><topic>Eutrophic lakes</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>invasive species</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Macrophytes</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Mussels</topic><topic>Nutrient enrichment</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>palaeoecology</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>space–time interactions</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salgado, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayer, Carl D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Ambroise G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willby, Nigel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patmore, Ian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennion, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Beth</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salgado, Jorge</au><au>Sayer, Carl D.</au><au>Brooks, Stephen J.</au><au>Davidson, Thomas A.</au><au>Baker, Ambroise G.</au><au>Willby, Nigel</au><au>Patmore, Ian R.</au><au>Goldsmith, Ben</au><au>Bennion, Helen</au><au>Okamura, Beth</au><au>Leung, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Connectivity and zebra mussel invasion offer short-term buffering of eutrophication impacts on floodplain lake landscape biodiversity</atitle><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1334</spage><epage>1347</epage><pages>1334-1347</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim
To investigate if connectivity and zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) occurrence can mitigate effects of eutrophication in a lowland lake landscape.
Location
Upper Lough Erne, Northern Ireland, UK.
Methods
Data on environment, macrophytes and invertebrates were assembled for three basins of a large central lake and its satellite floodplain lakes via field surveys and palaeolimnological analyses. Space–time interaction analyses of palaeoecological data were compared pre‐1950 and post‐1950. Multivariate analyses examined how connectivity, environment and zebra mussels influenced contemporary lake communities, and explain their divergence from historical communities in the past.
Results
Pre‐1950, we found high community variation across sites and low within‐lake variation in macrophytes, but progressive eutrophication accentuated within‐lake community variation after 1950. Partitioning analysis showed larger effects of connectivity than nutrient enrichment on contemporary macrophyte composition, while local effects structured invertebrate communities. Three clusters of lakes were revealed according to variation in macrophyte composition, isolation from the central lake and nutrient enrichment: Group 1– the central lake and six nearby lakes were meso‐eutrophic (TP = 66.7 ± 47.6 μg/L; TN = 0.79 ± 0.41 mg/L) and had the highest zebra mussel abundances and organismal biodiversity; Group 2– Eight eutrophic (TP = 112±36.6 μg/L; TN = 1.25 ± 0.5 mg/L) and connected lakes; Group 3– Seven isolated and hypertrophic (TP = 163.2 ± 101.5 μg/L; TN = 1.55 ± 0.3 mg/L) lakes. Pre‐1950 palaeolimnological data for macrophytes and invertebrates for 5 lakes and a basin in the central lake most resembled extant lake communities of Group 1. However, palaeo‐records revealed that macrophytes and invertebrates subsequently converged towards those of Groups 2 and 3.
Main conclusions
Our study reveals that the central “mother” lake acts as a hub for preserving biodiversity via shared hydrological connectivity with satellite lakes and high zebra mussel abundances. These may buffer the impoverishing effects of eutrophication and sustain unexpectedly high biodiversity in the short term. Such protective buffering, however, cannot be relied upon indefinitely to conserve biodiversity.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.12938</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0670-0334</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-9516 |
ispartof | Diversity & distributions, 2019-08, Vol.25 (8), p.1334-1347 |
issn | 1366-9516 1472-4642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2260822299 |
source | Jstor Journals Open Access |
subjects | Abundance Aquatic plants asymmetric eigenvector maps Basins Biodiversity BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH Buffers Communities Composition effects dispersal Divergence Dreissena polymorpha ecosystem resilience Eutrophic lakes Eutrophication Floodplains Hydrology invasive species Invertebrates Lakes Landscape Macrophytes Mollusks Mussels Nutrient enrichment Nutrients palaeoecology Satellites space–time interactions Variation |
title | Connectivity and zebra mussel invasion offer short-term buffering of eutrophication impacts on floodplain lake landscape biodiversity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T08%3A04%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Connectivity%20and%20zebra%20mussel%20invasion%20offer%20short-term%20buffering%20of%20eutrophication%20impacts%20on%20floodplain%20lake%20landscape%20biodiversity&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Salgado,%20Jorge&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1334&rft.epage=1347&rft.pages=1334-1347&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.12938&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_JFNAL%3E26702633%3C/jstor_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2260822299&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26702633&rfr_iscdi=true |