Trust and public relations: Center and edge
This article, which could be categorized as “iconoclastic speculation,” argues against the traditional close relationship between public relations and trust. Evidence of proximity is scarce. It could not be otherwise, because PR flourishes in Western-style liberal democracy, which is a polity tendin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public relations review 2005-11, Vol.31 (4), p.550-555 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 555 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 550 |
container_title | Public relations review |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Moloney, Kevin |
description | This article, which could be categorized as “iconoclastic speculation,” argues against the traditional close relationship between public relations and trust. Evidence of proximity is scarce. It could not be otherwise, because PR flourishes in Western-style liberal democracy, which is a polity tending to disorder, founded on open argument between organizations and groups. PR is the communicative trace of their search for advantage and survival in this competitive environment. In these circumstances, trust as a desired outcome of PR is pushed to the edge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224984829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0363811105001384</els_id><sourcerecordid>930017091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-6834d79ad422aa43aebdab8db0eb5375ec07c5e3636d4bb738fff00e9a3a65573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwDzhEXFHCOrYThwMSqspDqsSlnC0_NshRSYqdVOLf4xLOnPawM7OzHyHXFAoKtLrriv1kAh6KEkAUIAug4oQsqKxZzgWrT8kCWMVySSk9JxcxdpCEDRULcrsNUxwz3bssZey8zQLu9OiHPt5nK-xHDL9LdB94Sc5avYt49TeX5P1pvV295Ju359fV4ya3jLExryTjrm6042WpNWcajdNGOgNoUhmBFmorMBWqHDemZrJtWwBsNNOVEDVbkps5dx-GrwnjqLphCn06qcqSN5LLskkiPotsGGIM2Kp98J86fCsK6khFdWqmoo5UFEiVqCTbw2zD9MDBY1DReuwtOh_QjsoN_v-AH13lbBo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224984829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trust and public relations: Center and edge</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Moloney, Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Moloney, Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>This article, which could be categorized as “iconoclastic speculation,” argues against the traditional close relationship between public relations and trust. Evidence of proximity is scarce. It could not be otherwise, because PR flourishes in Western-style liberal democracy, which is a polity tending to disorder, founded on open argument between organizations and groups. PR is the communicative trace of their search for advantage and survival in this competitive environment. In these circumstances, trust as a desired outcome of PR is pushed to the edge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-8111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.015</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PREREL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Silver Spring: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Competitive advantage ; Goodwill ; Liberal democracy ; Mutual understanding ; Power ; Public relations ; Studies ; Theory ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Public relations review, 2005-11, Vol.31 (4), p.550-555</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-6834d79ad422aa43aebdab8db0eb5375ec07c5e3636d4bb738fff00e9a3a65573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-6834d79ad422aa43aebdab8db0eb5375ec07c5e3636d4bb738fff00e9a3a65573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moloney, Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>Trust and public relations: Center and edge</title><title>Public relations review</title><description>This article, which could be categorized as “iconoclastic speculation,” argues against the traditional close relationship between public relations and trust. Evidence of proximity is scarce. It could not be otherwise, because PR flourishes in Western-style liberal democracy, which is a polity tending to disorder, founded on open argument between organizations and groups. PR is the communicative trace of their search for advantage and survival in this competitive environment. In these circumstances, trust as a desired outcome of PR is pushed to the edge.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Goodwill</subject><subject>Liberal democracy</subject><subject>Mutual understanding</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Public relations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>0363-8111</issn><issn>1873-4537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwDzhEXFHCOrYThwMSqspDqsSlnC0_NshRSYqdVOLf4xLOnPawM7OzHyHXFAoKtLrriv1kAh6KEkAUIAug4oQsqKxZzgWrT8kCWMVySSk9JxcxdpCEDRULcrsNUxwz3bssZey8zQLu9OiHPt5nK-xHDL9LdB94Sc5avYt49TeX5P1pvV295Ju359fV4ya3jLExryTjrm6042WpNWcajdNGOgNoUhmBFmorMBWqHDemZrJtWwBsNNOVEDVbkps5dx-GrwnjqLphCn06qcqSN5LLskkiPotsGGIM2Kp98J86fCsK6khFdWqmoo5UFEiVqCTbw2zD9MDBY1DReuwtOh_QjsoN_v-AH13lbBo</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Moloney, Kevin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Trust and public relations: Center and edge</title><author>Moloney, Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-6834d79ad422aa43aebdab8db0eb5375ec07c5e3636d4bb738fff00e9a3a65573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Goodwill</topic><topic>Liberal democracy</topic><topic>Mutual understanding</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Public relations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moloney, Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public relations review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moloney, Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trust and public relations: Center and edge</atitle><jtitle>Public relations review</jtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>550</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>550-555</pages><issn>0363-8111</issn><eissn>1873-4537</eissn><coden>PREREL</coden><abstract>This article, which could be categorized as “iconoclastic speculation,” argues against the traditional close relationship between public relations and trust. Evidence of proximity is scarce. It could not be otherwise, because PR flourishes in Western-style liberal democracy, which is a polity tending to disorder, founded on open argument between organizations and groups. PR is the communicative trace of their search for advantage and survival in this competitive environment. In these circumstances, trust as a desired outcome of PR is pushed to the edge.</abstract><cop>Silver Spring</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.015</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-8111 |
ispartof | Public relations review, 2005-11, Vol.31 (4), p.550-555 |
issn | 0363-8111 1873-4537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_224984829 |
source | PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adaptability Competitive advantage Goodwill Liberal democracy Mutual understanding Power Public relations Studies Theory Trust |
title | Trust and public relations: Center and edge |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T07%3A50%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trust%20and%20public%20relations:%20Center%20and%20edge&rft.jtitle=Public%20relations%20review&rft.au=Moloney,%20Kevin&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=550&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=550-555&rft.issn=0363-8111&rft.eissn=1873-4537&rft.coden=PREREL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E930017091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224984829&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0363811105001384&rfr_iscdi=true |