Lessons from TARGET2 imbalances: The case for the ECB being a lender of last resort 1
During the global banking crisis of 2007-2009 and the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis of 2010-2012 the so called 'TARGET2 imbalances' attracted considerable attention. Some economists interpreted them as a symptom of the ECB's 'stealth bailout. The aim of the paper is to highlight...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economics and business review 2019-01, Vol.5 (2), p.48-63 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 63 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 48 |
container_title | Economics and business review |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Chmielewski, Tomasz Sławiński, Andrzej |
description | During the global banking crisis of 2007-2009 and the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis of 2010-2012 the so called 'TARGET2 imbalances' attracted considerable attention. Some economists interpreted them as a symptom of the ECB's 'stealth bailout. The aim of the paper is to highlight that contrary to such claim, the emergence of TARGET2 imbalances reflected the benefits of having a mutual central bank within a monetary union which facilitated cross-border funding in spite of the global financial turbulence. The ECB's liquidity loans to commercial banks in the Eurozone debtor countries shielded the Eurozone from a much deeper financial crisis than it actually occurred. The emergence of the TARGET 2 imbalances was actually only an accounting phenomenon resulting from the fact that these liquidity loans were technically extended by the debtor countries' national central banks which are de facto (from the monetary policy perspective) ECB's regional branches. |
doi_str_mv | 10.18559/ebr.2019.2.3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2250569422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2250569422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_22505694223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjrFuwkAQRE8RkYLAZfqVUtvsrX1Oji5BBopUkanRmawTW-aO3Jr_jws-gGrmaV4xSj1rzPSbMXbFTcwItc0oyx_UnAqDKaJ9nU09t5TqstBPKhHpEVGbkojMXB0-WSR4gTaGM9TvX7uqJujOjRucP7Gsof5lODlhaEOEcYJq8wENd_4HHAzsvzlCaGFwMkJkCXEEvVSPrRuEk1su1Mu2qjf79BLD35VlPPbhGv00HacXaEpbEOX3Wf9G6UTN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2250569422</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons from TARGET2 imbalances: The case for the ECB being a lender of last resort 1</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chmielewski, Tomasz ; Sławiński, Andrzej</creator><creatorcontrib>Chmielewski, Tomasz ; Sławiński, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><description>During the global banking crisis of 2007-2009 and the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis of 2010-2012 the so called 'TARGET2 imbalances' attracted considerable attention. Some economists interpreted them as a symptom of the ECB's 'stealth bailout. The aim of the paper is to highlight that contrary to such claim, the emergence of TARGET2 imbalances reflected the benefits of having a mutual central bank within a monetary union which facilitated cross-border funding in spite of the global financial turbulence. The ECB's liquidity loans to commercial banks in the Eurozone debtor countries shielded the Eurozone from a much deeper financial crisis than it actually occurred. The emergence of the TARGET 2 imbalances was actually only an accounting phenomenon resulting from the fact that these liquidity loans were technically extended by the debtor countries' national central banks which are de facto (from the monetary policy perspective) ECB's regional branches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2392-1641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2450-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18559/ebr.2019.2.3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poznan: Poznan University of Economics</publisher><subject>Bailouts ; Bank reserves ; Banking industry ; Branch banking ; Central banks ; Commercial banks ; Correspondent banks ; Economic crisis ; Eurozone ; Funding ; International finance ; Loans ; Monetary unions ; Payment systems ; Sovereign debt</subject><ispartof>Economics and business review, 2019-01, Vol.5 (2), p.48-63</ispartof><rights>Copyright Poznan University of Economics 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,862,27913,27914</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chmielewski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sławiński, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons from TARGET2 imbalances: The case for the ECB being a lender of last resort 1</title><title>Economics and business review</title><description>During the global banking crisis of 2007-2009 and the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis of 2010-2012 the so called 'TARGET2 imbalances' attracted considerable attention. Some economists interpreted them as a symptom of the ECB's 'stealth bailout. The aim of the paper is to highlight that contrary to such claim, the emergence of TARGET2 imbalances reflected the benefits of having a mutual central bank within a monetary union which facilitated cross-border funding in spite of the global financial turbulence. The ECB's liquidity loans to commercial banks in the Eurozone debtor countries shielded the Eurozone from a much deeper financial crisis than it actually occurred. The emergence of the TARGET 2 imbalances was actually only an accounting phenomenon resulting from the fact that these liquidity loans were technically extended by the debtor countries' national central banks which are de facto (from the monetary policy perspective) ECB's regional branches.</description><subject>Bailouts</subject><subject>Bank reserves</subject><subject>Banking industry</subject><subject>Branch banking</subject><subject>Central banks</subject><subject>Commercial banks</subject><subject>Correspondent banks</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Eurozone</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>International finance</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Monetary unions</subject><subject>Payment systems</subject><subject>Sovereign debt</subject><issn>2392-1641</issn><issn>2450-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjrFuwkAQRE8RkYLAZfqVUtvsrX1Oji5BBopUkanRmawTW-aO3Jr_jws-gGrmaV4xSj1rzPSbMXbFTcwItc0oyx_UnAqDKaJ9nU09t5TqstBPKhHpEVGbkojMXB0-WSR4gTaGM9TvX7uqJujOjRucP7Gsof5lODlhaEOEcYJq8wENd_4HHAzsvzlCaGFwMkJkCXEEvVSPrRuEk1su1Mu2qjf79BLD35VlPPbhGv00HacXaEpbEOX3Wf9G6UTN</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Chmielewski, Tomasz</creator><creator>Sławiński, Andrzej</creator><general>Poznan University of Economics</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Lessons from TARGET2 imbalances: The case for the ECB being a lender of last resort 1</title><author>Chmielewski, Tomasz ; Sławiński, Andrzej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22505694223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bailouts</topic><topic>Bank reserves</topic><topic>Banking industry</topic><topic>Branch banking</topic><topic>Central banks</topic><topic>Commercial banks</topic><topic>Correspondent banks</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Eurozone</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>International finance</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Monetary unions</topic><topic>Payment systems</topic><topic>Sovereign debt</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chmielewski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sławiński, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Economics and business review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chmielewski, Tomasz</au><au>Sławiński, Andrzej</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons from TARGET2 imbalances: The case for the ECB being a lender of last resort 1</atitle><jtitle>Economics and business review</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>48-63</pages><issn>2392-1641</issn><eissn>2450-0097</eissn><abstract>During the global banking crisis of 2007-2009 and the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis of 2010-2012 the so called 'TARGET2 imbalances' attracted considerable attention. Some economists interpreted them as a symptom of the ECB's 'stealth bailout. The aim of the paper is to highlight that contrary to such claim, the emergence of TARGET2 imbalances reflected the benefits of having a mutual central bank within a monetary union which facilitated cross-border funding in spite of the global financial turbulence. The ECB's liquidity loans to commercial banks in the Eurozone debtor countries shielded the Eurozone from a much deeper financial crisis than it actually occurred. The emergence of the TARGET 2 imbalances was actually only an accounting phenomenon resulting from the fact that these liquidity loans were technically extended by the debtor countries' national central banks which are de facto (from the monetary policy perspective) ECB's regional branches.</abstract><cop>Poznan</cop><pub>Poznan University of Economics</pub><doi>10.18559/ebr.2019.2.3</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2392-1641 |
ispartof | Economics and business review, 2019-01, Vol.5 (2), p.48-63 |
issn | 2392-1641 2450-0097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2250569422 |
source | De Gruyter Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bailouts Bank reserves Banking industry Branch banking Central banks Commercial banks Correspondent banks Economic crisis Eurozone Funding International finance Loans Monetary unions Payment systems Sovereign debt |
title | Lessons from TARGET2 imbalances: The case for the ECB being a lender of last resort 1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A17%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20from%20TARGET2%20imbalances:%20The%20case%20for%20the%20ECB%20being%20a%20lender%20of%20last%20resort%201&rft.jtitle=Economics%20and%20business%20review&rft.au=Chmielewski,%20Tomasz&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=48-63&rft.issn=2392-1641&rft.eissn=2450-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.18559/ebr.2019.2.3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2250569422%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2250569422&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |