Genetic variation of Pinus uncinata (Pinaceae) in the Pyrenees determined with cpSSR markers
The genetic variation within and between 13 populations (385 individuals) of Pinus uncinata was analyzed with ten chloroplast microsatellite markers. Both the infinite allele mutation and stepwise mutation model (SMM) have been applied to the analysis of the genetic structure and the geographical di...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Plant systematics and evolution 2009-02, Vol.277 (3-4), p.197-205 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 205 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3-4 |
| container_start_page | 197 |
| container_title | Plant systematics and evolution |
| container_volume | 277 |
| creator | Dzialuk, A Muchewicz, E Boratyński, A Montserrat, J. M Boratyńska, K Burczyk, J |
| description | The genetic variation within and between 13 populations (385 individuals) of Pinus uncinata was analyzed with ten chloroplast microsatellite markers. Both the infinite allele mutation and stepwise mutation model (SMM) have been applied to the analysis of the genetic structure and the geographical distribution of haplotypic variation. High level of genetic diversity and low but significant differentiation among compared population were found. Three marginal populations, Sierra de Cebollera, Margaride Mountains and Sierra de Gúdar are strongly differentiated from the rest. Mutations following SMM-like process contributed significantly to the regional differentiation. The pattern of genetic structure observed in mountain pine is common in conifers with a wide distribution range. Lack of significant genetic structuring may be a result of a recent fragmentation of a historically larger population and/or interspecific hybridization and introgression. The southernmost populations from the Sierra Cebollera and the Sierra de Gúdar are the most genetically distinct. This suggests a long period of spatial isolation and/or origin from different ancestral populations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00606-008-0123-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259358897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23655992</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23655992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c5857efb25e32e141abb5ee3d02ae56a296af6dde17907b54581650d91193d9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLHTEQhUOp0Fv1B_ShNNCX-rA6k9wkm8cirRYExatvQsjuzmpua_Y2yVXuv29kS33r0zDM-c4ZDmMfEI4RwJxkAA26AWgbQCGb3Ru2QI2q0Yjwli1AmrYR2pp37H3OawA0emkW7O6MIpXQ8yefgi9hinwa-VWI28y3sQ_RF8-_1N335OmIh8jLA_GrXaocZT5QofQYIg38OZQH3m9Wq2v-6NNPSvmA7Y3-V6bDv3Of3X7_dnN63lxcnv04_XrR9FKL0vSqVYbGTiiSgnCJvusUkRxAeFLaC6v9qIeB0FgwnVqqFrWCwSJaOdhO7rPPs-8mTb-3lItbT9sUa6QTQlmp2taaqsJZ1acp50Sj26RQP905BPdSoptLdLVE91Ki21VGzEyu2nhP6dX5f9DHGVrnMqV_KUJqpawV9f5pvo9-cv4-hexuVwJQAipbzZbyD4rTh1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259358897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic variation of Pinus uncinata (Pinaceae) in the Pyrenees determined with cpSSR markers</title><source>SpringerLink</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Dzialuk, A ; Muchewicz, E ; Boratyński, A ; Montserrat, J. M ; Boratyńska, K ; Burczyk, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Dzialuk, A ; Muchewicz, E ; Boratyński, A ; Montserrat, J. M ; Boratyńska, K ; Burczyk, J</creatorcontrib><description>The genetic variation within and between 13 populations (385 individuals) of Pinus uncinata was analyzed with ten chloroplast microsatellite markers. Both the infinite allele mutation and stepwise mutation model (SMM) have been applied to the analysis of the genetic structure and the geographical distribution of haplotypic variation. High level of genetic diversity and low but significant differentiation among compared population were found. Three marginal populations, Sierra de Cebollera, Margaride Mountains and Sierra de Gúdar are strongly differentiated from the rest. Mutations following SMM-like process contributed significantly to the regional differentiation. The pattern of genetic structure observed in mountain pine is common in conifers with a wide distribution range. Lack of significant genetic structuring may be a result of a recent fragmentation of a historically larger population and/or interspecific hybridization and introgression. The southernmost populations from the Sierra Cebollera and the Sierra de Gúdar are the most genetically distinct. This suggests a long period of spatial isolation and/or origin from different ancestral populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-2697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-6881</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00606-008-0123-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Vienna : Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chloroplasts ; Conifers ; Differentiation ; Genetic analysis ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic markers ; Genetic structure ; Genetic variation ; Geographical distribution ; Haplotypes ; Interspecific ; Interspecific hybridization ; Life Sciences ; Markers ; Massifs ; Microsatellites ; Mountains ; Mutation ; Original Article ; Pine trees ; Pinus uncinata ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Population distributions ; Population genetics ; Population structure ; Populations</subject><ispartof>Plant systematics and evolution, 2009-02, Vol.277 (3-4), p.197-205</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><rights>Plant Systematics and Evolution is a copyright of Springer, (2009). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c5857efb25e32e141abb5ee3d02ae56a296af6dde17907b54581650d91193d9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c5857efb25e32e141abb5ee3d02ae56a296af6dde17907b54581650d91193d9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23655992$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23655992$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dzialuk, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muchewicz, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boratyński, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montserrat, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boratyńska, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burczyk, J</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic variation of Pinus uncinata (Pinaceae) in the Pyrenees determined with cpSSR markers</title><title>Plant systematics and evolution</title><addtitle>Plant Syst Evol</addtitle><description>The genetic variation within and between 13 populations (385 individuals) of Pinus uncinata was analyzed with ten chloroplast microsatellite markers. Both the infinite allele mutation and stepwise mutation model (SMM) have been applied to the analysis of the genetic structure and the geographical distribution of haplotypic variation. High level of genetic diversity and low but significant differentiation among compared population were found. Three marginal populations, Sierra de Cebollera, Margaride Mountains and Sierra de Gúdar are strongly differentiated from the rest. Mutations following SMM-like process contributed significantly to the regional differentiation. The pattern of genetic structure observed in mountain pine is common in conifers with a wide distribution range. Lack of significant genetic structuring may be a result of a recent fragmentation of a historically larger population and/or interspecific hybridization and introgression. The southernmost populations from the Sierra Cebollera and the Sierra de Gúdar are the most genetically distinct. This suggests a long period of spatial isolation and/or origin from different ancestral populations.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chloroplasts</subject><subject>Conifers</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic markers</subject><subject>Genetic structure</subject><subject>Genetic variation</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Haplotypes</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>Interspecific hybridization</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>Massifs</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus uncinata</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Population distributions</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Populations</subject><issn>0378-2697</issn><issn>1615-6110</issn><issn>2199-6881</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFLHTEQhUOp0Fv1B_ShNNCX-rA6k9wkm8cirRYExatvQsjuzmpua_Y2yVXuv29kS33r0zDM-c4ZDmMfEI4RwJxkAA26AWgbQCGb3Ru2QI2q0Yjwli1AmrYR2pp37H3OawA0emkW7O6MIpXQ8yefgi9hinwa-VWI28y3sQ_RF8-_1N335OmIh8jLA_GrXaocZT5QofQYIg38OZQH3m9Wq2v-6NNPSvmA7Y3-V6bDv3Of3X7_dnN63lxcnv04_XrR9FKL0vSqVYbGTiiSgnCJvusUkRxAeFLaC6v9qIeB0FgwnVqqFrWCwSJaOdhO7rPPs-8mTb-3lItbT9sUa6QTQlmp2taaqsJZ1acp50Sj26RQP905BPdSoptLdLVE91Ki21VGzEyu2nhP6dX5f9DHGVrnMqV_KUJqpawV9f5pvo9-cv4-hexuVwJQAipbzZbyD4rTh1w</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Dzialuk, A</creator><creator>Muchewicz, E</creator><creator>Boratyński, A</creator><creator>Montserrat, J. M</creator><creator>Boratyńska, K</creator><creator>Burczyk, J</creator><general>Vienna : Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Genetic variation of Pinus uncinata (Pinaceae) in the Pyrenees determined with cpSSR markers</title><author>Dzialuk, A ; Muchewicz, E ; Boratyński, A ; Montserrat, J. M ; Boratyńska, K ; Burczyk, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c5857efb25e32e141abb5ee3d02ae56a296af6dde17907b54581650d91193d9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chloroplasts</topic><topic>Conifers</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic markers</topic><topic>Genetic structure</topic><topic>Genetic variation</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Haplotypes</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>Interspecific hybridization</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>Massifs</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus uncinata</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Population distributions</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dzialuk, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muchewicz, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boratyński, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montserrat, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boratyńska, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burczyk, J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Plant systematics and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dzialuk, A</au><au>Muchewicz, E</au><au>Boratyński, A</au><au>Montserrat, J. M</au><au>Boratyńska, K</au><au>Burczyk, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic variation of Pinus uncinata (Pinaceae) in the Pyrenees determined with cpSSR markers</atitle><jtitle>Plant systematics and evolution</jtitle><stitle>Plant Syst Evol</stitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>277</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>197-205</pages><issn>0378-2697</issn><eissn>1615-6110</eissn><eissn>2199-6881</eissn><abstract>The genetic variation within and between 13 populations (385 individuals) of Pinus uncinata was analyzed with ten chloroplast microsatellite markers. Both the infinite allele mutation and stepwise mutation model (SMM) have been applied to the analysis of the genetic structure and the geographical distribution of haplotypic variation. High level of genetic diversity and low but significant differentiation among compared population were found. Three marginal populations, Sierra de Cebollera, Margaride Mountains and Sierra de Gúdar are strongly differentiated from the rest. Mutations following SMM-like process contributed significantly to the regional differentiation. The pattern of genetic structure observed in mountain pine is common in conifers with a wide distribution range. Lack of significant genetic structuring may be a result of a recent fragmentation of a historically larger population and/or interspecific hybridization and introgression. The southernmost populations from the Sierra Cebollera and the Sierra de Gúdar are the most genetically distinct. This suggests a long period of spatial isolation and/or origin from different ancestral populations.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Vienna : Springer Vienna</pub><doi>10.1007/s00606-008-0123-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0378-2697 |
| ispartof | Plant systematics and evolution, 2009-02, Vol.277 (3-4), p.197-205 |
| issn | 0378-2697 1615-6110 2199-6881 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2259358897 |
| source | SpringerLink; JSTOR |
| subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Chloroplasts Conifers Differentiation Genetic analysis Genetic diversity Genetic markers Genetic structure Genetic variation Geographical distribution Haplotypes Interspecific Interspecific hybridization Life Sciences Markers Massifs Microsatellites Mountains Mutation Original Article Pine trees Pinus uncinata Plant Anatomy/Development Plant Ecology Plant Sciences Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Population distributions Population genetics Population structure Populations |
| title | Genetic variation of Pinus uncinata (Pinaceae) in the Pyrenees determined with cpSSR markers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A58%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20variation%20of%20Pinus%20uncinata%20(Pinaceae)%20in%20the%20Pyrenees%20determined%20with%20cpSSR%20markers&rft.jtitle=Plant%20systematics%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Dzialuk,%20A&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=277&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=197-205&rft.issn=0378-2697&rft.eissn=1615-6110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00606-008-0123-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23655992%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259358897&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23655992&rfr_iscdi=true |