Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations
Rationale, goals, and objectives Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preoperative care have been developed for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). The objective of this study was to synthetize recommendations for SAP based on best‐evaluated CPGs. Methods A systematic literature search for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.591-602 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 602 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 591 |
container_title | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Wainberg, Sheila Kalb Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira Nascimento, Jéssica Santos Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline Melo, Daniela Oliveira |
description | Rationale, goals, and objectives
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preoperative care have been developed for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). The objective of this study was to synthetize recommendations for SAP based on best‐evaluated CPGs.
Methods
A systematic literature search for documents related to SAP, published between January 2011 and December 2016, was conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and specific CPG websites. Three reviewers independently assessed the rigour of development and editorial independence of CPGs based on domains 3 and 6 of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. CPGs with domain 3 scores of 50% and greater were selected for synthesis of recommendations. Two reviewers independently extracted CPG recommendations from among these documents. A third reviewer performed the synthesis of recommendations.
Results
The search retrieved 363 documents, of which 29 CPGs were appraised using AGREE II. Only eight (28%) scored 50% and greater in domain 3. Most CPGs addressed topics related to preoperative care, including SAP. No conflicting recommendations were found, and most recommendations were based on clinical practice. The only recommendation for which there was a difference among CPGs was with respect to the time to initiate the administration of antibiotics (1 hour before or close to the time of the surgical incision). Four CPGs provide recommendations that demonstrate concern about inadequate SAP prolongation.
Conclusion
Several CPGs for SAP were developed without the desired methodological rigour or transparency. Synthesis of recommendations for best‐evaluated CPGs provides a broad approach owing to the complementarity of the recommendations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jep.12992 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2253671030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2253671030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e65c2a28923df63e84063269a594519219f004e88bb33fc6d5d52e12927524063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQJVYs0voRuwk7VJWXKgESrCPXmbSu8sJOgEh8PG5T2OGNLc_x9cxB6JySMfVrsoF6TFkcswM0pFyKgE0FP9yehQx8IRygE-c2hFBOxPQYDTghLCQRG6LvWW5Ko1WOa6t0YzTgVWtS8LfgcFZZ7Fq72gGqbExhtK2WZodX9brL1Zdx1_ilVblpVGM-AKvaJxmncudfpNh1ZbMGZxyuMmxBV0UBZerRqnSn6CjzHJzt9xF6u52_zu6DxdPdw-xmEWguOAtACs0Ui2LG00xyiEIiOZOxEnEoaMxonBESQhQtl5xnWqYiFQz83F4D27IjdNnn-qbfW3BNsqlaW_ovE8YEl1NKOPHUVU_5EZ2zkCW1NYWyXUJJsvWceM_JzrNnL_aJ7bKA9I_8FeuBSQ98mhy6_5OSx_lzH_kDunmIcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253671030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb ; Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite ; Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro ; Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira ; Nascimento, Jéssica Santos ; Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline ; Melo, Daniela Oliveira</creator><creatorcontrib>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb ; Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite ; Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro ; Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira ; Nascimento, Jéssica Santos ; Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline ; Melo, Daniela Oliveira</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale, goals, and objectives
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preoperative care have been developed for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). The objective of this study was to synthetize recommendations for SAP based on best‐evaluated CPGs.
Methods
A systematic literature search for documents related to SAP, published between January 2011 and December 2016, was conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and specific CPG websites. Three reviewers independently assessed the rigour of development and editorial independence of CPGs based on domains 3 and 6 of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. CPGs with domain 3 scores of 50% and greater were selected for synthesis of recommendations. Two reviewers independently extracted CPG recommendations from among these documents. A third reviewer performed the synthesis of recommendations.
Results
The search retrieved 363 documents, of which 29 CPGs were appraised using AGREE II. Only eight (28%) scored 50% and greater in domain 3. Most CPGs addressed topics related to preoperative care, including SAP. No conflicting recommendations were found, and most recommendations were based on clinical practice. The only recommendation for which there was a difference among CPGs was with respect to the time to initiate the administration of antibiotics (1 hour before or close to the time of the surgical incision). Four CPGs provide recommendations that demonstrate concern about inadequate SAP prolongation.
Conclusion
Several CPGs for SAP were developed without the desired methodological rigour or transparency. Synthesis of recommendations for best‐evaluated CPGs provides a broad approach owing to the complementarity of the recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.12992</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30024082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - standards ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; clinical guidelines ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Disease prevention ; evaluation ; Evidence-based medicine ; Evidence-Based Practice - methods ; health care ; health services research ; Humans ; Infections ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Preoperative Care - standards ; Qualitative research ; Surgery ; systematic reviews</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.591-602</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e65c2a28923df63e84063269a594519219f004e88bb33fc6d5d52e12927524063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e65c2a28923df63e84063269a594519219f004e88bb33fc6d5d52e12927524063</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8613-7953</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjep.12992$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjep.12992$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30024082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento, Jéssica Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Daniela Oliveira</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Rationale, goals, and objectives
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preoperative care have been developed for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). The objective of this study was to synthetize recommendations for SAP based on best‐evaluated CPGs.
Methods
A systematic literature search for documents related to SAP, published between January 2011 and December 2016, was conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and specific CPG websites. Three reviewers independently assessed the rigour of development and editorial independence of CPGs based on domains 3 and 6 of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. CPGs with domain 3 scores of 50% and greater were selected for synthesis of recommendations. Two reviewers independently extracted CPG recommendations from among these documents. A third reviewer performed the synthesis of recommendations.
Results
The search retrieved 363 documents, of which 29 CPGs were appraised using AGREE II. Only eight (28%) scored 50% and greater in domain 3. Most CPGs addressed topics related to preoperative care, including SAP. No conflicting recommendations were found, and most recommendations were based on clinical practice. The only recommendation for which there was a difference among CPGs was with respect to the time to initiate the administration of antibiotics (1 hour before or close to the time of the surgical incision). Four CPGs provide recommendations that demonstrate concern about inadequate SAP prolongation.
Conclusion
Several CPGs for SAP were developed without the desired methodological rigour or transparency. Synthesis of recommendations for best‐evaluated CPGs provides a broad approach owing to the complementarity of the recommendations.</description><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - standards</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>clinical guidelines</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice - methods</subject><subject>health care</subject><subject>health services research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - standards</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>systematic reviews</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQJVYs0voRuwk7VJWXKgESrCPXmbSu8sJOgEh8PG5T2OGNLc_x9cxB6JySMfVrsoF6TFkcswM0pFyKgE0FP9yehQx8IRygE-c2hFBOxPQYDTghLCQRG6LvWW5Ko1WOa6t0YzTgVWtS8LfgcFZZ7Fq72gGqbExhtK2WZodX9brL1Zdx1_ilVblpVGM-AKvaJxmncudfpNh1ZbMGZxyuMmxBV0UBZerRqnSn6CjzHJzt9xF6u52_zu6DxdPdw-xmEWguOAtACs0Ui2LG00xyiEIiOZOxEnEoaMxonBESQhQtl5xnWqYiFQz83F4D27IjdNnn-qbfW3BNsqlaW_ovE8YEl1NKOPHUVU_5EZ2zkCW1NYWyXUJJsvWceM_JzrNnL_aJ7bKA9I_8FeuBSQ98mhy6_5OSx_lzH_kDunmIcg</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb</creator><creator>Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite</creator><creator>Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro</creator><creator>Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira</creator><creator>Nascimento, Jéssica Santos</creator><creator>Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline</creator><creator>Melo, Daniela Oliveira</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-7953</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations</title><author>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb ; Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite ; Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro ; Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira ; Nascimento, Jéssica Santos ; Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline ; Melo, Daniela Oliveira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e65c2a28923df63e84063269a594519219f004e88bb33fc6d5d52e12927524063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - standards</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>clinical guidelines</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice - methods</topic><topic>health care</topic><topic>health services research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - standards</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>systematic reviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento, Jéssica Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Daniela Oliveira</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wainberg, Sheila Kalb</au><au>Santos, Nathalia Celini Leite</au><au>Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro</au><au>Vasconcelos, Luciana Pereira</au><au>Nascimento, Jéssica Santos</au><au>Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Caroline</au><au>Melo, Daniela Oliveira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>602</epage><pages>591-602</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Rationale, goals, and objectives
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preoperative care have been developed for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). The objective of this study was to synthetize recommendations for SAP based on best‐evaluated CPGs.
Methods
A systematic literature search for documents related to SAP, published between January 2011 and December 2016, was conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and specific CPG websites. Three reviewers independently assessed the rigour of development and editorial independence of CPGs based on domains 3 and 6 of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. CPGs with domain 3 scores of 50% and greater were selected for synthesis of recommendations. Two reviewers independently extracted CPG recommendations from among these documents. A third reviewer performed the synthesis of recommendations.
Results
The search retrieved 363 documents, of which 29 CPGs were appraised using AGREE II. Only eight (28%) scored 50% and greater in domain 3. Most CPGs addressed topics related to preoperative care, including SAP. No conflicting recommendations were found, and most recommendations were based on clinical practice. The only recommendation for which there was a difference among CPGs was with respect to the time to initiate the administration of antibiotics (1 hour before or close to the time of the surgical incision). Four CPGs provide recommendations that demonstrate concern about inadequate SAP prolongation.
Conclusion
Several CPGs for SAP were developed without the desired methodological rigour or transparency. Synthesis of recommendations for best‐evaluated CPGs provides a broad approach owing to the complementarity of the recommendations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30024082</pmid><doi>10.1111/jep.12992</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-7953</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-1294 |
ispartof | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.591-602 |
issn | 1356-1294 1365-2753 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2253671030 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods Antibiotic Prophylaxis - standards Antibiotics Antimicrobial agents clinical guidelines Clinical medicine Clinical practice guidelines Disease prevention evaluation Evidence-based medicine Evidence-Based Practice - methods health care health services research Humans Infections Practice Guidelines as Topic Preoperative Care - methods Preoperative Care - standards Qualitative research Surgery systematic reviews |
title | Clinical practice guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Qualitative appraisals and synthesis of recommendations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20practice%20guidelines%20for%20surgical%20antimicrobial%20prophylaxis:%20Qualitative%20appraisals%20and%20synthesis%20of%20recommendations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Wainberg,%20Sheila%20Kalb&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=602&rft.pages=591-602&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.12992&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2253671030%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253671030&rft_id=info:pmid/30024082&rfr_iscdi=true |