Arnica montana subsp. atlantica: Really a subspecies?
In Arnica montana L. (Asteraceae) two subspecies are described, A. montana subsp. atlantica (AMA), present only on the Iberian Peninsula and A. montana subsp. montana (AMM) with a very wide distribution area. The morphological differences between the two subspecies are small and variable. Therefore,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Genetic resources and crop evolution 2018-10, Vol.65 (7), p.1829-1838 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1838 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1829 |
| container_title | Genetic resources and crop evolution |
| container_volume | 65 |
| creator | Schmiderer, Corinna Torres-Londono, Paula Lutz-Röder, Andrea Duwe, Virginia K. Novak, Johannes |
| description | In
Arnica montana
L. (Asteraceae) two subspecies are described,
A. montana
subsp.
atlantica
(AMA), present only on the Iberian Peninsula and
A. montana
subsp.
montana
(AMM) with a very wide distribution area. The morphological differences between the two subspecies are small and variable. Therefore, this concept is sometimes questioned. To establish the genetic background of the two subspecies, populations of AMA and AMM together with herbarium samples and DNA Bank material of AMM were tested with 12 microsatellite markers.
A. montana
propagates by seeds or by clonal propagation of its rhizome. In AMA, clonality was frequent while in AMM only one case of clonality could be identified. Therefore, further results were clone-corrected. Genetically, AMA separated very well from AMM with a
G
ST
between the subspecies of 0.81, genetically justifying the subspecies concept of
A. montana
. Genetic variability in AMA (H
exp
= 0.28) was lower than in the AMM populations (H
exp
= 0.70). A somewhat higher fixation index of AMA (
F
ST
= 0.17, compared to an
F
ST
= 0.08 for AMM) may indicate that geneflow in AMA is a bit more restricted than in alpine AMM. However, the fixation index of AMA is not deviating from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. No inbreeding was observed for AMA (
F
IS
= 0.10) and AMM (
F
IS
= 0.08). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10722-018-0653-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259767883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2259767883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-42a8abd65805d49ad0f2e6c82f983b46166fe1e5d22081e29286dfec9ae95d843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWD_-AG8LnlNnJh-beJFS_IKCIHoO6W5WWra7Ndke-t-bsgVPyhzm8H7vDfMYu0GYIkB5lxBKIg5oOGglOJ2wCapScIVgT9kELClujZbn7CKlNQDYUpsJU7PYrSpfbPpu8J0v0m6ZttPCD63vhizcF-_Bt-2-OEqhWoX0cMXOGt-mcH3cl-zz6fFj_sIXb8-v89mCV0LKgUvyxi9rrQyoWlpfQ0NBV4Yaa8RSatS6CRhUTQQGA1kyum5CZX2wqjZSXLLbMXcb--9dSINb97vY5ZOOSOUPSmPEvxSCyKPxQOFIVbFPKYbGbeNq4-PeIbhDh27s0OUO3aFDR9lDoydltvsK8Tf5b9MPCx1xfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259767883</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arnica montana subsp. atlantica: Really a subspecies?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Schmiderer, Corinna ; Torres-Londono, Paula ; Lutz-Röder, Andrea ; Duwe, Virginia K. ; Novak, Johannes</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmiderer, Corinna ; Torres-Londono, Paula ; Lutz-Röder, Andrea ; Duwe, Virginia K. ; Novak, Johannes</creatorcontrib><description>In
Arnica montana
L. (Asteraceae) two subspecies are described,
A. montana
subsp.
atlantica
(AMA), present only on the Iberian Peninsula and
A. montana
subsp.
montana
(AMM) with a very wide distribution area. The morphological differences between the two subspecies are small and variable. Therefore, this concept is sometimes questioned. To establish the genetic background of the two subspecies, populations of AMA and AMM together with herbarium samples and DNA Bank material of AMM were tested with 12 microsatellite markers.
A. montana
propagates by seeds or by clonal propagation of its rhizome. In AMA, clonality was frequent while in AMM only one case of clonality could be identified. Therefore, further results were clone-corrected. Genetically, AMA separated very well from AMM with a
G
ST
between the subspecies of 0.81, genetically justifying the subspecies concept of
A. montana
. Genetic variability in AMA (H
exp
= 0.28) was lower than in the AMM populations (H
exp
= 0.70). A somewhat higher fixation index of AMA (
F
ST
= 0.17, compared to an
F
ST
= 0.08 for AMM) may indicate that geneflow in AMA is a bit more restricted than in alpine AMM. However, the fixation index of AMA is not deviating from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. No inbreeding was observed for AMA (
F
IS
= 0.10) and AMM (
F
IS
= 0.08).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-9864</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10722-018-0653-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Aquatic plants ; Arnica montana ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Fixation ; Genetic markers ; Genetic variability ; Inbreeding ; Life Sciences ; Microsatellites ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Populations ; Research Article ; Rhizomes ; Seeds</subject><ispartof>Genetic resources and crop evolution, 2018-10, Vol.65 (7), p.1829-1838</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2018</rights><rights>Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved. © 2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-42a8abd65805d49ad0f2e6c82f983b46166fe1e5d22081e29286dfec9ae95d843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-42a8abd65805d49ad0f2e6c82f983b46166fe1e5d22081e29286dfec9ae95d843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6098-3964</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10722-018-0653-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10722-018-0653-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmiderer, Corinna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Londono, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz-Röder, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duwe, Virginia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>Arnica montana subsp. atlantica: Really a subspecies?</title><title>Genetic resources and crop evolution</title><addtitle>Genet Resour Crop Evol</addtitle><description>In
Arnica montana
L. (Asteraceae) two subspecies are described,
A. montana
subsp.
atlantica
(AMA), present only on the Iberian Peninsula and
A. montana
subsp.
montana
(AMM) with a very wide distribution area. The morphological differences between the two subspecies are small and variable. Therefore, this concept is sometimes questioned. To establish the genetic background of the two subspecies, populations of AMA and AMM together with herbarium samples and DNA Bank material of AMM were tested with 12 microsatellite markers.
A. montana
propagates by seeds or by clonal propagation of its rhizome. In AMA, clonality was frequent while in AMM only one case of clonality could be identified. Therefore, further results were clone-corrected. Genetically, AMA separated very well from AMM with a
G
ST
between the subspecies of 0.81, genetically justifying the subspecies concept of
A. montana
. Genetic variability in AMA (H
exp
= 0.28) was lower than in the AMM populations (H
exp
= 0.70). A somewhat higher fixation index of AMA (
F
ST
= 0.17, compared to an
F
ST
= 0.08 for AMM) may indicate that geneflow in AMA is a bit more restricted than in alpine AMM. However, the fixation index of AMA is not deviating from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. No inbreeding was observed for AMA (
F
IS
= 0.10) and AMM (
F
IS
= 0.08).</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Arnica montana</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Fixation</subject><subject>Genetic markers</subject><subject>Genetic variability</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Rhizomes</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><issn>0925-9864</issn><issn>1573-5109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWD_-AG8LnlNnJh-beJFS_IKCIHoO6W5WWra7Ndke-t-bsgVPyhzm8H7vDfMYu0GYIkB5lxBKIg5oOGglOJ2wCapScIVgT9kELClujZbn7CKlNQDYUpsJU7PYrSpfbPpu8J0v0m6ZttPCD63vhizcF-_Bt-2-OEqhWoX0cMXOGt-mcH3cl-zz6fFj_sIXb8-v89mCV0LKgUvyxi9rrQyoWlpfQ0NBV4Yaa8RSatS6CRhUTQQGA1kyum5CZX2wqjZSXLLbMXcb--9dSINb97vY5ZOOSOUPSmPEvxSCyKPxQOFIVbFPKYbGbeNq4-PeIbhDh27s0OUO3aFDR9lDoydltvsK8Tf5b9MPCx1xfw</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Schmiderer, Corinna</creator><creator>Torres-Londono, Paula</creator><creator>Lutz-Röder, Andrea</creator><creator>Duwe, Virginia K.</creator><creator>Novak, Johannes</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-3964</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Arnica montana subsp. atlantica: Really a subspecies?</title><author>Schmiderer, Corinna ; Torres-Londono, Paula ; Lutz-Röder, Andrea ; Duwe, Virginia K. ; Novak, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-42a8abd65805d49ad0f2e6c82f983b46166fe1e5d22081e29286dfec9ae95d843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Arnica montana</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Fixation</topic><topic>Genetic markers</topic><topic>Genetic variability</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Rhizomes</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmiderer, Corinna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Londono, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz-Röder, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duwe, Virginia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Genetic resources and crop evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmiderer, Corinna</au><au>Torres-Londono, Paula</au><au>Lutz-Röder, Andrea</au><au>Duwe, Virginia K.</au><au>Novak, Johannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arnica montana subsp. atlantica: Really a subspecies?</atitle><jtitle>Genetic resources and crop evolution</jtitle><stitle>Genet Resour Crop Evol</stitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1829</spage><epage>1838</epage><pages>1829-1838</pages><issn>0925-9864</issn><eissn>1573-5109</eissn><abstract>In
Arnica montana
L. (Asteraceae) two subspecies are described,
A. montana
subsp.
atlantica
(AMA), present only on the Iberian Peninsula and
A. montana
subsp.
montana
(AMM) with a very wide distribution area. The morphological differences between the two subspecies are small and variable. Therefore, this concept is sometimes questioned. To establish the genetic background of the two subspecies, populations of AMA and AMM together with herbarium samples and DNA Bank material of AMM were tested with 12 microsatellite markers.
A. montana
propagates by seeds or by clonal propagation of its rhizome. In AMA, clonality was frequent while in AMM only one case of clonality could be identified. Therefore, further results were clone-corrected. Genetically, AMA separated very well from AMM with a
G
ST
between the subspecies of 0.81, genetically justifying the subspecies concept of
A. montana
. Genetic variability in AMA (H
exp
= 0.28) was lower than in the AMM populations (H
exp
= 0.70). A somewhat higher fixation index of AMA (
F
ST
= 0.17, compared to an
F
ST
= 0.08 for AMM) may indicate that geneflow in AMA is a bit more restricted than in alpine AMM. However, the fixation index of AMA is not deviating from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. No inbreeding was observed for AMA (
F
IS
= 0.10) and AMM (
F
IS
= 0.08).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10722-018-0653-2</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-3964</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0925-9864 |
| ispartof | Genetic resources and crop evolution, 2018-10, Vol.65 (7), p.1829-1838 |
| issn | 0925-9864 1573-5109 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2259767883 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Agriculture Aquatic plants Arnica montana Biomedical and Life Sciences Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Fixation Genetic markers Genetic variability Inbreeding Life Sciences Microsatellites Plant Genetics and Genomics Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Populations Research Article Rhizomes Seeds |
| title | Arnica montana subsp. atlantica: Really a subspecies? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T13%3A37%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arnica%20montana%20subsp.%20atlantica:%20Really%20a%20subspecies?&rft.jtitle=Genetic%20resources%20and%20crop%20evolution&rft.au=Schmiderer,%20Corinna&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1829&rft.epage=1838&rft.pages=1829-1838&rft.issn=0925-9864&rft.eissn=1573-5109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10722-018-0653-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259767883%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259767883&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |