Denying Services to Prevent Regret

Denying Services to Prevent Regret

Sometimes the majority of individuals accepting a service regret their decision, and we can predict that future recipients will feel similarly. For example, a hospital might learn that the majority of patients regret accepting a given medical intervention, and a UN agency might learn that most refug...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied philosophy 2019-07, Vol.36 (3), p.471-490
1. Verfasser: GERVER, MOLLIE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Cognition & reasoning
Epistemology
Services
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 490
container_issue 3
container_start_page 471
container_title Journal of applied philosophy
container_volume 36
creator GERVER, MOLLIE
description Sometimes the majority of individuals accepting a service regret their decision, and we can predict that future recipients will feel similarly. For example, a hospital might learn that the majority of patients regret accepting a given medical intervention, and a UN agency might learn that most refugees it has helped repatriate regret returning home. I argue that agents providing services that lead to likely regret have one pro tanto reason to discontinue their services, and this reason is weighty if the service is epistemically transformative.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/japp.12335
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2255433881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26810528</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26810528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3595-d2fb429deac2bfe28aad891083fa30615b2d6f8198b1739387ba8104e89a6cc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYv3oWgNyF1ZzebzB5L_aZg8eO8bJJJSahJ3E0r_femRj06l7k8zzvDy9gp8An0c1XZtp2AkFLtsRFEMYZKS77PRlzEUSgThYfsyPuKc644iBE7v6Z6W9bL4IXcpszIB10TLBxtqO6CZ1o66o7ZQWFXnk5-9pi93d68zu7D-dPdw2w6DzOptApzUaSR0DnZTKQFCbQ2Rw0cZWElj0GlIo8LBI0pJFJLTFKLwCNCbeMsS-SYXQy5rWs-1uQ7UzVrV_cnjRBKRVIiQk9dDlTmGu8dFaZ15bt1WwPc7Dowuw7Mdwc9DAP8Wa5o-w9pHqeLxa9zNjiV7xr354i4f1YJlF9qD2Yn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2255433881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Denying Services to Prevent Regret</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>GERVER, MOLLIE</creator><creatorcontrib>GERVER, MOLLIE</creatorcontrib><description>Sometimes the majority of individuals accepting a service regret their decision, and we can predict that future recipients will feel similarly. For example, a hospital might learn that the majority of patients regret accepting a given medical intervention, and a UN agency might learn that most refugees it has helped repatriate regret returning home. I argue that agents providing services that lead to likely regret have one pro tanto reason to discontinue their services, and this reason is weighty if the service is epistemically transformative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-3758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5930</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/japp.12335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley</publisher><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Epistemology ; Services</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied philosophy, 2019-07, Vol.36 (3), p.471-490</ispartof><rights>Society for Applied Philosophy, 2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Society for Applied Philosophy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3595-d2fb429deac2bfe28aad891083fa30615b2d6f8198b1739387ba8104e89a6cc73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjapp.12335$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjapp.12335$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>GERVER, MOLLIE</creatorcontrib><title>Denying Services to Prevent Regret</title><title>Journal of applied philosophy</title><description>Sometimes the majority of individuals accepting a service regret their decision, and we can predict that future recipients will feel similarly. For example, a hospital might learn that the majority of patients regret accepting a given medical intervention, and a UN agency might learn that most refugees it has helped repatriate regret returning home. I argue that agents providing services that lead to likely regret have one pro tanto reason to discontinue their services, and this reason is weighty if the service is epistemically transformative.</description><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Services</subject><issn>0264-3758</issn><issn>1468-5930</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYv3oWgNyF1ZzebzB5L_aZg8eO8bJJJSahJ3E0r_femRj06l7k8zzvDy9gp8An0c1XZtp2AkFLtsRFEMYZKS77PRlzEUSgThYfsyPuKc644iBE7v6Z6W9bL4IXcpszIB10TLBxtqO6CZ1o66o7ZQWFXnk5-9pi93d68zu7D-dPdw2w6DzOptApzUaSR0DnZTKQFCbQ2Rw0cZWElj0GlIo8LBI0pJFJLTFKLwCNCbeMsS-SYXQy5rWs-1uQ7UzVrV_cnjRBKRVIiQk9dDlTmGu8dFaZ15bt1WwPc7Dowuw7Mdwc9DAP8Wa5o-w9pHqeLxa9zNjiV7xr354i4f1YJlF9qD2Yn</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>GERVER, MOLLIE</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Denying Services to Prevent Regret</title><author>GERVER, MOLLIE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3595-d2fb429deac2bfe28aad891083fa30615b2d6f8198b1739387ba8104e89a6cc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GERVER, MOLLIE</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GERVER, MOLLIE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Denying Services to Prevent Regret</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied philosophy</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>471-490</pages><issn>0264-3758</issn><eissn>1468-5930</eissn><abstract>Sometimes the majority of individuals accepting a service regret their decision, and we can predict that future recipients will feel similarly. For example, a hospital might learn that the majority of patients regret accepting a given medical intervention, and a UN agency might learn that most refugees it has helped repatriate regret returning home. I argue that agents providing services that lead to likely regret have one pro tanto reason to discontinue their services, and this reason is weighty if the service is epistemically transformative.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/japp.12335</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-3758
ispartof Journal of applied philosophy, 2019-07, Vol.36 (3), p.471-490
issn 0264-3758
1468-5930
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2255433881
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cognition & reasoning
Epistemology
Services
title Denying Services to Prevent Regret
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T12%3A55%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Denying%20Services%20to%20Prevent%20Regret&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20philosophy&rft.au=GERVER,%20MOLLIE&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=471-490&rft.issn=0264-3758&rft.eissn=1468-5930&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/japp.12335&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26810528%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2255433881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26810528&rfr_iscdi=true