Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations

This article offers some epistemological and methodological considerations on the topic of measuring creativity across cultures. It starts from reflecting on the key terms-creativity, culture, and measurement-and continues by proposing and illustrating three different types of "logic" that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts creativity, and the arts, 2019-05, Vol.13 (2), p.227-232
1. Verfasser: Glăveanu, Vlad Petre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 2
container_start_page 227
container_title Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts
container_volume 13
creator Glăveanu, Vlad Petre
description This article offers some epistemological and methodological considerations on the topic of measuring creativity across cultures. It starts from reflecting on the key terms-creativity, culture, and measurement-and continues by proposing and illustrating three different types of "logic" that can underpin the cultural study of creativity. The logic of comparison focuses on standardization and comparability and is specific for most cross-cultural investigations. The logic of exploration highlights differences in creativity assessment between people and groups and focuses on their origins and dynamic, something specific for cultural or sociocultural research. Last but not least, the logic of understanding guides those investigations that operate with local and bottom-up rather than universal, top-down definitions and categories, inspired by what is known as indigenous psychology. By reflecting on the strengths and limitations of each approach, the article ends with some theoretical and practical guidelines for those researchers interested in the study of creativity, culture and their complex, multifaceted relationship.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/aca0000216
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2253223715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2209752839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-808d240cd58d1a5550cd0fd55cb839e3750fd1f0040312083bd37692f8f340503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0WiRa48ASRuIECtidOHG5VVBapFRcQ3CzXdoqrNAm2g9S3x6UsN-Yy26f5ZwahM4KvCIbiWiqJo1GS76ERKYGkUOLXfTQmGQAvac7wwU-Dl_kRGnu_wjgrgOYj9DI30g_OtsukckYG-2HDJpko13mfVEMTBmf8TTLtrQ9m3TXd0irZJLLVydyEt07_lqqu9VYbF2fE6AQd1rLx5vTbH6Pn2-lTdZ_OHu8eqskslUAhpBxzTTOsNOOaSMZYDHGtGVMLDqWBgsWM1HFdDIRiDgsNRV7SmteQYYbhGJ3v5vauex-MD2LVDa6NkoJSBpRCQdj_FC4LRqNapC521Nf1ztSid3Yt3UYQLLa_Fn-_jvDlDpa9FL3fKOmCVY3xanDOtGHLCgKCRoUCPgFDU32z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2209752839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations</title><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</creator><contributor>Goldstein, Thalia ; Vartanian, Oshin ; Reiter-Palmon, Roni ; Barbot, Baptiste</contributor><creatorcontrib>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre ; Goldstein, Thalia ; Vartanian, Oshin ; Reiter-Palmon, Roni ; Barbot, Baptiste</creatorcontrib><description>This article offers some epistemological and methodological considerations on the topic of measuring creativity across cultures. It starts from reflecting on the key terms-creativity, culture, and measurement-and continues by proposing and illustrating three different types of "logic" that can underpin the cultural study of creativity. The logic of comparison focuses on standardization and comparability and is specific for most cross-cultural investigations. The logic of exploration highlights differences in creativity assessment between people and groups and focuses on their origins and dynamic, something specific for cultural or sociocultural research. Last but not least, the logic of understanding guides those investigations that operate with local and bottom-up rather than universal, top-down definitions and categories, inspired by what is known as indigenous psychology. By reflecting on the strengths and limitations of each approach, the article ends with some theoretical and practical guidelines for those researchers interested in the study of creativity, culture and their complex, multifaceted relationship.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-3896</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433892650</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433892653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-390X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/aca0000216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Between Groups Design ; Creativity ; Creativity Assessment ; Cross Cultural Differences ; Cross Cultural Psychology ; Culture ; Culture (Anthropological) ; Epistemology ; Human ; Logical Thinking ; Measurement ; Methods ; Sociocultural Factors</subject><ispartof>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2019-05, Vol.13 (2), p.227-232</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-808d240cd58d1a5550cd0fd55cb839e3750fd1f0040312083bd37692f8f340503</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30972</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Goldstein, Thalia</contributor><contributor>Vartanian, Oshin</contributor><contributor>Reiter-Palmon, Roni</contributor><contributor>Barbot, Baptiste</contributor><creatorcontrib>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations</title><title>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</title><description>This article offers some epistemological and methodological considerations on the topic of measuring creativity across cultures. It starts from reflecting on the key terms-creativity, culture, and measurement-and continues by proposing and illustrating three different types of "logic" that can underpin the cultural study of creativity. The logic of comparison focuses on standardization and comparability and is specific for most cross-cultural investigations. The logic of exploration highlights differences in creativity assessment between people and groups and focuses on their origins and dynamic, something specific for cultural or sociocultural research. Last but not least, the logic of understanding guides those investigations that operate with local and bottom-up rather than universal, top-down definitions and categories, inspired by what is known as indigenous psychology. By reflecting on the strengths and limitations of each approach, the article ends with some theoretical and practical guidelines for those researchers interested in the study of creativity, culture and their complex, multifaceted relationship.</description><subject>Between Groups Design</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Creativity Assessment</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Differences</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Psychology</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Culture (Anthropological)</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Logical Thinking</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Sociocultural Factors</subject><issn>1931-3896</issn><issn>1931-390X</issn><isbn>1433892650</isbn><isbn>9781433892653</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0WiRa48ASRuIECtidOHG5VVBapFRcQ3CzXdoqrNAm2g9S3x6UsN-Yy26f5ZwahM4KvCIbiWiqJo1GS76ERKYGkUOLXfTQmGQAvac7wwU-Dl_kRGnu_wjgrgOYj9DI30g_OtsukckYG-2HDJpko13mfVEMTBmf8TTLtrQ9m3TXd0irZJLLVydyEt07_lqqu9VYbF2fE6AQd1rLx5vTbH6Pn2-lTdZ_OHu8eqskslUAhpBxzTTOsNOOaSMZYDHGtGVMLDqWBgsWM1HFdDIRiDgsNRV7SmteQYYbhGJ3v5vauex-MD2LVDa6NkoJSBpRCQdj_FC4LRqNapC521Nf1ztSid3Yt3UYQLLa_Fn-_jvDlDpa9FL3fKOmCVY3xanDOtGHLCgKCRoUCPgFDU32z</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QI</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>~I4</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations</title><author>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-808d240cd58d1a5550cd0fd55cb839e3750fd1f0040312083bd37692f8f340503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Between Groups Design</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Creativity Assessment</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Differences</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Psychology</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Culture (Anthropological)</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Logical Thinking</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Sociocultural Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glăveanu, Vlad Petre</au><au>Goldstein, Thalia</au><au>Vartanian, Oshin</au><au>Reiter-Palmon, Roni</au><au>Barbot, Baptiste</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>227-232</pages><issn>1931-3896</issn><eissn>1931-390X</eissn><isbn>1433892650</isbn><isbn>9781433892653</isbn><abstract>This article offers some epistemological and methodological considerations on the topic of measuring creativity across cultures. It starts from reflecting on the key terms-creativity, culture, and measurement-and continues by proposing and illustrating three different types of "logic" that can underpin the cultural study of creativity. The logic of comparison focuses on standardization and comparability and is specific for most cross-cultural investigations. The logic of exploration highlights differences in creativity assessment between people and groups and focuses on their origins and dynamic, something specific for cultural or sociocultural research. Last but not least, the logic of understanding guides those investigations that operate with local and bottom-up rather than universal, top-down definitions and categories, inspired by what is known as indigenous psychology. By reflecting on the strengths and limitations of each approach, the article ends with some theoretical and practical guidelines for those researchers interested in the study of creativity, culture and their complex, multifaceted relationship.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/aca0000216</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-3896
ispartof Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2019-05, Vol.13 (2), p.227-232
issn 1931-3896
1931-390X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2253223715
source ARTbibliographies Modern; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Between Groups Design
Creativity
Creativity Assessment
Cross Cultural Differences
Cross Cultural Psychology
Culture
Culture (Anthropological)
Epistemology
Human
Logical Thinking
Measurement
Methods
Sociocultural Factors
title Measuring Creativity Across Cultures: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A02%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Creativity%20Across%20Cultures:%20Epistemological%20and%20Methodological%20Considerations&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20aesthetics,%20creativity,%20and%20the%20arts&rft.au=Gl%C4%83veanu,%20Vlad%20Petre&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=227-232&rft.issn=1931-3896&rft.eissn=1931-390X&rft.isbn=1433892650&rft.isbn_list=9781433892653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/aca0000216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2209752839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2209752839&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true