Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys

Most medications prescribed for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder are psychomotor stimulants with reinforcing effects in laboratory animals (eg methylphenidate). The present studies were conducted to evaluate the reinforcing effects of the recently approved medication atomoxetine in monkeys t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2005-04, Vol.30 (4), p.758-764
Hauptverfasser: GASIOR, Maciej, BERGMAN, Jack, KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne, PARONIS, Carol A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 764
container_issue 4
container_start_page 758
container_title Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 30
creator GASIOR, Maciej
BERGMAN, Jack
KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne
PARONIS, Carol A
description Most medications prescribed for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder are psychomotor stimulants with reinforcing effects in laboratory animals (eg methylphenidate). The present studies were conducted to evaluate the reinforcing effects of the recently approved medication atomoxetine in monkeys trained to 'choose' between automated deliveries of either an i.v. injection or food. Rhesus monkeys were trained to lever-press under concurrent schedules of reinforcement; responses on one lever resulted in an injection of either saline or drug, and responses on the alternative lever resulted in food delivery. Data were collected on four measures: response rates, percentage of total responses occurring on the injection-lever (% ILR), number of injections earned, and number of food pellets earned. Dose-effect functions were determined for cocaine (0.003-0.3 mg/kg/inj), methylphenidate (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), amphetamine (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), atomoxetine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg/inj), and desipramine (0.03-1.0 mg/kg/inj) using a double alternation schedule of saline and drug availability. Results indicate that the distribution of behavior changed according to the drug and dose available for self-injection. Saline availability was typically associated with high rates of food-maintained responding. The % ILR increased from 3+/-1% when saline was available to >90% when >0.03 mg/kg/inj of cocaine, methylphenidate or d-amphetamine was available. However, no dose of atomoxetine or desipramine maintained self-administration behavior on the injection-lever. The number of food pellets earned per session decreased as the dose of each drug increased, indicative of behavioral activity with all five drugs. The reinforcing effects of cocaine, methylphenidate, and d-amphetamine in these studies are consistent with previous findings in nonhuman primates and with their documented abuse liability. The absence of reinforcing effects of atomoxetine support the view that, like desipramine, it has no evident abuse potential.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/sj.npp.1300593
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_225235731</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>971693391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-898b48efc747aeb4266b50a05069b1d9d018cfebc826a5c7e5d69ebdf40a70783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0c1u1DAUBWALgehQ2LIDWUgsE-w4dpIlmk7LSEVIhaLuIse57niasYN_Ks1z8MJNNJFm5cX97rmSD0IfKckpYfW3sM_tOOaUEcIb9gqtaFWSTLDy4TVakbphGWXs4QK9C2FPCOWVqN-iC8p5IQghK_R_8yyHJKNxFjuN4w7wHRirnVfGPuKN1qBimEc_nXXyYOwM0hjlE-Ct3ZnOROcDvrc9eCzx2lmVvAcb8W-1gz4NMC9fO9djaXu8zf_m-MqnR3wFg3kGf8TG4rsdhBTmE09wDO_RGy2HAB-W9xLdX2_-rH9kt79utuvvt5kqaRGzuqm7sgatqrKS0JWFEB0nknAimo72TU9orTR0qi6E5KoC3osGul6XRFakqtkl-nLKHb37lyDEdu-St9PJtih4wXjF6ITyE1LeheBBt6M3B-mPLSXtXEEb9u1UQbtUMC18XlJTd4D-zJc_n8DXBcig5KC9tMqEsxOibEQ5B306OStj8nAGy6EX3gqazA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225235731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>GASIOR, Maciej ; BERGMAN, Jack ; KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne ; PARONIS, Carol A</creator><creatorcontrib>GASIOR, Maciej ; BERGMAN, Jack ; KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne ; PARONIS, Carol A</creatorcontrib><description>Most medications prescribed for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder are psychomotor stimulants with reinforcing effects in laboratory animals (eg methylphenidate). The present studies were conducted to evaluate the reinforcing effects of the recently approved medication atomoxetine in monkeys trained to 'choose' between automated deliveries of either an i.v. injection or food. Rhesus monkeys were trained to lever-press under concurrent schedules of reinforcement; responses on one lever resulted in an injection of either saline or drug, and responses on the alternative lever resulted in food delivery. Data were collected on four measures: response rates, percentage of total responses occurring on the injection-lever (% ILR), number of injections earned, and number of food pellets earned. Dose-effect functions were determined for cocaine (0.003-0.3 mg/kg/inj), methylphenidate (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), amphetamine (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), atomoxetine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg/inj), and desipramine (0.03-1.0 mg/kg/inj) using a double alternation schedule of saline and drug availability. Results indicate that the distribution of behavior changed according to the drug and dose available for self-injection. Saline availability was typically associated with high rates of food-maintained responding. The % ILR increased from 3+/-1% when saline was available to &gt;90% when &gt;0.03 mg/kg/inj of cocaine, methylphenidate or d-amphetamine was available. However, no dose of atomoxetine or desipramine maintained self-administration behavior on the injection-lever. The number of food pellets earned per session decreased as the dose of each drug increased, indicative of behavioral activity with all five drugs. The reinforcing effects of cocaine, methylphenidate, and d-amphetamine in these studies are consistent with previous findings in nonhuman primates and with their documented abuse liability. The absence of reinforcing effects of atomoxetine support the view that, like desipramine, it has no evident abuse potential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-133X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-634X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300593</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15526000</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEROEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Nature Publishing</publisher><subject>Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects ; Animals ; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride ; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy ; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - metabolism ; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - drug effects ; Brain - metabolism ; Brain - physiopathology ; Central Nervous System Stimulants - adverse effects ; Cocaine - adverse effects ; Desipramine - adverse effects ; Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects ; Disease Models, Animal ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Eating - drug effects ; Eating - physiology ; Female ; Infusion Pumps ; Macaca mulatta ; Medical sciences ; Methylphenidate - adverse effects ; Neuropharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Propylamines - adverse effects ; Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease) ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopharmacology ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Self Administration ; Substance-Related Disorders - metabolism ; Substance-Related Disorders - physiopathology ; Substance-Related Disorders - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.), 2005-04, Vol.30 (4), p.758-764</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-898b48efc747aeb4266b50a05069b1d9d018cfebc826a5c7e5d69ebdf40a70783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-898b48efc747aeb4266b50a05069b1d9d018cfebc826a5c7e5d69ebdf40a70783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16649643$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15526000$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GASIOR, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERGMAN, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARONIS, Carol A</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys</title><title>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology</addtitle><description>Most medications prescribed for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder are psychomotor stimulants with reinforcing effects in laboratory animals (eg methylphenidate). The present studies were conducted to evaluate the reinforcing effects of the recently approved medication atomoxetine in monkeys trained to 'choose' between automated deliveries of either an i.v. injection or food. Rhesus monkeys were trained to lever-press under concurrent schedules of reinforcement; responses on one lever resulted in an injection of either saline or drug, and responses on the alternative lever resulted in food delivery. Data were collected on four measures: response rates, percentage of total responses occurring on the injection-lever (% ILR), number of injections earned, and number of food pellets earned. Dose-effect functions were determined for cocaine (0.003-0.3 mg/kg/inj), methylphenidate (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), amphetamine (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), atomoxetine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg/inj), and desipramine (0.03-1.0 mg/kg/inj) using a double alternation schedule of saline and drug availability. Results indicate that the distribution of behavior changed according to the drug and dose available for self-injection. Saline availability was typically associated with high rates of food-maintained responding. The % ILR increased from 3+/-1% when saline was available to &gt;90% when &gt;0.03 mg/kg/inj of cocaine, methylphenidate or d-amphetamine was available. However, no dose of atomoxetine or desipramine maintained self-administration behavior on the injection-lever. The number of food pellets earned per session decreased as the dose of each drug increased, indicative of behavioral activity with all five drugs. The reinforcing effects of cocaine, methylphenidate, and d-amphetamine in these studies are consistent with previous findings in nonhuman primates and with their documented abuse liability. The absence of reinforcing effects of atomoxetine support the view that, like desipramine, it has no evident abuse potential.</description><subject>Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Atomoxetine Hydrochloride</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - metabolism</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - drug effects</subject><subject>Brain - metabolism</subject><subject>Brain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Stimulants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cocaine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Desipramine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Eating - drug effects</subject><subject>Eating - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Infusion Pumps</subject><subject>Macaca mulatta</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methylphenidate - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Propylamines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease)</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopharmacology</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Self Administration</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - metabolism</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0893-133X</issn><issn>1740-634X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0c1u1DAUBWALgehQ2LIDWUgsE-w4dpIlmk7LSEVIhaLuIse57niasYN_Ks1z8MJNNJFm5cX97rmSD0IfKckpYfW3sM_tOOaUEcIb9gqtaFWSTLDy4TVakbphGWXs4QK9C2FPCOWVqN-iC8p5IQghK_R_8yyHJKNxFjuN4w7wHRirnVfGPuKN1qBimEc_nXXyYOwM0hjlE-Ct3ZnOROcDvrc9eCzx2lmVvAcb8W-1gz4NMC9fO9djaXu8zf_m-MqnR3wFg3kGf8TG4rsdhBTmE09wDO_RGy2HAB-W9xLdX2_-rH9kt79utuvvt5kqaRGzuqm7sgatqrKS0JWFEB0nknAimo72TU9orTR0qi6E5KoC3osGul6XRFakqtkl-nLKHb37lyDEdu-St9PJtih4wXjF6ITyE1LeheBBt6M3B-mPLSXtXEEb9u1UQbtUMC18XlJTd4D-zJc_n8DXBcig5KC9tMqEsxOibEQ5B306OStj8nAGy6EX3gqazA</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>GASIOR, Maciej</creator><creator>BERGMAN, Jack</creator><creator>KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne</creator><creator>PARONIS, Carol A</creator><general>Nature Publishing</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys</title><author>GASIOR, Maciej ; BERGMAN, Jack ; KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne ; PARONIS, Carol A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-898b48efc747aeb4266b50a05069b1d9d018cfebc826a5c7e5d69ebdf40a70783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Atomoxetine Hydrochloride</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - metabolism</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - drug effects</topic><topic>Brain - metabolism</topic><topic>Brain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Stimulants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cocaine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Desipramine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Eating - drug effects</topic><topic>Eating - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Infusion Pumps</topic><topic>Macaca mulatta</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methylphenidate - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Propylamines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease)</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopharmacology</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Self Administration</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - metabolism</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GASIOR, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERGMAN, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARONIS, Carol A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GASIOR, Maciej</au><au>BERGMAN, Jack</au><au>KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne</au><au>PARONIS, Carol A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>758</spage><epage>764</epage><pages>758-764</pages><issn>0893-133X</issn><eissn>1740-634X</eissn><coden>NEROEW</coden><abstract>Most medications prescribed for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder are psychomotor stimulants with reinforcing effects in laboratory animals (eg methylphenidate). The present studies were conducted to evaluate the reinforcing effects of the recently approved medication atomoxetine in monkeys trained to 'choose' between automated deliveries of either an i.v. injection or food. Rhesus monkeys were trained to lever-press under concurrent schedules of reinforcement; responses on one lever resulted in an injection of either saline or drug, and responses on the alternative lever resulted in food delivery. Data were collected on four measures: response rates, percentage of total responses occurring on the injection-lever (% ILR), number of injections earned, and number of food pellets earned. Dose-effect functions were determined for cocaine (0.003-0.3 mg/kg/inj), methylphenidate (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), amphetamine (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), atomoxetine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg/inj), and desipramine (0.03-1.0 mg/kg/inj) using a double alternation schedule of saline and drug availability. Results indicate that the distribution of behavior changed according to the drug and dose available for self-injection. Saline availability was typically associated with high rates of food-maintained responding. The % ILR increased from 3+/-1% when saline was available to &gt;90% when &gt;0.03 mg/kg/inj of cocaine, methylphenidate or d-amphetamine was available. However, no dose of atomoxetine or desipramine maintained self-administration behavior on the injection-lever. The number of food pellets earned per session decreased as the dose of each drug increased, indicative of behavioral activity with all five drugs. The reinforcing effects of cocaine, methylphenidate, and d-amphetamine in these studies are consistent with previous findings in nonhuman primates and with their documented abuse liability. The absence of reinforcing effects of atomoxetine support the view that, like desipramine, it has no evident abuse potential.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Nature Publishing</pub><pmid>15526000</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.npp.1300593</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-133X
ispartof Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.), 2005-04, Vol.30 (4), p.758-764
issn 0893-133X
1740-634X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_225235731
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects
Animals
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - metabolism
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - physiopathology
Biological and medical sciences
Brain - drug effects
Brain - metabolism
Brain - physiopathology
Central Nervous System Stimulants - adverse effects
Cocaine - adverse effects
Desipramine - adverse effects
Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects
Disease Models, Animal
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Eating - drug effects
Eating - physiology
Female
Infusion Pumps
Macaca mulatta
Medical sciences
Methylphenidate - adverse effects
Neuropharmacology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Propylamines - adverse effects
Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease)
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopharmacology
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Self Administration
Substance-Related Disorders - metabolism
Substance-Related Disorders - physiopathology
Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control
title Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A34%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Reinforcing%20Effects%20of%20Monoamine%20Reuptake%20Inhibitors%20Under%20a%20Concurrent%20Schedule%20of%20Food%20and%20I.V.%20Drug%20Delivery%20in%20Rhesus%20Monkeys&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychopharmacology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=GASIOR,%20Maciej&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=758&rft.epage=764&rft.pages=758-764&rft.issn=0893-133X&rft.eissn=1740-634X&rft.coden=NEROEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.npp.1300593&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E971693391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225235731&rft_id=info:pmid/15526000&rfr_iscdi=true