The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism

Social stimuli often do not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors maintained by generalized conditioned re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of developmental and physical disabilities 2017-04, Vol.29 (2), p.325-340
Hauptverfasser: Axe, Judah B., Laprime, Amanda P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 340
container_issue 2
container_start_page 325
container_title Journal of developmental and physical disabilities
container_volume 29
creator Axe, Judah B.
Laprime, Amanda P.
description Social stimuli often do not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on conditioning praise as a reinforcer. We identified primary reinforcers for two nonverbal participants with autism (ages 5 and 9): tickles and potato chips. A preliminary reinforcer analysis demonstrated that button-pressing was consistently more frequent in a contingent primary reinforcer condition than in contingent praise and no programmed consequence conditions. Contingent pairing of praise and the primary reinforcer was then administered in 1-min sessions, and responding during praise alone was evaluated before and after pairing sessions each day. In the context of a reversal design with praise probes, pairing resulted in increases in button-pressing in the praise condition relative to the no programmed consequence condition. In addition, 6 consecutive pairing sessions resulted in higher levels of button-pressing with praise than 3 consecutive pairing sessions. Future research should continue refining the procedures for conditioning attention as a reinforcer as well as examine more closely the role of motivating operations in the process.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259587294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2259587294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fa1bac9453cd7935e46b705e312c658841db51195db9be36ce448e87edf2c6a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3A9Wgek8xkWUp9gGCRCu5CJnPjpLQzNUkR_70ZRnDl5t574Jxz4UPompJbSkh1Fympa1YQKgslWB4naEZFxQsuanKabyJkwSR_P0cXMW4JIZIpNUPNpgO8cg5sinhweDn0yfcf0Ce8Nj7kEw89XsVkmp2P3ajXwfgI2ERs8Cv43g3BQsBfPnV42fldG6Cf1OKYfNxfojNndhGufvccvd2vNsvH4vnl4Wm5eC4spzIVztDGWFUKbttKcQGlbCoigFNmpajrkraNoFSJtlENcGmhLGuoK2hdNhjO5-hm6j2E4fMIMentcAx9fqkZE0rUFVNldtHJZcMQYwCnD8HvTfjWlOgRpZ5Q6oxSjyi1yhk2ZeJhJALhr_n_0A8KA3bM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259587294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Axe, Judah B. ; Laprime, Amanda P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Axe, Judah B. ; Laprime, Amanda P.</creatorcontrib><description>Social stimuli often do not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on conditioning praise as a reinforcer. We identified primary reinforcers for two nonverbal participants with autism (ages 5 and 9): tickles and potato chips. A preliminary reinforcer analysis demonstrated that button-pressing was consistently more frequent in a contingent primary reinforcer condition than in contingent praise and no programmed consequence conditions. Contingent pairing of praise and the primary reinforcer was then administered in 1-min sessions, and responding during praise alone was evaluated before and after pairing sessions each day. In the context of a reversal design with praise probes, pairing resulted in increases in button-pressing in the praise condition relative to the no programmed consequence condition. In addition, 6 consecutive pairing sessions resulted in higher levels of button-pressing with praise than 3 consecutive pairing sessions. Future research should continue refining the procedures for conditioning attention as a reinforcer as well as examine more closely the role of motivating operations in the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-263X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3580</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Autism ; Autistic children ; Behavior ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Conditioning ; Original Article ; Pairing ; Pediatrics ; Positive Reinforcement ; Praise ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Reinforcement ; Reversal ; Social behavior ; Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2017-04, Vol.29 (2), p.325-340</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fa1bac9453cd7935e46b705e312c658841db51195db9be36ce448e87edf2c6a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fa1bac9453cd7935e46b705e312c658841db51195db9be36ce448e87edf2c6a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27901,27902,30976,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Axe, Judah B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laprime, Amanda P.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism</title><title>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</title><addtitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</addtitle><description>Social stimuli often do not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on conditioning praise as a reinforcer. We identified primary reinforcers for two nonverbal participants with autism (ages 5 and 9): tickles and potato chips. A preliminary reinforcer analysis demonstrated that button-pressing was consistently more frequent in a contingent primary reinforcer condition than in contingent praise and no programmed consequence conditions. Contingent pairing of praise and the primary reinforcer was then administered in 1-min sessions, and responding during praise alone was evaluated before and after pairing sessions each day. In the context of a reversal design with praise probes, pairing resulted in increases in button-pressing in the praise condition relative to the no programmed consequence condition. In addition, 6 consecutive pairing sessions resulted in higher levels of button-pressing with praise than 3 consecutive pairing sessions. Future research should continue refining the procedures for conditioning attention as a reinforcer as well as examine more closely the role of motivating operations in the process.</description><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Autistic children</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pairing</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Positive Reinforcement</subject><subject>Praise</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reversal</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><issn>1056-263X</issn><issn>1573-3580</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3A9Wgek8xkWUp9gGCRCu5CJnPjpLQzNUkR_70ZRnDl5t574Jxz4UPompJbSkh1Fympa1YQKgslWB4naEZFxQsuanKabyJkwSR_P0cXMW4JIZIpNUPNpgO8cg5sinhweDn0yfcf0Ce8Nj7kEw89XsVkmp2P3ajXwfgI2ERs8Cv43g3BQsBfPnV42fldG6Cf1OKYfNxfojNndhGufvccvd2vNsvH4vnl4Wm5eC4spzIVztDGWFUKbttKcQGlbCoigFNmpajrkraNoFSJtlENcGmhLGuoK2hdNhjO5-hm6j2E4fMIMentcAx9fqkZE0rUFVNldtHJZcMQYwCnD8HvTfjWlOgRpZ5Q6oxSjyi1yhk2ZeJhJALhr_n_0A8KA3bM</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Axe, Judah B.</creator><creator>Laprime, Amanda P.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism</title><author>Axe, Judah B. ; Laprime, Amanda P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fa1bac9453cd7935e46b705e312c658841db51195db9be36ce448e87edf2c6a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Autistic children</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pairing</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Positive Reinforcement</topic><topic>Praise</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reversal</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Axe, Judah B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laprime, Amanda P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Axe, Judah B.</au><au>Laprime, Amanda P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle><stitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</stitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>325-340</pages><issn>1056-263X</issn><eissn>1573-3580</eissn><abstract>Social stimuli often do not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on conditioning praise as a reinforcer. We identified primary reinforcers for two nonverbal participants with autism (ages 5 and 9): tickles and potato chips. A preliminary reinforcer analysis demonstrated that button-pressing was consistently more frequent in a contingent primary reinforcer condition than in contingent praise and no programmed consequence conditions. Contingent pairing of praise and the primary reinforcer was then administered in 1-min sessions, and responding during praise alone was evaluated before and after pairing sessions each day. In the context of a reversal design with praise probes, pairing resulted in increases in button-pressing in the praise condition relative to the no programmed consequence condition. In addition, 6 consecutive pairing sessions resulted in higher levels of button-pressing with praise than 3 consecutive pairing sessions. Future research should continue refining the procedures for conditioning attention as a reinforcer as well as examine more closely the role of motivating operations in the process.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1056-263X
ispartof Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2017-04, Vol.29 (2), p.325-340
issn 1056-263X
1573-3580
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2259587294
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals
subjects Autism
Autistic children
Behavior
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Child and School Psychology
Conditioning
Original Article
Pairing
Pediatrics
Positive Reinforcement
Praise
Psychology
Public Health
Reinforcement
Reversal
Social behavior
Stimuli
title The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A31%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Contingent%20Pairing%20on%20Establishing%20Praise%20as%20a%20Reinforcer%20with%20Children%20with%20Autism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20developmental%20and%20physical%20disabilities&rft.au=Axe,%20Judah%20B.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=325-340&rft.issn=1056-263X&rft.eissn=1573-3580&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10882-016-9526-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259587294%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259587294&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true