Construct Validity, Test-Retest Reliability, and Internal Consistency of the Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential Scale (PESD) in Disability Studies
The Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential scale (PESD), developed to examine the social perception of disability and attitudes towards people with a disability (PwD), comprises six dimensions: communicativeness, competence, attractiveness, intelligence, industriousness, and popularity. This paper...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of developmental and physical disabilities 2011-06, Vol.23 (3), p.257-265 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 265 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 257 |
| container_title | Journal of developmental and physical disabilities |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Fellinghauer, Bernd A. G. Roth, Andrea Bugari, Katinka Reinhardt, Jan D. |
| description | The Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential scale (PESD), developed to examine the social perception of disability and attitudes towards people with a disability (PwD), comprises six dimensions: communicativeness, competence, attractiveness, intelligence, industriousness, and popularity. This paper aims to assess the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the PESD. A longitudinal study with 40 participants of the Swiss general population and 2 (test-retest) * 8 (different photographs) measurements per subject was performed. Construct validity was examined via Principal Component Analysis (PCA), test-retest reliability via the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and a frequency analysis of deviations among test-retest scores, and internal consistency via Cronbach’s alpha. PCA extracted two factors corresponding to hard and soft skills for the test and a single factor for the retest. ICCs ranged from 0.44 (industriousness) to 0.60 (intelligence). Deviations between tests exceeding +/-1 were rather rare ranging from 6% (intelligence) to 14% (competence). Cronbach’s alpha equalled 0.814 and 0.858 for test and retest, respectively. Summarising, in our study the PESD appears to be a valid and reliable tool for the examination of the social perception of disability and attitudes towards PwD. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10882-010-9224-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259498240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2259498240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-32ce7aca3a11c35d7750c42fc2d95aea57ebef0762f3d8f6d371e7fd218737663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhQdRsFYfwF3AjYLR_HQmM0tpqxYES1vFXUgzNzYyZjTJLOZJfF1TK7hydS-c853LPVl2SskVJURcB0rKkmFCCa4YG-F-LxvQXHDM85Lsp53kBWYFfznMjkJ4I4QUrKoG2de4dSH6Tkf0rBpb29hfohWEiBcQ00ALaKxa2-ZHUK5GMxfBO9WgLWlDBKd71BoUN4Dmmza2aNpYbaOKtnVoCe_KRavRxBoDHtKe0KVWDaDz-XQ5uUDWJTH83kDL2NUWwnF2YFQT4OR3DrOn2-lqfI8fHu9m45sHrDktIuZMg1BacUWp5nktRE70iBnN6ipXoHIBazBEFMzwujRFzQUFYWpGS8FFUfBhdrbL_fDtZ5celm9tt30vSMbyalSVbESSi-5c2rcheDDyw9t35XtJidz2L3f9y9S_3PYv-8SwHROS172C_0v-H_oGqMeK9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259498240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construct Validity, Test-Retest Reliability, and Internal Consistency of the Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential Scale (PESD) in Disability Studies</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Fellinghauer, Bernd A. G. ; Roth, Andrea ; Bugari, Katinka ; Reinhardt, Jan D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fellinghauer, Bernd A. G. ; Roth, Andrea ; Bugari, Katinka ; Reinhardt, Jan D.</creatorcontrib><description>The Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential scale (PESD), developed to examine the social perception of disability and attitudes towards people with a disability (PwD), comprises six dimensions: communicativeness, competence, attractiveness, intelligence, industriousness, and popularity. This paper aims to assess the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the PESD. A longitudinal study with 40 participants of the Swiss general population and 2 (test-retest) * 8 (different photographs) measurements per subject was performed. Construct validity was examined via Principal Component Analysis (PCA), test-retest reliability via the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and a frequency analysis of deviations among test-retest scores, and internal consistency via Cronbach’s alpha. PCA extracted two factors corresponding to hard and soft skills for the test and a single factor for the retest. ICCs ranged from 0.44 (industriousness) to 0.60 (intelligence). Deviations between tests exceeding +/-1 were rather rare ranging from 6% (intelligence) to 14% (competence). Cronbach’s alpha equalled 0.814 and 0.858 for test and retest, respectively. Summarising, in our study the PESD appears to be a valid and reliable tool for the examination of the social perception of disability and attitudes towards PwD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-263X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3580</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10882-010-9224-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Competence ; Construct validity ; Disability studies ; Elicitation ; Intelligence ; Longitudinal Studies ; Original Article ; Pediatrics ; People with disabilities ; Photography ; Popularity ; Principal components analysis ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Semantic Differential ; Semantics ; Social perception ; Test-Retest reliability ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2011-06, Vol.23 (3), p.257-265</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities is a copyright of Springer, (2011). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-32ce7aca3a11c35d7750c42fc2d95aea57ebef0762f3d8f6d371e7fd218737663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-32ce7aca3a11c35d7750c42fc2d95aea57ebef0762f3d8f6d371e7fd218737663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10882-010-9224-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10882-010-9224-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27923,27924,30998,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fellinghauer, Bernd A. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugari, Katinka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhardt, Jan D.</creatorcontrib><title>Construct Validity, Test-Retest Reliability, and Internal Consistency of the Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential Scale (PESD) in Disability Studies</title><title>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</title><addtitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</addtitle><description>The Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential scale (PESD), developed to examine the social perception of disability and attitudes towards people with a disability (PwD), comprises six dimensions: communicativeness, competence, attractiveness, intelligence, industriousness, and popularity. This paper aims to assess the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the PESD. A longitudinal study with 40 participants of the Swiss general population and 2 (test-retest) * 8 (different photographs) measurements per subject was performed. Construct validity was examined via Principal Component Analysis (PCA), test-retest reliability via the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and a frequency analysis of deviations among test-retest scores, and internal consistency via Cronbach’s alpha. PCA extracted two factors corresponding to hard and soft skills for the test and a single factor for the retest. ICCs ranged from 0.44 (industriousness) to 0.60 (intelligence). Deviations between tests exceeding +/-1 were rather rare ranging from 6% (intelligence) to 14% (competence). Cronbach’s alpha equalled 0.814 and 0.858 for test and retest, respectively. Summarising, in our study the PESD appears to be a valid and reliable tool for the examination of the social perception of disability and attitudes towards PwD.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Construct validity</subject><subject>Disability studies</subject><subject>Elicitation</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Semantic Differential</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Social perception</subject><subject>Test-Retest reliability</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1056-263X</issn><issn>1573-3580</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhQdRsFYfwF3AjYLR_HQmM0tpqxYES1vFXUgzNzYyZjTJLOZJfF1TK7hydS-c853LPVl2SskVJURcB0rKkmFCCa4YG-F-LxvQXHDM85Lsp53kBWYFfznMjkJ4I4QUrKoG2de4dSH6Tkf0rBpb29hfohWEiBcQ00ALaKxa2-ZHUK5GMxfBO9WgLWlDBKd71BoUN4Dmmza2aNpYbaOKtnVoCe_KRavRxBoDHtKe0KVWDaDz-XQ5uUDWJTH83kDL2NUWwnF2YFQT4OR3DrOn2-lqfI8fHu9m45sHrDktIuZMg1BacUWp5nktRE70iBnN6ipXoHIBazBEFMzwujRFzQUFYWpGS8FFUfBhdrbL_fDtZ5celm9tt30vSMbyalSVbESSi-5c2rcheDDyw9t35XtJidz2L3f9y9S_3PYv-8SwHROS172C_0v-H_oGqMeK9Q</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Fellinghauer, Bernd A. G.</creator><creator>Roth, Andrea</creator><creator>Bugari, Katinka</creator><creator>Reinhardt, Jan D.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Construct Validity, Test-Retest Reliability, and Internal Consistency of the Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential Scale (PESD) in Disability Studies</title><author>Fellinghauer, Bernd A. G. ; Roth, Andrea ; Bugari, Katinka ; Reinhardt, Jan D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-32ce7aca3a11c35d7750c42fc2d95aea57ebef0762f3d8f6d371e7fd218737663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Construct validity</topic><topic>Disability studies</topic><topic>Elicitation</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Semantic Differential</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Social perception</topic><topic>Test-Retest reliability</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fellinghauer, Bernd A. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugari, Katinka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhardt, Jan D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fellinghauer, Bernd A. G.</au><au>Roth, Andrea</au><au>Bugari, Katinka</au><au>Reinhardt, Jan D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Construct Validity, Test-Retest Reliability, and Internal Consistency of the Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential Scale (PESD) in Disability Studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle><stitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</stitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>265</epage><pages>257-265</pages><issn>1056-263X</issn><eissn>1573-3580</eissn><abstract>The Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential scale (PESD), developed to examine the social perception of disability and attitudes towards people with a disability (PwD), comprises six dimensions: communicativeness, competence, attractiveness, intelligence, industriousness, and popularity. This paper aims to assess the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the PESD. A longitudinal study with 40 participants of the Swiss general population and 2 (test-retest) * 8 (different photographs) measurements per subject was performed. Construct validity was examined via Principal Component Analysis (PCA), test-retest reliability via the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and a frequency analysis of deviations among test-retest scores, and internal consistency via Cronbach’s alpha. PCA extracted two factors corresponding to hard and soft skills for the test and a single factor for the retest. ICCs ranged from 0.44 (industriousness) to 0.60 (intelligence). Deviations between tests exceeding +/-1 were rather rare ranging from 6% (intelligence) to 14% (competence). Cronbach’s alpha equalled 0.814 and 0.858 for test and retest, respectively. Summarising, in our study the PESD appears to be a valid and reliable tool for the examination of the social perception of disability and attitudes towards PwD.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10882-010-9224-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1056-263X |
| ispartof | Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2011-06, Vol.23 (3), p.257-265 |
| issn | 1056-263X 1573-3580 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2259498240 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Attitudes Behavioral Science and Psychology Child and School Psychology Competence Construct validity Disability studies Elicitation Intelligence Longitudinal Studies Original Article Pediatrics People with disabilities Photography Popularity Principal components analysis Psychology Public Health Semantic Differential Semantics Social perception Test-Retest reliability Validation studies Validity |
| title | Construct Validity, Test-Retest Reliability, and Internal Consistency of the Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential Scale (PESD) in Disability Studies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T06%3A10%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construct%20Validity,%20Test-Retest%20Reliability,%20and%20Internal%20Consistency%20of%20the%20Photo%20Elicitation%20Semantic%20Differential%20Scale%20(PESD)%20in%20Disability%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20developmental%20and%20physical%20disabilities&rft.au=Fellinghauer,%20Bernd%20A.%20G.&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=265&rft.pages=257-265&rft.issn=1056-263X&rft.eissn=1573-3580&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10882-010-9224-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259498240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259498240&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |