Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys
Most medications prescribed for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder are psychomotor stimulants with reinforcing effects in laboratory animals (eg methylphenidate). The present studies were conducted to evaluate the reinforcing effects of the recently approved medication atomoxetine in monkeys t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2005-04, Vol.30 (4), p.758-764 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 764 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 758 |
container_title | Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | GASIOR, Maciej BERGMAN, Jack KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne PARONIS, Carol A |
description | Most medications prescribed for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder are psychomotor stimulants with reinforcing effects in laboratory animals (eg methylphenidate). The present studies were conducted to evaluate the reinforcing effects of the recently approved medication atomoxetine in monkeys trained to 'choose' between automated deliveries of either an i.v. injection or food. Rhesus monkeys were trained to lever-press under concurrent schedules of reinforcement; responses on one lever resulted in an injection of either saline or drug, and responses on the alternative lever resulted in food delivery. Data were collected on four measures: response rates, percentage of total responses occurring on the injection-lever (% ILR), number of injections earned, and number of food pellets earned. Dose-effect functions were determined for cocaine (0.003-0.3 mg/kg/inj), methylphenidate (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), amphetamine (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), atomoxetine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg/inj), and desipramine (0.03-1.0 mg/kg/inj) using a double alternation schedule of saline and drug availability. Results indicate that the distribution of behavior changed according to the drug and dose available for self-injection. Saline availability was typically associated with high rates of food-maintained responding. The % ILR increased from 3+/-1% when saline was available to >90% when >0.03 mg/kg/inj of cocaine, methylphenidate or d-amphetamine was available. However, no dose of atomoxetine or desipramine maintained self-administration behavior on the injection-lever. The number of food pellets earned per session decreased as the dose of each drug increased, indicative of behavioral activity with all five drugs. The reinforcing effects of cocaine, methylphenidate, and d-amphetamine in these studies are consistent with previous findings in nonhuman primates and with their documented abuse liability. The absence of reinforcing effects of atomoxetine support the view that, like desipramine, it has no evident abuse potential. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sj.npp.1300593 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_225235731</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>971693391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-898b48efc747aeb4266b50a05069b1d9d018cfebc826a5c7e5d69ebdf40a70783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0c1u1DAUBWALgehQ2LIDWUgsE-w4dpIlmk7LSEVIhaLuIse57niasYN_Ks1z8MJNNJFm5cX97rmSD0IfKckpYfW3sM_tOOaUEcIb9gqtaFWSTLDy4TVakbphGWXs4QK9C2FPCOWVqN-iC8p5IQghK_R_8yyHJKNxFjuN4w7wHRirnVfGPuKN1qBimEc_nXXyYOwM0hjlE-Ct3ZnOROcDvrc9eCzx2lmVvAcb8W-1gz4NMC9fO9djaXu8zf_m-MqnR3wFg3kGf8TG4rsdhBTmE09wDO_RGy2HAB-W9xLdX2_-rH9kt79utuvvt5kqaRGzuqm7sgatqrKS0JWFEB0nknAimo72TU9orTR0qi6E5KoC3osGul6XRFakqtkl-nLKHb37lyDEdu-St9PJtih4wXjF6ITyE1LeheBBt6M3B-mPLSXtXEEb9u1UQbtUMC18XlJTd4D-zJc_n8DXBcig5KC9tMqEsxOibEQ5B306OStj8nAGy6EX3gqazA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225235731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>GASIOR, Maciej ; BERGMAN, Jack ; KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne ; PARONIS, Carol A</creator><creatorcontrib>GASIOR, Maciej ; BERGMAN, Jack ; KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne ; PARONIS, Carol A</creatorcontrib><description>Most medications prescribed for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder are psychomotor stimulants with reinforcing effects in laboratory animals (eg methylphenidate). The present studies were conducted to evaluate the reinforcing effects of the recently approved medication atomoxetine in monkeys trained to 'choose' between automated deliveries of either an i.v. injection or food. Rhesus monkeys were trained to lever-press under concurrent schedules of reinforcement; responses on one lever resulted in an injection of either saline or drug, and responses on the alternative lever resulted in food delivery. Data were collected on four measures: response rates, percentage of total responses occurring on the injection-lever (% ILR), number of injections earned, and number of food pellets earned. Dose-effect functions were determined for cocaine (0.003-0.3 mg/kg/inj), methylphenidate (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), amphetamine (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), atomoxetine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg/inj), and desipramine (0.03-1.0 mg/kg/inj) using a double alternation schedule of saline and drug availability. Results indicate that the distribution of behavior changed according to the drug and dose available for self-injection. Saline availability was typically associated with high rates of food-maintained responding. The % ILR increased from 3+/-1% when saline was available to >90% when >0.03 mg/kg/inj of cocaine, methylphenidate or d-amphetamine was available. However, no dose of atomoxetine or desipramine maintained self-administration behavior on the injection-lever. The number of food pellets earned per session decreased as the dose of each drug increased, indicative of behavioral activity with all five drugs. The reinforcing effects of cocaine, methylphenidate, and d-amphetamine in these studies are consistent with previous findings in nonhuman primates and with their documented abuse liability. The absence of reinforcing effects of atomoxetine support the view that, like desipramine, it has no evident abuse potential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-133X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-634X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300593</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15526000</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEROEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Nature Publishing</publisher><subject>Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects ; Animals ; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride ; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy ; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - metabolism ; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - drug effects ; Brain - metabolism ; Brain - physiopathology ; Central Nervous System Stimulants - adverse effects ; Cocaine - adverse effects ; Desipramine - adverse effects ; Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects ; Disease Models, Animal ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Eating - drug effects ; Eating - physiology ; Female ; Infusion Pumps ; Macaca mulatta ; Medical sciences ; Methylphenidate - adverse effects ; Neuropharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Propylamines - adverse effects ; Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease) ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopharmacology ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Self Administration ; Substance-Related Disorders - metabolism ; Substance-Related Disorders - physiopathology ; Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.), 2005-04, Vol.30 (4), p.758-764</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-898b48efc747aeb4266b50a05069b1d9d018cfebc826a5c7e5d69ebdf40a70783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-898b48efc747aeb4266b50a05069b1d9d018cfebc826a5c7e5d69ebdf40a70783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16649643$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15526000$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GASIOR, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERGMAN, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARONIS, Carol A</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys</title><title>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology</addtitle><description>Most medications prescribed for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder are psychomotor stimulants with reinforcing effects in laboratory animals (eg methylphenidate). The present studies were conducted to evaluate the reinforcing effects of the recently approved medication atomoxetine in monkeys trained to 'choose' between automated deliveries of either an i.v. injection or food. Rhesus monkeys were trained to lever-press under concurrent schedules of reinforcement; responses on one lever resulted in an injection of either saline or drug, and responses on the alternative lever resulted in food delivery. Data were collected on four measures: response rates, percentage of total responses occurring on the injection-lever (% ILR), number of injections earned, and number of food pellets earned. Dose-effect functions were determined for cocaine (0.003-0.3 mg/kg/inj), methylphenidate (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), amphetamine (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), atomoxetine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg/inj), and desipramine (0.03-1.0 mg/kg/inj) using a double alternation schedule of saline and drug availability. Results indicate that the distribution of behavior changed according to the drug and dose available for self-injection. Saline availability was typically associated with high rates of food-maintained responding. The % ILR increased from 3+/-1% when saline was available to >90% when >0.03 mg/kg/inj of cocaine, methylphenidate or d-amphetamine was available. However, no dose of atomoxetine or desipramine maintained self-administration behavior on the injection-lever. The number of food pellets earned per session decreased as the dose of each drug increased, indicative of behavioral activity with all five drugs. The reinforcing effects of cocaine, methylphenidate, and d-amphetamine in these studies are consistent with previous findings in nonhuman primates and with their documented abuse liability. The absence of reinforcing effects of atomoxetine support the view that, like desipramine, it has no evident abuse potential.</description><subject>Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Atomoxetine Hydrochloride</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - metabolism</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - drug effects</subject><subject>Brain - metabolism</subject><subject>Brain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Stimulants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cocaine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Desipramine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Eating - drug effects</subject><subject>Eating - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Infusion Pumps</subject><subject>Macaca mulatta</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methylphenidate - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Propylamines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease)</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopharmacology</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Self Administration</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - metabolism</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control</subject><issn>0893-133X</issn><issn>1740-634X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0c1u1DAUBWALgehQ2LIDWUgsE-w4dpIlmk7LSEVIhaLuIse57niasYN_Ks1z8MJNNJFm5cX97rmSD0IfKckpYfW3sM_tOOaUEcIb9gqtaFWSTLDy4TVakbphGWXs4QK9C2FPCOWVqN-iC8p5IQghK_R_8yyHJKNxFjuN4w7wHRirnVfGPuKN1qBimEc_nXXyYOwM0hjlE-Ct3ZnOROcDvrc9eCzx2lmVvAcb8W-1gz4NMC9fO9djaXu8zf_m-MqnR3wFg3kGf8TG4rsdhBTmE09wDO_RGy2HAB-W9xLdX2_-rH9kt79utuvvt5kqaRGzuqm7sgatqrKS0JWFEB0nknAimo72TU9orTR0qi6E5KoC3osGul6XRFakqtkl-nLKHb37lyDEdu-St9PJtih4wXjF6ITyE1LeheBBt6M3B-mPLSXtXEEb9u1UQbtUMC18XlJTd4D-zJc_n8DXBcig5KC9tMqEsxOibEQ5B306OStj8nAGy6EX3gqazA</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>GASIOR, Maciej</creator><creator>BERGMAN, Jack</creator><creator>KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne</creator><creator>PARONIS, Carol A</creator><general>Nature Publishing</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys</title><author>GASIOR, Maciej ; BERGMAN, Jack ; KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne ; PARONIS, Carol A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-898b48efc747aeb4266b50a05069b1d9d018cfebc826a5c7e5d69ebdf40a70783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Atomoxetine Hydrochloride</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - metabolism</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - drug effects</topic><topic>Brain - metabolism</topic><topic>Brain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Stimulants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cocaine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Desipramine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Eating - drug effects</topic><topic>Eating - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Infusion Pumps</topic><topic>Macaca mulatta</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methylphenidate - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Propylamines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease)</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopharmacology</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Self Administration</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - metabolism</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GASIOR, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERGMAN, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARONIS, Carol A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GASIOR, Maciej</au><au>BERGMAN, Jack</au><au>KALLMAN, Mary Jeanne</au><au>PARONIS, Carol A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>758</spage><epage>764</epage><pages>758-764</pages><issn>0893-133X</issn><eissn>1740-634X</eissn><coden>NEROEW</coden><abstract>Most medications prescribed for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder are psychomotor stimulants with reinforcing effects in laboratory animals (eg methylphenidate). The present studies were conducted to evaluate the reinforcing effects of the recently approved medication atomoxetine in monkeys trained to 'choose' between automated deliveries of either an i.v. injection or food. Rhesus monkeys were trained to lever-press under concurrent schedules of reinforcement; responses on one lever resulted in an injection of either saline or drug, and responses on the alternative lever resulted in food delivery. Data were collected on four measures: response rates, percentage of total responses occurring on the injection-lever (% ILR), number of injections earned, and number of food pellets earned. Dose-effect functions were determined for cocaine (0.003-0.3 mg/kg/inj), methylphenidate (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), amphetamine (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/inj), atomoxetine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg/inj), and desipramine (0.03-1.0 mg/kg/inj) using a double alternation schedule of saline and drug availability. Results indicate that the distribution of behavior changed according to the drug and dose available for self-injection. Saline availability was typically associated with high rates of food-maintained responding. The % ILR increased from 3+/-1% when saline was available to >90% when >0.03 mg/kg/inj of cocaine, methylphenidate or d-amphetamine was available. However, no dose of atomoxetine or desipramine maintained self-administration behavior on the injection-lever. The number of food pellets earned per session decreased as the dose of each drug increased, indicative of behavioral activity with all five drugs. The reinforcing effects of cocaine, methylphenidate, and d-amphetamine in these studies are consistent with previous findings in nonhuman primates and with their documented abuse liability. The absence of reinforcing effects of atomoxetine support the view that, like desipramine, it has no evident abuse potential.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Nature Publishing</pub><pmid>15526000</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.npp.1300593</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0893-133X |
ispartof | Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.), 2005-04, Vol.30 (4), p.758-764 |
issn | 0893-133X 1740-634X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_225235731 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects Animals Atomoxetine Hydrochloride Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - metabolism Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - physiopathology Biological and medical sciences Brain - drug effects Brain - metabolism Brain - physiopathology Central Nervous System Stimulants - adverse effects Cocaine - adverse effects Desipramine - adverse effects Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects Disease Models, Animal Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Eating - drug effects Eating - physiology Female Infusion Pumps Macaca mulatta Medical sciences Methylphenidate - adverse effects Neuropharmacology Pharmacology. Drug treatments Propylamines - adverse effects Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease) Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopharmacology Reinforcement (Psychology) Self Administration Substance-Related Disorders - metabolism Substance-Related Disorders - physiopathology Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control |
title | Evaluation of the Reinforcing Effects of Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors Under a Concurrent Schedule of Food and I.V. Drug Delivery in Rhesus Monkeys |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A34%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Reinforcing%20Effects%20of%20Monoamine%20Reuptake%20Inhibitors%20Under%20a%20Concurrent%20Schedule%20of%20Food%20and%20I.V.%20Drug%20Delivery%20in%20Rhesus%20Monkeys&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychopharmacology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=GASIOR,%20Maciej&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=758&rft.epage=764&rft.pages=758-764&rft.issn=0893-133X&rft.eissn=1740-634X&rft.coden=NEROEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.npp.1300593&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E971693391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225235731&rft_id=info:pmid/15526000&rfr_iscdi=true |