Employee performance, well‐being, and differential effects of human resource management subdimensions: Mutual gains or conflicting outcomes?

The human resource management (HRM) literature supports the idea that coherent systems of HRM practices can induce attitudinal effects when perceived subjectively by employees. Recently, scholars have proposed that subdimensions of HRM systems exist and account for variance in outcomes. This study e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human resource management journal 2019-07, Vol.29 (3), p.509-526
Hauptverfasser: Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere, Messersmith, Jake
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 526
container_issue 3
container_start_page 509
container_title Human resource management journal
container_volume 29
creator Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere
Messersmith, Jake
description The human resource management (HRM) literature supports the idea that coherent systems of HRM practices can induce attitudinal effects when perceived subjectively by employees. Recently, scholars have proposed that subdimensions of HRM systems exist and account for variance in outcomes. This study explores differential effects of three subdimensions of HRM systems (skill‐, motivation‐, and opportunity‐enhancing HRM practices) on employee innovative behaviours and well‐being. Our predictions are based on the mutual gains perspective, which specifies positive relationships between HRM practices and employee performance, and the conflicting outcomes perspective that links HRM practices to higher job demands and stress. Using data from the Finnish 2012 Practices of Working Life Survey, we find support for both the mutual gains and conflicting outcomes perspectives; however, we also show that the effects of the subsets of HRM practices are heterogeneous.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1748-8583.12203
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2258052861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2258052861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3893-86c8ec8934e32100d54954c882e13979aa21bbfeffd038861b44af22cb60f0db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMoOF7WbgNurebS1tSNiIw3FEF0HdL0ZIy0zZi0yOx8AvEZfRLPOOLWbPKf8H_nnPyE7HF2yPEc8eNcZapQ8pALweQamfy9rJMJq4o8K2RVbJKtlF4Y40KW-YR8TLt5GxYAdA7RhdiZ3sIBfYO2_Xr_rMH3swNq-oY23jmI0A_etBRQ2yHR4OjziAiNkMIYLVAszAw69NE01o1HlXzo0wm9G4cR0ZnxPYKR2tC71tsBJ9AwDjZ0kE53yIYzbYLd33ubPF1MH8-vstv7y-vzs9vMSlXJTJVWgUWVgxScsabI8X9WKQFcVseVMYLXtcM1GyaVKnmd58YJYeuSOdbUcpvsr_rOY3gdIQ36BffvcaQWolCsEAih62jlsjGkFMHpefSdiQvNmV6GrpcR62XE-id0JMoV8eZbWPxn11cPdzcr8BsibIeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2258052861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Employee performance, well‐being, and differential effects of human resource management subdimensions: Mutual gains or conflicting outcomes?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere ; Messersmith, Jake</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere ; Messersmith, Jake</creatorcontrib><description>The human resource management (HRM) literature supports the idea that coherent systems of HRM practices can induce attitudinal effects when perceived subjectively by employees. Recently, scholars have proposed that subdimensions of HRM systems exist and account for variance in outcomes. This study explores differential effects of three subdimensions of HRM systems (skill‐, motivation‐, and opportunity‐enhancing HRM practices) on employee innovative behaviours and well‐being. Our predictions are based on the mutual gains perspective, which specifies positive relationships between HRM practices and employee performance, and the conflicting outcomes perspective that links HRM practices to higher job demands and stress. Using data from the Finnish 2012 Practices of Working Life Survey, we find support for both the mutual gains and conflicting outcomes perspectives; however, we also show that the effects of the subsets of HRM practices are heterogeneous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-5395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-8583</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>affective commitment ; HRM practices ; Human resource management ; innovative behaviours ; job demands ; stress ; Studies ; well‐being</subject><ispartof>Human resource management journal, 2019-07, Vol.29 (3), p.509-526</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3893-86c8ec8934e32100d54954c882e13979aa21bbfeffd038861b44af22cb60f0db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3893-86c8ec8934e32100d54954c882e13979aa21bbfeffd038861b44af22cb60f0db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0704-5717</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1748-8583.12203$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1748-8583.12203$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messersmith, Jake</creatorcontrib><title>Employee performance, well‐being, and differential effects of human resource management subdimensions: Mutual gains or conflicting outcomes?</title><title>Human resource management journal</title><description>The human resource management (HRM) literature supports the idea that coherent systems of HRM practices can induce attitudinal effects when perceived subjectively by employees. Recently, scholars have proposed that subdimensions of HRM systems exist and account for variance in outcomes. This study explores differential effects of three subdimensions of HRM systems (skill‐, motivation‐, and opportunity‐enhancing HRM practices) on employee innovative behaviours and well‐being. Our predictions are based on the mutual gains perspective, which specifies positive relationships between HRM practices and employee performance, and the conflicting outcomes perspective that links HRM practices to higher job demands and stress. Using data from the Finnish 2012 Practices of Working Life Survey, we find support for both the mutual gains and conflicting outcomes perspectives; however, we also show that the effects of the subsets of HRM practices are heterogeneous.</description><subject>affective commitment</subject><subject>HRM practices</subject><subject>Human resource management</subject><subject>innovative behaviours</subject><subject>job demands</subject><subject>stress</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>well‐being</subject><issn>0954-5395</issn><issn>1748-8583</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMoOF7WbgNurebS1tSNiIw3FEF0HdL0ZIy0zZi0yOx8AvEZfRLPOOLWbPKf8H_nnPyE7HF2yPEc8eNcZapQ8pALweQamfy9rJMJq4o8K2RVbJKtlF4Y40KW-YR8TLt5GxYAdA7RhdiZ3sIBfYO2_Xr_rMH3swNq-oY23jmI0A_etBRQ2yHR4OjziAiNkMIYLVAszAw69NE01o1HlXzo0wm9G4cR0ZnxPYKR2tC71tsBJ9AwDjZ0kE53yIYzbYLd33ubPF1MH8-vstv7y-vzs9vMSlXJTJVWgUWVgxScsabI8X9WKQFcVseVMYLXtcM1GyaVKnmd58YJYeuSOdbUcpvsr_rOY3gdIQ36BffvcaQWolCsEAih62jlsjGkFMHpefSdiQvNmV6GrpcR62XE-id0JMoV8eZbWPxn11cPdzcr8BsibIeg</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere</creator><creator>Messersmith, Jake</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0704-5717</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Employee performance, well‐being, and differential effects of human resource management subdimensions: Mutual gains or conflicting outcomes?</title><author>Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere ; Messersmith, Jake</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3893-86c8ec8934e32100d54954c882e13979aa21bbfeffd038861b44af22cb60f0db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>affective commitment</topic><topic>HRM practices</topic><topic>Human resource management</topic><topic>innovative behaviours</topic><topic>job demands</topic><topic>stress</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>well‐being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messersmith, Jake</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Human resource management journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere</au><au>Messersmith, Jake</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Employee performance, well‐being, and differential effects of human resource management subdimensions: Mutual gains or conflicting outcomes?</atitle><jtitle>Human resource management journal</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>526</epage><pages>509-526</pages><issn>0954-5395</issn><eissn>1748-8583</eissn><abstract>The human resource management (HRM) literature supports the idea that coherent systems of HRM practices can induce attitudinal effects when perceived subjectively by employees. Recently, scholars have proposed that subdimensions of HRM systems exist and account for variance in outcomes. This study explores differential effects of three subdimensions of HRM systems (skill‐, motivation‐, and opportunity‐enhancing HRM practices) on employee innovative behaviours and well‐being. Our predictions are based on the mutual gains perspective, which specifies positive relationships between HRM practices and employee performance, and the conflicting outcomes perspective that links HRM practices to higher job demands and stress. Using data from the Finnish 2012 Practices of Working Life Survey, we find support for both the mutual gains and conflicting outcomes perspectives; however, we also show that the effects of the subsets of HRM practices are heterogeneous.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1748-8583.12203</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0704-5717</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-5395
ispartof Human resource management journal, 2019-07, Vol.29 (3), p.509-526
issn 0954-5395
1748-8583
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2258052861
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
subjects affective commitment
HRM practices
Human resource management
innovative behaviours
job demands
stress
Studies
well‐being
title Employee performance, well‐being, and differential effects of human resource management subdimensions: Mutual gains or conflicting outcomes?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T06%3A11%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Employee%20performance,%20well%E2%80%90being,%20and%20differential%20effects%20of%20human%20resource%20management%20subdimensions:%20Mutual%20gains%20or%20conflicting%20outcomes?&rft.jtitle=Human%20resource%20management%20journal&rft.au=Ogbonnaya,%20Chidiebere&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=526&rft.pages=509-526&rft.issn=0954-5395&rft.eissn=1748-8583&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12203&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2258052861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2258052861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true