Restructuring of Proto-Omagua-Kukama kin terms

Abstract This article reconstructs the system of kin terms in Proto-Omagua-Kukama (POK), the ancestral language of the Omagua and Kukama-Kukamiria, and compares it to Tupinambá, a former language of the Brazilian Atlantic coast and their closest relative in the Tupí-Guaraní language family. I identi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências humanas 2019-04, Vol.14 (1), p.65-78
1. Verfasser: O’Hagan, Zachary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; por
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 78
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências humanas
container_volume 14
creator O’Hagan, Zachary
description Abstract This article reconstructs the system of kin terms in Proto-Omagua-Kukama (POK), the ancestral language of the Omagua and Kukama-Kukamiria, and compares it to Tupinambá, a former language of the Brazilian Atlantic coast and their closest relative in the Tupí-Guaraní language family. I identify semantic shifts, analogy-based innovations, calques, and borrowings. I suggest that some of these changes are likely due to concomitant changes in pre-POK social structure. The identification of borrowings is potentially fruitful in determining which languages contributed to the setting that gave rise to POK. Detailed study of the evolution of the divergent grammar and lexicon of POK is crucial to understanding this social and linguistic history. Resumo Este artigo reconstrói o sistema terminológico de parentesco em Proto-Omagua-Kukama (POK), a língua ancestral dos Omagua e dos Kukama-Kukamiria, e compara-o ao de Tupinambá, a língua antigamente falada no litoral atlântico brasileiro, seu parente linguístico mais próximo. Identifico mudanças semânticas, inovações baseadas em analogia, calques e empréstimos. Sugiro que algumas dessas mudanças resultem de alterações concomitantes na estrutura social pré-POK. A identificação de empréstimos pode render frutos para a determinação de quais línguas contribuíram ao contexto em que surgiu o POK. O estudo detalhado da evolução da gramática e do léxico divergentes de POK é crucial para entender sua história social e linguística.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/1981.81222019000100005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2250584470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7802b03a636849dda58231219a879684</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2250584470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3515-c148d6eaaec4df114e98d33025707afa5b5d440a6bf628502960110bd6db875a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkFtLw0AQhRdRsGj_ggR8Tp3Z7PVRipdioSL6vEyym5Letm6SB_-9iRVffBgGDh9n5hzGbhBmKC3coTU4M8g5B7QAgMOAPGMTjtrkXAp9ziYjlI_QJZu27WZEQIOUYsJmb6HtUl91fWoO6yzW2WuKXcxXe1r3lL_0W9pTtm0OWRfSvr1mFzXt2jD93Vfs4_Hhff6cL1dPi_n9Mq8KiTKvUBivAlGohK8RRbDGFwVwqUFTTbKUXgggVdaKGwncKkCE0itfGi2puGKLk6-PtHHH1OwpfblIjfsRYlo7Sl1T7YLTBngJBalCGWG9J2l4gRwtGW0HafC6PXkdU_zsh7huE_t0GN53nEuQRggNA6VOVJVi26ZQ_11FcGPVbmzR_au6-AbA0Wz7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2250584470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Restructuring of Proto-Omagua-Kukama kin terms</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>O’Hagan, Zachary</creator><creatorcontrib>O’Hagan, Zachary</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This article reconstructs the system of kin terms in Proto-Omagua-Kukama (POK), the ancestral language of the Omagua and Kukama-Kukamiria, and compares it to Tupinambá, a former language of the Brazilian Atlantic coast and their closest relative in the Tupí-Guaraní language family. I identify semantic shifts, analogy-based innovations, calques, and borrowings. I suggest that some of these changes are likely due to concomitant changes in pre-POK social structure. The identification of borrowings is potentially fruitful in determining which languages contributed to the setting that gave rise to POK. Detailed study of the evolution of the divergent grammar and lexicon of POK is crucial to understanding this social and linguistic history. Resumo Este artigo reconstrói o sistema terminológico de parentesco em Proto-Omagua-Kukama (POK), a língua ancestral dos Omagua e dos Kukama-Kukamiria, e compara-o ao de Tupinambá, a língua antigamente falada no litoral atlântico brasileiro, seu parente linguístico mais próximo. Identifico mudanças semânticas, inovações baseadas em analogia, calques e empréstimos. Sugiro que algumas dessas mudanças resultem de alterações concomitantes na estrutura social pré-POK. A identificação de empréstimos pode render frutos para a determinação de quais línguas contribuíram ao contexto em que surgiu o POK. O estudo detalhado da evolução da gramática e do léxico divergentes de POK é crucial para entender sua história social e linguística.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1981-8122</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2178-2547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2178-2547</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/1981.81222019000100005</identifier><language>eng ; por</language><publisher>Belem: Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi</publisher><subject>Amazonia ; Calques ; Grammar ; Grammar lexicon relationship ; Guarani ; Innovations ; Kin terms ; Language contact ; Lexical evolution ; Proto languages ; Semantics ; Social structure ; Sociolinguistics ; Tupian languages ; Tupí-Guaraní</subject><ispartof>Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências humanas, 2019-04, Vol.14 (1), p.65-78</ispartof><rights>Copyright Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi Jan-Apr 2019</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3515-c148d6eaaec4df114e98d33025707afa5b5d440a6bf628502960110bd6db875a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3515-c148d6eaaec4df114e98d33025707afa5b5d440a6bf628502960110bd6db875a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2720-2070</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,862,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O’Hagan, Zachary</creatorcontrib><title>Restructuring of Proto-Omagua-Kukama kin terms</title><title>Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências humanas</title><description>Abstract This article reconstructs the system of kin terms in Proto-Omagua-Kukama (POK), the ancestral language of the Omagua and Kukama-Kukamiria, and compares it to Tupinambá, a former language of the Brazilian Atlantic coast and their closest relative in the Tupí-Guaraní language family. I identify semantic shifts, analogy-based innovations, calques, and borrowings. I suggest that some of these changes are likely due to concomitant changes in pre-POK social structure. The identification of borrowings is potentially fruitful in determining which languages contributed to the setting that gave rise to POK. Detailed study of the evolution of the divergent grammar and lexicon of POK is crucial to understanding this social and linguistic history. Resumo Este artigo reconstrói o sistema terminológico de parentesco em Proto-Omagua-Kukama (POK), a língua ancestral dos Omagua e dos Kukama-Kukamiria, e compara-o ao de Tupinambá, a língua antigamente falada no litoral atlântico brasileiro, seu parente linguístico mais próximo. Identifico mudanças semânticas, inovações baseadas em analogia, calques e empréstimos. Sugiro que algumas dessas mudanças resultem de alterações concomitantes na estrutura social pré-POK. A identificação de empréstimos pode render frutos para a determinação de quais línguas contribuíram ao contexto em que surgiu o POK. O estudo detalhado da evolução da gramática e do léxico divergentes de POK é crucial para entender sua história social e linguística.</description><subject>Amazonia</subject><subject>Calques</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammar lexicon relationship</subject><subject>Guarani</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Kin terms</subject><subject>Language contact</subject><subject>Lexical evolution</subject><subject>Proto languages</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Sociolinguistics</subject><subject>Tupian languages</subject><subject>Tupí-Guaraní</subject><issn>1981-8122</issn><issn>2178-2547</issn><issn>2178-2547</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplkFtLw0AQhRdRsGj_ggR8Tp3Z7PVRipdioSL6vEyym5Letm6SB_-9iRVffBgGDh9n5hzGbhBmKC3coTU4M8g5B7QAgMOAPGMTjtrkXAp9ziYjlI_QJZu27WZEQIOUYsJmb6HtUl91fWoO6yzW2WuKXcxXe1r3lL_0W9pTtm0OWRfSvr1mFzXt2jD93Vfs4_Hhff6cL1dPi_n9Mq8KiTKvUBivAlGohK8RRbDGFwVwqUFTTbKUXgggVdaKGwncKkCE0itfGi2puGKLk6-PtHHH1OwpfblIjfsRYlo7Sl1T7YLTBngJBalCGWG9J2l4gRwtGW0HafC6PXkdU_zsh7huE_t0GN53nEuQRggNA6VOVJVi26ZQ_11FcGPVbmzR_au6-AbA0Wz7</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>O’Hagan, Zachary</creator><general>Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi</general><general>Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2720-2070</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Restructuring of Proto-Omagua-Kukama kin terms</title><author>O’Hagan, Zachary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3515-c148d6eaaec4df114e98d33025707afa5b5d440a6bf628502960110bd6db875a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; por</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Amazonia</topic><topic>Calques</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammar lexicon relationship</topic><topic>Guarani</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Kin terms</topic><topic>Language contact</topic><topic>Lexical evolution</topic><topic>Proto languages</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Sociolinguistics</topic><topic>Tupian languages</topic><topic>Tupí-Guaraní</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Hagan, Zachary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências humanas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Hagan, Zachary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Restructuring of Proto-Omagua-Kukama kin terms</atitle><jtitle>Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências humanas</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>65-78</pages><issn>1981-8122</issn><issn>2178-2547</issn><eissn>2178-2547</eissn><abstract>Abstract This article reconstructs the system of kin terms in Proto-Omagua-Kukama (POK), the ancestral language of the Omagua and Kukama-Kukamiria, and compares it to Tupinambá, a former language of the Brazilian Atlantic coast and their closest relative in the Tupí-Guaraní language family. I identify semantic shifts, analogy-based innovations, calques, and borrowings. I suggest that some of these changes are likely due to concomitant changes in pre-POK social structure. The identification of borrowings is potentially fruitful in determining which languages contributed to the setting that gave rise to POK. Detailed study of the evolution of the divergent grammar and lexicon of POK is crucial to understanding this social and linguistic history. Resumo Este artigo reconstrói o sistema terminológico de parentesco em Proto-Omagua-Kukama (POK), a língua ancestral dos Omagua e dos Kukama-Kukamiria, e compara-o ao de Tupinambá, a língua antigamente falada no litoral atlântico brasileiro, seu parente linguístico mais próximo. Identifico mudanças semânticas, inovações baseadas em analogia, calques e empréstimos. Sugiro que algumas dessas mudanças resultem de alterações concomitantes na estrutura social pré-POK. A identificação de empréstimos pode render frutos para a determinação de quais línguas contribuíram ao contexto em que surgiu o POK. O estudo detalhado da evolução da gramática e do léxico divergentes de POK é crucial para entender sua história social e linguística.</abstract><cop>Belem</cop><pub>Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi</pub><doi>10.1590/1981.81222019000100005</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2720-2070</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1981-8122
ispartof Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências humanas, 2019-04, Vol.14 (1), p.65-78
issn 1981-8122
2178-2547
2178-2547
language eng ; por
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2250584470
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Amazonia
Calques
Grammar
Grammar lexicon relationship
Guarani
Innovations
Kin terms
Language contact
Lexical evolution
Proto languages
Semantics
Social structure
Sociolinguistics
Tupian languages
Tupí-Guaraní
title Restructuring of Proto-Omagua-Kukama kin terms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A55%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Restructuring%20of%20Proto-Omagua-Kukama%20kin%20terms&rft.jtitle=Boletim%20do%20Museu%20Paraense%20Emi%CC%81lio%20Goeldi.%20Cie%CC%82ncias%20humanas&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Hagan,%20Zachary&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=65-78&rft.issn=1981-8122&rft.eissn=2178-2547&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/1981.81222019000100005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2250584470%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2250584470&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7802b03a636849dda58231219a879684&rfr_iscdi=true