How to Make Values Count in Everyday Decisions
Values-based decision making, a popular term these days in both industry and academia, is commonly exemplified by Johnson & Johnson's 1982 decision to pull Tylenol off retailers shelves, at a cost of $100 million to the company, after tainted capsules had been found. The company's cour...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | MIT Sloan management review 2008-06, Vol.49 (4), p.75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 75 |
container_title | MIT Sloan management review |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Urbany, Joel E Reynolds, Thomas J Phillips, Joan M |
description | Values-based decision making, a popular term these days in both industry and academia, is commonly exemplified by Johnson & Johnson's 1982 decision to pull Tylenol off retailers shelves, at a cost of $100 million to the company, after tainted capsules had been found. The company's courageous action illustrated how decision making is a trade-off between values - in this case, choosing customer safety over short-term financial performance. Values-based decision making has in fact come to take on the exclusive meaning of socially responsible decision making. But while a greater emphasis on ethics is certainly praiseworthy, an important reality is being missed. All decisions - whether judged highly ethical, grossly unethical or anywhere in between - are values-based. That is, a decision necessarily involves an implicit or explicit trade-off of values. Because the values that underlie our decision making are often buried in the shortcuts we take, we need a means for revealing those values and expressly thinking through the trade-offs between them. The framework we present in this article helps a decision maker to understand that everyday decisions all have some basis in values, to sort out the specific values involved in a given decision-making event, and to make the decision with full awareness of its ethical implications. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224966266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1520405561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p182t-d7a393ae183db3a2561943168aa3d225415267d0ac8d24926f8f7975eabbb6cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjstuwjAQRb2gUnn9g8U-KJ6JJ_ayCrRUAnVT2KJJ7EihKKZxQsXfN1K7uqtzzp2IqdIIiVU2exazGC9pqkBBOhXrXfiRfZAH_vLyxNfBR1mEoe1l08rt3XcPxw-58VUTm9DGhXiq-Rr98n_n4vi6_Sx2yf7j7b142Sc3ZaBPXM5okb0y6Epk0DSWUZFhRgegM6WBcpdyZRxkFqg2dW5z7bksS6oczsXqz3vrwvf4qT9fwtC1Y_IMI0AERPgLwG48gA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224966266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to Make Values Count in Everyday Decisions</title><source>MIT Sloan Management Review</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Urbany, Joel E ; Reynolds, Thomas J ; Phillips, Joan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Urbany, Joel E ; Reynolds, Thomas J ; Phillips, Joan M</creatorcontrib><description>Values-based decision making, a popular term these days in both industry and academia, is commonly exemplified by Johnson & Johnson's 1982 decision to pull Tylenol off retailers shelves, at a cost of $100 million to the company, after tainted capsules had been found. The company's courageous action illustrated how decision making is a trade-off between values - in this case, choosing customer safety over short-term financial performance. Values-based decision making has in fact come to take on the exclusive meaning of socially responsible decision making. But while a greater emphasis on ethics is certainly praiseworthy, an important reality is being missed. All decisions - whether judged highly ethical, grossly unethical or anywhere in between - are values-based. That is, a decision necessarily involves an implicit or explicit trade-off of values. Because the values that underlie our decision making are often buried in the shortcuts we take, we need a means for revealing those values and expressly thinking through the trade-offs between them. The framework we present in this article helps a decision maker to understand that everyday decisions all have some basis in values, to sort out the specific values involved in a given decision-making event, and to make the decision with full awareness of its ethical implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1532-9194</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SMRVAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA</publisher><subject>Coffee ; Decision making ; Ethics ; Prices ; Professional ethics ; Strategic planning ; Values</subject><ispartof>MIT Sloan management review, 2008-06, Vol.49 (4), p.75</ispartof><rights>Copyright Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Urbany, Joel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Joan M</creatorcontrib><title>How to Make Values Count in Everyday Decisions</title><title>MIT Sloan management review</title><description>Values-based decision making, a popular term these days in both industry and academia, is commonly exemplified by Johnson & Johnson's 1982 decision to pull Tylenol off retailers shelves, at a cost of $100 million to the company, after tainted capsules had been found. The company's courageous action illustrated how decision making is a trade-off between values - in this case, choosing customer safety over short-term financial performance. Values-based decision making has in fact come to take on the exclusive meaning of socially responsible decision making. But while a greater emphasis on ethics is certainly praiseworthy, an important reality is being missed. All decisions - whether judged highly ethical, grossly unethical or anywhere in between - are values-based. That is, a decision necessarily involves an implicit or explicit trade-off of values. Because the values that underlie our decision making are often buried in the shortcuts we take, we need a means for revealing those values and expressly thinking through the trade-offs between them. The framework we present in this article helps a decision maker to understand that everyday decisions all have some basis in values, to sort out the specific values involved in a given decision-making event, and to make the decision with full awareness of its ethical implications.</description><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1532-9194</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjstuwjAQRb2gUnn9g8U-KJ6JJ_ayCrRUAnVT2KJJ7EihKKZxQsXfN1K7uqtzzp2IqdIIiVU2exazGC9pqkBBOhXrXfiRfZAH_vLyxNfBR1mEoe1l08rt3XcPxw-58VUTm9DGhXiq-Rr98n_n4vi6_Sx2yf7j7b142Sc3ZaBPXM5okb0y6Epk0DSWUZFhRgegM6WBcpdyZRxkFqg2dW5z7bksS6oczsXqz3vrwvf4qT9fwtC1Y_IMI0AERPgLwG48gA</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Urbany, Joel E</creator><creator>Reynolds, Thomas J</creator><creator>Phillips, Joan M</creator><general>Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88K</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2T</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>How to Make Values Count in Everyday Decisions</title><author>Urbany, Joel E ; Reynolds, Thomas J ; Phillips, Joan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p182t-d7a393ae183db3a2561943168aa3d225415267d0ac8d24926f8f7975eabbb6cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Urbany, Joel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Joan M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Telecommunications (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Telecommunications Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>MIT Sloan management review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Urbany, Joel E</au><au>Reynolds, Thomas J</au><au>Phillips, Joan M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to Make Values Count in Everyday Decisions</atitle><jtitle>MIT Sloan management review</jtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>75</spage><pages>75-</pages><issn>1532-9194</issn><coden>SMRVAO</coden><abstract>Values-based decision making, a popular term these days in both industry and academia, is commonly exemplified by Johnson & Johnson's 1982 decision to pull Tylenol off retailers shelves, at a cost of $100 million to the company, after tainted capsules had been found. The company's courageous action illustrated how decision making is a trade-off between values - in this case, choosing customer safety over short-term financial performance. Values-based decision making has in fact come to take on the exclusive meaning of socially responsible decision making. But while a greater emphasis on ethics is certainly praiseworthy, an important reality is being missed. All decisions - whether judged highly ethical, grossly unethical or anywhere in between - are values-based. That is, a decision necessarily involves an implicit or explicit trade-off of values. Because the values that underlie our decision making are often buried in the shortcuts we take, we need a means for revealing those values and expressly thinking through the trade-offs between them. The framework we present in this article helps a decision maker to understand that everyday decisions all have some basis in values, to sort out the specific values involved in a given decision-making event, and to make the decision with full awareness of its ethical implications.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1532-9194 |
ispartof | MIT Sloan management review, 2008-06, Vol.49 (4), p.75 |
issn | 1532-9194 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_224966266 |
source | MIT Sloan Management Review; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Coffee Decision making Ethics Prices Professional ethics Strategic planning Values |
title | How to Make Values Count in Everyday Decisions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A10%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20Make%20Values%20Count%20in%20Everyday%20Decisions&rft.jtitle=MIT%20Sloan%20management%20review&rft.au=Urbany,%20Joel%20E&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=75&rft.pages=75-&rft.issn=1532-9194&rft.coden=SMRVAO&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1520405561%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224966266&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |