Comparison of underground mine DPM simulation using discrete phase and continuous phase models

[Display omitted] •CFD modelling of diesel particulate matter distribution were established.•Species transport, Eulerian-Eulerian and Eulerian-Lagrangian methods are used.•Strength and weakness of different methods are compared and analysed. Diesel particulate matter (DPM) is carcinogenic to humans....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Process safety and environmental protection 2019-07, Vol.127, p.45-55
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Ping, Xu, Guang, Zhou, Fubao, Mullins, Benjamin, Abishek, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 55
container_issue
container_start_page 45
container_title Process safety and environmental protection
container_volume 127
creator Chang, Ping
Xu, Guang
Zhou, Fubao
Mullins, Benjamin
Abishek, S.
description [Display omitted] •CFD modelling of diesel particulate matter distribution were established.•Species transport, Eulerian-Eulerian and Eulerian-Lagrangian methods are used.•Strength and weakness of different methods are compared and analysed. Diesel particulate matter (DPM) is carcinogenic to humans. DPM concentrations in underground mines are much higher than other working environments, thus pose substantial health threats to miners due to overexposure. Computational fluid dynamics is commonly used to study the DPM dispersion and assess the concentration distribution in various working environments. However, most such studies for underground mines treated DPM as a continuous phase (gas phase) in the model. DPM is a solid discrete phase, and its behaviours could be quite different from that of gaseous contaminants. This study compared DPM concentration distributions by using three modelling methods: the Eulerian-Lagrangian method and the Eulerian-Eulerian method that treats DPM as discrete phase particles, and the species transport method that treats DPM as a continuous phase gas. The model was based on a typical underground mine development face with a forcing auxiliary ventilation setup. It was found that the general DPM concentration distribution for the three numerical methods was similar for simple geometry with more uniform flow regions. However, large discrepancies existed in the development heading with complex geometry and flow features. The findings suggest that when simulating DPM, although the species transport method can provide relatively accurate results with much less computational time, the parameters of the modelled gas need to be carefully calibrated to get a better simulation result. For key areas where the diesel machinery and miners are usually located, the Eulerian-Lagrangian method should be used for more accurate analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.psep.2019.04.027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259349474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0957582019300539</els_id><sourcerecordid>2259349474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ab6b1e8b29c3c4b14c7702d14d85e59f9d2450ef25abed1279317e779993c2f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-gKuC69YkTSYNuJHxCiO60K0hTU7HlGlSk1bw7W2ZWbs6cPj-c_kQuiS4IJisrtuiT9AXFBNZYFZgKo7QggjG8pLL6hgtsOQi5xXFp-gspRZjTKggC_S5Dl2vo0vBZ6HJRm8hbmOYatY5D9nd20uWXDfu9OAmZEzObzPrkokwQNZ_6QSZnmAT_OD8GMZ0aHbBwi6do5NG7xJcHOoSfTzcv6-f8s3r4_P6dpObcsWHXNermkBVU2lKw2rCjBCYWsJsxYHLRlrKOIaGcl2DnS6XJREghJSyNLRh5RJd7ef2MXyPkAbVhjH6aaWilMuSSSZmiu4pE0NKERrVR9fp-KsIVrNH1arZo5o9KszU5HEK3exD0zvw4yCqZBx4A9ZFMIOywf0X_wM7h3zv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259349474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of underground mine DPM simulation using discrete phase and continuous phase models</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chang, Ping ; Xu, Guang ; Zhou, Fubao ; Mullins, Benjamin ; Abishek, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ping ; Xu, Guang ; Zhou, Fubao ; Mullins, Benjamin ; Abishek, S.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •CFD modelling of diesel particulate matter distribution were established.•Species transport, Eulerian-Eulerian and Eulerian-Lagrangian methods are used.•Strength and weakness of different methods are compared and analysed. Diesel particulate matter (DPM) is carcinogenic to humans. DPM concentrations in underground mines are much higher than other working environments, thus pose substantial health threats to miners due to overexposure. Computational fluid dynamics is commonly used to study the DPM dispersion and assess the concentration distribution in various working environments. However, most such studies for underground mines treated DPM as a continuous phase (gas phase) in the model. DPM is a solid discrete phase, and its behaviours could be quite different from that of gaseous contaminants. This study compared DPM concentration distributions by using three modelling methods: the Eulerian-Lagrangian method and the Eulerian-Eulerian method that treats DPM as discrete phase particles, and the species transport method that treats DPM as a continuous phase gas. The model was based on a typical underground mine development face with a forcing auxiliary ventilation setup. It was found that the general DPM concentration distribution for the three numerical methods was similar for simple geometry with more uniform flow regions. However, large discrepancies existed in the development heading with complex geometry and flow features. The findings suggest that when simulating DPM, although the species transport method can provide relatively accurate results with much less computational time, the parameters of the modelled gas need to be carefully calibrated to get a better simulation result. For key areas where the diesel machinery and miners are usually located, the Eulerian-Lagrangian method should be used for more accurate analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-5820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.04.027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rugby: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Carcinogens ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer applications ; Computer simulation ; Computing time ; Contaminants ; Diesel ; Diesel particulate matter ; Eulerian-Eulerian method ; Eulerian-Lagrangian method ; Fluid dynamics ; Health risks ; Hydrodynamics ; Mathematical models ; Mine ventilation ; Miners ; Mines ; Numerical methods ; Occupational health ; Particulate emissions ; Particulate matter ; Species transport method ; Transport ; Underground mines ; Uniform flow ; Vapor phases ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Process safety and environmental protection, 2019-07, Vol.127, p.45-55</ispartof><rights>2019 Institution of Chemical Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ab6b1e8b29c3c4b14c7702d14d85e59f9d2450ef25abed1279317e779993c2f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ab6b1e8b29c3c4b14c7702d14d85e59f9d2450ef25abed1279317e779993c2f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582019300539$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Guang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Fubao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullins, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abishek, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of underground mine DPM simulation using discrete phase and continuous phase models</title><title>Process safety and environmental protection</title><description>[Display omitted] •CFD modelling of diesel particulate matter distribution were established.•Species transport, Eulerian-Eulerian and Eulerian-Lagrangian methods are used.•Strength and weakness of different methods are compared and analysed. Diesel particulate matter (DPM) is carcinogenic to humans. DPM concentrations in underground mines are much higher than other working environments, thus pose substantial health threats to miners due to overexposure. Computational fluid dynamics is commonly used to study the DPM dispersion and assess the concentration distribution in various working environments. However, most such studies for underground mines treated DPM as a continuous phase (gas phase) in the model. DPM is a solid discrete phase, and its behaviours could be quite different from that of gaseous contaminants. This study compared DPM concentration distributions by using three modelling methods: the Eulerian-Lagrangian method and the Eulerian-Eulerian method that treats DPM as discrete phase particles, and the species transport method that treats DPM as a continuous phase gas. The model was based on a typical underground mine development face with a forcing auxiliary ventilation setup. It was found that the general DPM concentration distribution for the three numerical methods was similar for simple geometry with more uniform flow regions. However, large discrepancies existed in the development heading with complex geometry and flow features. The findings suggest that when simulating DPM, although the species transport method can provide relatively accurate results with much less computational time, the parameters of the modelled gas need to be carefully calibrated to get a better simulation result. For key areas where the diesel machinery and miners are usually located, the Eulerian-Lagrangian method should be used for more accurate analysis.</description><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Computing time</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Diesel</subject><subject>Diesel particulate matter</subject><subject>Eulerian-Eulerian method</subject><subject>Eulerian-Lagrangian method</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mine ventilation</subject><subject>Miners</subject><subject>Mines</subject><subject>Numerical methods</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Particulate emissions</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Species transport method</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Underground mines</subject><subject>Uniform flow</subject><subject>Vapor phases</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>0957-5820</issn><issn>1744-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-gKuC69YkTSYNuJHxCiO60K0hTU7HlGlSk1bw7W2ZWbs6cPj-c_kQuiS4IJisrtuiT9AXFBNZYFZgKo7QggjG8pLL6hgtsOQi5xXFp-gspRZjTKggC_S5Dl2vo0vBZ6HJRm8hbmOYatY5D9nd20uWXDfu9OAmZEzObzPrkokwQNZ_6QSZnmAT_OD8GMZ0aHbBwi6do5NG7xJcHOoSfTzcv6-f8s3r4_P6dpObcsWHXNermkBVU2lKw2rCjBCYWsJsxYHLRlrKOIaGcl2DnS6XJREghJSyNLRh5RJd7ef2MXyPkAbVhjH6aaWilMuSSSZmiu4pE0NKERrVR9fp-KsIVrNH1arZo5o9KszU5HEK3exD0zvw4yCqZBx4A9ZFMIOywf0X_wM7h3zv</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Chang, Ping</creator><creator>Xu, Guang</creator><creator>Zhou, Fubao</creator><creator>Mullins, Benjamin</creator><creator>Abishek, S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Comparison of underground mine DPM simulation using discrete phase and continuous phase models</title><author>Chang, Ping ; Xu, Guang ; Zhou, Fubao ; Mullins, Benjamin ; Abishek, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ab6b1e8b29c3c4b14c7702d14d85e59f9d2450ef25abed1279317e779993c2f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Computing time</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Diesel</topic><topic>Diesel particulate matter</topic><topic>Eulerian-Eulerian method</topic><topic>Eulerian-Lagrangian method</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mine ventilation</topic><topic>Miners</topic><topic>Mines</topic><topic>Numerical methods</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Particulate emissions</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Species transport method</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Underground mines</topic><topic>Uniform flow</topic><topic>Vapor phases</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Guang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Fubao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullins, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abishek, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Process safety and environmental protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, Ping</au><au>Xu, Guang</au><au>Zhou, Fubao</au><au>Mullins, Benjamin</au><au>Abishek, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of underground mine DPM simulation using discrete phase and continuous phase models</atitle><jtitle>Process safety and environmental protection</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>127</volume><spage>45</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>45-55</pages><issn>0957-5820</issn><eissn>1744-3598</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •CFD modelling of diesel particulate matter distribution were established.•Species transport, Eulerian-Eulerian and Eulerian-Lagrangian methods are used.•Strength and weakness of different methods are compared and analysed. Diesel particulate matter (DPM) is carcinogenic to humans. DPM concentrations in underground mines are much higher than other working environments, thus pose substantial health threats to miners due to overexposure. Computational fluid dynamics is commonly used to study the DPM dispersion and assess the concentration distribution in various working environments. However, most such studies for underground mines treated DPM as a continuous phase (gas phase) in the model. DPM is a solid discrete phase, and its behaviours could be quite different from that of gaseous contaminants. This study compared DPM concentration distributions by using three modelling methods: the Eulerian-Lagrangian method and the Eulerian-Eulerian method that treats DPM as discrete phase particles, and the species transport method that treats DPM as a continuous phase gas. The model was based on a typical underground mine development face with a forcing auxiliary ventilation setup. It was found that the general DPM concentration distribution for the three numerical methods was similar for simple geometry with more uniform flow regions. However, large discrepancies existed in the development heading with complex geometry and flow features. The findings suggest that when simulating DPM, although the species transport method can provide relatively accurate results with much less computational time, the parameters of the modelled gas need to be carefully calibrated to get a better simulation result. For key areas where the diesel machinery and miners are usually located, the Eulerian-Lagrangian method should be used for more accurate analysis.</abstract><cop>Rugby</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.psep.2019.04.027</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-5820
ispartof Process safety and environmental protection, 2019-07, Vol.127, p.45-55
issn 0957-5820
1744-3598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2259349474
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Carcinogens
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer applications
Computer simulation
Computing time
Contaminants
Diesel
Diesel particulate matter
Eulerian-Eulerian method
Eulerian-Lagrangian method
Fluid dynamics
Health risks
Hydrodynamics
Mathematical models
Mine ventilation
Miners
Mines
Numerical methods
Occupational health
Particulate emissions
Particulate matter
Species transport method
Transport
Underground mines
Uniform flow
Vapor phases
Ventilation
title Comparison of underground mine DPM simulation using discrete phase and continuous phase models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T04%3A31%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20underground%20mine%20DPM%20simulation%20using%20discrete%20phase%20and%20continuous%20phase%20models&rft.jtitle=Process%20safety%20and%20environmental%20protection&rft.au=Chang,%20Ping&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=127&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=45-55&rft.issn=0957-5820&rft.eissn=1744-3598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psep.2019.04.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259349474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259349474&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0957582019300539&rfr_iscdi=true