The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism
Social stimuli often do not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors maintained by generalized conditioned re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of developmental and physical disabilities 2017-04, Vol.29 (2), p.325-340 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 340 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 325 |
container_title | Journal of developmental and physical disabilities |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Axe, Judah B. Laprime, Amanda P. |
description | Social stimuli often do not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on conditioning praise as a reinforcer. We identified primary reinforcers for two nonverbal participants with autism (ages 5 and 9): tickles and potato chips. A preliminary reinforcer analysis demonstrated that button-pressing was consistently more frequent in a contingent primary reinforcer condition than in contingent praise and no programmed consequence conditions. Contingent pairing of praise and the primary reinforcer was then administered in 1-min sessions, and responding during praise alone was evaluated before and after pairing sessions each day. In the context of a reversal design with praise probes, pairing resulted in increases in button-pressing in the praise condition relative to the no programmed consequence condition. In addition, 6 consecutive pairing sessions resulted in higher levels of button-pressing with praise than 3 consecutive pairing sessions. Future research should continue refining the procedures for conditioning attention as a reinforcer as well as examine more closely the role of motivating operations in the process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259587294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2259587294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fa1bac9453cd7935e46b705e312c658841db51195db9be36ce448e87edf2c6a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3A9Wgek8xkWUp9gGCRCu5CJnPjpLQzNUkR_70ZRnDl5t574Jxz4UPompJbSkh1Fympa1YQKgslWB4naEZFxQsuanKabyJkwSR_P0cXMW4JIZIpNUPNpgO8cg5sinhweDn0yfcf0Ce8Nj7kEw89XsVkmp2P3ajXwfgI2ERs8Cv43g3BQsBfPnV42fldG6Cf1OKYfNxfojNndhGufvccvd2vNsvH4vnl4Wm5eC4spzIVztDGWFUKbttKcQGlbCoigFNmpajrkraNoFSJtlENcGmhLGuoK2hdNhjO5-hm6j2E4fMIMentcAx9fqkZE0rUFVNldtHJZcMQYwCnD8HvTfjWlOgRpZ5Q6oxSjyi1yhk2ZeJhJALhr_n_0A8KA3bM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259587294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Axe, Judah B. ; Laprime, Amanda P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Axe, Judah B. ; Laprime, Amanda P.</creatorcontrib><description>Social stimuli often do not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on conditioning praise as a reinforcer. We identified primary reinforcers for two nonverbal participants with autism (ages 5 and 9): tickles and potato chips. A preliminary reinforcer analysis demonstrated that button-pressing was consistently more frequent in a contingent primary reinforcer condition than in contingent praise and no programmed consequence conditions. Contingent pairing of praise and the primary reinforcer was then administered in 1-min sessions, and responding during praise alone was evaluated before and after pairing sessions each day. In the context of a reversal design with praise probes, pairing resulted in increases in button-pressing in the praise condition relative to the no programmed consequence condition. In addition, 6 consecutive pairing sessions resulted in higher levels of button-pressing with praise than 3 consecutive pairing sessions. Future research should continue refining the procedures for conditioning attention as a reinforcer as well as examine more closely the role of motivating operations in the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-263X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3580</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Autism ; Autistic children ; Behavior ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Conditioning ; Original Article ; Pairing ; Pediatrics ; Positive Reinforcement ; Praise ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Reinforcement ; Reversal ; Social behavior ; Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2017-04, Vol.29 (2), p.325-340</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fa1bac9453cd7935e46b705e312c658841db51195db9be36ce448e87edf2c6a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fa1bac9453cd7935e46b705e312c658841db51195db9be36ce448e87edf2c6a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27901,27902,30976,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Axe, Judah B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laprime, Amanda P.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism</title><title>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</title><addtitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</addtitle><description>Social stimuli often do not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on conditioning praise as a reinforcer. We identified primary reinforcers for two nonverbal participants with autism (ages 5 and 9): tickles and potato chips. A preliminary reinforcer analysis demonstrated that button-pressing was consistently more frequent in a contingent primary reinforcer condition than in contingent praise and no programmed consequence conditions. Contingent pairing of praise and the primary reinforcer was then administered in 1-min sessions, and responding during praise alone was evaluated before and after pairing sessions each day. In the context of a reversal design with praise probes, pairing resulted in increases in button-pressing in the praise condition relative to the no programmed consequence condition. In addition, 6 consecutive pairing sessions resulted in higher levels of button-pressing with praise than 3 consecutive pairing sessions. Future research should continue refining the procedures for conditioning attention as a reinforcer as well as examine more closely the role of motivating operations in the process.</description><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Autistic children</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pairing</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Positive Reinforcement</subject><subject>Praise</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reversal</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><issn>1056-263X</issn><issn>1573-3580</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3A9Wgek8xkWUp9gGCRCu5CJnPjpLQzNUkR_70ZRnDl5t574Jxz4UPompJbSkh1Fympa1YQKgslWB4naEZFxQsuanKabyJkwSR_P0cXMW4JIZIpNUPNpgO8cg5sinhweDn0yfcf0Ce8Nj7kEw89XsVkmp2P3ajXwfgI2ERs8Cv43g3BQsBfPnV42fldG6Cf1OKYfNxfojNndhGufvccvd2vNsvH4vnl4Wm5eC4spzIVztDGWFUKbttKcQGlbCoigFNmpajrkraNoFSJtlENcGmhLGuoK2hdNhjO5-hm6j2E4fMIMentcAx9fqkZE0rUFVNldtHJZcMQYwCnD8HvTfjWlOgRpZ5Q6oxSjyi1yhk2ZeJhJALhr_n_0A8KA3bM</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Axe, Judah B.</creator><creator>Laprime, Amanda P.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism</title><author>Axe, Judah B. ; Laprime, Amanda P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fa1bac9453cd7935e46b705e312c658841db51195db9be36ce448e87edf2c6a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Autistic children</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pairing</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Positive Reinforcement</topic><topic>Praise</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reversal</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Axe, Judah B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laprime, Amanda P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Axe, Judah B.</au><au>Laprime, Amanda P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle><stitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</stitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>325-340</pages><issn>1056-263X</issn><eissn>1573-3580</eissn><abstract>Social stimuli often do not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on conditioning praise as a reinforcer. We identified primary reinforcers for two nonverbal participants with autism (ages 5 and 9): tickles and potato chips. A preliminary reinforcer analysis demonstrated that button-pressing was consistently more frequent in a contingent primary reinforcer condition than in contingent praise and no programmed consequence conditions. Contingent pairing of praise and the primary reinforcer was then administered in 1-min sessions, and responding during praise alone was evaluated before and after pairing sessions each day. In the context of a reversal design with praise probes, pairing resulted in increases in button-pressing in the praise condition relative to the no programmed consequence condition. In addition, 6 consecutive pairing sessions resulted in higher levels of button-pressing with praise than 3 consecutive pairing sessions. Future research should continue refining the procedures for conditioning attention as a reinforcer as well as examine more closely the role of motivating operations in the process.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1056-263X |
ispartof | Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2017-04, Vol.29 (2), p.325-340 |
issn | 1056-263X 1573-3580 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2259587294 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Autism Autistic children Behavior Behavioral Science and Psychology Child and School Psychology Conditioning Original Article Pairing Pediatrics Positive Reinforcement Praise Psychology Public Health Reinforcement Reversal Social behavior Stimuli |
title | The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A31%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Contingent%20Pairing%20on%20Establishing%20Praise%20as%20a%20Reinforcer%20with%20Children%20with%20Autism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20developmental%20and%20physical%20disabilities&rft.au=Axe,%20Judah%20B.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=325-340&rft.issn=1056-263X&rft.eissn=1573-3580&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259587294%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259587294&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |