What Influences Business Academics’ Use of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) List? Evidence From a Survey of UK Academics

The development of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) list in 2007 and its rapid adoption by UK business schools has had a profound effect on the nature of business and management academics’ ways of working. Using a large‐scale survey of UK business academics, we assess the extent to which in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of management 2019-07, Vol.30 (3), p.730-747
Hauptverfasser: Walker, James T., Fenton, Evelyn, Salter, Ammon, Salandra, Rossella
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 747
container_issue 3
container_start_page 730
container_title British journal of management
container_volume 30
creator Walker, James T.
Fenton, Evelyn
Salter, Ammon
Salandra, Rossella
description The development of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) list in 2007 and its rapid adoption by UK business schools has had a profound effect on the nature of business and management academics’ ways of working. Using a large‐scale survey of UK business academics, we assess the extent to which individuals use the Academic Journal Guide (AJG/ABS) list in their day‐to‐day professional activities. In particular, we explore how their perceptions of the list, the academic influence of their research, academic rank and organizational context drive the varied use. Building on prior research on the importance of univalent attitudes in predicting behaviour, we find those who have either strong positive or negative views of the list are more extensive users than those who are ambivalent. We also find that the extent of use of the AJG/ABS list is greatest among those academics who have lower academic influence, in the middle or junior ranks within business schools and in middle and low‐status universities. We explore the implications of these findings for the value of journal rankings and for the management of business schools.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-8551.12294
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2256031509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2256031509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-a3c3aaa2fe04b9a2321c7f4325c4b06ed9f00273565bb977e7a875dee50993df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL9OwzAQxiMEEqUws1pigSGt_8RxM6G0aqFQ1KFUjJbj2KqrNC5xUtQNiafg9XgSEoLKyC13uvt930mf510i2EN19VEQMn9AKeohjKPgyOscNsf1DAPqE8TwqXfm3BrC-hiyjvfxshIlmOY6q1QulQPDyplcOQdiKVK1MdJ9vX-CpVPAalCuFIids9KI0ti8WR34hVxZmzlwHQ8XN2BmXHkLxjuTNrZgUtgNEGBRFTu1b2TLx78H596JFplTF7-96y0n4-fRvT-b301H8cyXhLLAF0QSIQTWCgZJJDDBSDIdEExlkMBQpZGGEDNCQ5okEWOKiQGjqVIURhFJNel6V63vtrCvlXIlX9uqyOuXHGMaQoJqsqb6LSUL61yhNN8WZiOKPUeQN0nzJlfe5Mp_kq4VYat4M5na_4fz4cP8qRV-A4vqgDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2256031509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Influences Business Academics’ Use of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) List? Evidence From a Survey of UK Academics</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Walker, James T. ; Fenton, Evelyn ; Salter, Ammon ; Salandra, Rossella</creator><creatorcontrib>Walker, James T. ; Fenton, Evelyn ; Salter, Ammon ; Salandra, Rossella</creatorcontrib><description>The development of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) list in 2007 and its rapid adoption by UK business schools has had a profound effect on the nature of business and management academics’ ways of working. Using a large‐scale survey of UK business academics, we assess the extent to which individuals use the Academic Journal Guide (AJG/ABS) list in their day‐to‐day professional activities. In particular, we explore how their perceptions of the list, the academic influence of their research, academic rank and organizational context drive the varied use. Building on prior research on the importance of univalent attitudes in predicting behaviour, we find those who have either strong positive or negative views of the list are more extensive users than those who are ambivalent. We also find that the extent of use of the AJG/ABS list is greatest among those academics who have lower academic influence, in the middle or junior ranks within business schools and in middle and low‐status universities. We explore the implications of these findings for the value of journal rankings and for the management of business schools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic staff ; Ambivalence ; Attitudes ; Business schools ; Management development programmes ; Polls &amp; surveys</subject><ispartof>British journal of management, 2019-07, Vol.30 (3), p.730-747</ispartof><rights>2018 British Academy of Management</rights><rights>2019 British Academy of Management</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-a3c3aaa2fe04b9a2321c7f4325c4b06ed9f00273565bb977e7a875dee50993df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-a3c3aaa2fe04b9a2321c7f4325c4b06ed9f00273565bb977e7a875dee50993df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-8551.12294$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-8551.12294$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walker, James T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, Evelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salter, Ammon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salandra, Rossella</creatorcontrib><title>What Influences Business Academics’ Use of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) List? Evidence From a Survey of UK Academics</title><title>British journal of management</title><description>The development of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) list in 2007 and its rapid adoption by UK business schools has had a profound effect on the nature of business and management academics’ ways of working. Using a large‐scale survey of UK business academics, we assess the extent to which individuals use the Academic Journal Guide (AJG/ABS) list in their day‐to‐day professional activities. In particular, we explore how their perceptions of the list, the academic influence of their research, academic rank and organizational context drive the varied use. Building on prior research on the importance of univalent attitudes in predicting behaviour, we find those who have either strong positive or negative views of the list are more extensive users than those who are ambivalent. We also find that the extent of use of the AJG/ABS list is greatest among those academics who have lower academic influence, in the middle or junior ranks within business schools and in middle and low‐status universities. We explore the implications of these findings for the value of journal rankings and for the management of business schools.</description><subject>Academic staff</subject><subject>Ambivalence</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Business schools</subject><subject>Management development programmes</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><issn>1045-3172</issn><issn>1467-8551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL9OwzAQxiMEEqUws1pigSGt_8RxM6G0aqFQ1KFUjJbj2KqrNC5xUtQNiafg9XgSEoLKyC13uvt930mf510i2EN19VEQMn9AKeohjKPgyOscNsf1DAPqE8TwqXfm3BrC-hiyjvfxshIlmOY6q1QulQPDyplcOQdiKVK1MdJ9vX-CpVPAalCuFIids9KI0ti8WR34hVxZmzlwHQ8XN2BmXHkLxjuTNrZgUtgNEGBRFTu1b2TLx78H596JFplTF7-96y0n4-fRvT-b301H8cyXhLLAF0QSIQTWCgZJJDDBSDIdEExlkMBQpZGGEDNCQ5okEWOKiQGjqVIURhFJNel6V63vtrCvlXIlX9uqyOuXHGMaQoJqsqb6LSUL61yhNN8WZiOKPUeQN0nzJlfe5Mp_kq4VYat4M5na_4fz4cP8qRV-A4vqgDg</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Walker, James T.</creator><creator>Fenton, Evelyn</creator><creator>Salter, Ammon</creator><creator>Salandra, Rossella</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>What Influences Business Academics’ Use of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) List? Evidence From a Survey of UK Academics</title><author>Walker, James T. ; Fenton, Evelyn ; Salter, Ammon ; Salandra, Rossella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-a3c3aaa2fe04b9a2321c7f4325c4b06ed9f00273565bb977e7a875dee50993df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic staff</topic><topic>Ambivalence</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Business schools</topic><topic>Management development programmes</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walker, James T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, Evelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salter, Ammon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salandra, Rossella</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>British journal of management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walker, James T.</au><au>Fenton, Evelyn</au><au>Salter, Ammon</au><au>Salandra, Rossella</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Influences Business Academics’ Use of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) List? Evidence From a Survey of UK Academics</atitle><jtitle>British journal of management</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>730</spage><epage>747</epage><pages>730-747</pages><issn>1045-3172</issn><eissn>1467-8551</eissn><abstract>The development of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) list in 2007 and its rapid adoption by UK business schools has had a profound effect on the nature of business and management academics’ ways of working. Using a large‐scale survey of UK business academics, we assess the extent to which individuals use the Academic Journal Guide (AJG/ABS) list in their day‐to‐day professional activities. In particular, we explore how their perceptions of the list, the academic influence of their research, academic rank and organizational context drive the varied use. Building on prior research on the importance of univalent attitudes in predicting behaviour, we find those who have either strong positive or negative views of the list are more extensive users than those who are ambivalent. We also find that the extent of use of the AJG/ABS list is greatest among those academics who have lower academic influence, in the middle or junior ranks within business schools and in middle and low‐status universities. We explore the implications of these findings for the value of journal rankings and for the management of business schools.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8551.12294</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-3172
ispartof British journal of management, 2019-07, Vol.30 (3), p.730-747
issn 1045-3172
1467-8551
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2256031509
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
subjects Academic staff
Ambivalence
Attitudes
Business schools
Management development programmes
Polls & surveys
title What Influences Business Academics’ Use of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) List? Evidence From a Survey of UK Academics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A38%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Influences%20Business%20Academics%E2%80%99%20Use%20of%20the%20Association%20of%20Business%20Schools%20(ABS)%20List?%20Evidence%20From%20a%20Survey%20of%20UK%20Academics&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20management&rft.au=Walker,%20James%20T.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=730&rft.epage=747&rft.pages=730-747&rft.issn=1045-3172&rft.eissn=1467-8551&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12294&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2256031509%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2256031509&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true