Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations
This article offers some epistemological and methodological considerations on the topic of measuring creativity across cultures. It starts from reflecting on the key terms-creativity, culture, and measurement-and continues by proposing and illustrating three different types of "logic" that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts creativity, and the arts, 2019-05, Vol.13 (2), p.227-232 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 232 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 227 |
container_title | Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Glăveanu, Vlad Petre |
description | This article offers some epistemological and methodological considerations on the topic of measuring creativity across cultures. It starts from reflecting on the key terms-creativity, culture, and measurement-and continues by proposing and illustrating three different types of "logic" that can underpin the cultural study of creativity. The logic of comparison focuses on standardization and comparability and is specific for most cross-cultural investigations. The logic of exploration highlights differences in creativity assessment between people and groups and focuses on their origins and dynamic, something specific for cultural or sociocultural research. Last but not least, the logic of understanding guides those investigations that operate with local and bottom-up rather than universal, top-down definitions and categories, inspired by what is known as indigenous psychology. By reflecting on the strengths and limitations of each approach, the article ends with some theoretical and practical guidelines for those researchers interested in the study of creativity, culture and their complex, multifaceted relationship. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/aca0000216 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2253223715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2209752839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-808d240cd58d1a5550cd0fd55cb839e3750fd1f0040312083bd37692f8f340503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0WiRa48ASRuIECtidOHG5VVBapFRcQ3CzXdoqrNAm2g9S3x6UsN-Yy26f5ZwahM4KvCIbiWiqJo1GS76ERKYGkUOLXfTQmGQAvac7wwU-Dl_kRGnu_wjgrgOYj9DI30g_OtsukckYG-2HDJpko13mfVEMTBmf8TTLtrQ9m3TXd0irZJLLVydyEt07_lqqu9VYbF2fE6AQd1rLx5vTbH6Pn2-lTdZ_OHu8eqskslUAhpBxzTTOsNOOaSMZYDHGtGVMLDqWBgsWM1HFdDIRiDgsNRV7SmteQYYbhGJ3v5vauex-MD2LVDa6NkoJSBpRCQdj_FC4LRqNapC521Nf1ztSid3Yt3UYQLLa_Fn-_jvDlDpa9FL3fKOmCVY3xanDOtGHLCgKCRoUCPgFDU32z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2209752839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations</title><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</creator><contributor>Goldstein, Thalia ; Vartanian, Oshin ; Reiter-Palmon, Roni ; Barbot, Baptiste</contributor><creatorcontrib>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre ; Goldstein, Thalia ; Vartanian, Oshin ; Reiter-Palmon, Roni ; Barbot, Baptiste</creatorcontrib><description>This article offers some epistemological and methodological considerations on the topic of measuring creativity across cultures. It starts from reflecting on the key terms-creativity, culture, and measurement-and continues by proposing and illustrating three different types of "logic" that can underpin the cultural study of creativity. The logic of comparison focuses on standardization and comparability and is specific for most cross-cultural investigations. The logic of exploration highlights differences in creativity assessment between people and groups and focuses on their origins and dynamic, something specific for cultural or sociocultural research. Last but not least, the logic of understanding guides those investigations that operate with local and bottom-up rather than universal, top-down definitions and categories, inspired by what is known as indigenous psychology. By reflecting on the strengths and limitations of each approach, the article ends with some theoretical and practical guidelines for those researchers interested in the study of creativity, culture and their complex, multifaceted relationship.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-3896</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433892650</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433892653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-390X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/aca0000216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Between Groups Design ; Creativity ; Creativity Assessment ; Cross Cultural Differences ; Cross Cultural Psychology ; Culture ; Culture (Anthropological) ; Epistemology ; Human ; Logical Thinking ; Measurement ; Methods ; Sociocultural Factors</subject><ispartof>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2019-05, Vol.13 (2), p.227-232</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-808d240cd58d1a5550cd0fd55cb839e3750fd1f0040312083bd37692f8f340503</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30972</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Goldstein, Thalia</contributor><contributor>Vartanian, Oshin</contributor><contributor>Reiter-Palmon, Roni</contributor><contributor>Barbot, Baptiste</contributor><creatorcontrib>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations</title><title>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</title><description>This article offers some epistemological and methodological considerations on the topic of measuring creativity across cultures. It starts from reflecting on the key terms-creativity, culture, and measurement-and continues by proposing and illustrating three different types of "logic" that can underpin the cultural study of creativity. The logic of comparison focuses on standardization and comparability and is specific for most cross-cultural investigations. The logic of exploration highlights differences in creativity assessment between people and groups and focuses on their origins and dynamic, something specific for cultural or sociocultural research. Last but not least, the logic of understanding guides those investigations that operate with local and bottom-up rather than universal, top-down definitions and categories, inspired by what is known as indigenous psychology. By reflecting on the strengths and limitations of each approach, the article ends with some theoretical and practical guidelines for those researchers interested in the study of creativity, culture and their complex, multifaceted relationship.</description><subject>Between Groups Design</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Creativity Assessment</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Differences</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Psychology</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Culture (Anthropological)</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Logical Thinking</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Sociocultural Factors</subject><issn>1931-3896</issn><issn>1931-390X</issn><isbn>1433892650</isbn><isbn>9781433892653</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0WiRa48ASRuIECtidOHG5VVBapFRcQ3CzXdoqrNAm2g9S3x6UsN-Yy26f5ZwahM4KvCIbiWiqJo1GS76ERKYGkUOLXfTQmGQAvac7wwU-Dl_kRGnu_wjgrgOYj9DI30g_OtsukckYG-2HDJpko13mfVEMTBmf8TTLtrQ9m3TXd0irZJLLVydyEt07_lqqu9VYbF2fE6AQd1rLx5vTbH6Pn2-lTdZ_OHu8eqskslUAhpBxzTTOsNOOaSMZYDHGtGVMLDqWBgsWM1HFdDIRiDgsNRV7SmteQYYbhGJ3v5vauex-MD2LVDa6NkoJSBpRCQdj_FC4LRqNapC521Nf1ztSid3Yt3UYQLLa_Fn-_jvDlDpa9FL3fKOmCVY3xanDOtGHLCgKCRoUCPgFDU32z</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QI</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>~I4</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations</title><author>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-808d240cd58d1a5550cd0fd55cb839e3750fd1f0040312083bd37692f8f340503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Between Groups Design</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Creativity Assessment</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Differences</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Psychology</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Culture (Anthropological)</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Logical Thinking</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Sociocultural Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</au><au>Goldstein, Thalia</au><au>Vartanian, Oshin</au><au>Reiter-Palmon, Roni</au><au>Barbot, Baptiste</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>227-232</pages><issn>1931-3896</issn><eissn>1931-390X</eissn><isbn>1433892650</isbn><isbn>9781433892653</isbn><abstract>This article offers some epistemological and methodological considerations on the topic of measuring creativity across cultures. It starts from reflecting on the key terms-creativity, culture, and measurement-and continues by proposing and illustrating three different types of "logic" that can underpin the cultural study of creativity. The logic of comparison focuses on standardization and comparability and is specific for most cross-cultural investigations. The logic of exploration highlights differences in creativity assessment between people and groups and focuses on their origins and dynamic, something specific for cultural or sociocultural research. Last but not least, the logic of understanding guides those investigations that operate with local and bottom-up rather than universal, top-down definitions and categories, inspired by what is known as indigenous psychology. By reflecting on the strengths and limitations of each approach, the article ends with some theoretical and practical guidelines for those researchers interested in the study of creativity, culture and their complex, multifaceted relationship.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/aca0000216</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1931-3896 |
ispartof | Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2019-05, Vol.13 (2), p.227-232 |
issn | 1931-3896 1931-390X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2253223715 |
source | ARTbibliographies Modern; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Between Groups Design Creativity Creativity Assessment Cross Cultural Differences Cross Cultural Psychology Culture Culture (Anthropological) Epistemology Human Logical Thinking Measurement Methods Sociocultural Factors |
title | Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A02%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Creativity%20Across%20Cultures:%20Epistemological%20and%20Methodological%20Considerations&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20aesthetics,%20creativity,%20and%20the%20arts&rft.au=Gl%C4%83veanu,%20Vlad%20Petre&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=227-232&rft.issn=1931-3896&rft.eissn=1931-390X&rft.isbn=1433892650&rft.isbn_list=9781433892653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/aca0000216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2209752839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2209752839&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |