Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution

The origin and the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Alxa Block have not been well studied, largely due to widespread desert coverage and a lack of high-resolution geochronological data. This paper reports zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Bloc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau 2019-07, Vol.108 (5), p.1705-1723
Hauptverfasser: Tian, Rongsong, Xie, Guoai, Zhang, Jin, Zhu, Wenbin, Qu, Junfeng, Gao, Shuang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1723
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1705
container_title International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau
container_volume 108
creator Tian, Rongsong
Xie, Guoai
Zhang, Jin
Zhu, Wenbin
Qu, Junfeng
Gao, Shuang
description The origin and the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Alxa Block have not been well studied, largely due to widespread desert coverage and a lack of high-resolution geochronological data. This paper reports zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block. Detrital zircons from the Langshan Group mainly provide U–Pb ages between ca. 2000 Ma and 1100 Ma, suggesting that their provenance was dominated by late Palaeoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic rocks, which yield two main peak ages at 1592 Ma and 1745 Ma. These zircons possess εHf (t) values between − 15 and + 8, implying the derivation of their precursor magmas from old crust and juvenile materials. Zircon U–Pb dating yields ages of 898 ± 4 Ma and 808 ± 4 Ma for the granite cobbles in coarse conglomerate in the Fourth Formation and the diorite intruding into the Second Formation of the Langshan Group, which constrains the depositional age of the main part of the Langshan Group to between 898 and 804 Ma. Our data show that the Langshan Group was probably deposited in an intra-continental rift basin and originated from recycled orogens. The geochronology and palaeocurrent data indicate that the North China Craton (NCC) could not have provided source materials for the Langshan Group. Instead, the Langshan Group shares a similar origin and detrital zircon age spectrum with the Beishan Complex in the South Beishan Collage. Combining these findings with published data, we propose that the Alxa Block was not a part of the NCC during the Neoproterozoic but a Precambrian micro-continent block. The Alxa Block recorded footprints that are related to the late amalgamation of the Rodinia supercontinent and the initial breakup. We suggest that the Alxa Block laid between Australia and Laurentia in the Rodinia supercontinent during the Neoproterozoic.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2252317532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2252317532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ef17c678c4d4a355f64f4aaa11ed55c3773ed35bff3ef843c6adaf8b129656403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscQ74N2m4FQQFqYIDcLZcZ92mpHaw0wp4AV4bt0Fw42DtaDUza30InVJyTgkpLiIhktOM0DK9IqlyDw2o4EXGWc72f7UUh-goxiUh2wUdoK8nqOoVuE6HD9wGvwGnnQGsXYX1HLC3uFsAnmo3jwvt8CT4dYtrt9s6H9LQsYPg8Lh51_iq8eb1EtertqmN7mrvIrY-4AfwqTz5_KevDe7AdN4lARvfrLe2Y3RgdRPh5GcO0cvtzfP1XTZ9nNxfj6eZ4bTsMrC0MHkxMqISmktpc2GF1ppSqKQ0vCg4VFzOrOVgR4KbXFfajmaUlbnMBeFDdNb3pu-8rSF2aunXwaWTijHJOC0kZ8nFepcJPsYAVrWhXiVEihK1Ba564CoBVzvgqkwh3odiMrs5hL_qf1LfNXGGdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2252317532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tian, Rongsong ; Xie, Guoai ; Zhang, Jin ; Zhu, Wenbin ; Qu, Junfeng ; Gao, Shuang</creator><creatorcontrib>Tian, Rongsong ; Xie, Guoai ; Zhang, Jin ; Zhu, Wenbin ; Qu, Junfeng ; Gao, Shuang</creatorcontrib><description>The origin and the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Alxa Block have not been well studied, largely due to widespread desert coverage and a lack of high-resolution geochronological data. This paper reports zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block. Detrital zircons from the Langshan Group mainly provide U–Pb ages between ca. 2000 Ma and 1100 Ma, suggesting that their provenance was dominated by late Palaeoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic rocks, which yield two main peak ages at 1592 Ma and 1745 Ma. These zircons possess εHf (t) values between − 15 and + 8, implying the derivation of their precursor magmas from old crust and juvenile materials. Zircon U–Pb dating yields ages of 898 ± 4 Ma and 808 ± 4 Ma for the granite cobbles in coarse conglomerate in the Fourth Formation and the diorite intruding into the Second Formation of the Langshan Group, which constrains the depositional age of the main part of the Langshan Group to between 898 and 804 Ma. Our data show that the Langshan Group was probably deposited in an intra-continental rift basin and originated from recycled orogens. The geochronology and palaeocurrent data indicate that the North China Craton (NCC) could not have provided source materials for the Langshan Group. Instead, the Langshan Group shares a similar origin and detrital zircon age spectrum with the Beishan Complex in the South Beishan Collage. Combining these findings with published data, we propose that the Alxa Block was not a part of the NCC during the Neoproterozoic but a Precambrian micro-continent block. The Alxa Block recorded footprints that are related to the late amalgamation of the Rodinia supercontinent and the initial breakup. We suggest that the Alxa Block laid between Australia and Laurentia in the Rodinia supercontinent during the Neoproterozoic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1437-3254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-3262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Age ; Cobblestone ; Conglomerates ; Cratons ; Data ; Diorite ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Evolution ; Geochemistry ; Geochronology ; Geochronometry ; Geological time ; Geology ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Isotopes ; Lead ; Mineral Resources ; Original Paper ; Precambrian ; Provenance ; Radiometric dating ; Sedimentology ; Structural Geology ; Tectonics ; Zircon</subject><ispartof>International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau, 2019-07, Vol.108 (5), p.1705-1723</ispartof><rights>Geologische Vereinigung e.V. (GV) 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ef17c678c4d4a355f64f4aaa11ed55c3773ed35bff3ef843c6adaf8b129656403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ef17c678c4d4a355f64f4aaa11ed55c3773ed35bff3ef843c6adaf8b129656403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tian, Rongsong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Guoai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Wenbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Junfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Shuang</creatorcontrib><title>Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution</title><title>International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau</title><addtitle>Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch)</addtitle><description>The origin and the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Alxa Block have not been well studied, largely due to widespread desert coverage and a lack of high-resolution geochronological data. This paper reports zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block. Detrital zircons from the Langshan Group mainly provide U–Pb ages between ca. 2000 Ma and 1100 Ma, suggesting that their provenance was dominated by late Palaeoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic rocks, which yield two main peak ages at 1592 Ma and 1745 Ma. These zircons possess εHf (t) values between − 15 and + 8, implying the derivation of their precursor magmas from old crust and juvenile materials. Zircon U–Pb dating yields ages of 898 ± 4 Ma and 808 ± 4 Ma for the granite cobbles in coarse conglomerate in the Fourth Formation and the diorite intruding into the Second Formation of the Langshan Group, which constrains the depositional age of the main part of the Langshan Group to between 898 and 804 Ma. Our data show that the Langshan Group was probably deposited in an intra-continental rift basin and originated from recycled orogens. The geochronology and palaeocurrent data indicate that the North China Craton (NCC) could not have provided source materials for the Langshan Group. Instead, the Langshan Group shares a similar origin and detrital zircon age spectrum with the Beishan Complex in the South Beishan Collage. Combining these findings with published data, we propose that the Alxa Block was not a part of the NCC during the Neoproterozoic but a Precambrian micro-continent block. The Alxa Block recorded footprints that are related to the late amalgamation of the Rodinia supercontinent and the initial breakup. We suggest that the Alxa Block laid between Australia and Laurentia in the Rodinia supercontinent during the Neoproterozoic.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Cobblestone</subject><subject>Conglomerates</subject><subject>Cratons</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Diorite</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geochronology</subject><subject>Geochronometry</subject><subject>Geological time</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Mineral Resources</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Precambrian</subject><subject>Provenance</subject><subject>Radiometric dating</subject><subject>Sedimentology</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Zircon</subject><issn>1437-3254</issn><issn>1437-3262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscQ74N2m4FQQFqYIDcLZcZ92mpHaw0wp4AV4bt0Fw42DtaDUza30InVJyTgkpLiIhktOM0DK9IqlyDw2o4EXGWc72f7UUh-goxiUh2wUdoK8nqOoVuE6HD9wGvwGnnQGsXYX1HLC3uFsAnmo3jwvt8CT4dYtrt9s6H9LQsYPg8Lh51_iq8eb1EtertqmN7mrvIrY-4AfwqTz5_KevDe7AdN4lARvfrLe2Y3RgdRPh5GcO0cvtzfP1XTZ9nNxfj6eZ4bTsMrC0MHkxMqISmktpc2GF1ppSqKQ0vCg4VFzOrOVgR4KbXFfajmaUlbnMBeFDdNb3pu-8rSF2aunXwaWTijHJOC0kZ8nFepcJPsYAVrWhXiVEihK1Ba564CoBVzvgqkwh3odiMrs5hL_qf1LfNXGGdA</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Tian, Rongsong</creator><creator>Xie, Guoai</creator><creator>Zhang, Jin</creator><creator>Zhu, Wenbin</creator><creator>Qu, Junfeng</creator><creator>Gao, Shuang</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution</title><author>Tian, Rongsong ; Xie, Guoai ; Zhang, Jin ; Zhu, Wenbin ; Qu, Junfeng ; Gao, Shuang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ef17c678c4d4a355f64f4aaa11ed55c3773ed35bff3ef843c6adaf8b129656403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Cobblestone</topic><topic>Conglomerates</topic><topic>Cratons</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Diorite</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geochronology</topic><topic>Geochronometry</topic><topic>Geological time</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Mineral Resources</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Precambrian</topic><topic>Provenance</topic><topic>Radiometric dating</topic><topic>Sedimentology</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Zircon</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tian, Rongsong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Guoai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Wenbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Junfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Shuang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tian, Rongsong</au><au>Xie, Guoai</au><au>Zhang, Jin</au><au>Zhu, Wenbin</au><au>Qu, Junfeng</au><au>Gao, Shuang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution</atitle><jtitle>International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau</jtitle><stitle>Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch)</stitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1705</spage><epage>1723</epage><pages>1705-1723</pages><issn>1437-3254</issn><eissn>1437-3262</eissn><abstract>The origin and the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Alxa Block have not been well studied, largely due to widespread desert coverage and a lack of high-resolution geochronological data. This paper reports zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block. Detrital zircons from the Langshan Group mainly provide U–Pb ages between ca. 2000 Ma and 1100 Ma, suggesting that their provenance was dominated by late Palaeoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic rocks, which yield two main peak ages at 1592 Ma and 1745 Ma. These zircons possess εHf (t) values between − 15 and + 8, implying the derivation of their precursor magmas from old crust and juvenile materials. Zircon U–Pb dating yields ages of 898 ± 4 Ma and 808 ± 4 Ma for the granite cobbles in coarse conglomerate in the Fourth Formation and the diorite intruding into the Second Formation of the Langshan Group, which constrains the depositional age of the main part of the Langshan Group to between 898 and 804 Ma. Our data show that the Langshan Group was probably deposited in an intra-continental rift basin and originated from recycled orogens. The geochronology and palaeocurrent data indicate that the North China Craton (NCC) could not have provided source materials for the Langshan Group. Instead, the Langshan Group shares a similar origin and detrital zircon age spectrum with the Beishan Complex in the South Beishan Collage. Combining these findings with published data, we propose that the Alxa Block was not a part of the NCC during the Neoproterozoic but a Precambrian micro-continent block. The Alxa Block recorded footprints that are related to the late amalgamation of the Rodinia supercontinent and the initial breakup. We suggest that the Alxa Block laid between Australia and Laurentia in the Rodinia supercontinent during the Neoproterozoic.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1437-3254
ispartof International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau, 2019-07, Vol.108 (5), p.1705-1723
issn 1437-3254
1437-3262
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2252317532
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Age
Cobblestone
Conglomerates
Cratons
Data
Diorite
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Evolution
Geochemistry
Geochronology
Geochronometry
Geological time
Geology
Geophysics/Geodesy
Isotopes
Lead
Mineral Resources
Original Paper
Precambrian
Provenance
Radiometric dating
Sedimentology
Structural Geology
Tectonics
Zircon
title Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A00%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sedimentary%20provenance%20and%20age%20of%20the%20Langshan%20Group%20in%20the%20northeastern%20Alxa%20Block:%20implications%20for%20Neoproterozoic%20tectonic%20evolution&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20earth%20sciences%20:%20Geologische%20Rundschau&rft.au=Tian,%20Rongsong&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1705&rft.epage=1723&rft.pages=1705-1723&rft.issn=1437-3254&rft.eissn=1437-3262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2252317532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2252317532&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true