BrokerCustomer Arbitration: An Attractive Alternative to Litigation
As docket congestion continues to increase the time and expense of litigating commodity futures disputes in federal and state courts, arbitration has become the forum of choice for many brokers and their customers. Amendments to the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and promulgation of various administra...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of futures markets 1987-08, Vol.7 (4), p.459 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 459 |
| container_title | The journal of futures markets |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | White, Frederick L Stein, William L |
| description | As docket congestion continues to increase the time and expense of litigating commodity futures disputes in federal and state courts, arbitration has become the forum of choice for many brokers and their customers. Amendments to the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and promulgation of various administrative rules indicate that Congress and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) sanction arbitration of broker--customer disputes. Claimants can choose from several arbitration forums, including those conducted under the auspices of the National Futures Association (NFA), contract markets, and the New York Stock Exchange. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_225479388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>391737431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2254793883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi8sKwjAQRYMoWB__ENwXpk20jbtYFBcu3ZcqUVJjopOp328pfoCrew6cO2JJBmqTKiXkmCWQF5AWIpNTNouxBQClJCSs2mF4GKy6SOFpkGu8WMKGbPBbrj3X1NuV7Mdw7cigbwamwE-W7H0IF2xya1w0y9_O2eqwP1fH9IXh3ZlIdRu6_ulinedrWShRluKv6Auu8Dt5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225479388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>BrokerCustomer Arbitration: An Attractive Alternative to Litigation</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>White, Frederick L ; Stein, William L</creator><creatorcontrib>White, Frederick L ; Stein, William L</creatorcontrib><description>As docket congestion continues to increase the time and expense of litigating commodity futures disputes in federal and state courts, arbitration has become the forum of choice for many brokers and their customers. Amendments to the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and promulgation of various administrative rules indicate that Congress and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) sanction arbitration of broker--customer disputes. Claimants can choose from several arbitration forums, including those conducted under the auspices of the National Futures Association (NFA), contract markets, and the New York Stock Exchange.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-7314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9934</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFMADT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Arbitration ; Brokers ; Commodity futures ; Customers ; Decision making ; Disputes ; Jurisdiction ; Litigation ; State court decisions ; Stock exchanges</subject><ispartof>The journal of futures markets, 1987-08, Vol.7 (4), p.459</ispartof><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Aug 1987</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, Frederick L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, William L</creatorcontrib><title>BrokerCustomer Arbitration: An Attractive Alternative to Litigation</title><title>The journal of futures markets</title><description>As docket congestion continues to increase the time and expense of litigating commodity futures disputes in federal and state courts, arbitration has become the forum of choice for many brokers and their customers. Amendments to the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and promulgation of various administrative rules indicate that Congress and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) sanction arbitration of broker--customer disputes. Claimants can choose from several arbitration forums, including those conducted under the auspices of the National Futures Association (NFA), contract markets, and the New York Stock Exchange.</description><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Brokers</subject><subject>Commodity futures</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><issn>0270-7314</issn><issn>1096-9934</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi8sKwjAQRYMoWB__ENwXpk20jbtYFBcu3ZcqUVJjopOp328pfoCrew6cO2JJBmqTKiXkmCWQF5AWIpNTNouxBQClJCSs2mF4GKy6SOFpkGu8WMKGbPBbrj3X1NuV7Mdw7cigbwamwE-W7H0IF2xya1w0y9_O2eqwP1fH9IXh3ZlIdRu6_ulinedrWShRluKv6Auu8Dt5</recordid><startdate>19870801</startdate><enddate>19870801</enddate><creator>White, Frederick L</creator><creator>Stein, William L</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870801</creationdate><title>BrokerCustomer Arbitration: An Attractive Alternative to Litigation</title><author>White, Frederick L ; Stein, William L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2254793883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Brokers</topic><topic>Commodity futures</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, Frederick L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, William L</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Archive</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of futures markets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, Frederick L</au><au>Stein, William L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>BrokerCustomer Arbitration: An Attractive Alternative to Litigation</atitle><jtitle>The journal of futures markets</jtitle><date>1987-08-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>459</spage><pages>459-</pages><issn>0270-7314</issn><eissn>1096-9934</eissn><coden>JFMADT</coden><abstract>As docket congestion continues to increase the time and expense of litigating commodity futures disputes in federal and state courts, arbitration has become the forum of choice for many brokers and their customers. Amendments to the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and promulgation of various administrative rules indicate that Congress and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) sanction arbitration of broker--customer disputes. Claimants can choose from several arbitration forums, including those conducted under the auspices of the National Futures Association (NFA), contract markets, and the New York Stock Exchange.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0270-7314 |
| ispartof | The journal of futures markets, 1987-08, Vol.7 (4), p.459 |
| issn | 0270-7314 1096-9934 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_225479388 |
| source | Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Arbitration Brokers Commodity futures Customers Decision making Disputes Jurisdiction Litigation State court decisions Stock exchanges |
| title | BrokerCustomer Arbitration: An Attractive Alternative to Litigation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A15%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=BrokerCustomer%20Arbitration:%20An%20Attractive%20Alternative%20to%20Litigation&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20futures%20markets&rft.au=White,%20Frederick%20L&rft.date=1987-08-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=459&rft.pages=459-&rft.issn=0270-7314&rft.eissn=1096-9934&rft.coden=JFMADT&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E391737431%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225479388&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |