A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding
Introduction Adverse drug reaction (ADR) detection in hospitals is heavily reliant on spontaneous reporting by clinical staff, with studies in the literature pointing to high rates of underreporting [ 1 ]. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes have been used in epide...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Drug safety 2019-06, Vol.42 (6), p.721-725 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 725 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 721 |
container_title | Drug safety |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | McMaster, Christopher Liew, David Keith, Claire Aminian, Parnaz Frauman, Albert |
description | Introduction
Adverse drug reaction (ADR) detection in hospitals is heavily reliant on spontaneous reporting by clinical staff, with studies in the literature pointing to high rates of underreporting [
1
]. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes have been used in epidemiological studies of ADRs and offer the potential for automated ADR detection systems.
Objective
The aim of this study was to develop an automated ADR detection system based on ICD-10 codes, using machine-learning algorithms to improve accuracy and efficiency.
Methods
For a 12-month period from December 2016 to November 2017, every inpatient episode receiving an ICD-10 code in the range Y40.0–Y59.9 (ADR code) was flagged for review as a potential ADR. Each flagged admission was assessed by an expert pharmacist and, if needed, reviewed at regular ADR committee meetings. For each report, a determination was made about ADR probability and severity. The dataset was randomly split into training and test sets. A machine-learning model using the random forest algorithm was developed on the training set to discriminate between true and false ADR reports. The model was then applied to the test set to assess accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC).
Results
In the study period, 2917 Y40.0–Y59.9 codes were applied to admissions, resulting in 245 ADR reports after review. These 245 reports accounted for 44.5% of all ADR reporting in our hospital in the study period. A random forest model built on the training set was able to discriminate between true and false reports on the test set with an AUC of 0.803.
Conclusions
Automated ADR detection using ICD-10 coding significantly improved ADR detection in the study period, with improved discrimination between true and false reports by applying a machine-learning model. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2260082952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2260082952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-87bb34fdbab9c5c71d611bde61f247eda34e608fd39e46a353aae8b858eff98e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3DAUhUVJaaZp_0AWRZC1Ur0sy0szSdrClEBp10K2rh2FsTWR5MD8-yh10uy6uq9zz4EPoXNGLxml9dckKVeSUKZJGRtJju_QhrG6IayR_ARtKGOSVA1Tp-hjSveUUs2V_oBOBa15JYTaoLHFP21_52cgO7Bx9vOI2_0Yos93E84B3x6yn3wC3C45TDaDw617hFg2V3EZ8S-wffZhxleQYe2GGCa83fvZ93aPt8EV00_o_WD3CT6_1DP05-b69_Y72d1--7Ftd6QXdZWJrrtOyMF1tmv6qq-ZU4x1DhQbuKzBWSFBUT040YBUVlTCWtCdrjQMQ6NBnKGL1fcQw8MCKZv7sMS5RBrO1TOApuJFxVdVH0NKEQZziH6y8WgYNc9szcrWFLbmL1tzLE9fXqyXbgL37-UVZhGIVZDKaR4hvmX_x_YJds2GMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2260082952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>McMaster, Christopher ; Liew, David ; Keith, Claire ; Aminian, Parnaz ; Frauman, Albert</creator><creatorcontrib>McMaster, Christopher ; Liew, David ; Keith, Claire ; Aminian, Parnaz ; Frauman, Albert</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Adverse drug reaction (ADR) detection in hospitals is heavily reliant on spontaneous reporting by clinical staff, with studies in the literature pointing to high rates of underreporting [
1
]. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes have been used in epidemiological studies of ADRs and offer the potential for automated ADR detection systems.
Objective
The aim of this study was to develop an automated ADR detection system based on ICD-10 codes, using machine-learning algorithms to improve accuracy and efficiency.
Methods
For a 12-month period from December 2016 to November 2017, every inpatient episode receiving an ICD-10 code in the range Y40.0–Y59.9 (ADR code) was flagged for review as a potential ADR. Each flagged admission was assessed by an expert pharmacist and, if needed, reviewed at regular ADR committee meetings. For each report, a determination was made about ADR probability and severity. The dataset was randomly split into training and test sets. A machine-learning model using the random forest algorithm was developed on the training set to discriminate between true and false ADR reports. The model was then applied to the test set to assess accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC).
Results
In the study period, 2917 Y40.0–Y59.9 codes were applied to admissions, resulting in 245 ADR reports after review. These 245 reports accounted for 44.5% of all ADR reporting in our hospital in the study period. A random forest model built on the training set was able to discriminate between true and false reports on the test set with an AUC of 0.803.
Conclusions
Automated ADR detection using ICD-10 coding significantly improved ADR detection in the study period, with improved discrimination between true and false reports by applying a machine-learning model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0114-5916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1942</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30725336</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Accuracy ; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems - statistics & numerical data ; Algorithms ; Automation ; Causality ; Clinical Coding - statistics & numerical data ; Codes ; Coding ; Datasets ; Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - prevention & control ; Epidemiology ; Generalized linear models ; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals ; Hospitals - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; International Classification of Diseases ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Machine Learning - statistics & numerical data ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Morbidity ; Patients ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; ROC Curve ; Short Communication ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Test sets ; Training]]></subject><ispartof>Drug safety, 2019-06, Vol.42 (6), p.721-725</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-87bb34fdbab9c5c71d611bde61f247eda34e608fd39e46a353aae8b858eff98e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-87bb34fdbab9c5c71d611bde61f247eda34e608fd39e46a353aae8b858eff98e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2432-5451</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30725336$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McMaster, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aminian, Parnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frauman, Albert</creatorcontrib><title>A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding</title><title>Drug safety</title><addtitle>Drug Saf</addtitle><addtitle>Drug Saf</addtitle><description>Introduction
Adverse drug reaction (ADR) detection in hospitals is heavily reliant on spontaneous reporting by clinical staff, with studies in the literature pointing to high rates of underreporting [
1
]. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes have been used in epidemiological studies of ADRs and offer the potential for automated ADR detection systems.
Objective
The aim of this study was to develop an automated ADR detection system based on ICD-10 codes, using machine-learning algorithms to improve accuracy and efficiency.
Methods
For a 12-month period from December 2016 to November 2017, every inpatient episode receiving an ICD-10 code in the range Y40.0–Y59.9 (ADR code) was flagged for review as a potential ADR. Each flagged admission was assessed by an expert pharmacist and, if needed, reviewed at regular ADR committee meetings. For each report, a determination was made about ADR probability and severity. The dataset was randomly split into training and test sets. A machine-learning model using the random forest algorithm was developed on the training set to discriminate between true and false ADR reports. The model was then applied to the test set to assess accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC).
Results
In the study period, 2917 Y40.0–Y59.9 codes were applied to admissions, resulting in 245 ADR reports after review. These 245 reports accounted for 44.5% of all ADR reporting in our hospital in the study period. A random forest model built on the training set was able to discriminate between true and false reports on the test set with an AUC of 0.803.
Conclusions
Automated ADR detection using ICD-10 coding significantly improved ADR detection in the study period, with improved discrimination between true and false reports by applying a machine-learning model.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Clinical Coding - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Codes</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - prevention & control</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Classification of Diseases</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Machine Learning - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Short Communication</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Test sets</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0114-5916</issn><issn>1179-1942</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtr3DAUhUVJaaZp_0AWRZC1Ur0sy0szSdrClEBp10K2rh2FsTWR5MD8-yh10uy6uq9zz4EPoXNGLxml9dckKVeSUKZJGRtJju_QhrG6IayR_ARtKGOSVA1Tp-hjSveUUs2V_oBOBa15JYTaoLHFP21_52cgO7Bx9vOI2_0Yos93E84B3x6yn3wC3C45TDaDw617hFg2V3EZ8S-wffZhxleQYe2GGCa83fvZ93aPt8EV00_o_WD3CT6_1DP05-b69_Y72d1--7Ftd6QXdZWJrrtOyMF1tmv6qq-ZU4x1DhQbuKzBWSFBUT040YBUVlTCWtCdrjQMQ6NBnKGL1fcQw8MCKZv7sMS5RBrO1TOApuJFxVdVH0NKEQZziH6y8WgYNc9szcrWFLbmL1tzLE9fXqyXbgL37-UVZhGIVZDKaR4hvmX_x_YJds2GMA</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>McMaster, Christopher</creator><creator>Liew, David</creator><creator>Keith, Claire</creator><creator>Aminian, Parnaz</creator><creator>Frauman, Albert</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2432-5451</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding</title><author>McMaster, Christopher ; Liew, David ; Keith, Claire ; Aminian, Parnaz ; Frauman, Albert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-87bb34fdbab9c5c71d611bde61f247eda34e608fd39e46a353aae8b858eff98e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Clinical Coding - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Codes</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - prevention & control</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Classification of Diseases</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Machine Learning - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Short Communication</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Test sets</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McMaster, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aminian, Parnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frauman, Albert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Drug safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McMaster, Christopher</au><au>Liew, David</au><au>Keith, Claire</au><au>Aminian, Parnaz</au><au>Frauman, Albert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding</atitle><jtitle>Drug safety</jtitle><stitle>Drug Saf</stitle><addtitle>Drug Saf</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>721</spage><epage>725</epage><pages>721-725</pages><issn>0114-5916</issn><eissn>1179-1942</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Adverse drug reaction (ADR) detection in hospitals is heavily reliant on spontaneous reporting by clinical staff, with studies in the literature pointing to high rates of underreporting [
1
]. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes have been used in epidemiological studies of ADRs and offer the potential for automated ADR detection systems.
Objective
The aim of this study was to develop an automated ADR detection system based on ICD-10 codes, using machine-learning algorithms to improve accuracy and efficiency.
Methods
For a 12-month period from December 2016 to November 2017, every inpatient episode receiving an ICD-10 code in the range Y40.0–Y59.9 (ADR code) was flagged for review as a potential ADR. Each flagged admission was assessed by an expert pharmacist and, if needed, reviewed at regular ADR committee meetings. For each report, a determination was made about ADR probability and severity. The dataset was randomly split into training and test sets. A machine-learning model using the random forest algorithm was developed on the training set to discriminate between true and false ADR reports. The model was then applied to the test set to assess accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC).
Results
In the study period, 2917 Y40.0–Y59.9 codes were applied to admissions, resulting in 245 ADR reports after review. These 245 reports accounted for 44.5% of all ADR reporting in our hospital in the study period. A random forest model built on the training set was able to discriminate between true and false reports on the test set with an AUC of 0.803.
Conclusions
Automated ADR detection using ICD-10 coding significantly improved ADR detection in the study period, with improved discrimination between true and false reports by applying a machine-learning model.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>30725336</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2432-5451</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0114-5916 |
ispartof | Drug safety, 2019-06, Vol.42 (6), p.721-725 |
issn | 0114-5916 1179-1942 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2260082952 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service) |
subjects | Accuracy Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems - statistics & numerical data Algorithms Automation Causality Clinical Coding - statistics & numerical data Codes Coding Datasets Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - prevention & control Epidemiology Generalized linear models Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data Hospitals Hospitals - statistics & numerical data Humans International Classification of Diseases Learning algorithms Machine learning Machine Learning - statistics & numerical data Medicine Medicine & Public Health Morbidity Patients Pharmacology/Toxicology ROC Curve Short Communication Studies Systematic review Test sets Training |
title | A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A45%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Machine-Learning%20Algorithm%20to%20Optimise%20Automated%20Adverse%20Drug%20Reaction%20Detection%20from%20Clinical%20Coding&rft.jtitle=Drug%20safety&rft.au=McMaster,%20Christopher&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=721&rft.epage=725&rft.pages=721-725&rft.issn=0114-5916&rft.eissn=1179-1942&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2260082952%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2260082952&rft_id=info:pmid/30725336&rfr_iscdi=true |