Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History
Muslims have venerated Jerusalem since the seventh century. Their direct control of the city began in 638 and lasted, except for a few interruptions, until 1917. When we examine the evolution of an official Muslim attitude towards Jerusalem, it becomes clear that they perceived their role not as own...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.) Ariz.), 2019-06, Vol.53 (1), p.20-33 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 33 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.) |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Mourad, Suleiman A. |
description | Muslims have venerated Jerusalem since the seventh century. Their direct control of the city began in 638 and lasted, except for a few interruptions, until 1917. When we examine the evolution of an official Muslim attitude towards Jerusalem, it becomes clear that they perceived their role not as owners of the city but rather as custodians. This attitude was informed by the realization that Jerusalem was sacred to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, and that all three religious communities share many of the same sacred sites. As such, statesmanship and law obliged Muslim rulers to protect and defend Christian and Jewish sacred spaces, even against occasional Muslim mob behavior that called for the destruction, confiscation, or exclusive use of those places. The Trump administration's decision in 2017 to enact the 1995 decision of the U.S. Congress to move the American embassy to Jerusalem stands as a violation of this historical framework and of the rule of law and sanctions the eradication of Palestinian identity and historical memory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/rms.2019.3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2251074195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_rms_2019_3</cupid><jstor_id>26731398</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26731398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c207t-4014071771cc13370562750c96fee28a102144ca88f694b278b59e1b630cf8dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMFLwzAUxoMoOOYu3oWAN7EzL0mb1pNuqJsMBjLPIU3TkdE2M-mQ_fdmbOjFd3kP3o_v4_sQugYyBgLiwbdhTAkUY3aGBpTRImGUpufxhhQSxnO4RKMQNiROBizjdICeVs7hiV3j3uHS4OV3Z6pH_GHqxujeui5g1-F343dBNabFtsPz0KjWajyzoXd-f4UuatUEMzrtIfp8fVlNZ8li-TafPi8STYnoE06AEwFCgNbAmCBpRkVKdJHVxtBcAaHAuVZ5XmcFL6nIy7QwUGaM6DqvKjZEt0fdrXdfOxN6uXE730VLGUMCERyKNFJ3R0p7F4I3tdx62yq_l0DkoSQZS5KHkiSL8M0R3hyS_JI0EwxYkcf__UlMtaW31dr8ef4j9wMOJW8m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2251074195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Mourad, Suleiman A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mourad, Suleiman A.</creatorcontrib><description>Muslims have venerated Jerusalem since the seventh century. Their direct control of the city began in 638 and lasted, except for a few interruptions, until 1917. When we examine the evolution of an official Muslim attitude towards Jerusalem, it becomes clear that they perceived their role not as owners of the city but rather as custodians. This attitude was informed by the realization that Jerusalem was sacred to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, and that all three religious communities share many of the same sacred sites. As such, statesmanship and law obliged Muslim rulers to protect and defend Christian and Jewish sacred spaces, even against occasional Muslim mob behavior that called for the destruction, confiscation, or exclusive use of those places. The Trump administration's decision in 2017 to enact the 1995 decision of the U.S. Congress to move the American embassy to Jerusalem stands as a violation of this historical framework and of the rule of law and sanctions the eradication of Palestinian identity and historical memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-3481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-3225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/rms.2019.3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Historiography ; History ; Islam ; Monotheism ; Muslims ; Nonviolence ; Pence, Mike ; Politics ; Religion ; SPECIAL FOCUS: FROM TEL AVIV TO JERUSALEM: AN EMBASSY MOVE AS THE CRUCIBLE FOR CONTESTED HISTORIES ; Spirituality ; Violence ; Zionism</subject><ispartof>Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.), 2019-06, Vol.53 (1), p.20-33</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Middle East Studies Association of North America, Inc. 2019</rights><rights>Middle East Studies Association of North America, Inc. 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c207t-4014071771cc13370562750c96fee28a102144ca88f694b278b59e1b630cf8dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26731398$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S215134811900003X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mourad, Suleiman A.</creatorcontrib><title>Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History</title><title>Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.)</title><addtitle>Rev. Middle East Stud</addtitle><description>Muslims have venerated Jerusalem since the seventh century. Their direct control of the city began in 638 and lasted, except for a few interruptions, until 1917. When we examine the evolution of an official Muslim attitude towards Jerusalem, it becomes clear that they perceived their role not as owners of the city but rather as custodians. This attitude was informed by the realization that Jerusalem was sacred to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, and that all three religious communities share many of the same sacred sites. As such, statesmanship and law obliged Muslim rulers to protect and defend Christian and Jewish sacred spaces, even against occasional Muslim mob behavior that called for the destruction, confiscation, or exclusive use of those places. The Trump administration's decision in 2017 to enact the 1995 decision of the U.S. Congress to move the American embassy to Jerusalem stands as a violation of this historical framework and of the rule of law and sanctions the eradication of Palestinian identity and historical memory.</description><subject>Historiography</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Monotheism</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>Nonviolence</subject><subject>Pence, Mike</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>SPECIAL FOCUS: FROM TEL AVIV TO JERUSALEM: AN EMBASSY MOVE AS THE CRUCIBLE FOR CONTESTED HISTORIES</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Zionism</subject><issn>2151-3481</issn><issn>2329-3225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMFLwzAUxoMoOOYu3oWAN7EzL0mb1pNuqJsMBjLPIU3TkdE2M-mQ_fdmbOjFd3kP3o_v4_sQugYyBgLiwbdhTAkUY3aGBpTRImGUpufxhhQSxnO4RKMQNiROBizjdICeVs7hiV3j3uHS4OV3Z6pH_GHqxujeui5g1-F343dBNabFtsPz0KjWajyzoXd-f4UuatUEMzrtIfp8fVlNZ8li-TafPi8STYnoE06AEwFCgNbAmCBpRkVKdJHVxtBcAaHAuVZ5XmcFL6nIy7QwUGaM6DqvKjZEt0fdrXdfOxN6uXE730VLGUMCERyKNFJ3R0p7F4I3tdx62yq_l0DkoSQZS5KHkiSL8M0R3hyS_JI0EwxYkcf__UlMtaW31dr8ef4j9wMOJW8m</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Mourad, Suleiman A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Middle East Studies Association of North America (MESA)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History</title><author>Mourad, Suleiman A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c207t-4014071771cc13370562750c96fee28a102144ca88f694b278b59e1b630cf8dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Historiography</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Monotheism</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>Nonviolence</topic><topic>Pence, Mike</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>SPECIAL FOCUS: FROM TEL AVIV TO JERUSALEM: AN EMBASSY MOVE AS THE CRUCIBLE FOR CONTESTED HISTORIES</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Zionism</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mourad, Suleiman A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mourad, Suleiman A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History</atitle><jtitle>Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.)</jtitle><addtitle>Rev. Middle East Stud</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>20-33</pages><issn>2151-3481</issn><eissn>2329-3225</eissn><abstract>Muslims have venerated Jerusalem since the seventh century. Their direct control of the city began in 638 and lasted, except for a few interruptions, until 1917. When we examine the evolution of an official Muslim attitude towards Jerusalem, it becomes clear that they perceived their role not as owners of the city but rather as custodians. This attitude was informed by the realization that Jerusalem was sacred to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, and that all three religious communities share many of the same sacred sites. As such, statesmanship and law obliged Muslim rulers to protect and defend Christian and Jewish sacred spaces, even against occasional Muslim mob behavior that called for the destruction, confiscation, or exclusive use of those places. The Trump administration's decision in 2017 to enact the 1995 decision of the U.S. Congress to move the American embassy to Jerusalem stands as a violation of this historical framework and of the rule of law and sanctions the eradication of Palestinian identity and historical memory.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/rms.2019.3</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2151-3481 |
ispartof | Review of Middle East studies (Tucson, Ariz.), 2019-06, Vol.53 (1), p.20-33 |
issn | 2151-3481 2329-3225 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2251074195 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Historiography History Islam Monotheism Muslims Nonviolence Pence, Mike Politics Religion SPECIAL FOCUS: FROM TEL AVIV TO JERUSALEM: AN EMBASSY MOVE AS THE CRUCIBLE FOR CONTESTED HISTORIES Spirituality Violence Zionism |
title | Too Big to be Owned: Reflections on Jerusalem in Islamic History |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A44%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Too%20Big%20to%20be%20Owned:%20Reflections%20on%20Jerusalem%20in%20Islamic%20History&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20Middle%20East%20studies%20(Tucson,%20Ariz.)&rft.au=Mourad,%20Suleiman%20A.&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=20-33&rft.issn=2151-3481&rft.eissn=2329-3225&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/rms.2019.3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26731398%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2251074195&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_rms_2019_3&rft_jstor_id=26731398&rfr_iscdi=true |