Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History

Muslims have venerated Jerusalem since the seventh century. Their direct control of the city began in 638 and lasted, except for a few interruptions, until 1917. When we examine the evolution of an official Muslim attitude towards Jerusalem, it becomes clear that they perceived their role not as own...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.) Ariz.), 2019-06, Vol.53 (1), p.20-33
1. Verfasser: Mourad, Suleiman A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 33
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.)
container_volume 53
creator Mourad, Suleiman A.
description Muslims have venerated Jerusalem since the seventh century. Their direct control of the city began in 638 and lasted, except for a few interruptions, until 1917. When we examine the evolution of an official Muslim attitude towards Jerusalem, it becomes clear that they perceived their role not as owners of the city but rather as custodians. This attitude was informed by the realization that Jerusalem was sacred to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, and that all three religious communities share many of the same sacred sites. As such, statesmanship and law obliged Muslim rulers to protect and defend Christian and Jewish sacred spaces, even against occasional Muslim mob behavior that called for the destruction, confiscation, or exclusive use of those places. The Trump administration's decision in 2017 to enact the 1995 decision of the U.S. Congress to move the American embassy to Jerusalem stands as a violation of this historical framework and of the rule of law and sanctions the eradication of Palestinian identity and historical memory.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/rms.2019.3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2251074195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_rms_2019_3</cupid><jstor_id>26731398</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26731398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c207t-4014071771cc13370562750c96fee28a102144ca88f694b278b59e1b630cf8dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMFLwzAUxoMoOOYu3oWAN7EzL0mb1pNuqJsMBjLPIU3TkdE2M-mQ_fdmbOjFd3kP3o_v4_sQugYyBgLiwbdhTAkUY3aGBpTRImGUpufxhhQSxnO4RKMQNiROBizjdICeVs7hiV3j3uHS4OV3Z6pH_GHqxujeui5g1-F343dBNabFtsPz0KjWajyzoXd-f4UuatUEMzrtIfp8fVlNZ8li-TafPi8STYnoE06AEwFCgNbAmCBpRkVKdJHVxtBcAaHAuVZ5XmcFL6nIy7QwUGaM6DqvKjZEt0fdrXdfOxN6uXE730VLGUMCERyKNFJ3R0p7F4I3tdx62yq_l0DkoSQZS5KHkiSL8M0R3hyS_JI0EwxYkcf__UlMtaW31dr8ef4j9wMOJW8m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2251074195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Mourad, Suleiman A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mourad, Suleiman A.</creatorcontrib><description>Muslims have venerated Jerusalem since the seventh century. Their direct control of the city began in 638 and lasted, except for a few interruptions, until 1917. When we examine the evolution of an official Muslim attitude towards Jerusalem, it becomes clear that they perceived their role not as owners of the city but rather as custodians. This attitude was informed by the realization that Jerusalem was sacred to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, and that all three religious communities share many of the same sacred sites. As such, statesmanship and law obliged Muslim rulers to protect and defend Christian and Jewish sacred spaces, even against occasional Muslim mob behavior that called for the destruction, confiscation, or exclusive use of those places. The Trump administration's decision in 2017 to enact the 1995 decision of the U.S. Congress to move the American embassy to Jerusalem stands as a violation of this historical framework and of the rule of law and sanctions the eradication of Palestinian identity and historical memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-3481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-3225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/rms.2019.3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Historiography ; History ; Islam ; Monotheism ; Muslims ; Nonviolence ; Pence, Mike ; Politics ; Religion ; SPECIAL FOCUS: FROM TEL AVIV TO JERUSALEM: AN EMBASSY MOVE AS THE CRUCIBLE FOR CONTESTED HISTORIES ; Spirituality ; Violence ; Zionism</subject><ispartof>Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.), 2019-06, Vol.53 (1), p.20-33</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Middle East Studies Association of North America, Inc. 2019</rights><rights>Middle East Studies Association of North America, Inc. 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c207t-4014071771cc13370562750c96fee28a102144ca88f694b278b59e1b630cf8dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26731398$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S215134811900003X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mourad, Suleiman A.</creatorcontrib><title>Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History</title><title>Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.)</title><addtitle>Rev. Middle East Stud</addtitle><description>Muslims have venerated Jerusalem since the seventh century. Their direct control of the city began in 638 and lasted, except for a few interruptions, until 1917. When we examine the evolution of an official Muslim attitude towards Jerusalem, it becomes clear that they perceived their role not as owners of the city but rather as custodians. This attitude was informed by the realization that Jerusalem was sacred to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, and that all three religious communities share many of the same sacred sites. As such, statesmanship and law obliged Muslim rulers to protect and defend Christian and Jewish sacred spaces, even against occasional Muslim mob behavior that called for the destruction, confiscation, or exclusive use of those places. The Trump administration's decision in 2017 to enact the 1995 decision of the U.S. Congress to move the American embassy to Jerusalem stands as a violation of this historical framework and of the rule of law and sanctions the eradication of Palestinian identity and historical memory.</description><subject>Historiography</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Monotheism</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>Nonviolence</subject><subject>Pence, Mike</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>SPECIAL FOCUS: FROM TEL AVIV TO JERUSALEM: AN EMBASSY MOVE AS THE CRUCIBLE FOR CONTESTED HISTORIES</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Zionism</subject><issn>2151-3481</issn><issn>2329-3225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMFLwzAUxoMoOOYu3oWAN7EzL0mb1pNuqJsMBjLPIU3TkdE2M-mQ_fdmbOjFd3kP3o_v4_sQugYyBgLiwbdhTAkUY3aGBpTRImGUpufxhhQSxnO4RKMQNiROBizjdICeVs7hiV3j3uHS4OV3Z6pH_GHqxujeui5g1-F343dBNabFtsPz0KjWajyzoXd-f4UuatUEMzrtIfp8fVlNZ8li-TafPi8STYnoE06AEwFCgNbAmCBpRkVKdJHVxtBcAaHAuVZ5XmcFL6nIy7QwUGaM6DqvKjZEt0fdrXdfOxN6uXE730VLGUMCERyKNFJ3R0p7F4I3tdx62yq_l0DkoSQZS5KHkiSL8M0R3hyS_JI0EwxYkcf__UlMtaW31dr8ef4j9wMOJW8m</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Mourad, Suleiman A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Middle East Studies Association of North America (MESA)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History</title><author>Mourad, Suleiman A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c207t-4014071771cc13370562750c96fee28a102144ca88f694b278b59e1b630cf8dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Historiography</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Monotheism</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>Nonviolence</topic><topic>Pence, Mike</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>SPECIAL FOCUS: FROM TEL AVIV TO JERUSALEM: AN EMBASSY MOVE AS THE CRUCIBLE FOR CONTESTED HISTORIES</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Zionism</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mourad, Suleiman A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mourad, Suleiman A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History</atitle><jtitle>Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.)</jtitle><addtitle>Rev. Middle East Stud</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>20-33</pages><issn>2151-3481</issn><eissn>2329-3225</eissn><abstract>Muslims have venerated Jerusalem since the seventh century. Their direct control of the city began in 638 and lasted, except for a few interruptions, until 1917. When we examine the evolution of an official Muslim attitude towards Jerusalem, it becomes clear that they perceived their role not as owners of the city but rather as custodians. This attitude was informed by the realization that Jerusalem was sacred to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, and that all three religious communities share many of the same sacred sites. As such, statesmanship and law obliged Muslim rulers to protect and defend Christian and Jewish sacred spaces, even against occasional Muslim mob behavior that called for the destruction, confiscation, or exclusive use of those places. The Trump administration's decision in 2017 to enact the 1995 decision of the U.S. Congress to move the American embassy to Jerusalem stands as a violation of this historical framework and of the rule of law and sanctions the eradication of Palestinian identity and historical memory.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/rms.2019.3</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2151-3481
ispartof Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.), 2019-06, Vol.53 (1), p.20-33
issn 2151-3481
2329-3225
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2251074195
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Historiography
History
Islam
Monotheism
Muslims
Nonviolence
Pence, Mike
Politics
Religion
SPECIAL FOCUS: FROM TEL AVIV TO JERUSALEM: AN EMBASSY MOVE AS THE CRUCIBLE FOR CONTESTED HISTORIES
Spirituality
Violence
Zionism
title Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A44%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Too%20Big%20to%20be%20Owned:%20Reflections%20on%20Jerusalem%20in%20Islamic%20History&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20Middle%20East%20studies%20(Tucson,%20Ariz.)&rft.au=Mourad,%20Suleiman%20A.&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=20-33&rft.issn=2151-3481&rft.eissn=2329-3225&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/rms.2019.3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26731398%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2251074195&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_rms_2019_3&rft_jstor_id=26731398&rfr_iscdi=true