Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops
Improving energy use efficiency (EUE) is critical for increasing farmers’ incomes, developing sustainable agriculture, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, data on EUE, net income, and GHG emissions across various tillage and crop residue (straw) treatments remains scarce. This st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems 2017-07, Vol.108 (3), p.323-337 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 337 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 323 |
container_title | Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Lu, Xingli Lu, Xingneng |
description | Improving energy use efficiency (EUE) is critical for increasing farmers’ incomes, developing sustainable agriculture, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, data on EUE, net income, and GHG emissions across various tillage and crop residue (straw) treatments remains scarce. This study aimed to estimate these variables across different tillage and straw treatments used in summer maize production in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system in China’s Loess Plateau. Tillage treatments included chisel plowing, no tillage, and moldboard plowing. These were studied both with straw returned to the soil, or removed. All activities and production processes were recorded. The results demonstrate that fertilizer especially nitrogen fertilizer, and to a lesser extent, the fuel used for tillage, sowing and harvesting, were the two major consumers of energy and producers of GHG emissions. These results indicated that the use of chisel plow or conducting no tillage with straw returned to the soil, can reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, and improve the economic benefits of summer maize production in the region, compared with conventional moldboard plow tillage without straw (which is typically burned off). The results show that further improvements could be facilitated by improving the utilization of nitrogen fertilizer, returning straw to the soil, and reducing tillage. These practices can reduce GHG reductions, and improve EUE and farmers’ incomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259854224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2259854224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-c7eef152471c5e93ea309556e8edb9ddabcbb1fd31f54c4f9e0684e2f67dafd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT1OxDAQhS0EEsvCAegs0RKwYzs_JVrxJ61Es9SWk4yzWW2c4EmKRRTcgRtyEryEggaqmZG_90bjR8g5Z1ecsfQaOUuZihhPozxTeaQOyIyrVEQsS9LD0ItMRVxweUxOEDcsaEQmZ-Rt1Wy3pgZqXEVL3_XUAzbVCBSshXJA2jk6rMPowNc7WnYOx7Yfms5d0sb14_D5_tGNQ2jCGwZ-b1R7ALfuRgRaG6TQNohBEcwsbU3zCt-r8JQcWbNFOPupc_J8d7taPETLp_vHxc0yKoWUQ1SmAJarWKa8VJALMILlSiWQQVXkVWWKsii4rQS3SpbS5sCSTEJsk7QytpJiTi4m3953LyPgoDfd6F1YqeNYhf-ScfwvxXMuVZZnMg4Un6hwAaIHq3vftMbvNGd6H4WeotAhCr2PQqugiScNBtbV4H85_yn6At3Tj4U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259854224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Lu, Xingli ; Lu, Xingneng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xingli ; Lu, Xingneng</creatorcontrib><description>Improving energy use efficiency (EUE) is critical for increasing farmers’ incomes, developing sustainable agriculture, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, data on EUE, net income, and GHG emissions across various tillage and crop residue (straw) treatments remains scarce. This study aimed to estimate these variables across different tillage and straw treatments used in summer maize production in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system in China’s Loess Plateau. Tillage treatments included chisel plowing, no tillage, and moldboard plowing. These were studied both with straw returned to the soil, or removed. All activities and production processes were recorded. The results demonstrate that fertilizer especially nitrogen fertilizer, and to a lesser extent, the fuel used for tillage, sowing and harvesting, were the two major consumers of energy and producers of GHG emissions. These results indicated that the use of chisel plow or conducting no tillage with straw returned to the soil, can reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, and improve the economic benefits of summer maize production in the region, compared with conventional moldboard plow tillage without straw (which is typically burned off). The results show that further improvements could be facilitated by improving the utilization of nitrogen fertilizer, returning straw to the soil, and reducing tillage. These practices can reduce GHG reductions, and improve EUE and farmers’ incomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-1314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural equipment ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Air pollution ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cereal crops ; Combustion ; Consumers ; Corn ; Cost engineering ; Crop production ; Crop residues ; Cropping systems ; Crops ; Emissions ; Energy consumption ; Energy costs ; Energy management ; Farm buildings ; Farmers ; Farming ; Farms ; Fertilizers ; Fuel consumption ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Hand tools ; Harvesting ; Life Sciences ; Nitrogen ; Original Article ; Planting ; Plowing ; Plows ; Power efficiency ; Soil fertility ; Soils ; Straw ; Summer ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; Tillage ; Wheat ; Winter wheat</subject><ispartof>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2017-07, Vol.108 (3), p.323-337</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2017</rights><rights>Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-c7eef152471c5e93ea309556e8edb9ddabcbb1fd31f54c4f9e0684e2f67dafd43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-c7eef152471c5e93ea309556e8edb9ddabcbb1fd31f54c4f9e0684e2f67dafd43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xingli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xingneng</creatorcontrib><title>Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops</title><title>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems</title><addtitle>Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst</addtitle><description>Improving energy use efficiency (EUE) is critical for increasing farmers’ incomes, developing sustainable agriculture, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, data on EUE, net income, and GHG emissions across various tillage and crop residue (straw) treatments remains scarce. This study aimed to estimate these variables across different tillage and straw treatments used in summer maize production in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system in China’s Loess Plateau. Tillage treatments included chisel plowing, no tillage, and moldboard plowing. These were studied both with straw returned to the soil, or removed. All activities and production processes were recorded. The results demonstrate that fertilizer especially nitrogen fertilizer, and to a lesser extent, the fuel used for tillage, sowing and harvesting, were the two major consumers of energy and producers of GHG emissions. These results indicated that the use of chisel plow or conducting no tillage with straw returned to the soil, can reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, and improve the economic benefits of summer maize production in the region, compared with conventional moldboard plow tillage without straw (which is typically burned off). The results show that further improvements could be facilitated by improving the utilization of nitrogen fertilizer, returning straw to the soil, and reducing tillage. These practices can reduce GHG reductions, and improve EUE and farmers’ incomes.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural equipment</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Farm buildings</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fuel consumption</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hand tools</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Plowing</subject><subject>Plows</subject><subject>Power efficiency</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Straw</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Winter wheat</subject><issn>1385-1314</issn><issn>1573-0867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kT1OxDAQhS0EEsvCAegs0RKwYzs_JVrxJ61Es9SWk4yzWW2c4EmKRRTcgRtyEryEggaqmZG_90bjR8g5Z1ecsfQaOUuZihhPozxTeaQOyIyrVEQsS9LD0ItMRVxweUxOEDcsaEQmZ-Rt1Wy3pgZqXEVL3_XUAzbVCBSshXJA2jk6rMPowNc7WnYOx7Yfms5d0sb14_D5_tGNQ2jCGwZ-b1R7ALfuRgRaG6TQNohBEcwsbU3zCt-r8JQcWbNFOPupc_J8d7taPETLp_vHxc0yKoWUQ1SmAJarWKa8VJALMILlSiWQQVXkVWWKsii4rQS3SpbS5sCSTEJsk7QytpJiTi4m3953LyPgoDfd6F1YqeNYhf-ScfwvxXMuVZZnMg4Un6hwAaIHq3vftMbvNGd6H4WeotAhCr2PQqugiScNBtbV4H85_yn6At3Tj4U</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Lu, Xingli</creator><creator>Lu, Xingneng</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops</title><author>Lu, Xingli ; Lu, Xingneng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-c7eef152471c5e93ea309556e8edb9ddabcbb1fd31f54c4f9e0684e2f67dafd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural equipment</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Farm buildings</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fuel consumption</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hand tools</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Plowing</topic><topic>Plows</topic><topic>Power efficiency</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Straw</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Winter wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xingli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xingneng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, Xingli</au><au>Lu, Xingneng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops</atitle><jtitle>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems</jtitle><stitle>Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst</stitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>337</epage><pages>323-337</pages><issn>1385-1314</issn><eissn>1573-0867</eissn><abstract>Improving energy use efficiency (EUE) is critical for increasing farmers’ incomes, developing sustainable agriculture, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, data on EUE, net income, and GHG emissions across various tillage and crop residue (straw) treatments remains scarce. This study aimed to estimate these variables across different tillage and straw treatments used in summer maize production in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system in China’s Loess Plateau. Tillage treatments included chisel plowing, no tillage, and moldboard plowing. These were studied both with straw returned to the soil, or removed. All activities and production processes were recorded. The results demonstrate that fertilizer especially nitrogen fertilizer, and to a lesser extent, the fuel used for tillage, sowing and harvesting, were the two major consumers of energy and producers of GHG emissions. These results indicated that the use of chisel plow or conducting no tillage with straw returned to the soil, can reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, and improve the economic benefits of summer maize production in the region, compared with conventional moldboard plow tillage without straw (which is typically burned off). The results show that further improvements could be facilitated by improving the utilization of nitrogen fertilizer, returning straw to the soil, and reducing tillage. These practices can reduce GHG reductions, and improve EUE and farmers’ incomes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1385-1314 |
ispartof | Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2017-07, Vol.108 (3), p.323-337 |
issn | 1385-1314 1573-0867 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2259854224 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Agricultural economics Agricultural equipment Agriculture Agronomy Air pollution Biomedical and Life Sciences Cereal crops Combustion Consumers Corn Cost engineering Crop production Crop residues Cropping systems Crops Emissions Energy consumption Energy costs Energy management Farm buildings Farmers Farming Farms Fertilizers Fuel consumption Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Hand tools Harvesting Life Sciences Nitrogen Original Article Planting Plowing Plows Power efficiency Soil fertility Soils Straw Summer Sustainability Sustainable agriculture Tillage Wheat Winter wheat |
title | Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A40%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tillage%20and%20crop%20residue%20effects%20on%20the%20energy%20consumption,%20input%E2%80%93output%20costs%20and%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20of%20maize%20crops&rft.jtitle=Nutrient%20cycling%20in%20agroecosystems&rft.au=Lu,%20Xingli&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=337&rft.pages=323-337&rft.issn=1385-1314&rft.eissn=1573-0867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259854224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259854224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |