Understanding the Earth Systems: Expressions of Dynamic and Cyclic Thinking Among University Students

In this two-part study, we examine undergraduate university students' expression of two important system thinking characteristics—dynamic thinking and cyclic thinking—focusing particularly on students of geology. The study was conducted using an Earth systems questionnaire designed to elicit an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of science education and technology 2015-12, Vol.24 (6), p.761-775
Hauptverfasser: Batzri, Or, Assaraf, Orit Ben Zvi, Cohen, Carmit, Orion, Nir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 775
container_issue 6
container_start_page 761
container_title Journal of science education and technology
container_volume 24
creator Batzri, Or
Assaraf, Orit Ben Zvi
Cohen, Carmit
Orion, Nir
description In this two-part study, we examine undergraduate university students' expression of two important system thinking characteristics—dynamic thinking and cyclic thinking—focusing particularly on students of geology. The study was conducted using an Earth systems questionnaire designed to elicit and reflect either dynamic or cyclic thinking. The study's first part was quantitative. Its population consisted of a research group (223 students majoring in geology or physical geography) and a control group (312 students with no background in geology). The students were asked to rate their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale. Overall, the students in the research group expressed higher levels of dynamic thinking than those in the control group. The geology students showed relatively strong dynamic thinking toward the geosphere and hydrosphere, but not the biosphere. In cyclic thinking, their levels were significantly higher for all Earth systems, suggesting a connection between learning about different cycles in Earth systems, developing cyclic thinking and applying it to other Earth cycles. The second part was qualitative and administered only to the students who majored in geology. They were asked to freely explain their answers to the questionnaire's statements. Our aim was to identify recurring patterns in how these students express their dynamic and cyclic thinking. Their explanations were given to four experts in the field of Earth science, who then presented, in a semi-structured interview, the recurring characteristics of dynamic thinking that they found in the students' explanations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10956-015-9562-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259578431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714981500</galeid><ericid>EJ1081890</ericid><jstor_id>43867743</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A714981500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c75b3eb5fb78dace4314c2ae40bbefb946af59cfaad9dd089c8f4831a7641e203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFvGyEQhVdVIzVN8wNyqITU8yawwAK9Wa7bporUQ-IzYtnBxrXBBRx1_32wtkqvFRIz4s37gNc0NwTfEozFXSZY8b7FhLe1dq1801wSLmhLJFVva4-5qirj75r3Oe8wxkoqfNnAOoyQcjFh9GGDyhbQyqSyRY9TLnDIn9HqzzFBzj6GjKJDX6ZgDt6iakDLye5r-7T14dfZvTjEuq-Df65IXyb0WE4jhJI_NBfO7DNc_61Xzfrr6mn5vX34-e1-uXhoLetVaa3gA4WBu0HI0VhglDDbGWB4GMANivXGcWWdMaMaRyyVlY5JSozoGYEO06vm08w9pvj7BLnoXTylUK_UXccVF7Ii69TtPLUxe9A-uFiSsXWNUH8WAzhfzxeCMCUJx2csmQ02xZwTOH1M_mDSpAnW5_j1HL-u8etz_FpWz8fZA8nb1_nVD4IlqclXvZv1XLWwgfTvqf8B3eUS0yuVUdkLwSh9AZHcnHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259578431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the Earth Systems: Expressions of Dynamic and Cyclic Thinking Among University Students</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Batzri, Or ; Assaraf, Orit Ben Zvi ; Cohen, Carmit ; Orion, Nir</creator><creatorcontrib>Batzri, Or ; Assaraf, Orit Ben Zvi ; Cohen, Carmit ; Orion, Nir</creatorcontrib><description>In this two-part study, we examine undergraduate university students' expression of two important system thinking characteristics—dynamic thinking and cyclic thinking—focusing particularly on students of geology. The study was conducted using an Earth systems questionnaire designed to elicit and reflect either dynamic or cyclic thinking. The study's first part was quantitative. Its population consisted of a research group (223 students majoring in geology or physical geography) and a control group (312 students with no background in geology). The students were asked to rate their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale. Overall, the students in the research group expressed higher levels of dynamic thinking than those in the control group. The geology students showed relatively strong dynamic thinking toward the geosphere and hydrosphere, but not the biosphere. In cyclic thinking, their levels were significantly higher for all Earth systems, suggesting a connection between learning about different cycles in Earth systems, developing cyclic thinking and applying it to other Earth cycles. The second part was qualitative and administered only to the students who majored in geology. They were asked to freely explain their answers to the questionnaire's statements. Our aim was to identify recurring patterns in how these students express their dynamic and cyclic thinking. Their explanations were given to four experts in the field of Earth science, who then presented, in a semi-structured interview, the recurring characteristics of dynamic thinking that they found in the students' explanations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1839</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10956-015-9562-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media LLC</publisher><subject>Biosphere ; College Science ; College Students ; Control Groups ; Critical Thinking ; Earth ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Experimental Groups ; Geography ; Geology ; Geosphere ; Hydrosphere ; Interviews ; Likert Scales ; Lithosphere ; Majors (Students) ; Methods ; Physical Geography ; Qualitative Research ; Questionnaires ; Science Education ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Statistical Analysis ; Students ; Systems Approach ; Thinking Skills ; Undergraduate Students ; University students</subject><ispartof>Journal of science education and technology, 2015-12, Vol.24 (6), p.761-775</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Journal of Science Education and Technology is a copyright of Springer, (2015). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c75b3eb5fb78dace4314c2ae40bbefb946af59cfaad9dd089c8f4831a7641e203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c75b3eb5fb78dace4314c2ae40bbefb946af59cfaad9dd089c8f4831a7641e203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43867743$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43867743$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1081890$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batzri, Or</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assaraf, Orit Ben Zvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Carmit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orion, Nir</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the Earth Systems: Expressions of Dynamic and Cyclic Thinking Among University Students</title><title>Journal of science education and technology</title><addtitle>J Sci Educ Technol</addtitle><description>In this two-part study, we examine undergraduate university students' expression of two important system thinking characteristics—dynamic thinking and cyclic thinking—focusing particularly on students of geology. The study was conducted using an Earth systems questionnaire designed to elicit and reflect either dynamic or cyclic thinking. The study's first part was quantitative. Its population consisted of a research group (223 students majoring in geology or physical geography) and a control group (312 students with no background in geology). The students were asked to rate their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale. Overall, the students in the research group expressed higher levels of dynamic thinking than those in the control group. The geology students showed relatively strong dynamic thinking toward the geosphere and hydrosphere, but not the biosphere. In cyclic thinking, their levels were significantly higher for all Earth systems, suggesting a connection between learning about different cycles in Earth systems, developing cyclic thinking and applying it to other Earth cycles. The second part was qualitative and administered only to the students who majored in geology. They were asked to freely explain their answers to the questionnaire's statements. Our aim was to identify recurring patterns in how these students express their dynamic and cyclic thinking. Their explanations were given to four experts in the field of Earth science, who then presented, in a semi-structured interview, the recurring characteristics of dynamic thinking that they found in the students' explanations.</description><subject>Biosphere</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Critical Thinking</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geosphere</subject><subject>Hydrosphere</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Lithosphere</subject><subject>Majors (Students)</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Systems Approach</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>University students</subject><issn>1059-0145</issn><issn>1573-1839</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFvGyEQhVdVIzVN8wNyqITU8yawwAK9Wa7bporUQ-IzYtnBxrXBBRx1_32wtkqvFRIz4s37gNc0NwTfEozFXSZY8b7FhLe1dq1801wSLmhLJFVva4-5qirj75r3Oe8wxkoqfNnAOoyQcjFh9GGDyhbQyqSyRY9TLnDIn9HqzzFBzj6GjKJDX6ZgDt6iakDLye5r-7T14dfZvTjEuq-Df65IXyb0WE4jhJI_NBfO7DNc_61Xzfrr6mn5vX34-e1-uXhoLetVaa3gA4WBu0HI0VhglDDbGWB4GMANivXGcWWdMaMaRyyVlY5JSozoGYEO06vm08w9pvj7BLnoXTylUK_UXccVF7Ii69TtPLUxe9A-uFiSsXWNUH8WAzhfzxeCMCUJx2csmQ02xZwTOH1M_mDSpAnW5_j1HL-u8etz_FpWz8fZA8nb1_nVD4IlqclXvZv1XLWwgfTvqf8B3eUS0yuVUdkLwSh9AZHcnHA</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Batzri, Or</creator><creator>Assaraf, Orit Ben Zvi</creator><creator>Cohen, Carmit</creator><creator>Orion, Nir</creator><general>Springer Science+Business Media LLC</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Understanding the Earth Systems: Expressions of Dynamic and Cyclic Thinking Among University Students</title><author>Batzri, Or ; Assaraf, Orit Ben Zvi ; Cohen, Carmit ; Orion, Nir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c75b3eb5fb78dace4314c2ae40bbefb946af59cfaad9dd089c8f4831a7641e203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biosphere</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Critical Thinking</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geosphere</topic><topic>Hydrosphere</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Lithosphere</topic><topic>Majors (Students)</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Systems Approach</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>University students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batzri, Or</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assaraf, Orit Ben Zvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Carmit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orion, Nir</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of science education and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batzri, Or</au><au>Assaraf, Orit Ben Zvi</au><au>Cohen, Carmit</au><au>Orion, Nir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1081890</ericid><atitle>Understanding the Earth Systems: Expressions of Dynamic and Cyclic Thinking Among University Students</atitle><jtitle>Journal of science education and technology</jtitle><stitle>J Sci Educ Technol</stitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>761</spage><epage>775</epage><pages>761-775</pages><issn>1059-0145</issn><eissn>1573-1839</eissn><abstract>In this two-part study, we examine undergraduate university students' expression of two important system thinking characteristics—dynamic thinking and cyclic thinking—focusing particularly on students of geology. The study was conducted using an Earth systems questionnaire designed to elicit and reflect either dynamic or cyclic thinking. The study's first part was quantitative. Its population consisted of a research group (223 students majoring in geology or physical geography) and a control group (312 students with no background in geology). The students were asked to rate their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale. Overall, the students in the research group expressed higher levels of dynamic thinking than those in the control group. The geology students showed relatively strong dynamic thinking toward the geosphere and hydrosphere, but not the biosphere. In cyclic thinking, their levels were significantly higher for all Earth systems, suggesting a connection between learning about different cycles in Earth systems, developing cyclic thinking and applying it to other Earth cycles. The second part was qualitative and administered only to the students who majored in geology. They were asked to freely explain their answers to the questionnaire's statements. Our aim was to identify recurring patterns in how these students express their dynamic and cyclic thinking. Their explanations were given to four experts in the field of Earth science, who then presented, in a semi-structured interview, the recurring characteristics of dynamic thinking that they found in the students' explanations.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science+Business Media LLC</pub><doi>10.1007/s10956-015-9562-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-0145
ispartof Journal of science education and technology, 2015-12, Vol.24 (6), p.761-775
issn 1059-0145
1573-1839
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2259578431
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biosphere
College Science
College Students
Control Groups
Critical Thinking
Earth
Education
Educational Technology
Experimental Groups
Geography
Geology
Geosphere
Hydrosphere
Interviews
Likert Scales
Lithosphere
Majors (Students)
Methods
Physical Geography
Qualitative Research
Questionnaires
Science Education
Semi Structured Interviews
Statistical Analysis
Students
Systems Approach
Thinking Skills
Undergraduate Students
University students
title Understanding the Earth Systems: Expressions of Dynamic and Cyclic Thinking Among University Students
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T13%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20Earth%20Systems:%20Expressions%20of%20Dynamic%20and%20Cyclic%20Thinking%20Among%20University%20Students&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20science%20education%20and%20technology&rft.au=Batzri,%20Or&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=761&rft.epage=775&rft.pages=761-775&rft.issn=1059-0145&rft.eissn=1573-1839&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10956-015-9562-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714981500%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259578431&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A714981500&rft_ericid=EJ1081890&rft_jstor_id=43867743&rfr_iscdi=true