What is (un)acceptable?: thoughts on social acceptability in HCI research
Technology is changing the way we experience our lives. Interactive and increasingly intelligent technologies allow us to tackle challenges previously considered unsolvable and to augment our capabilities of sensing, communication, and even creativity. Examples include head-mounted displays and smar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Interactions (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-05, Vol.26 (3), p.36-40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 40 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Interactions (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Koelle, Marion Olsson, Thomas Mitchell, Robb Williamson, Julie Boll, Susanne |
description | Technology is changing the way we experience our lives. Interactive and increasingly intelligent technologies allow us to tackle challenges previously considered unsolvable and to augment our capabilities of sensing, communication, and even creativity. Examples include head-mounted displays and smart personal services for ubiquitous information access, and autonomous vehicles for increased comfort and safety. Simultaneously, these very same technologies introduce new risks, raise new concerns, and can increase both social tension and inequality between users and non-users. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1145/3319073 |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2256127088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2256127088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c130t-87901c2652deadce261bb67295284eb9a3c73d22c24189603882257c441fede23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjz1LA0EURQdRMEaxtA1YqMXoe2--K5GgiRCwUSyH2dlZTIjZdWa38N-7klT3FodzuYxdItwjSvUgBDow4ohNUCnLhZTueOxgiCtFcMrOStkAoAByE3b1-RX62brMbofdXYgxdX2otunxnJ00YVvSxSGn7OPl-X2-5Ku3xev8acXjKOi5NQ4wklZUp1DHRBqrShtyiqxMlQsiGlETRZJonQZhLZEyUUpsUp1ITNn13tvl9mdIpfebdsi7cdKPoEYyYO1I3eypmNtScmp8l9ffIf96BP__2h9eiz_UFkTO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>2256127088</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>What is (un)acceptable?: thoughts on social acceptability in HCI research</title><source>ACM Digital Library Complete</source><creator>Koelle, Marion ; Olsson, Thomas ; Mitchell, Robb ; Williamson, Julie ; Boll, Susanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Koelle, Marion ; Olsson, Thomas ; Mitchell, Robb ; Williamson, Julie ; Boll, Susanne</creatorcontrib><description>Technology is changing the way we experience our lives. Interactive and increasingly intelligent technologies allow us to tackle challenges previously considered unsolvable and to augment our capabilities of sensing, communication, and even creativity. Examples include head-mounted displays and smart personal services for ubiquitous information access, and autonomous vehicles for increased comfort and safety. Simultaneously, these very same technologies introduce new risks, raise new concerns, and can increase both social tension and inequality between users and non-users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1072-5520</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/3319073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Association for Computing Machinery</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Communication ; Creativity ; Helmet mounted displays ; Inequality ; Information dissemination ; Remote sensing ; Technological change</subject><ispartof>Interactions (New York, N.Y.), 2019-05, Vol.26 (3), p.36-40</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association for Computing Machinery May/Jun 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c130t-87901c2652deadce261bb67295284eb9a3c73d22c24189603882257c441fede23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koelle, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Robb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boll, Susanne</creatorcontrib><title>What is (un)acceptable?: thoughts on social acceptability in HCI research</title><title>Interactions (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>Technology is changing the way we experience our lives. Interactive and increasingly intelligent technologies allow us to tackle challenges previously considered unsolvable and to augment our capabilities of sensing, communication, and even creativity. Examples include head-mounted displays and smart personal services for ubiquitous information access, and autonomous vehicles for increased comfort and safety. Simultaneously, these very same technologies introduce new risks, raise new concerns, and can increase both social tension and inequality between users and non-users.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Helmet mounted displays</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><issn>1072-5520</issn><issn>1558-3449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNotjz1LA0EURQdRMEaxtA1YqMXoe2--K5GgiRCwUSyH2dlZTIjZdWa38N-7klT3FodzuYxdItwjSvUgBDow4ohNUCnLhZTueOxgiCtFcMrOStkAoAByE3b1-RX62brMbofdXYgxdX2otunxnJ00YVvSxSGn7OPl-X2-5Ku3xev8acXjKOi5NQ4wklZUp1DHRBqrShtyiqxMlQsiGlETRZJonQZhLZEyUUpsUp1ITNn13tvl9mdIpfebdsi7cdKPoEYyYO1I3eypmNtScmp8l9ffIf96BP__2h9eiz_UFkTO</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Koelle, Marion</creator><creator>Olsson, Thomas</creator><creator>Mitchell, Robb</creator><creator>Williamson, Julie</creator><creator>Boll, Susanne</creator><general>Association for Computing Machinery</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>What is (un)acceptable?</title><author>Koelle, Marion ; Olsson, Thomas ; Mitchell, Robb ; Williamson, Julie ; Boll, Susanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c130t-87901c2652deadce261bb67295284eb9a3c73d22c24189603882257c441fede23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Helmet mounted displays</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koelle, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Robb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boll, Susanne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Interactions (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koelle, Marion</au><au>Olsson, Thomas</au><au>Mitchell, Robb</au><au>Williamson, Julie</au><au>Boll, Susanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is (un)acceptable?: thoughts on social acceptability in HCI research</atitle><jtitle>Interactions (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>36-40</pages><issn>1072-5520</issn><eissn>1558-3449</eissn><abstract>Technology is changing the way we experience our lives. Interactive and increasingly intelligent technologies allow us to tackle challenges previously considered unsolvable and to augment our capabilities of sensing, communication, and even creativity. Examples include head-mounted displays and smart personal services for ubiquitous information access, and autonomous vehicles for increased comfort and safety. Simultaneously, these very same technologies introduce new risks, raise new concerns, and can increase both social tension and inequality between users and non-users.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Association for Computing Machinery</pub><doi>10.1145/3319073</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1072-5520 |
ispartof | Interactions (New York, N.Y.), 2019-05, Vol.26 (3), p.36-40 |
issn | 1072-5520 1558-3449 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2256127088 |
source | ACM Digital Library Complete |
subjects | Acceptability Communication Creativity Helmet mounted displays Inequality Information dissemination Remote sensing Technological change |
title | What is (un)acceptable?: thoughts on social acceptability in HCI research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A08%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20(un)acceptable?:%20thoughts%20on%20social%20acceptability%20in%20HCI%20research&rft.jtitle=Interactions%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Koelle,%20Marion&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=36-40&rft.issn=1072-5520&rft.eissn=1558-3449&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/3319073&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2256127088%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2256127088&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |