Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution
The origin and the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Alxa Block have not been well studied, largely due to widespread desert coverage and a lack of high-resolution geochronological data. This paper reports zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Bloc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau 2019-07, Vol.108 (5), p.1705-1723 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1723 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1705 |
container_title | International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Tian, Rongsong Xie, Guoai Zhang, Jin Zhu, Wenbin Qu, Junfeng Gao, Shuang |
description | The origin and the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Alxa Block have not been well studied, largely due to widespread desert coverage and a lack of high-resolution geochronological data. This paper reports zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block. Detrital zircons from the Langshan Group mainly provide U–Pb ages between ca. 2000 Ma and 1100 Ma, suggesting that their provenance was dominated by late Palaeoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic rocks, which yield two main peak ages at 1592 Ma and 1745 Ma. These zircons possess εHf (t) values between − 15 and + 8, implying the derivation of their precursor magmas from old crust and juvenile materials. Zircon U–Pb dating yields ages of 898 ± 4 Ma and 808 ± 4 Ma for the granite cobbles in coarse conglomerate in the Fourth Formation and the diorite intruding into the Second Formation of the Langshan Group, which constrains the depositional age of the main part of the Langshan Group to between 898 and 804 Ma. Our data show that the Langshan Group was probably deposited in an intra-continental rift basin and originated from recycled orogens. The geochronology and palaeocurrent data indicate that the North China Craton (NCC) could not have provided source materials for the Langshan Group. Instead, the Langshan Group shares a similar origin and detrital zircon age spectrum with the Beishan Complex in the South Beishan Collage. Combining these findings with published data, we propose that the Alxa Block was not a part of the NCC during the Neoproterozoic but a Precambrian micro-continent block. The Alxa Block recorded footprints that are related to the late amalgamation of the Rodinia supercontinent and the initial breakup. We suggest that the Alxa Block laid between Australia and Laurentia in the Rodinia supercontinent during the Neoproterozoic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2252317532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2252317532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ef17c678c4d4a355f64f4aaa11ed55c3773ed35bff3ef843c6adaf8b129656403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscQ74N2m4FQQFqYIDcLZcZ92mpHaw0wp4AV4bt0Fw42DtaDUza30InVJyTgkpLiIhktOM0DK9IqlyDw2o4EXGWc72f7UUh-goxiUh2wUdoK8nqOoVuE6HD9wGvwGnnQGsXYX1HLC3uFsAnmo3jwvt8CT4dYtrt9s6H9LQsYPg8Lh51_iq8eb1EtertqmN7mrvIrY-4AfwqTz5_KevDe7AdN4lARvfrLe2Y3RgdRPh5GcO0cvtzfP1XTZ9nNxfj6eZ4bTsMrC0MHkxMqISmktpc2GF1ppSqKQ0vCg4VFzOrOVgR4KbXFfajmaUlbnMBeFDdNb3pu-8rSF2aunXwaWTijHJOC0kZ8nFepcJPsYAVrWhXiVEihK1Ba564CoBVzvgqkwh3odiMrs5hL_qf1LfNXGGdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2252317532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tian, Rongsong ; Xie, Guoai ; Zhang, Jin ; Zhu, Wenbin ; Qu, Junfeng ; Gao, Shuang</creator><creatorcontrib>Tian, Rongsong ; Xie, Guoai ; Zhang, Jin ; Zhu, Wenbin ; Qu, Junfeng ; Gao, Shuang</creatorcontrib><description>The origin and the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Alxa Block have not been well studied, largely due to widespread desert coverage and a lack of high-resolution geochronological data. This paper reports zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block. Detrital zircons from the Langshan Group mainly provide U–Pb ages between ca. 2000 Ma and 1100 Ma, suggesting that their provenance was dominated by late Palaeoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic rocks, which yield two main peak ages at 1592 Ma and 1745 Ma. These zircons possess εHf (t) values between − 15 and + 8, implying the derivation of their precursor magmas from old crust and juvenile materials. Zircon U–Pb dating yields ages of 898 ± 4 Ma and 808 ± 4 Ma for the granite cobbles in coarse conglomerate in the Fourth Formation and the diorite intruding into the Second Formation of the Langshan Group, which constrains the depositional age of the main part of the Langshan Group to between 898 and 804 Ma. Our data show that the Langshan Group was probably deposited in an intra-continental rift basin and originated from recycled orogens. The geochronology and palaeocurrent data indicate that the North China Craton (NCC) could not have provided source materials for the Langshan Group. Instead, the Langshan Group shares a similar origin and detrital zircon age spectrum with the Beishan Complex in the South Beishan Collage. Combining these findings with published data, we propose that the Alxa Block was not a part of the NCC during the Neoproterozoic but a Precambrian micro-continent block. The Alxa Block recorded footprints that are related to the late amalgamation of the Rodinia supercontinent and the initial breakup. We suggest that the Alxa Block laid between Australia and Laurentia in the Rodinia supercontinent during the Neoproterozoic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1437-3254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-3262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Age ; Cobblestone ; Conglomerates ; Cratons ; Data ; Diorite ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Evolution ; Geochemistry ; Geochronology ; Geochronometry ; Geological time ; Geology ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Isotopes ; Lead ; Mineral Resources ; Original Paper ; Precambrian ; Provenance ; Radiometric dating ; Sedimentology ; Structural Geology ; Tectonics ; Zircon</subject><ispartof>International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau, 2019-07, Vol.108 (5), p.1705-1723</ispartof><rights>Geologische Vereinigung e.V. (GV) 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ef17c678c4d4a355f64f4aaa11ed55c3773ed35bff3ef843c6adaf8b129656403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ef17c678c4d4a355f64f4aaa11ed55c3773ed35bff3ef843c6adaf8b129656403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tian, Rongsong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Guoai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Wenbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Junfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Shuang</creatorcontrib><title>Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution</title><title>International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau</title><addtitle>Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch)</addtitle><description>The origin and the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Alxa Block have not been well studied, largely due to widespread desert coverage and a lack of high-resolution geochronological data. This paper reports zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block. Detrital zircons from the Langshan Group mainly provide U–Pb ages between ca. 2000 Ma and 1100 Ma, suggesting that their provenance was dominated by late Palaeoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic rocks, which yield two main peak ages at 1592 Ma and 1745 Ma. These zircons possess εHf (t) values between − 15 and + 8, implying the derivation of their precursor magmas from old crust and juvenile materials. Zircon U–Pb dating yields ages of 898 ± 4 Ma and 808 ± 4 Ma for the granite cobbles in coarse conglomerate in the Fourth Formation and the diorite intruding into the Second Formation of the Langshan Group, which constrains the depositional age of the main part of the Langshan Group to between 898 and 804 Ma. Our data show that the Langshan Group was probably deposited in an intra-continental rift basin and originated from recycled orogens. The geochronology and palaeocurrent data indicate that the North China Craton (NCC) could not have provided source materials for the Langshan Group. Instead, the Langshan Group shares a similar origin and detrital zircon age spectrum with the Beishan Complex in the South Beishan Collage. Combining these findings with published data, we propose that the Alxa Block was not a part of the NCC during the Neoproterozoic but a Precambrian micro-continent block. The Alxa Block recorded footprints that are related to the late amalgamation of the Rodinia supercontinent and the initial breakup. We suggest that the Alxa Block laid between Australia and Laurentia in the Rodinia supercontinent during the Neoproterozoic.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Cobblestone</subject><subject>Conglomerates</subject><subject>Cratons</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Diorite</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geochronology</subject><subject>Geochronometry</subject><subject>Geological time</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Mineral Resources</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Precambrian</subject><subject>Provenance</subject><subject>Radiometric dating</subject><subject>Sedimentology</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Zircon</subject><issn>1437-3254</issn><issn>1437-3262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscQ74N2m4FQQFqYIDcLZcZ92mpHaw0wp4AV4bt0Fw42DtaDUza30InVJyTgkpLiIhktOM0DK9IqlyDw2o4EXGWc72f7UUh-goxiUh2wUdoK8nqOoVuE6HD9wGvwGnnQGsXYX1HLC3uFsAnmo3jwvt8CT4dYtrt9s6H9LQsYPg8Lh51_iq8eb1EtertqmN7mrvIrY-4AfwqTz5_KevDe7AdN4lARvfrLe2Y3RgdRPh5GcO0cvtzfP1XTZ9nNxfj6eZ4bTsMrC0MHkxMqISmktpc2GF1ppSqKQ0vCg4VFzOrOVgR4KbXFfajmaUlbnMBeFDdNb3pu-8rSF2aunXwaWTijHJOC0kZ8nFepcJPsYAVrWhXiVEihK1Ba564CoBVzvgqkwh3odiMrs5hL_qf1LfNXGGdA</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Tian, Rongsong</creator><creator>Xie, Guoai</creator><creator>Zhang, Jin</creator><creator>Zhu, Wenbin</creator><creator>Qu, Junfeng</creator><creator>Gao, Shuang</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution</title><author>Tian, Rongsong ; Xie, Guoai ; Zhang, Jin ; Zhu, Wenbin ; Qu, Junfeng ; Gao, Shuang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ef17c678c4d4a355f64f4aaa11ed55c3773ed35bff3ef843c6adaf8b129656403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Cobblestone</topic><topic>Conglomerates</topic><topic>Cratons</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Diorite</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geochronology</topic><topic>Geochronometry</topic><topic>Geological time</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Mineral Resources</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Precambrian</topic><topic>Provenance</topic><topic>Radiometric dating</topic><topic>Sedimentology</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Zircon</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tian, Rongsong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Guoai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Wenbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Junfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Shuang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tian, Rongsong</au><au>Xie, Guoai</au><au>Zhang, Jin</au><au>Zhu, Wenbin</au><au>Qu, Junfeng</au><au>Gao, Shuang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution</atitle><jtitle>International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau</jtitle><stitle>Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch)</stitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1705</spage><epage>1723</epage><pages>1705-1723</pages><issn>1437-3254</issn><eissn>1437-3262</eissn><abstract>The origin and the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Alxa Block have not been well studied, largely due to widespread desert coverage and a lack of high-resolution geochronological data. This paper reports zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block. Detrital zircons from the Langshan Group mainly provide U–Pb ages between ca. 2000 Ma and 1100 Ma, suggesting that their provenance was dominated by late Palaeoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic rocks, which yield two main peak ages at 1592 Ma and 1745 Ma. These zircons possess εHf (t) values between − 15 and + 8, implying the derivation of their precursor magmas from old crust and juvenile materials. Zircon U–Pb dating yields ages of 898 ± 4 Ma and 808 ± 4 Ma for the granite cobbles in coarse conglomerate in the Fourth Formation and the diorite intruding into the Second Formation of the Langshan Group, which constrains the depositional age of the main part of the Langshan Group to between 898 and 804 Ma. Our data show that the Langshan Group was probably deposited in an intra-continental rift basin and originated from recycled orogens. The geochronology and palaeocurrent data indicate that the North China Craton (NCC) could not have provided source materials for the Langshan Group. Instead, the Langshan Group shares a similar origin and detrital zircon age spectrum with the Beishan Complex in the South Beishan Collage. Combining these findings with published data, we propose that the Alxa Block was not a part of the NCC during the Neoproterozoic but a Precambrian micro-continent block. The Alxa Block recorded footprints that are related to the late amalgamation of the Rodinia supercontinent and the initial breakup. We suggest that the Alxa Block laid between Australia and Laurentia in the Rodinia supercontinent during the Neoproterozoic.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1437-3254 |
ispartof | International journal of earth sciences : Geologische Rundschau, 2019-07, Vol.108 (5), p.1705-1723 |
issn | 1437-3254 1437-3262 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2252317532 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Age Cobblestone Conglomerates Cratons Data Diorite Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Evolution Geochemistry Geochronology Geochronometry Geological time Geology Geophysics/Geodesy Isotopes Lead Mineral Resources Original Paper Precambrian Provenance Radiometric dating Sedimentology Structural Geology Tectonics Zircon |
title | Sedimentary provenance and age of the Langshan Group in the northeastern Alxa Block: implications for Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A00%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sedimentary%20provenance%20and%20age%20of%20the%20Langshan%20Group%20in%20the%20northeastern%20Alxa%20Block:%20implications%20for%20Neoproterozoic%20tectonic%20evolution&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20earth%20sciences%20:%20Geologische%20Rundschau&rft.au=Tian,%20Rongsong&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1705&rft.epage=1723&rft.pages=1705-1723&rft.issn=1437-3254&rft.eissn=1437-3262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00531-019-01731-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2252317532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2252317532&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |