Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations

Rationale, goals, and objectives Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preoperative care have been developed for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). The objective of this study was to synthetize recommendations for SAP based on best‐evaluated CPGs. Methods A systematic literature search for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.591-602
Hauptverfasser: Wainberg, Sheila Kalb, Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite, Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro, Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira, Nascimento, Jéssica Santos, Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline, Melo, Daniela Oliveira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 602
container_issue 4
container_start_page 591
container_title Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
container_volume 25
creator Wainberg, Sheila Kalb
Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite
Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro
Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira
Nascimento, Jéssica Santos
Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline
Melo, Daniela Oliveira
description Rationale, goals, and objectives Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preoperative care have been developed for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). The objective of this study was to synthetize recommendations for SAP based on best‐evaluated CPGs. Methods A systematic literature search for documents related to SAP, published between January 2011 and December 2016, was conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and specific CPG websites. Three reviewers independently assessed the rigour of development and editorial independence of CPGs based on domains 3 and 6 of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. CPGs with domain 3 scores of 50% and greater were selected for synthesis of recommendations. Two reviewers independently extracted CPG recommendations from among these documents. A third reviewer performed the synthesis of recommendations. Results The search retrieved 363 documents, of which 29 CPGs were appraised using AGREE II. Only eight (28%) scored 50% and greater in domain 3. Most CPGs addressed topics related to preoperative care, including SAP. No conflicting recommendations were found, and most recommendations were based on clinical practice. The only recommendation for which there was a difference among CPGs was with respect to the time to initiate the administration of antibiotics (1 hour before or close to the time of the surgical incision). Four CPGs provide recommendations that demonstrate concern about inadequate SAP prolongation. Conclusion Several CPGs for SAP were developed without the desired methodological rigour or transparency. Synthesis of recommendations for best‐evaluated CPGs provides a broad approach owing to the complementarity of the recommendations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jep.12992
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2253671030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2253671030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e65c2a28923df63e84063269a594519219f004e88bb33fc6d5d52e12927524063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQJVYs0voRuwk7VJWXKgESrCPXmbSu8sJOgEh8PG5T2OGNLc_x9cxB6JySMfVrsoF6TFkcswM0pFyKgE0FP9yehQx8IRygE-c2hFBOxPQYDTghLCQRG6LvWW5Ko1WOa6t0YzTgVWtS8LfgcFZZ7Fq72gGqbExhtK2WZodX9brL1Zdx1_ilVblpVGM-AKvaJxmncudfpNh1ZbMGZxyuMmxBV0UBZerRqnSn6CjzHJzt9xF6u52_zu6DxdPdw-xmEWguOAtACs0Ui2LG00xyiEIiOZOxEnEoaMxonBESQhQtl5xnWqYiFQz83F4D27IjdNnn-qbfW3BNsqlaW_ovE8YEl1NKOPHUVU_5EZ2zkCW1NYWyXUJJsvWceM_JzrNnL_aJ7bKA9I_8FeuBSQ98mhy6_5OSx_lzH_kDunmIcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253671030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb ; Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite ; Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro ; Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira ; Nascimento, Jéssica Santos ; Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline ; Melo, Daniela Oliveira</creator><creatorcontrib>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb ; Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite ; Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro ; Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira ; Nascimento, Jéssica Santos ; Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline ; Melo, Daniela Oliveira</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale, goals, and objectives Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preoperative care have been developed for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). The objective of this study was to synthetize recommendations for SAP based on best‐evaluated CPGs. Methods A systematic literature search for documents related to SAP, published between January 2011 and December 2016, was conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and specific CPG websites. Three reviewers independently assessed the rigour of development and editorial independence of CPGs based on domains 3 and 6 of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research &amp; Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. CPGs with domain 3 scores of 50% and greater were selected for synthesis of recommendations. Two reviewers independently extracted CPG recommendations from among these documents. A third reviewer performed the synthesis of recommendations. Results The search retrieved 363 documents, of which 29 CPGs were appraised using AGREE II. Only eight (28%) scored 50% and greater in domain 3. Most CPGs addressed topics related to preoperative care, including SAP. No conflicting recommendations were found, and most recommendations were based on clinical practice. The only recommendation for which there was a difference among CPGs was with respect to the time to initiate the administration of antibiotics (1 hour before or close to the time of the surgical incision). Four CPGs provide recommendations that demonstrate concern about inadequate SAP prolongation. Conclusion Several CPGs for SAP were developed without the desired methodological rigour or transparency. Synthesis of recommendations for best‐evaluated CPGs provides a broad approach owing to the complementarity of the recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.12992</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30024082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - standards ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; clinical guidelines ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Disease prevention ; evaluation ; Evidence-based medicine ; Evidence-Based Practice - methods ; health care ; health services research ; Humans ; Infections ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Preoperative Care - standards ; Qualitative research ; Surgery ; systematic reviews</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.591-602</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e65c2a28923df63e84063269a594519219f004e88bb33fc6d5d52e12927524063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e65c2a28923df63e84063269a594519219f004e88bb33fc6d5d52e12927524063</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8613-7953</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjep.12992$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjep.12992$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30024082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento, Jéssica Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Daniela Oliveira</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Rationale, goals, and objectives Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preoperative care have been developed for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). The objective of this study was to synthetize recommendations for SAP based on best‐evaluated CPGs. Methods A systematic literature search for documents related to SAP, published between January 2011 and December 2016, was conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and specific CPG websites. Three reviewers independently assessed the rigour of development and editorial independence of CPGs based on domains 3 and 6 of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research &amp; Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. CPGs with domain 3 scores of 50% and greater were selected for synthesis of recommendations. Two reviewers independently extracted CPG recommendations from among these documents. A third reviewer performed the synthesis of recommendations. Results The search retrieved 363 documents, of which 29 CPGs were appraised using AGREE II. Only eight (28%) scored 50% and greater in domain 3. Most CPGs addressed topics related to preoperative care, including SAP. No conflicting recommendations were found, and most recommendations were based on clinical practice. The only recommendation for which there was a difference among CPGs was with respect to the time to initiate the administration of antibiotics (1 hour before or close to the time of the surgical incision). Four CPGs provide recommendations that demonstrate concern about inadequate SAP prolongation. Conclusion Several CPGs for SAP were developed without the desired methodological rigour or transparency. Synthesis of recommendations for best‐evaluated CPGs provides a broad approach owing to the complementarity of the recommendations.</description><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - standards</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>clinical guidelines</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice - methods</subject><subject>health care</subject><subject>health services research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - standards</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>systematic reviews</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQJVYs0voRuwk7VJWXKgESrCPXmbSu8sJOgEh8PG5T2OGNLc_x9cxB6JySMfVrsoF6TFkcswM0pFyKgE0FP9yehQx8IRygE-c2hFBOxPQYDTghLCQRG6LvWW5Ko1WOa6t0YzTgVWtS8LfgcFZZ7Fq72gGqbExhtK2WZodX9brL1Zdx1_ilVblpVGM-AKvaJxmncudfpNh1ZbMGZxyuMmxBV0UBZerRqnSn6CjzHJzt9xF6u52_zu6DxdPdw-xmEWguOAtACs0Ui2LG00xyiEIiOZOxEnEoaMxonBESQhQtl5xnWqYiFQz83F4D27IjdNnn-qbfW3BNsqlaW_ovE8YEl1NKOPHUVU_5EZ2zkCW1NYWyXUJJsvWceM_JzrNnL_aJ7bKA9I_8FeuBSQ98mhy6_5OSx_lzH_kDunmIcg</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb</creator><creator>Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite</creator><creator>Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro</creator><creator>Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira</creator><creator>Nascimento, Jéssica Santos</creator><creator>Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline</creator><creator>Melo, Daniela Oliveira</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-7953</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations</title><author>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb ; Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite ; Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro ; Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira ; Nascimento, Jéssica Santos ; Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline ; Melo, Daniela Oliveira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e65c2a28923df63e84063269a594519219f004e88bb33fc6d5d52e12927524063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - standards</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>clinical guidelines</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice - methods</topic><topic>health care</topic><topic>health services research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - standards</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>systematic reviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento, Jéssica Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Daniela Oliveira</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb</au><au>Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite</au><au>Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro</au><au>Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira</au><au>Nascimento, Jéssica Santos</au><au>Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline</au><au>Melo, Daniela Oliveira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>602</epage><pages>591-602</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Rationale, goals, and objectives Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preoperative care have been developed for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). The objective of this study was to synthetize recommendations for SAP based on best‐evaluated CPGs. Methods A systematic literature search for documents related to SAP, published between January 2011 and December 2016, was conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and specific CPG websites. Three reviewers independently assessed the rigour of development and editorial independence of CPGs based on domains 3 and 6 of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research &amp; Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. CPGs with domain 3 scores of 50% and greater were selected for synthesis of recommendations. Two reviewers independently extracted CPG recommendations from among these documents. A third reviewer performed the synthesis of recommendations. Results The search retrieved 363 documents, of which 29 CPGs were appraised using AGREE II. Only eight (28%) scored 50% and greater in domain 3. Most CPGs addressed topics related to preoperative care, including SAP. No conflicting recommendations were found, and most recommendations were based on clinical practice. The only recommendation for which there was a difference among CPGs was with respect to the time to initiate the administration of antibiotics (1 hour before or close to the time of the surgical incision). Four CPGs provide recommendations that demonstrate concern about inadequate SAP prolongation. Conclusion Several CPGs for SAP were developed without the desired methodological rigour or transparency. Synthesis of recommendations for best‐evaluated CPGs provides a broad approach owing to the complementarity of the recommendations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30024082</pmid><doi>10.1111/jep.12992</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-7953</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1356-1294
ispartof Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.591-602
issn 1356-1294
1365-2753
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2253671030
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods
Antibiotic Prophylaxis - standards
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial agents
clinical guidelines
Clinical medicine
Clinical practice guidelines
Disease prevention
evaluation
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-Based Practice - methods
health care
health services research
Humans
Infections
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Preoperative Care - methods
Preoperative Care - standards
Qualitative research
Surgery
systematic reviews
title Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20practice%20guidelines%20for%20surgical%20antimicrobial%20prophylaxis:%20Qualitative%20appraisals%20and%20synthesis%20of%20recommendations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Wainberg,%20Sheila%20Kalb&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=602&rft.pages=591-602&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.12992&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2253671030%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253671030&rft_id=info:pmid/30024082&rfr_iscdi=true