Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops

Improving energy use efficiency (EUE) is critical for increasing farmers’ incomes, developing sustainable agriculture, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, data on EUE, net income, and GHG emissions across various tillage and crop residue (straw) treatments remains scarce. This st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems 2017-07, Vol.108 (3), p.323-337
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Xingli, Lu, Xingneng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 337
container_issue 3
container_start_page 323
container_title Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems
container_volume 108
creator Lu, Xingli
Lu, Xingneng
description Improving energy use efficiency (EUE) is critical for increasing farmers’ incomes, developing sustainable agriculture, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, data on EUE, net income, and GHG emissions across various tillage and crop residue (straw) treatments remains scarce. This study aimed to estimate these variables across different tillage and straw treatments used in summer maize production in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system in China’s Loess Plateau. Tillage treatments included chisel plowing, no tillage, and moldboard plowing. These were studied both with straw returned to the soil, or removed. All activities and production processes were recorded. The results demonstrate that fertilizer especially nitrogen fertilizer, and to a lesser extent, the fuel used for tillage, sowing and harvesting, were the two major consumers of energy and producers of GHG emissions. These results indicated that the use of chisel plow or conducting no tillage with straw returned to the soil, can reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, and improve the economic benefits of summer maize production in the region, compared with conventional moldboard plow tillage without straw (which is typically burned off). The results show that further improvements could be facilitated by improving the utilization of nitrogen fertilizer, returning straw to the soil, and reducing tillage. These practices can reduce GHG reductions, and improve EUE and farmers’ incomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259854224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2259854224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-c7eef152471c5e93ea309556e8edb9ddabcbb1fd31f54c4f9e0684e2f67dafd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT1OxDAQhS0EEsvCAegs0RKwYzs_JVrxJ61Es9SWk4yzWW2c4EmKRRTcgRtyEryEggaqmZG_90bjR8g5Z1ecsfQaOUuZihhPozxTeaQOyIyrVEQsS9LD0ItMRVxweUxOEDcsaEQmZ-Rt1Wy3pgZqXEVL3_XUAzbVCBSshXJA2jk6rMPowNc7WnYOx7Yfms5d0sb14_D5_tGNQ2jCGwZ-b1R7ALfuRgRaG6TQNohBEcwsbU3zCt-r8JQcWbNFOPupc_J8d7taPETLp_vHxc0yKoWUQ1SmAJarWKa8VJALMILlSiWQQVXkVWWKsii4rQS3SpbS5sCSTEJsk7QytpJiTi4m3953LyPgoDfd6F1YqeNYhf-ScfwvxXMuVZZnMg4Un6hwAaIHq3vftMbvNGd6H4WeotAhCr2PQqugiScNBtbV4H85_yn6At3Tj4U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259854224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Lu, Xingli ; Lu, Xingneng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xingli ; Lu, Xingneng</creatorcontrib><description>Improving energy use efficiency (EUE) is critical for increasing farmers’ incomes, developing sustainable agriculture, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, data on EUE, net income, and GHG emissions across various tillage and crop residue (straw) treatments remains scarce. This study aimed to estimate these variables across different tillage and straw treatments used in summer maize production in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system in China’s Loess Plateau. Tillage treatments included chisel plowing, no tillage, and moldboard plowing. These were studied both with straw returned to the soil, or removed. All activities and production processes were recorded. The results demonstrate that fertilizer especially nitrogen fertilizer, and to a lesser extent, the fuel used for tillage, sowing and harvesting, were the two major consumers of energy and producers of GHG emissions. These results indicated that the use of chisel plow or conducting no tillage with straw returned to the soil, can reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, and improve the economic benefits of summer maize production in the region, compared with conventional moldboard plow tillage without straw (which is typically burned off). The results show that further improvements could be facilitated by improving the utilization of nitrogen fertilizer, returning straw to the soil, and reducing tillage. These practices can reduce GHG reductions, and improve EUE and farmers’ incomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-1314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural equipment ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Air pollution ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cereal crops ; Combustion ; Consumers ; Corn ; Cost engineering ; Crop production ; Crop residues ; Cropping systems ; Crops ; Emissions ; Energy consumption ; Energy costs ; Energy management ; Farm buildings ; Farmers ; Farming ; Farms ; Fertilizers ; Fuel consumption ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Hand tools ; Harvesting ; Life Sciences ; Nitrogen ; Original Article ; Planting ; Plowing ; Plows ; Power efficiency ; Soil fertility ; Soils ; Straw ; Summer ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; Tillage ; Wheat ; Winter wheat</subject><ispartof>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2017-07, Vol.108 (3), p.323-337</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2017</rights><rights>Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-c7eef152471c5e93ea309556e8edb9ddabcbb1fd31f54c4f9e0684e2f67dafd43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-c7eef152471c5e93ea309556e8edb9ddabcbb1fd31f54c4f9e0684e2f67dafd43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xingli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xingneng</creatorcontrib><title>Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops</title><title>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems</title><addtitle>Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst</addtitle><description>Improving energy use efficiency (EUE) is critical for increasing farmers’ incomes, developing sustainable agriculture, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, data on EUE, net income, and GHG emissions across various tillage and crop residue (straw) treatments remains scarce. This study aimed to estimate these variables across different tillage and straw treatments used in summer maize production in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system in China’s Loess Plateau. Tillage treatments included chisel plowing, no tillage, and moldboard plowing. These were studied both with straw returned to the soil, or removed. All activities and production processes were recorded. The results demonstrate that fertilizer especially nitrogen fertilizer, and to a lesser extent, the fuel used for tillage, sowing and harvesting, were the two major consumers of energy and producers of GHG emissions. These results indicated that the use of chisel plow or conducting no tillage with straw returned to the soil, can reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, and improve the economic benefits of summer maize production in the region, compared with conventional moldboard plow tillage without straw (which is typically burned off). The results show that further improvements could be facilitated by improving the utilization of nitrogen fertilizer, returning straw to the soil, and reducing tillage. These practices can reduce GHG reductions, and improve EUE and farmers’ incomes.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural equipment</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Farm buildings</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fuel consumption</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hand tools</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Plowing</subject><subject>Plows</subject><subject>Power efficiency</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Straw</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Winter wheat</subject><issn>1385-1314</issn><issn>1573-0867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kT1OxDAQhS0EEsvCAegs0RKwYzs_JVrxJ61Es9SWk4yzWW2c4EmKRRTcgRtyEryEggaqmZG_90bjR8g5Z1ecsfQaOUuZihhPozxTeaQOyIyrVEQsS9LD0ItMRVxweUxOEDcsaEQmZ-Rt1Wy3pgZqXEVL3_XUAzbVCBSshXJA2jk6rMPowNc7WnYOx7Yfms5d0sb14_D5_tGNQ2jCGwZ-b1R7ALfuRgRaG6TQNohBEcwsbU3zCt-r8JQcWbNFOPupc_J8d7taPETLp_vHxc0yKoWUQ1SmAJarWKa8VJALMILlSiWQQVXkVWWKsii4rQS3SpbS5sCSTEJsk7QytpJiTi4m3953LyPgoDfd6F1YqeNYhf-ScfwvxXMuVZZnMg4Un6hwAaIHq3vftMbvNGd6H4WeotAhCr2PQqugiScNBtbV4H85_yn6At3Tj4U</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Lu, Xingli</creator><creator>Lu, Xingneng</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops</title><author>Lu, Xingli ; Lu, Xingneng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-c7eef152471c5e93ea309556e8edb9ddabcbb1fd31f54c4f9e0684e2f67dafd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural equipment</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Farm buildings</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fuel consumption</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hand tools</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Plowing</topic><topic>Plows</topic><topic>Power efficiency</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Straw</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Winter wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xingli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xingneng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, Xingli</au><au>Lu, Xingneng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops</atitle><jtitle>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems</jtitle><stitle>Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst</stitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>337</epage><pages>323-337</pages><issn>1385-1314</issn><eissn>1573-0867</eissn><abstract>Improving energy use efficiency (EUE) is critical for increasing farmers’ incomes, developing sustainable agriculture, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, data on EUE, net income, and GHG emissions across various tillage and crop residue (straw) treatments remains scarce. This study aimed to estimate these variables across different tillage and straw treatments used in summer maize production in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system in China’s Loess Plateau. Tillage treatments included chisel plowing, no tillage, and moldboard plowing. These were studied both with straw returned to the soil, or removed. All activities and production processes were recorded. The results demonstrate that fertilizer especially nitrogen fertilizer, and to a lesser extent, the fuel used for tillage, sowing and harvesting, were the two major consumers of energy and producers of GHG emissions. These results indicated that the use of chisel plow or conducting no tillage with straw returned to the soil, can reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, and improve the economic benefits of summer maize production in the region, compared with conventional moldboard plow tillage without straw (which is typically burned off). The results show that further improvements could be facilitated by improving the utilization of nitrogen fertilizer, returning straw to the soil, and reducing tillage. These practices can reduce GHG reductions, and improve EUE and farmers’ incomes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-1314
ispartof Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2017-07, Vol.108 (3), p.323-337
issn 1385-1314
1573-0867
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2259854224
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Agricultural economics
Agricultural equipment
Agriculture
Agronomy
Air pollution
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cereal crops
Combustion
Consumers
Corn
Cost engineering
Crop production
Crop residues
Cropping systems
Crops
Emissions
Energy consumption
Energy costs
Energy management
Farm buildings
Farmers
Farming
Farms
Fertilizers
Fuel consumption
Greenhouse effect
Greenhouse gases
Hand tools
Harvesting
Life Sciences
Nitrogen
Original Article
Planting
Plowing
Plows
Power efficiency
Soil fertility
Soils
Straw
Summer
Sustainability
Sustainable agriculture
Tillage
Wheat
Winter wheat
title Tillage and crop residue effects on the energy consumption, input–output costs and greenhouse gas emissions of maize crops
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A40%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tillage%20and%20crop%20residue%20effects%20on%20the%20energy%20consumption,%20input%E2%80%93output%20costs%20and%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20of%20maize%20crops&rft.jtitle=Nutrient%20cycling%20in%20agroecosystems&rft.au=Lu,%20Xingli&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=337&rft.pages=323-337&rft.issn=1385-1314&rft.eissn=1573-0867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10705-017-9859-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259854224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259854224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true