Taxonomy and cytogeography of Cardamine raphanifolia and C. gallaecica (Brassicaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula
For a long time it was considered that Cardamine raphanifolia is widely distributed with several infraspecific taxa in the Mediterranean region. Recent studies showed that C. raphanifolia is restricted to the northern Iberian Peninsula. Cardamine gallaecica from NW Spain was regarded to be closely r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Plant systematics and evolution 2005-07, Vol.254 (1/2), p.69-91 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 91 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1/2 |
| container_start_page | 69 |
| container_title | Plant systematics and evolution |
| container_volume | 254 |
| creator | Perný, M. Tribsch, A. Stuessy, T.F. Marhold, K. |
| description | For a long time it was considered that Cardamine raphanifolia is widely distributed with several infraspecific taxa in the Mediterranean region. Recent studies showed that C. raphanifolia is restricted to the northern Iberian Peninsula. Cardamine gallaecica from NW Spain was regarded to be closely related, but was originally regarded as C. amara, and later described as C. raphanifolia subsp. gallaecica. In this study, we validate the treatment of C. raphanifolia and C. gallaecica as distinct species, and show their clear differentiation based on morphometric and molecular AFLP analyses. Moreover, both species are clearly distinct from C. amara subsp. pyrenaea, which has an overlapping distributional range with C. raphanifolia. Hexaploid (2n = 48) and octoploid cytotypes (2n = 64) of C. raphanifolia, and tetraploid (2n = 32) and hexaploid (2n = 48) cytotypes of C. gallaecica were found. Due to their weak morphological and genetic differentiation, these polyploid races are not classified as separate taxa. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00606-005-0317-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259349660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23655158</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23655158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-af3bc7c2e7be3a28be19f05cf5f52c43068902f5207ccc679a5656d43c428def3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8KKHrZNkk-wetfhRKOihnsM0Tdot26QmW7D_3q0VT_MyPO8MPIRcMxgxAP2QARSoAkAWIJgu5AkZMMVkoRiDUzIAoauCq1qfk4uc1wBMq1IPSJjhdwxxs6cYFtTuu7h0cZlwu9rT6OkY0wI3TXD0sMLQ-Ng2-MuOR3SJbYvONhbp3VPCnPtkHbp72gTarRydzF1qMNAPF5qQdy1ekjOPbXZXf3NIPl-eZ-O3Yvr-Ohk_TgsrFOsK9GJuteVOz51AXs0dqz1I66WX3JYCVFUD7zNoa63SNUol1aIUtuTVwnkxJLfHu9sUv3Yud2Yddyn0Lw3nshZlrRT0FDtSNsWck_Nmm5oNpr1hYA5azVGr6bWag1Yj-87NsbPOXUz_BS6UlExW4gezQXTH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259349660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taxonomy and cytogeography of Cardamine raphanifolia and C. gallaecica (Brassicaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula</title><source>SpringerLink</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Perný, M. ; Tribsch, A. ; Stuessy, T.F. ; Marhold, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Perný, M. ; Tribsch, A. ; Stuessy, T.F. ; Marhold, K.</creatorcontrib><description>For a long time it was considered that Cardamine raphanifolia is widely distributed with several infraspecific taxa in the Mediterranean region. Recent studies showed that C. raphanifolia is restricted to the northern Iberian Peninsula. Cardamine gallaecica from NW Spain was regarded to be closely related, but was originally regarded as C. amara, and later described as C. raphanifolia subsp. gallaecica. In this study, we validate the treatment of C. raphanifolia and C. gallaecica as distinct species, and show their clear differentiation based on morphometric and molecular AFLP analyses. Moreover, both species are clearly distinct from C. amara subsp. pyrenaea, which has an overlapping distributional range with C. raphanifolia. Hexaploid (2n = 48) and octoploid cytotypes (2n = 64) of C. raphanifolia, and tetraploid (2n = 32) and hexaploid (2n = 48) cytotypes of C. gallaecica were found. Due to their weak morphological and genetic differentiation, these polyploid races are not classified as separate taxa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-2697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-6881</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00606-005-0317-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Amplified fragment length polymorphism ; Biological taxonomies ; Cardamine ; Differentiation ; Geography ; Hexaploidy ; Leaves ; Petals ; Plants ; Ploidies ; Polyploidy ; Taxa ; Taxonomy ; Tetraploidy</subject><ispartof>Plant systematics and evolution, 2005-07, Vol.254 (1/2), p.69-91</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2005</rights><rights>Plant Systematics and Evolution is a copyright of Springer, (2005). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-af3bc7c2e7be3a28be19f05cf5f52c43068902f5207ccc679a5656d43c428def3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23655158$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23655158$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perný, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tribsch, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuessy, T.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marhold, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Taxonomy and cytogeography of Cardamine raphanifolia and C. gallaecica (Brassicaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula</title><title>Plant systematics and evolution</title><description>For a long time it was considered that Cardamine raphanifolia is widely distributed with several infraspecific taxa in the Mediterranean region. Recent studies showed that C. raphanifolia is restricted to the northern Iberian Peninsula. Cardamine gallaecica from NW Spain was regarded to be closely related, but was originally regarded as C. amara, and later described as C. raphanifolia subsp. gallaecica. In this study, we validate the treatment of C. raphanifolia and C. gallaecica as distinct species, and show their clear differentiation based on morphometric and molecular AFLP analyses. Moreover, both species are clearly distinct from C. amara subsp. pyrenaea, which has an overlapping distributional range with C. raphanifolia. Hexaploid (2n = 48) and octoploid cytotypes (2n = 64) of C. raphanifolia, and tetraploid (2n = 32) and hexaploid (2n = 48) cytotypes of C. gallaecica were found. Due to their weak morphological and genetic differentiation, these polyploid races are not classified as separate taxa.</description><subject>Amplified fragment length polymorphism</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Cardamine</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Hexaploidy</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Petals</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Ploidies</subject><subject>Polyploidy</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Tetraploidy</subject><issn>0378-2697</issn><issn>1615-6110</issn><issn>2199-6881</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8KKHrZNkk-wetfhRKOihnsM0Tdot26QmW7D_3q0VT_MyPO8MPIRcMxgxAP2QARSoAkAWIJgu5AkZMMVkoRiDUzIAoauCq1qfk4uc1wBMq1IPSJjhdwxxs6cYFtTuu7h0cZlwu9rT6OkY0wI3TXD0sMLQ-Ng2-MuOR3SJbYvONhbp3VPCnPtkHbp72gTarRydzF1qMNAPF5qQdy1ekjOPbXZXf3NIPl-eZ-O3Yvr-Ohk_TgsrFOsK9GJuteVOz51AXs0dqz1I66WX3JYCVFUD7zNoa63SNUol1aIUtuTVwnkxJLfHu9sUv3Yud2Yddyn0Lw3nshZlrRT0FDtSNsWck_Nmm5oNpr1hYA5azVGr6bWag1Yj-87NsbPOXUz_BS6UlExW4gezQXTH</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Perný, M.</creator><creator>Tribsch, A.</creator><creator>Stuessy, T.F.</creator><creator>Marhold, K.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Taxonomy and cytogeography of Cardamine raphanifolia and C. gallaecica (Brassicaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula</title><author>Perný, M. ; Tribsch, A. ; Stuessy, T.F. ; Marhold, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-af3bc7c2e7be3a28be19f05cf5f52c43068902f5207ccc679a5656d43c428def3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Amplified fragment length polymorphism</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Cardamine</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Hexaploidy</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Petals</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Ploidies</topic><topic>Polyploidy</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Tetraploidy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perný, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tribsch, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuessy, T.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marhold, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Plant systematics and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perný, M.</au><au>Tribsch, A.</au><au>Stuessy, T.F.</au><au>Marhold, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taxonomy and cytogeography of Cardamine raphanifolia and C. gallaecica (Brassicaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula</atitle><jtitle>Plant systematics and evolution</jtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>254</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>69-91</pages><issn>0378-2697</issn><eissn>1615-6110</eissn><eissn>2199-6881</eissn><abstract>For a long time it was considered that Cardamine raphanifolia is widely distributed with several infraspecific taxa in the Mediterranean region. Recent studies showed that C. raphanifolia is restricted to the northern Iberian Peninsula. Cardamine gallaecica from NW Spain was regarded to be closely related, but was originally regarded as C. amara, and later described as C. raphanifolia subsp. gallaecica. In this study, we validate the treatment of C. raphanifolia and C. gallaecica as distinct species, and show their clear differentiation based on morphometric and molecular AFLP analyses. Moreover, both species are clearly distinct from C. amara subsp. pyrenaea, which has an overlapping distributional range with C. raphanifolia. Hexaploid (2n = 48) and octoploid cytotypes (2n = 64) of C. raphanifolia, and tetraploid (2n = 32) and hexaploid (2n = 48) cytotypes of C. gallaecica were found. Due to their weak morphological and genetic differentiation, these polyploid races are not classified as separate taxa.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00606-005-0317-5</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0378-2697 |
| ispartof | Plant systematics and evolution, 2005-07, Vol.254 (1/2), p.69-91 |
| issn | 0378-2697 1615-6110 2199-6881 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2259349660 |
| source | SpringerLink; JSTOR |
| subjects | Amplified fragment length polymorphism Biological taxonomies Cardamine Differentiation Geography Hexaploidy Leaves Petals Plants Ploidies Polyploidy Taxa Taxonomy Tetraploidy |
| title | Taxonomy and cytogeography of Cardamine raphanifolia and C. gallaecica (Brassicaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A34%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taxonomy%20and%20cytogeography%20of%20Cardamine%20raphanifolia%20and%20C.%20gallaecica%20(Brassicaceae)%20in%20the%20Iberian%20Peninsula&rft.jtitle=Plant%20systematics%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Pern%C3%BD,%20M.&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=254&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=69-91&rft.issn=0378-2697&rft.eissn=1615-6110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00606-005-0317-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23655158%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259349660&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23655158&rfr_iscdi=true |