Mapping valley bottom confinement at the network scale

In this article, we demonstrate the application of a continuous confinement metric across entire river networks. Confinement is a useful metric for characterizing and discriminating valley setting. At the reach scale, valley bottom confinement is measured and quantified as the ratio of the length of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth surface processes and landforms 2019-07, Vol.44 (9), p.1828-1845
Hauptverfasser: O'Brien, Gary R., Wheaton, Joseph M., Fryirs, Kirstie, Macfarlane, William W., Brierley, Gary, Whitehead, Kelly, Gilbert, Jordan, Volk, Carol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1845
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1828
container_title Earth surface processes and landforms
container_volume 44
creator O'Brien, Gary R.
Wheaton, Joseph M.
Fryirs, Kirstie
Macfarlane, William W.
Brierley, Gary
Whitehead, Kelly
Gilbert, Jordan
Volk, Carol
description In this article, we demonstrate the application of a continuous confinement metric across entire river networks. Confinement is a useful metric for characterizing and discriminating valley setting. At the reach scale, valley bottom confinement is measured and quantified as the ratio of the length of channel confined on either bank by a confining margin divided by the reach length. The valley bottom is occupied by the contemporary floodplain and/or its channel(s); confining margins can be any landform or feature that makes up the valley bottom margin, such as bedrock hillslopes, terraces, fans, or anthropogenic features such as stopbanks or constructed levees. To test the reliability of calculating confinement across entire networks, we applied our geoprocessing scripts across four physiographically distinct watersheds of the Pacific Northwest, USA using freely available national datasets. Comparison of manually digitized and mapped with modeled calculations of confinement revealed that roughly one‐third of reaches were equivalent and about two‐thirds of the sites differ by less than ±15%. A sensitivity analysis found that a 500 m reach segmentation length produced reasonable agreement with manual, categorical, expert‐derived analysis of confinement. Confinement accuracy can be improved (c. 4% to 17% gains) using a more accurately mapped valley bottom and channel position (i.e. with higher‐resolution model inputs). This is particularly important when differentiating rivers in the partly confined valley setting. However, at the watershed scale, patterns derived from mapping confinement are not fundamentally different, making this a reasonably accurate and rapid technique for analysis and measurement of confinement across broad spatial extents. © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Valley confinement is a useful metric for characterizing and discriminating valley settings across broad spatial scales and distinct process regimes. In this article, we present an approach for measuring confinement across entire drainage networks using nationally available layers of intermediate resolution. This method accounts for channel position on the valley floor and lengths of channel that interact with potential confining margins to produce rapid, consistent, assessment of confinement over large areas with a reasonable degree of accuracy.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/esp.4615
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2254280060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2254280060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3505-44f963438df6152d704627921e7c25a23fd5e93ec2268aed831ea5252f0a9f9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV8CcsePGSOvuZ7FFK_YCKgnpe1mRWU9Mk7m4t_femxqunuTzMO_MScs5gxgD4FcZ-JjVTB2TCwOjMFCI_JBNgJs-MEPkxOYlxBcCYLMyE6AfX93X7Tr9d0-COvnUpdWtadq2vW1xjm6hLNH0gbTFtu_BJY-kaPCVH3jURz_7mlLzeLF7md9ny8fZ-fr3MnFCgMim90UKKovLDSbzKQWqeG84wL7lyXPhKoRFYcq4Lh1UhGDrFFffgjDeVmJKLcW8fuq8NxmRX3Sa0Q6TlXEleAGgY1OWoytDFGNDbPtRrF3aWgd23YodW7L6VgWYj3dbDu_86u3h--vU_HqVhmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2254280060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mapping valley bottom confinement at the network scale</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>O'Brien, Gary R. ; Wheaton, Joseph M. ; Fryirs, Kirstie ; Macfarlane, William W. ; Brierley, Gary ; Whitehead, Kelly ; Gilbert, Jordan ; Volk, Carol</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Gary R. ; Wheaton, Joseph M. ; Fryirs, Kirstie ; Macfarlane, William W. ; Brierley, Gary ; Whitehead, Kelly ; Gilbert, Jordan ; Volk, Carol</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we demonstrate the application of a continuous confinement metric across entire river networks. Confinement is a useful metric for characterizing and discriminating valley setting. At the reach scale, valley bottom confinement is measured and quantified as the ratio of the length of channel confined on either bank by a confining margin divided by the reach length. The valley bottom is occupied by the contemporary floodplain and/or its channel(s); confining margins can be any landform or feature that makes up the valley bottom margin, such as bedrock hillslopes, terraces, fans, or anthropogenic features such as stopbanks or constructed levees. To test the reliability of calculating confinement across entire networks, we applied our geoprocessing scripts across four physiographically distinct watersheds of the Pacific Northwest, USA using freely available national datasets. Comparison of manually digitized and mapped with modeled calculations of confinement revealed that roughly one‐third of reaches were equivalent and about two‐thirds of the sites differ by less than ±15%. A sensitivity analysis found that a 500 m reach segmentation length produced reasonable agreement with manual, categorical, expert‐derived analysis of confinement. Confinement accuracy can be improved (c. 4% to 17% gains) using a more accurately mapped valley bottom and channel position (i.e. with higher‐resolution model inputs). This is particularly important when differentiating rivers in the partly confined valley setting. However, at the watershed scale, patterns derived from mapping confinement are not fundamentally different, making this a reasonably accurate and rapid technique for analysis and measurement of confinement across broad spatial extents. © 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. Valley confinement is a useful metric for characterizing and discriminating valley settings across broad spatial scales and distinct process regimes. In this article, we present an approach for measuring confinement across entire drainage networks using nationally available layers of intermediate resolution. This method accounts for channel position on the valley floor and lengths of channel that interact with potential confining margins to produce rapid, consistent, assessment of confinement over large areas with a reasonable degree of accuracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.4615</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anthropogenic factors ; Bedrock ; Confinement ; Confining ; Digitization ; drainage network ; Floodplains ; fluvial geomorphology ; Landforms ; Length ; Levees ; Mapping ; Network reliability ; River networks ; river restoration ; River Styles ; Rivers ; Segmentation ; Sensitivity analysis ; Terraces ; Valleys ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2019-07, Vol.44 (9), p.1828-1845</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3505-44f963438df6152d704627921e7c25a23fd5e93ec2268aed831ea5252f0a9f9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3505-44f963438df6152d704627921e7c25a23fd5e93ec2268aed831ea5252f0a9f9d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1310-1105 ; 0000-0002-8361-8150 ; 0000-0002-0859-7986 ; 0000-0003-0541-3384</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fesp.4615$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fesp.4615$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Gary R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheaton, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fryirs, Kirstie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macfarlane, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brierley, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitehead, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, Carol</creatorcontrib><title>Mapping valley bottom confinement at the network scale</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><description>In this article, we demonstrate the application of a continuous confinement metric across entire river networks. Confinement is a useful metric for characterizing and discriminating valley setting. At the reach scale, valley bottom confinement is measured and quantified as the ratio of the length of channel confined on either bank by a confining margin divided by the reach length. The valley bottom is occupied by the contemporary floodplain and/or its channel(s); confining margins can be any landform or feature that makes up the valley bottom margin, such as bedrock hillslopes, terraces, fans, or anthropogenic features such as stopbanks or constructed levees. To test the reliability of calculating confinement across entire networks, we applied our geoprocessing scripts across four physiographically distinct watersheds of the Pacific Northwest, USA using freely available national datasets. Comparison of manually digitized and mapped with modeled calculations of confinement revealed that roughly one‐third of reaches were equivalent and about two‐thirds of the sites differ by less than ±15%. A sensitivity analysis found that a 500 m reach segmentation length produced reasonable agreement with manual, categorical, expert‐derived analysis of confinement. Confinement accuracy can be improved (c. 4% to 17% gains) using a more accurately mapped valley bottom and channel position (i.e. with higher‐resolution model inputs). This is particularly important when differentiating rivers in the partly confined valley setting. However, at the watershed scale, patterns derived from mapping confinement are not fundamentally different, making this a reasonably accurate and rapid technique for analysis and measurement of confinement across broad spatial extents. © 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. Valley confinement is a useful metric for characterizing and discriminating valley settings across broad spatial scales and distinct process regimes. In this article, we present an approach for measuring confinement across entire drainage networks using nationally available layers of intermediate resolution. This method accounts for channel position on the valley floor and lengths of channel that interact with potential confining margins to produce rapid, consistent, assessment of confinement over large areas with a reasonable degree of accuracy.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Bedrock</subject><subject>Confinement</subject><subject>Confining</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>drainage network</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>fluvial geomorphology</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>Length</subject><subject>Levees</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Network reliability</subject><subject>River networks</subject><subject>river restoration</subject><subject>River Styles</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Terraces</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV8CcsePGSOvuZ7FFK_YCKgnpe1mRWU9Mk7m4t_femxqunuTzMO_MScs5gxgD4FcZ-JjVTB2TCwOjMFCI_JBNgJs-MEPkxOYlxBcCYLMyE6AfX93X7Tr9d0-COvnUpdWtadq2vW1xjm6hLNH0gbTFtu_BJY-kaPCVH3jURz_7mlLzeLF7md9ny8fZ-fr3MnFCgMim90UKKovLDSbzKQWqeG84wL7lyXPhKoRFYcq4Lh1UhGDrFFffgjDeVmJKLcW8fuq8NxmRX3Sa0Q6TlXEleAGgY1OWoytDFGNDbPtRrF3aWgd23YodW7L6VgWYj3dbDu_86u3h--vU_HqVhmw</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>O'Brien, Gary R.</creator><creator>Wheaton, Joseph M.</creator><creator>Fryirs, Kirstie</creator><creator>Macfarlane, William W.</creator><creator>Brierley, Gary</creator><creator>Whitehead, Kelly</creator><creator>Gilbert, Jordan</creator><creator>Volk, Carol</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1310-1105</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8361-8150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-7986</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0541-3384</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Mapping valley bottom confinement at the network scale</title><author>O'Brien, Gary R. ; Wheaton, Joseph M. ; Fryirs, Kirstie ; Macfarlane, William W. ; Brierley, Gary ; Whitehead, Kelly ; Gilbert, Jordan ; Volk, Carol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3505-44f963438df6152d704627921e7c25a23fd5e93ec2268aed831ea5252f0a9f9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Bedrock</topic><topic>Confinement</topic><topic>Confining</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>drainage network</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>fluvial geomorphology</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>Length</topic><topic>Levees</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Network reliability</topic><topic>River networks</topic><topic>river restoration</topic><topic>River Styles</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Terraces</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Gary R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheaton, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fryirs, Kirstie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macfarlane, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brierley, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitehead, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, Carol</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Brien, Gary R.</au><au>Wheaton, Joseph M.</au><au>Fryirs, Kirstie</au><au>Macfarlane, William W.</au><au>Brierley, Gary</au><au>Whitehead, Kelly</au><au>Gilbert, Jordan</au><au>Volk, Carol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mapping valley bottom confinement at the network scale</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1828</spage><epage>1845</epage><pages>1828-1845</pages><issn>0197-9337</issn><eissn>1096-9837</eissn><abstract>In this article, we demonstrate the application of a continuous confinement metric across entire river networks. Confinement is a useful metric for characterizing and discriminating valley setting. At the reach scale, valley bottom confinement is measured and quantified as the ratio of the length of channel confined on either bank by a confining margin divided by the reach length. The valley bottom is occupied by the contemporary floodplain and/or its channel(s); confining margins can be any landform or feature that makes up the valley bottom margin, such as bedrock hillslopes, terraces, fans, or anthropogenic features such as stopbanks or constructed levees. To test the reliability of calculating confinement across entire networks, we applied our geoprocessing scripts across four physiographically distinct watersheds of the Pacific Northwest, USA using freely available national datasets. Comparison of manually digitized and mapped with modeled calculations of confinement revealed that roughly one‐third of reaches were equivalent and about two‐thirds of the sites differ by less than ±15%. A sensitivity analysis found that a 500 m reach segmentation length produced reasonable agreement with manual, categorical, expert‐derived analysis of confinement. Confinement accuracy can be improved (c. 4% to 17% gains) using a more accurately mapped valley bottom and channel position (i.e. with higher‐resolution model inputs). This is particularly important when differentiating rivers in the partly confined valley setting. However, at the watershed scale, patterns derived from mapping confinement are not fundamentally different, making this a reasonably accurate and rapid technique for analysis and measurement of confinement across broad spatial extents. © 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. Valley confinement is a useful metric for characterizing and discriminating valley settings across broad spatial scales and distinct process regimes. In this article, we present an approach for measuring confinement across entire drainage networks using nationally available layers of intermediate resolution. This method accounts for channel position on the valley floor and lengths of channel that interact with potential confining margins to produce rapid, consistent, assessment of confinement over large areas with a reasonable degree of accuracy.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/esp.4615</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1310-1105</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8361-8150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-7986</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0541-3384</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-9337
ispartof Earth surface processes and landforms, 2019-07, Vol.44 (9), p.1828-1845
issn 0197-9337
1096-9837
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2254280060
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Analysis
Anthropogenic factors
Bedrock
Confinement
Confining
Digitization
drainage network
Floodplains
fluvial geomorphology
Landforms
Length
Levees
Mapping
Network reliability
River networks
river restoration
River Styles
Rivers
Segmentation
Sensitivity analysis
Terraces
Valleys
Watersheds
title Mapping valley bottom confinement at the network scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T13%3A24%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mapping%20valley%20bottom%20confinement%20at%20the%20network%20scale&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=O'Brien,%20Gary%20R.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1828&rft.epage=1845&rft.pages=1828-1845&rft.issn=0197-9337&rft.eissn=1096-9837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.4615&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2254280060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2254280060&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true