Trust and public relations: Center and edge

This article, which could be categorized as “iconoclastic speculation,” argues against the traditional close relationship between public relations and trust. Evidence of proximity is scarce. It could not be otherwise, because PR flourishes in Western-style liberal democracy, which is a polity tendin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public relations review 2005-11, Vol.31 (4), p.550-555
1. Verfasser: Moloney, Kevin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 555
container_issue 4
container_start_page 550
container_title Public relations review
container_volume 31
creator Moloney, Kevin
description This article, which could be categorized as “iconoclastic speculation,” argues against the traditional close relationship between public relations and trust. Evidence of proximity is scarce. It could not be otherwise, because PR flourishes in Western-style liberal democracy, which is a polity tending to disorder, founded on open argument between organizations and groups. PR is the communicative trace of their search for advantage and survival in this competitive environment. In these circumstances, trust as a desired outcome of PR is pushed to the edge.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224984829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0363811105001384</els_id><sourcerecordid>930017091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-6834d79ad422aa43aebdab8db0eb5375ec07c5e3636d4bb738fff00e9a3a65573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwDzhEXFHCOrYThwMSqspDqsSlnC0_NshRSYqdVOLf4xLOnPawM7OzHyHXFAoKtLrriv1kAh6KEkAUIAug4oQsqKxZzgWrT8kCWMVySSk9JxcxdpCEDRULcrsNUxwz3bssZey8zQLu9OiHPt5nK-xHDL9LdB94Sc5avYt49TeX5P1pvV295Ju359fV4ya3jLExryTjrm6042WpNWcajdNGOgNoUhmBFmorMBWqHDemZrJtWwBsNNOVEDVbkps5dx-GrwnjqLphCn06qcqSN5LLskkiPotsGGIM2Kp98J86fCsK6khFdWqmoo5UFEiVqCTbw2zD9MDBY1DReuwtOh_QjsoN_v-AH13lbBo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224984829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trust and public relations: Center and edge</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Moloney, Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Moloney, Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>This article, which could be categorized as “iconoclastic speculation,” argues against the traditional close relationship between public relations and trust. Evidence of proximity is scarce. It could not be otherwise, because PR flourishes in Western-style liberal democracy, which is a polity tending to disorder, founded on open argument between organizations and groups. PR is the communicative trace of their search for advantage and survival in this competitive environment. In these circumstances, trust as a desired outcome of PR is pushed to the edge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-8111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.015</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PREREL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Silver Spring: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Competitive advantage ; Goodwill ; Liberal democracy ; Mutual understanding ; Power ; Public relations ; Studies ; Theory ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Public relations review, 2005-11, Vol.31 (4), p.550-555</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-6834d79ad422aa43aebdab8db0eb5375ec07c5e3636d4bb738fff00e9a3a65573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-6834d79ad422aa43aebdab8db0eb5375ec07c5e3636d4bb738fff00e9a3a65573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moloney, Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>Trust and public relations: Center and edge</title><title>Public relations review</title><description>This article, which could be categorized as “iconoclastic speculation,” argues against the traditional close relationship between public relations and trust. Evidence of proximity is scarce. It could not be otherwise, because PR flourishes in Western-style liberal democracy, which is a polity tending to disorder, founded on open argument between organizations and groups. PR is the communicative trace of their search for advantage and survival in this competitive environment. In these circumstances, trust as a desired outcome of PR is pushed to the edge.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Goodwill</subject><subject>Liberal democracy</subject><subject>Mutual understanding</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Public relations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>0363-8111</issn><issn>1873-4537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwDzhEXFHCOrYThwMSqspDqsSlnC0_NshRSYqdVOLf4xLOnPawM7OzHyHXFAoKtLrriv1kAh6KEkAUIAug4oQsqKxZzgWrT8kCWMVySSk9JxcxdpCEDRULcrsNUxwz3bssZey8zQLu9OiHPt5nK-xHDL9LdB94Sc5avYt49TeX5P1pvV295Ju359fV4ya3jLExryTjrm6042WpNWcajdNGOgNoUhmBFmorMBWqHDemZrJtWwBsNNOVEDVbkps5dx-GrwnjqLphCn06qcqSN5LLskkiPotsGGIM2Kp98J86fCsK6khFdWqmoo5UFEiVqCTbw2zD9MDBY1DReuwtOh_QjsoN_v-AH13lbBo</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Moloney, Kevin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Trust and public relations: Center and edge</title><author>Moloney, Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-6834d79ad422aa43aebdab8db0eb5375ec07c5e3636d4bb738fff00e9a3a65573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Goodwill</topic><topic>Liberal democracy</topic><topic>Mutual understanding</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Public relations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moloney, Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public relations review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moloney, Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trust and public relations: Center and edge</atitle><jtitle>Public relations review</jtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>550</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>550-555</pages><issn>0363-8111</issn><eissn>1873-4537</eissn><coden>PREREL</coden><abstract>This article, which could be categorized as “iconoclastic speculation,” argues against the traditional close relationship between public relations and trust. Evidence of proximity is scarce. It could not be otherwise, because PR flourishes in Western-style liberal democracy, which is a polity tending to disorder, founded on open argument between organizations and groups. PR is the communicative trace of their search for advantage and survival in this competitive environment. In these circumstances, trust as a desired outcome of PR is pushed to the edge.</abstract><cop>Silver Spring</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.015</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-8111
ispartof Public relations review, 2005-11, Vol.31 (4), p.550-555
issn 0363-8111
1873-4537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_224984829
source PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adaptability
Competitive advantage
Goodwill
Liberal democracy
Mutual understanding
Power
Public relations
Studies
Theory
Trust
title Trust and public relations: Center and edge
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T07%3A50%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trust%20and%20public%20relations:%20Center%20and%20edge&rft.jtitle=Public%20relations%20review&rft.au=Moloney,%20Kevin&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=550&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=550-555&rft.issn=0363-8111&rft.eissn=1873-4537&rft.coden=PREREL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E930017091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224984829&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0363811105001384&rfr_iscdi=true