The influence of atrial fibrillation on the levels of NT-proBNP versus GDF-15 in patients with heart failure

Background In heart failure (HF), levels of NT-proBNP are influenced by the presence of concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF), making it difficult to distinguish between HF versus AF in patients with raised NT-proBNP. It is unknown whether levels of GDF-15 are also influenced by AF in patients with H...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical research in cardiology 2020-03, Vol.109 (3), p.331-338
Hauptverfasser: Santema, Bernadet T., Chan, Michelle M. Y., Tromp, Jasper, Dokter, Martin, van der Wal, Haye H., Emmens, Johanna E., Takens, Janny, Samani, Nilesh J., Ng, Leong L., Lang, Chim C., van der Meer, Peter, ter Maaten, Jozine M., Damman, Kevin, Dickstein, Kenneth, Cleland, John G., Zannad, Faiez, Anker, Stefan D., Metra, Marco, van der Harst, Pim, de Boer, Rudolf A., van Veldhuisen, Dirk J., Rienstra, Michiel, Lam, Carolyn S. P., Voors, Adriaan A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background In heart failure (HF), levels of NT-proBNP are influenced by the presence of concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF), making it difficult to distinguish between HF versus AF in patients with raised NT-proBNP. It is unknown whether levels of GDF-15 are also influenced by AF in patients with HF. In this study we compared the plasma levels of NT-proBNP versus GDF-15 in patients with HF in AF versus sinus rhythm (SR). Methods In a post hoc analysis of the index cohort of BIOSTAT-CHF ( n  = 2516), we studied patients with HF categorized into three groups: (1) AF at baseline ( n  = 733), (2) SR at baseline with a history of AF ( n  = 183), and (3) SR at baseline and no history of AF ( n  = 1025). The findings were validated in the validation cohort of BIOSTAT-CHF ( n  = 1738). Results Plasma NT-proBNP levels of patients who had AF at baseline were higher than those of patients in SR (both with and without a history of AF), even after multivariable adjustment (3417 [25th–75th percentile 1897–6486] versus 1788 [682–3870], adjusted p  
ISSN:1861-0684
1861-0692
DOI:10.1007/s00392-019-01513-y