What's a Single Man Blathering about? Jesus on Marriage.

The church throughout its history has laid claim to Jesus’ teaching about marriage. It has dubbed the declared distillations to be the “dominical words on marriage.” The only problem is that historical criticism has left contemporary readers with no certainty about what Jesus actually said; literary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of religious history 2019-06, Vol.43 (2), p.148-162
1. Verfasser: Cadwallader, Alan H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue 2
container_start_page 148
container_title Journal of religious history
container_volume 43
creator Cadwallader, Alan H.
description The church throughout its history has laid claim to Jesus’ teaching about marriage. It has dubbed the declared distillations to be the “dominical words on marriage.” The only problem is that historical criticism has left contemporary readers with no certainty about what Jesus actually said; literary critics have destabilised whether Jesus’ words on marriage were ever intended to be transtemporal; textual critics have demonstrated the impossibility of nailing down any fixed teaching and ideological critics have shown the vested interests of scribes in shaping the meaning of the text from the very beginning. Marriage, it seems, is a Rorschach test completely subject to the needs and interests of those who venture into looking at it. Consequently Jesus can relegate marriage to a practice not even worthy of the resurrection, prize it open to multiple spouses whether contemporaneous or sequential, enforce asymmetrical pairings based on gender, and generally fall in with whatever state or church decisions might be. “Dominical words on marriage” proves to be a house built on sand.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-9809.12584
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2254633600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2254633600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2704-f54fd99c279e6e70bf5d24f56fcd9b31c9d2dcc31bfe5ba063ca88c8d6fc3b9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUws1piYEp7_ogTTwgqoFSgSnyI0XIcu00VkmInQv3vcQli5ZbTvfu9O-khdE5gQmJNCRdZInOQE0LTnB-g0Z9yiEYAlCac0uwYnYSwAYAsBTFC-ftad5cBa_xSNava4ifd4Jtad2vro4B10fbdFV7Y0AfcNnHtfaVXdnKKjpyugz377WP0dnf7Opsnj8v7h9n1Y2JoBjxxKXellHGQVtgMCpeWlLtUOFPKghEjS1oaw0jhbFpoEMzoPDd5GQFWSMPG6GK4u_XtZ29DpzZt75v4UlGacsGYAIjUdKCMb0Pw1qmtrz603ykCah-P2oeh9mGon3iiQwyOr6q2u_9wtVg-zwfjN8LaZgU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2254633600</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What's a Single Man Blathering about? Jesus on Marriage.</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Cadwallader, Alan H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cadwallader, Alan H.</creatorcontrib><description>The church throughout its history has laid claim to Jesus’ teaching about marriage. It has dubbed the declared distillations to be the “dominical words on marriage.” The only problem is that historical criticism has left contemporary readers with no certainty about what Jesus actually said; literary critics have destabilised whether Jesus’ words on marriage were ever intended to be transtemporal; textual critics have demonstrated the impossibility of nailing down any fixed teaching and ideological critics have shown the vested interests of scribes in shaping the meaning of the text from the very beginning. Marriage, it seems, is a Rorschach test completely subject to the needs and interests of those who venture into looking at it. Consequently Jesus can relegate marriage to a practice not even worthy of the resurrection, prize it open to multiple spouses whether contemporaneous or sequential, enforce asymmetrical pairings based on gender, and generally fall in with whatever state or church decisions might be. “Dominical words on marriage” proves to be a house built on sand.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-9809.12584</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley and Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Families &amp; family life ; Ideology ; Jesus Christ ; Literary criticism ; Marriage ; Religious history ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Journal of religious history, 2019-06, Vol.43 (2), p.148-162</ispartof><rights>2019 Religious History Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-3423-1125</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-9809.12584$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-9809.12584$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cadwallader, Alan H.</creatorcontrib><title>What's a Single Man Blathering about? Jesus on Marriage.</title><title>Journal of religious history</title><description>The church throughout its history has laid claim to Jesus’ teaching about marriage. It has dubbed the declared distillations to be the “dominical words on marriage.” The only problem is that historical criticism has left contemporary readers with no certainty about what Jesus actually said; literary critics have destabilised whether Jesus’ words on marriage were ever intended to be transtemporal; textual critics have demonstrated the impossibility of nailing down any fixed teaching and ideological critics have shown the vested interests of scribes in shaping the meaning of the text from the very beginning. Marriage, it seems, is a Rorschach test completely subject to the needs and interests of those who venture into looking at it. Consequently Jesus can relegate marriage to a practice not even worthy of the resurrection, prize it open to multiple spouses whether contemporaneous or sequential, enforce asymmetrical pairings based on gender, and generally fall in with whatever state or church decisions might be. “Dominical words on marriage” proves to be a house built on sand.</description><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Jesus Christ</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Religious history</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0022-4227</issn><issn>1467-9809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUws1piYEp7_ogTTwgqoFSgSnyI0XIcu00VkmInQv3vcQli5ZbTvfu9O-khdE5gQmJNCRdZInOQE0LTnB-g0Z9yiEYAlCac0uwYnYSwAYAsBTFC-ftad5cBa_xSNava4ifd4Jtad2vro4B10fbdFV7Y0AfcNnHtfaVXdnKKjpyugz377WP0dnf7Opsnj8v7h9n1Y2JoBjxxKXellHGQVtgMCpeWlLtUOFPKghEjS1oaw0jhbFpoEMzoPDd5GQFWSMPG6GK4u_XtZ29DpzZt75v4UlGacsGYAIjUdKCMb0Pw1qmtrz603ykCah-P2oeh9mGon3iiQwyOr6q2u_9wtVg-zwfjN8LaZgU</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Cadwallader, Alan H.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3423-1125</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>What's a Single Man Blathering about? Jesus on Marriage.</title><author>Cadwallader, Alan H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2704-f54fd99c279e6e70bf5d24f56fcd9b31c9d2dcc31bfe5ba063ca88c8d6fc3b9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Jesus Christ</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Religious history</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cadwallader, Alan H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of religious history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cadwallader, Alan H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What's a Single Man Blathering about? Jesus on Marriage.</atitle><jtitle>Journal of religious history</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>148</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>148-162</pages><issn>0022-4227</issn><eissn>1467-9809</eissn><abstract>The church throughout its history has laid claim to Jesus’ teaching about marriage. It has dubbed the declared distillations to be the “dominical words on marriage.” The only problem is that historical criticism has left contemporary readers with no certainty about what Jesus actually said; literary critics have destabilised whether Jesus’ words on marriage were ever intended to be transtemporal; textual critics have demonstrated the impossibility of nailing down any fixed teaching and ideological critics have shown the vested interests of scribes in shaping the meaning of the text from the very beginning. Marriage, it seems, is a Rorschach test completely subject to the needs and interests of those who venture into looking at it. Consequently Jesus can relegate marriage to a practice not even worthy of the resurrection, prize it open to multiple spouses whether contemporaneous or sequential, enforce asymmetrical pairings based on gender, and generally fall in with whatever state or church decisions might be. “Dominical words on marriage” proves to be a house built on sand.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-9809.12584</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3423-1125</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4227
ispartof Journal of religious history, 2019-06, Vol.43 (2), p.148-162
issn 0022-4227
1467-9809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2254633600
source Wiley Journals
subjects Families & family life
Ideology
Jesus Christ
Literary criticism
Marriage
Religious history
Theology
title What's a Single Man Blathering about? Jesus on Marriage.
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A07%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What's%20a%20Single%20Man%20Blathering%20about?%20Jesus%20on%20Marriage.&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20religious%20history&rft.au=Cadwallader,%20Alan%20H.&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=148-162&rft.issn=0022-4227&rft.eissn=1467-9809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-9809.12584&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2254633600%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2254633600&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true